SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Is It GMO? When Printing a Label on a Package Is Too Easy...
The food industry’s latest ploy would pretend to label GMOs while making it more difficult to tell what’s in your food.
Mar 23, 2016
Big Food companies have spent millions of dollars trying to block states from requiring GMO labeling. Thanks to pressure from hundreds of thousands of concerned people, including over 172,000 Food & Water Watch supporters, we've stopped the Senate from doing away with GMO labels... so far. But the industry's newest ploy shows why we need to keep the pressure on. Tell your Senators to protect clear, on-package GMO labeling.
Vermont's GMO labeling law will go into effect on July 1, and the corporations that make money off GMOs are getting desperate. Now, they're pushing Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) and others to introduce a so-called compromise letting QR codes and 800 numbers count as GMO labels.
You've probably seen QR codes on packaging or flyers, though you may not have known what they are. They're black-and-white squares that look like evolved bar codes, and when scanned with a smartphone they can direct people to websites, transmit contact information and more.
Let's consider this. In the industry's version of a compromise, here's how you would tell if a product contains GMOs:
- Find the QR code
- Take out you smartphone, if you have one
- Find your QR code scanning app
- Scan the QR code
- If it doesn't work at first, keep trying
- Wait for a web page to load
- Find out if the product contains GMOs
If we had clear, on-package GMO labeling, this process would look a bit different:
- Read the label and find out if the product contains GMOs
Why would Big Food companies propose such a cumbersome system? The only reason is to hide information from shoppers. If it's difficult enough to decipher a label, shoppers won't bother - grocery shopping is difficult enough without stopping to scan QR codes. If they're so determined to make GMO labels less useful, they might as well write the labels in code and give shoppers an old-fashioned decoder ring when they enter the store. Unlike QR codes, at least code-cracking will keep the kids busy as they help decipher what you're buying!
As tempting as it is to joke about this ludicrous plan, it's actually quite insidious. The QR code compromise is not only inconvenient; it's discriminatory against low-income shoppers and anyone who doesn't have a smartphone. Even the most tech-savvy smartphone users rarely use QR codes; surveys have found that only 21% of smartphone owners ever scan a QR code, and 97% of Americans don't even know what QR codes are. Yet clear labeling is clearly achievable: since last week, Kelloggs, Mars, and General Mills have all announced that they will label GMOs and follow Vermont's labeling law.
Grocery shopping shouldn't require you to be a smartphone super-user. We need to stop this phony compromise and protect GMO labeling.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2021 Food & Water Watch
Big Food companies have spent millions of dollars trying to block states from requiring GMO labeling. Thanks to pressure from hundreds of thousands of concerned people, including over 172,000 Food & Water Watch supporters, we've stopped the Senate from doing away with GMO labels... so far. But the industry's newest ploy shows why we need to keep the pressure on. Tell your Senators to protect clear, on-package GMO labeling.
Vermont's GMO labeling law will go into effect on July 1, and the corporations that make money off GMOs are getting desperate. Now, they're pushing Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) and others to introduce a so-called compromise letting QR codes and 800 numbers count as GMO labels.
You've probably seen QR codes on packaging or flyers, though you may not have known what they are. They're black-and-white squares that look like evolved bar codes, and when scanned with a smartphone they can direct people to websites, transmit contact information and more.
Let's consider this. In the industry's version of a compromise, here's how you would tell if a product contains GMOs:
- Find the QR code
- Take out you smartphone, if you have one
- Find your QR code scanning app
- Scan the QR code
- If it doesn't work at first, keep trying
- Wait for a web page to load
- Find out if the product contains GMOs
If we had clear, on-package GMO labeling, this process would look a bit different:
- Read the label and find out if the product contains GMOs
Why would Big Food companies propose such a cumbersome system? The only reason is to hide information from shoppers. If it's difficult enough to decipher a label, shoppers won't bother - grocery shopping is difficult enough without stopping to scan QR codes. If they're so determined to make GMO labels less useful, they might as well write the labels in code and give shoppers an old-fashioned decoder ring when they enter the store. Unlike QR codes, at least code-cracking will keep the kids busy as they help decipher what you're buying!
As tempting as it is to joke about this ludicrous plan, it's actually quite insidious. The QR code compromise is not only inconvenient; it's discriminatory against low-income shoppers and anyone who doesn't have a smartphone. Even the most tech-savvy smartphone users rarely use QR codes; surveys have found that only 21% of smartphone owners ever scan a QR code, and 97% of Americans don't even know what QR codes are. Yet clear labeling is clearly achievable: since last week, Kelloggs, Mars, and General Mills have all announced that they will label GMOs and follow Vermont's labeling law.
Grocery shopping shouldn't require you to be a smartphone super-user. We need to stop this phony compromise and protect GMO labeling.
Big Food companies have spent millions of dollars trying to block states from requiring GMO labeling. Thanks to pressure from hundreds of thousands of concerned people, including over 172,000 Food & Water Watch supporters, we've stopped the Senate from doing away with GMO labels... so far. But the industry's newest ploy shows why we need to keep the pressure on. Tell your Senators to protect clear, on-package GMO labeling.
Vermont's GMO labeling law will go into effect on July 1, and the corporations that make money off GMOs are getting desperate. Now, they're pushing Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) and others to introduce a so-called compromise letting QR codes and 800 numbers count as GMO labels.
You've probably seen QR codes on packaging or flyers, though you may not have known what they are. They're black-and-white squares that look like evolved bar codes, and when scanned with a smartphone they can direct people to websites, transmit contact information and more.
Let's consider this. In the industry's version of a compromise, here's how you would tell if a product contains GMOs:
- Find the QR code
- Take out you smartphone, if you have one
- Find your QR code scanning app
- Scan the QR code
- If it doesn't work at first, keep trying
- Wait for a web page to load
- Find out if the product contains GMOs
If we had clear, on-package GMO labeling, this process would look a bit different:
- Read the label and find out if the product contains GMOs
Why would Big Food companies propose such a cumbersome system? The only reason is to hide information from shoppers. If it's difficult enough to decipher a label, shoppers won't bother - grocery shopping is difficult enough without stopping to scan QR codes. If they're so determined to make GMO labels less useful, they might as well write the labels in code and give shoppers an old-fashioned decoder ring when they enter the store. Unlike QR codes, at least code-cracking will keep the kids busy as they help decipher what you're buying!
As tempting as it is to joke about this ludicrous plan, it's actually quite insidious. The QR code compromise is not only inconvenient; it's discriminatory against low-income shoppers and anyone who doesn't have a smartphone. Even the most tech-savvy smartphone users rarely use QR codes; surveys have found that only 21% of smartphone owners ever scan a QR code, and 97% of Americans don't even know what QR codes are. Yet clear labeling is clearly achievable: since last week, Kelloggs, Mars, and General Mills have all announced that they will label GMOs and follow Vermont's labeling law.
Grocery shopping shouldn't require you to be a smartphone super-user. We need to stop this phony compromise and protect GMO labeling.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.