Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

There are less than 72 hours left in this Mid-Year Campaign and our independent journalism needs your help today.
If you value our work, please support Common Dreams. This is our hour of need.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

The nation's infrastructure needs emergency attention, but there's a right way to fix our nation's crumbling bridges and other vitals systems, and then there's the right-wing way. "Trump's plan has us paying for corporations to build the infrastructure they were already planning to build, for their own profit reasons," writes Johnson. "They get to keep it after we pay for it. And then they get to make us pay them to use it." (Image: ASCE)

Should We Pay the Rich to Build Infrastructure, Then Pay Them to Use It?

Dave Johnson

 by People's Action Blog

It’s starting to look like President Trump’s promised $1-trillion plan to rebuild the nation’s infrastructure will be as bad for us as his health care plan turned out to be.

Infrastructure Report Card

The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) has issued their 2017 Infrastructure Report Card. We didn’t do so well. Our “grade” is a miserable D+. Why? Go outside and look around at our out-of-date and crumbling roads, bridges, dams, airports, water systems, and electrical grid.

"Trump’s plan is to have We the People pay businesses, through tax breaks, to build infrastructure that they then own. Then they make us pay again through tolls and fees to use the infrastructure we just paid to build, if we want to use it."

President Obama was able to address a bit of the problem in the 2009 “stimulus.” This passed because Democrats had supermajority control of the Senate at the time. But then they lost enough seats that Republicans could block things, and block they did. Republicans filibustered everything after that.

Now, after blocking infrastructure projects for seven of the last eight years, Republicans are suddenly talking about how we need to fix our infrastructure. What does this mean?

Trump’s “Plan”

Trump’s promise to revamp infrastructure has, shall we say, “evolved.” Early in the campaign, candidate Trump just said “believe me”: he would take care of fixing everything. In his campaign announcement speech he said,

[We need to] rebuild the country’s infrastructure. Nobody can do that like me. Believe me. It will be done on time, on budget, way below cost, way below what anyone ever thought.

I look at the roads being built all over the country, and I say I can build those things for one-third. What they do is unbelievable, how bad.

By August, his promises had evolved into details – well, one detail: to “double” whatever Hillary Clinton would invest in infrastructure.

Her number is a fraction of what we’re talking about. We need much more money to rebuild our infrastructure. I would say at least double her numbers, and you’re going to really need a lot more than that.

Then, his promises morphed into a plan to sell “infrastructure bonds” to cover the costs. In other words, do things the way they are always done: borrow money to build infrastructure, then pay it back from the resulting economic gains.

By October, the plan had evolved into a $1 trillion promise. Except, it wasn’t, really.

A tax credit would be offered to private companies to finance projects, while the companies would also have to take equity investments in the projects. According to Yahoo Finance, $167 billion of the $1 trillion investment would be equity investment, while the rest would be debt raised by private partners.

Additionally, all projects built under the plan would be required to generate cash flow, like toll roads or airports that produce tax revenue instead of free parks or highways without tolls. The equity investment partners would also take the revenue, essentially privatizing much of the new infrastructure and making riskier investments more palatable.

Note this key point in Trump’s “evolved” plan: “privatizing much of the new infrastructure.”

Trump’s Plan: Pay Rich People To Build It, Then Pay Them To Let Us Use It

Privatizing infrastructure means We the People won’t own it, a few rich people will. We’ll then have to pay them to let us use our own roads, dams and bridges.

Trump’s plan fundamentally alters the relationship between the people of this country and the government. Instead of a country “of, by and for the people” doing what we have done since our founding: building and maintaining infrastructure that We the People all can use.

Trump’s plan is to have We the People pay businesses, through tax breaks, to build infrastructure that they then own. Then they make us pay again through tolls and fees to use the infrastructure we just paid to build, if we want to use it.

Nice work, if you’re rich enough to get it.

There isn’t even any real reason to think this plan will actually do the job of improving our infrastructure. The tax credits are likely to go to projects the private corporations were already planning to do, anyway.

Grover Norquist summed up the private corporate priorities in a Washington Times report on Trump’s plan,

Grover Norquist, founder and president of Americans for Tax Reform, described the infrastructure program being drafted at the White House as part of the biggest reduction of regulations envisioned since President Ronald Reagan, potentially clearing the way for massive private investment.

‘We’ve had an eight-year war on infrastructure by the Obama administration,’ said Mr. Norquist. ‘They tried to stop and did stop pipelines, coal production, gold exploration, mining of natural gas and fracking.’

Yes, those tax credits will likely go toward the infrastructure priorities of Trump’s cronies: “pipelines, coal production, gold exploration, mining of natural gas and fracking.”

Senate Democrats’ Plan

In January, Senate Democrats introduced a plan of their own: We the People build infrastructure that we own and all get to use. My post in January, Don’t Be Fooled By Trump’s Promises on Infrastructure Jobs, had the details.

Their plan is called “A Blueprint to Rebuild America’s Infrastructure, Creating Over 15 Million New Jobs.” Click through for a one-page description or read their full, detailed report.

Here’s a quick summary:

● $210 billion to repair crumbling roads and bridges, (saving the average American family over $1,700 a year). 2.7 million new jobs.

● $110 billion to modernize water and sewer systems. 2.5 million new jobs.

● $180 billion to expand rail and bus systems. 2.5 million new jobs

● $200 billion for a new vital infrastructure projects (VIP) program that will direct major federal investments to the most critical national projects. 2.6 million new jobs.

● $75 billion to rebuild America’s schools. 975,000 new jobs.

● $70 billion to modernize America’s ports, airports and waterways. 845,000 new jobs.

● $100 billion to build 21st-century energy infrastructure. 1.3 million new jobs.

● $20 billion to expand broadband access to millions of Americans. 260,000 new jobs.

● $20 billion in funding to address critical infrastructure backlogs on public lands and in Indian country. 260,000 new jobs.

● $10 billion to construct new Veterans Administration hospitals and extended care facilities

● $10 billion to support the creation of new innovative financing. 1.3 million new jobs.

How To Pay For This?

Senate Democrats offered a very simple way to pay for their infrastructure proposal – largely the same plan Bernie Sanders offered during the primaries.

Corporations have well over $2 trillion of profits stashed in tax havens, just waiting to be taxed. Senate Democrats say, ‘Let’s just close that loophole and collect those taxes.’

Doing so would immediately generate more than $700 billion of tax revenue, plus another $100 billion or so each year. In addition, the corporations would “bring the money” back and the untaxed portion would be used to expand and hire, and distribute the rest to shareholders. Either way, this brings that money into the U.S. economy.

The Choice

So there is a choice. Trump’s plan has us paying for corporations to build the infrastructure they were already planning to build, for their own profit reasons. They get to keep it after we pay for it. And then they get to make us pay them to use it.

The Democrat’s plan makes the corporations pay taxes on profits they have stashed outside the country to pay for the public infrastructure we need. Then we own it and we all get to use it.

Which plan do you think is better? Call your member of Congress and bother of your Senators and let them know which you think it best.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Dave Johnson

Dave Johnson

Dave Johnson is a former Senior Fellow for the Campaign for America's Future & Renew California.

Just a few days left in our crucial Mid-Year Campaign and we might not make it without your help.
Who funds our independent journalism? Readers like you who believe in our mission: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. No corporate advertisers. No billionaire founder. Our non-partisan, nonprofit media model has only one source of revenue: The people who read and value this work and our mission. That's it.
And the model is simple: If everyone just gives whatever amount they can afford and think is reasonable—$3, $9, $29, or more—we can continue. If not enough do, we go dark.

All the small gifts add up to something otherwise impossible. Please join us today. Donate to Common Dreams. This is crunch time. We need you now.

Grave Warnings as Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case That Threatens 'Future of Voting Rights'

"Buckle up," implores one prominent legal scholar. "An extreme decision here could fundamentally alter the balance of power in setting election rules in the states and provide a path for great threats to elections."

Brett Wilkins ·


Biden Urged to Take Emergency Action After 'Disastrous' Climate Ruling by Supreme Court

"The catastrophic impact of this decision cannot be understated," said Rep. Pramila Jayapal, but "we cannot accept defeat."

Kenny Stancil ·


'Now We're Talking!' Says AOC as Biden Backs Filibuster Carveout for Abortion Rights

"Time for people to see a real, forceful push for it," said the New York Democrat. "Use the bully pulpit. We need more."

Jake Johnson ·


Supreme Court Says Biden Can End 'Shameful' Remain in Mexico Asylum Policy

"Now is the turn for Congress to get rid of Title 42, and provide a solution to the weakened asylum system in place, to provide a humane and fair alternative to vulnerable children, families, and individuals fleeing unsafe conditions and persecution."

Brett Wilkins ·


Democrats Lose Senate Majority as 82-Year-Old Leahy Heads for Hip Surgery

"It could be over for the Senate Dems now," said one policy expert in response. "This could mean they effectively lost their majority."

Jon Queally ·

Common Dreams Logo