SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"Grocery shopping shouldn't require you to be a smartphone super-user." (Photo: Food & Water Watch)
Is It GMO? When Printing a Label on a Package Is Too Easy...
The food industry’s latest ploy would pretend to label GMOs while making it more difficult to tell what’s in your food.
Mar 23, 2016
Big Food companies have spent millions of dollars trying to block states from requiring GMO labeling. Thanks to pressure from hundreds of thousands of concerned people, including over 172,000 Food & Water Watch supporters, we've stopped the Senate from doing away with GMO labels... so far. But the industry's newest ploy shows why we need to keep the pressure on. Tell your Senators to protect clear, on-package GMO labeling.
Vermont's GMO labeling law will go into effect on July 1, and the corporations that make money off GMOs are getting desperate. Now, they're pushing Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) and others to introduce a so-called compromise letting QR codes and 800 numbers count as GMO labels.
You've probably seen QR codes on packaging or flyers, though you may not have known what they are. They're black-and-white squares that look like evolved bar codes, and when scanned with a smartphone they can direct people to websites, transmit contact information and more.
Let's consider this. In the industry's version of a compromise, here's how you would tell if a product contains GMOs:
- Find the QR code
- Take out you smartphone, if you have one
- Find your QR code scanning app
- Scan the QR code
- If it doesn't work at first, keep trying
- Wait for a web page to load
- Find out if the product contains GMOs
If we had clear, on-package GMO labeling, this process would look a bit different:
- Read the label and find out if the product contains GMOs
Why would Big Food companies propose such a cumbersome system? The only reason is to hide information from shoppers. If it's difficult enough to decipher a label, shoppers won't bother - grocery shopping is difficult enough without stopping to scan QR codes. If they're so determined to make GMO labels less useful, they might as well write the labels in code and give shoppers an old-fashioned decoder ring when they enter the store. Unlike QR codes, at least code-cracking will keep the kids busy as they help decipher what you're buying!
As tempting as it is to joke about this ludicrous plan, it's actually quite insidious. The QR code compromise is not only inconvenient; it's discriminatory against low-income shoppers and anyone who doesn't have a smartphone. Even the most tech-savvy smartphone users rarely use QR codes; surveys have found that only 21% of smartphone owners ever scan a QR code, and 97% of Americans don't even know what QR codes are. Yet clear labeling is clearly achievable: since last week, Kelloggs, Mars, and General Mills have all announced that they will label GMOs and follow Vermont's labeling law.
Grocery shopping shouldn't require you to be a smartphone super-user. We need to stop this phony compromise and protect GMO labeling.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2021 Food & Water Watch
Big Food companies have spent millions of dollars trying to block states from requiring GMO labeling. Thanks to pressure from hundreds of thousands of concerned people, including over 172,000 Food & Water Watch supporters, we've stopped the Senate from doing away with GMO labels... so far. But the industry's newest ploy shows why we need to keep the pressure on. Tell your Senators to protect clear, on-package GMO labeling.
Vermont's GMO labeling law will go into effect on July 1, and the corporations that make money off GMOs are getting desperate. Now, they're pushing Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) and others to introduce a so-called compromise letting QR codes and 800 numbers count as GMO labels.
You've probably seen QR codes on packaging or flyers, though you may not have known what they are. They're black-and-white squares that look like evolved bar codes, and when scanned with a smartphone they can direct people to websites, transmit contact information and more.
Let's consider this. In the industry's version of a compromise, here's how you would tell if a product contains GMOs:
- Find the QR code
- Take out you smartphone, if you have one
- Find your QR code scanning app
- Scan the QR code
- If it doesn't work at first, keep trying
- Wait for a web page to load
- Find out if the product contains GMOs
If we had clear, on-package GMO labeling, this process would look a bit different:
- Read the label and find out if the product contains GMOs
Why would Big Food companies propose such a cumbersome system? The only reason is to hide information from shoppers. If it's difficult enough to decipher a label, shoppers won't bother - grocery shopping is difficult enough without stopping to scan QR codes. If they're so determined to make GMO labels less useful, they might as well write the labels in code and give shoppers an old-fashioned decoder ring when they enter the store. Unlike QR codes, at least code-cracking will keep the kids busy as they help decipher what you're buying!
As tempting as it is to joke about this ludicrous plan, it's actually quite insidious. The QR code compromise is not only inconvenient; it's discriminatory against low-income shoppers and anyone who doesn't have a smartphone. Even the most tech-savvy smartphone users rarely use QR codes; surveys have found that only 21% of smartphone owners ever scan a QR code, and 97% of Americans don't even know what QR codes are. Yet clear labeling is clearly achievable: since last week, Kelloggs, Mars, and General Mills have all announced that they will label GMOs and follow Vermont's labeling law.
Grocery shopping shouldn't require you to be a smartphone super-user. We need to stop this phony compromise and protect GMO labeling.
Big Food companies have spent millions of dollars trying to block states from requiring GMO labeling. Thanks to pressure from hundreds of thousands of concerned people, including over 172,000 Food & Water Watch supporters, we've stopped the Senate from doing away with GMO labels... so far. But the industry's newest ploy shows why we need to keep the pressure on. Tell your Senators to protect clear, on-package GMO labeling.
Vermont's GMO labeling law will go into effect on July 1, and the corporations that make money off GMOs are getting desperate. Now, they're pushing Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) and others to introduce a so-called compromise letting QR codes and 800 numbers count as GMO labels.
You've probably seen QR codes on packaging or flyers, though you may not have known what they are. They're black-and-white squares that look like evolved bar codes, and when scanned with a smartphone they can direct people to websites, transmit contact information and more.
Let's consider this. In the industry's version of a compromise, here's how you would tell if a product contains GMOs:
- Find the QR code
- Take out you smartphone, if you have one
- Find your QR code scanning app
- Scan the QR code
- If it doesn't work at first, keep trying
- Wait for a web page to load
- Find out if the product contains GMOs
If we had clear, on-package GMO labeling, this process would look a bit different:
- Read the label and find out if the product contains GMOs
Why would Big Food companies propose such a cumbersome system? The only reason is to hide information from shoppers. If it's difficult enough to decipher a label, shoppers won't bother - grocery shopping is difficult enough without stopping to scan QR codes. If they're so determined to make GMO labels less useful, they might as well write the labels in code and give shoppers an old-fashioned decoder ring when they enter the store. Unlike QR codes, at least code-cracking will keep the kids busy as they help decipher what you're buying!
As tempting as it is to joke about this ludicrous plan, it's actually quite insidious. The QR code compromise is not only inconvenient; it's discriminatory against low-income shoppers and anyone who doesn't have a smartphone. Even the most tech-savvy smartphone users rarely use QR codes; surveys have found that only 21% of smartphone owners ever scan a QR code, and 97% of Americans don't even know what QR codes are. Yet clear labeling is clearly achievable: since last week, Kelloggs, Mars, and General Mills have all announced that they will label GMOs and follow Vermont's labeling law.
Grocery shopping shouldn't require you to be a smartphone super-user. We need to stop this phony compromise and protect GMO labeling.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.