Skip to main content

Why are the billionaires always laughing?

Because they know the corporate media will never call bullshit on their bullshit.

Why are the billionaires laughing?

It’s easy to laugh when the corporate press treats you as a glorious success instead of the epitome of a broken social order. Billionaires laugh because they know the corporate media prefers to fawn over them rather than hold them to account.

Today, we ask you to support our nonprofit, independent journalism because we are not impressed by billionaires flying into space, their corporations despoiling our health and planet, or their vast fortunes safely concealed in tax havens across the globe. We are not laughing.

We are hard at work producing journalism for the common good. With our Fall Campaign underway, please support this mission today. We cannot do it without you.

Support Our Work -- Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Every donation—large or small—helps us bring you the news that matters.

The Reverend Billy Talen (left) was among those who marched to the White House to protest human rights abuses by the U.S. government in 2012. ( Photo: Witness Against Torture/Justin Norman/flickr/cc)

The Culture of Torture in the Trump Era

Robert Crawford

“Would I bring back waterboarding?  You bet your ass I would. . . . It works.  And even if it doesn’t work they deserve it anyway for what they do to us.”

Among the anxieties about what Donald Trump will do once in office is whether the new president will carry through with his threats to bring back torture.  After all, a return to torture would be a disaster for the nation’s foreign policy.

Yet, also consider the damage already inflicted on the body politic from Trump’s campaign rhetoric.  Words spoken or printed in the public sphere shape the horizon of possibilities so that some actions become thinkable and permissible while others are held to be unacceptable.

There are four ways that Trump’s torture talk has harmed our political culture.

First, one of the most enduring struggles over the powers of government is about legitimate and illegitimate uses of violence.   Examples include allowable violence for police and prison personnel, the death penalty, targeted assassinations, and acceptable violence toward enemy soldiers and populations in war zones. These examples remind us that limiting state violence is a work in progress.

Torture is a case in point.  Polling of Americans shows that support for torture has increased since the 2001 terrorist attacks and especially since former vice president Dick Cheney and many others openly defended the Bush administration’s torture program.  Popular television series and movies have contributed to torture’s acceptance. When Trump pledged to use waterboarding “and a hell of a lot worse,” his supporters roared their approval.

Embracing one form of violence in clear violation of the law cannot but help to lower the barriers to other kinds of state violence.

Second, Trump’s torture rhetoric moved seamlessly from instrumental arguments about obtaining vital information to the language of revenge—a well-worn pathway to the acceptance of violence.  Trump’s “even if it doesn’t work  . . .” comment reveals that he is willing to disregard professional interrogators’ advice that torture is ineffective.  Instead, he promotes the regressive human urge to inflict pain for the sake of getting even.

As if torture of terrorist suspects were not enough, Trump also threatened to “take out their families.”  Never mind that collective punishment, like torture, is a war crime.

Third, torture is highly symbolic of violence of a particular kind: the violence exerted by the all-powerful upon a helpless victim.  The will of the jailor-interrogator cannot be opposed.  The sense of vulnerability induced by terrorist violence undergoes a psycho-political reversal via a strongman willing to feed off fantasies of total dominance.

It is this very quality of inflicting torment on a totally helpless victim that has made torture so reprehensible for those who still believe that human dignity is a first principle of human relationships.  The US government is legally bound to honor the no-torture principle, a cornerstone of international humanitarian law.

Fourth, the rhetoric of torture reinforces the false assurance that security can be guaranteed only by a willingness to employ “any means necessary” against an intractable enemy.  From this premise, moral limits on means must be subordinated to the presumed justification of ends.  This is a recipe for civilian, military, and security officials to “take the gloves off” or “go to the dark side”—phrases that still haunt our political culture from the early post-9/11 era of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Tenet.

A torture culture is also constructed by what is not said or done.

President Obama and, later, Congress, did the right thing in acting to abolish the Bush administration’s torture program.  Yet, imagine if Obama had supported criminal investigations of the top civilian, military and security officials who authorized and implemented the torture regime. This is what the law requires.  If those who so flagrantly violated the law had been held accountable in some open judicial proceeding, would Trump or any other aspirant for high office proclaim his or her affinity for torture?
Accountability proceedings would have sent a strong signal that this form of violence cannot be tolerated.

Finally, the American people cannot begin to grapple with the moral dimensions of torture until they have full knowledge of personal and political consequences of the Bush-Cheney torture years.  President Obama could still help by declassifying the full Senate torture report and thereby releasing it to the public.

If the damage caused by Trump’s language of violence is to be reversed, we must not abandon a moral understanding of politics—a politics about what kind of people we want to be, what we want this nation to stand for and the future our children will inherit.

Although the challenges of such a politics are not new, the Trump era imposes an urgency we cannot afford to ignore.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Robert Crawford

Robert Crawford

Robert Crawford is a Professor Emeritus in Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at the University of Washington, Tacoma. Robert facilitates the Washington State Religious Campaign Against Torture, part of National Religious Campaign Against Torture.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

New York Taxi Workers Stage Hunger Strike to Demand Medallion Debt Relief

"They are an essential industry here in New York City," said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, "and we need to make sure we're doing right by them."

Julia Conley ·

'It's Not Coming Out': Bernie Sanders Stands Firm on Medicare Expansion

"It's what the American people want and, after waiting over 50 years, what they are going to get."

Julia Conley ·

'When We Organize, We Win': Ocasio-Cortez Joins India Walton at Rally in Buffalo

The two progressives joined striking hospital workers on the picket line at Mercy Hospital after the early voting rally.

Julia Conley ·

Fatal Film Set Shooting Followed Outcry by Union Crew Members Over Safety Protocols

"When union members walk off a set about safety concerns, maybe 'hiring scabs' isn’t the solution you think it is."

Julia Conley ·

New Whistleblower Sparks Calls to 'Crack Down on Facebook and All Big Tech Companies'

Hours after another ex-employee filed a formal complaint, reporting broke on internal documents that show the tech giant's failure to address concerns about content related to the 2020 U.S. election.

Jessica Corbett ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.

Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo