SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Good News For Now: Court Postpones Hearing in Apple v. FBI
A magistrate in Riverside, CA has canceled a hearing that was scheduled for Tuesday afternoon in the Apple v FBI case, at the FBI's request late Monday. The hearing was part of Apple's challenge to the FBI's demand that the company create a new version of its iOS, which would include a backdoor to allow easier access to a locked iPhone involved in the FBI's investigation into the 2015 San Bernardino shootings.
Mar 22, 2016
A magistrate in Riverside, CA has canceled a hearing that was scheduled for Tuesday afternoon in the Apple v FBI case, at the FBI's request late Monday. The hearing was part of Apple's challenge to the FBI's demand that the company create a new version of its iOS, which would include a backdoor to allow easier access to a locked iPhone involved in the FBI's investigation into the 2015 San Bernardino shootings.
The FBI told the court that an "outside party" demonstrated a potential method for accessing the data on the phone, and asked for time to test this method and report back. This is good news. For now, the government is backing off its demand that Apple build a tool that will compromise the security of millions, contradicts Apple's own beliefs, and is unsafe and unconstitutional.
This may be more than just a routine extension of time. The FBI's motion acknowledges that it may have other avenues to pursue in accessing the data on the phone, something that it must do under the law. It could also provide a way for the FBI to get out of a very public battle it provoked over an extremely contentious issue: how and when tech companies can be forced to rewrite their software to facilitate surveillance.
This case was always about more than access to a single phone. It was an attempt to set a legal precedent that requires any company to undermine their users' security at the FBI's request. Security is vital to protect the information on your phone, and the FBI should work to enhance user security, not undermine it.
It's very clear that public engagement on this issue was key to helping move this from a fight just between Apple and the government to one where all of us know that our security is at stake. The world is watching. We extend our deepest appreciation to all the friends of EFF who spoke out on this issue.
But remember: this isn't over. The FBI could come back to the court in a few weeks and try again to force Apple to write software that breaks the security on our iPhones. It's also possible that the FBI will look for another test case it can use to create a legal precedent.
Regardless of the courtroom battles ahead, FBI will undoubtedly continue its efforts in Congress. For years, the FBI has been decrying what they see as a "going dark" problem -- the FBI initiative to undermine encryption. Several members of Congress, led by Senators Dianne Feinstein and Richard Burr, continue to threaten to rush through legislation that would mandate backdoors in our technology or otherwise force tech companies to ensure FBI's access to everyone's communications. We're also gearing up for a major battle over backdoor legislation in states like California and are worried about pressure that other technology companies may be facing, like WhatsApp.
Above all, we're committed to continuing to defend user rights to strong security, including strong encryption.
Please help us in this effort:
If you aren't already a member of EFF, please join today. Your support can ensure we are fighting legislative and legal battles for digital security. And if you are an EFF member, thanks for making this work possible.
And please join us in our public campaign in defense of encryption by tweeting to President Obama, urging him to reject backdoors in our technology.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Cindy Cohn
Cindy Cohn is legal director for the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), as well as its general counsel, coordinating over 40 national class action lawsuits against the telecommunications carriers and the government seeking to stop warrantless NSA surveillance
A magistrate in Riverside, CA has canceled a hearing that was scheduled for Tuesday afternoon in the Apple v FBI case, at the FBI's request late Monday. The hearing was part of Apple's challenge to the FBI's demand that the company create a new version of its iOS, which would include a backdoor to allow easier access to a locked iPhone involved in the FBI's investigation into the 2015 San Bernardino shootings.
The FBI told the court that an "outside party" demonstrated a potential method for accessing the data on the phone, and asked for time to test this method and report back. This is good news. For now, the government is backing off its demand that Apple build a tool that will compromise the security of millions, contradicts Apple's own beliefs, and is unsafe and unconstitutional.
This may be more than just a routine extension of time. The FBI's motion acknowledges that it may have other avenues to pursue in accessing the data on the phone, something that it must do under the law. It could also provide a way for the FBI to get out of a very public battle it provoked over an extremely contentious issue: how and when tech companies can be forced to rewrite their software to facilitate surveillance.
This case was always about more than access to a single phone. It was an attempt to set a legal precedent that requires any company to undermine their users' security at the FBI's request. Security is vital to protect the information on your phone, and the FBI should work to enhance user security, not undermine it.
It's very clear that public engagement on this issue was key to helping move this from a fight just between Apple and the government to one where all of us know that our security is at stake. The world is watching. We extend our deepest appreciation to all the friends of EFF who spoke out on this issue.
But remember: this isn't over. The FBI could come back to the court in a few weeks and try again to force Apple to write software that breaks the security on our iPhones. It's also possible that the FBI will look for another test case it can use to create a legal precedent.
Regardless of the courtroom battles ahead, FBI will undoubtedly continue its efforts in Congress. For years, the FBI has been decrying what they see as a "going dark" problem -- the FBI initiative to undermine encryption. Several members of Congress, led by Senators Dianne Feinstein and Richard Burr, continue to threaten to rush through legislation that would mandate backdoors in our technology or otherwise force tech companies to ensure FBI's access to everyone's communications. We're also gearing up for a major battle over backdoor legislation in states like California and are worried about pressure that other technology companies may be facing, like WhatsApp.
Above all, we're committed to continuing to defend user rights to strong security, including strong encryption.
Please help us in this effort:
If you aren't already a member of EFF, please join today. Your support can ensure we are fighting legislative and legal battles for digital security. And if you are an EFF member, thanks for making this work possible.
And please join us in our public campaign in defense of encryption by tweeting to President Obama, urging him to reject backdoors in our technology.
Cindy Cohn
Cindy Cohn is legal director for the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), as well as its general counsel, coordinating over 40 national class action lawsuits against the telecommunications carriers and the government seeking to stop warrantless NSA surveillance
A magistrate in Riverside, CA has canceled a hearing that was scheduled for Tuesday afternoon in the Apple v FBI case, at the FBI's request late Monday. The hearing was part of Apple's challenge to the FBI's demand that the company create a new version of its iOS, which would include a backdoor to allow easier access to a locked iPhone involved in the FBI's investigation into the 2015 San Bernardino shootings.
The FBI told the court that an "outside party" demonstrated a potential method for accessing the data on the phone, and asked for time to test this method and report back. This is good news. For now, the government is backing off its demand that Apple build a tool that will compromise the security of millions, contradicts Apple's own beliefs, and is unsafe and unconstitutional.
This may be more than just a routine extension of time. The FBI's motion acknowledges that it may have other avenues to pursue in accessing the data on the phone, something that it must do under the law. It could also provide a way for the FBI to get out of a very public battle it provoked over an extremely contentious issue: how and when tech companies can be forced to rewrite their software to facilitate surveillance.
This case was always about more than access to a single phone. It was an attempt to set a legal precedent that requires any company to undermine their users' security at the FBI's request. Security is vital to protect the information on your phone, and the FBI should work to enhance user security, not undermine it.
It's very clear that public engagement on this issue was key to helping move this from a fight just between Apple and the government to one where all of us know that our security is at stake. The world is watching. We extend our deepest appreciation to all the friends of EFF who spoke out on this issue.
But remember: this isn't over. The FBI could come back to the court in a few weeks and try again to force Apple to write software that breaks the security on our iPhones. It's also possible that the FBI will look for another test case it can use to create a legal precedent.
Regardless of the courtroom battles ahead, FBI will undoubtedly continue its efforts in Congress. For years, the FBI has been decrying what they see as a "going dark" problem -- the FBI initiative to undermine encryption. Several members of Congress, led by Senators Dianne Feinstein and Richard Burr, continue to threaten to rush through legislation that would mandate backdoors in our technology or otherwise force tech companies to ensure FBI's access to everyone's communications. We're also gearing up for a major battle over backdoor legislation in states like California and are worried about pressure that other technology companies may be facing, like WhatsApp.
Above all, we're committed to continuing to defend user rights to strong security, including strong encryption.
Please help us in this effort:
If you aren't already a member of EFF, please join today. Your support can ensure we are fighting legislative and legal battles for digital security. And if you are an EFF member, thanks for making this work possible.
And please join us in our public campaign in defense of encryption by tweeting to President Obama, urging him to reject backdoors in our technology.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.