Bernie's Call to Rein in Wall Street, Artfully Clear
At the heart of the matter is Bernie calling out the way Wall Street money has corrupted our democracy and perhaps most especially our election process. So when I went looking for ways to illustrate how that might have come into play on issues of deep concern to me, I found something that was instructive.
Bernie's direct statements about the demands Wall Street makes on elected officials are not part of any "artful smear" campaign, as has been suggested.
At the heart of the matter is Bernie calling out the way Wall Street money has corrupted our democracy and perhaps most especially our election process. So when I went looking for ways to illustrate how that might have come into play on issues of deep concern to me, I found something that was instructive.
Bernie's direct statements about the demands Wall Street makes on elected officials are not part of any "artful smear" campaign, as has been suggested.
The issue of medical debt and bankruptcy has been a part of my life since I first discovered how many Americans are driven into bankruptcy by our for-profit healthcare system. On July 17, 2007, I testified on a witness panel for the U.S. House Judiciary Committee as an American who went bankrupt while insured. Sitting next to me on that witness panel was then Harvard Law Professor Elizabeth Warren, who was one of the co-authors of a groundbreaking study on medical debt and bankruptcy. Neither one of us knew each other nor did we have any way to know we would follow our respective paths into this election cycle. Despite a few subtle hints, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has stayed out of the endorsement game so far.
Two years later, I would appear on Bill Moyers Journal where they were able to retrieve a bit of that congressional testimony about 10.34 minutes into this segment that aired on May 22, 2009. From that momentous point in my life forward, I have kept up with Sen. Warren's career, especially on the topics of interest to me. So when I recalled another time I heard Sen. Warren discuss issues related to bankruptcy law, I was taken by her clarity about what happens when representing Wall Street interests becomes more important than doing what is right for large numbers of Americans who have been devastated financially by health crises, medical debt and bankruptcy.
During Elizabeth Warren's own appearance on Bill Moyers Journal, she describes in vivid detail one time when Wall Street influence appeared to have caused Bernie's primary opponent, then Sen. Hillary Clinton, to change her position on bankruptcy law in a very significant way. Before she was a U.S. senator representing New York, Hillary knew the bankruptcy law would hurt people like me and millions of Americans. Hillary changed her mind after being elected to the Senate. If the influence of the financial service industry wasn't a factor in that change of position, then perhaps another explanation will be forthcoming. Let me be very clear, this appearance by Warren was years ago and well before anyone could have envisioned a Bernie run at the presidency. The video seems to confirm the sort of influence peddling Wall Street does and just how accurate Bernie's reflections are in 2016 about and what is at stake.
Bernie is right. And if we are to carry this political revolution forward as it now appears we will, rigorous honesty is demanded inasmuch as is possible that we are honest about those issues that threaten us most. We live in a digital world, and even if the emails may not matter, the videos don't fib. We may just need to give a damn about that.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
At the heart of the matter is Bernie calling out the way Wall Street money has corrupted our democracy and perhaps most especially our election process. So when I went looking for ways to illustrate how that might have come into play on issues of deep concern to me, I found something that was instructive.
Bernie's direct statements about the demands Wall Street makes on elected officials are not part of any "artful smear" campaign, as has been suggested.
The issue of medical debt and bankruptcy has been a part of my life since I first discovered how many Americans are driven into bankruptcy by our for-profit healthcare system. On July 17, 2007, I testified on a witness panel for the U.S. House Judiciary Committee as an American who went bankrupt while insured. Sitting next to me on that witness panel was then Harvard Law Professor Elizabeth Warren, who was one of the co-authors of a groundbreaking study on medical debt and bankruptcy. Neither one of us knew each other nor did we have any way to know we would follow our respective paths into this election cycle. Despite a few subtle hints, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has stayed out of the endorsement game so far.
Two years later, I would appear on Bill Moyers Journal where they were able to retrieve a bit of that congressional testimony about 10.34 minutes into this segment that aired on May 22, 2009. From that momentous point in my life forward, I have kept up with Sen. Warren's career, especially on the topics of interest to me. So when I recalled another time I heard Sen. Warren discuss issues related to bankruptcy law, I was taken by her clarity about what happens when representing Wall Street interests becomes more important than doing what is right for large numbers of Americans who have been devastated financially by health crises, medical debt and bankruptcy.
During Elizabeth Warren's own appearance on Bill Moyers Journal, she describes in vivid detail one time when Wall Street influence appeared to have caused Bernie's primary opponent, then Sen. Hillary Clinton, to change her position on bankruptcy law in a very significant way. Before she was a U.S. senator representing New York, Hillary knew the bankruptcy law would hurt people like me and millions of Americans. Hillary changed her mind after being elected to the Senate. If the influence of the financial service industry wasn't a factor in that change of position, then perhaps another explanation will be forthcoming. Let me be very clear, this appearance by Warren was years ago and well before anyone could have envisioned a Bernie run at the presidency. The video seems to confirm the sort of influence peddling Wall Street does and just how accurate Bernie's reflections are in 2016 about and what is at stake.
Bernie is right. And if we are to carry this political revolution forward as it now appears we will, rigorous honesty is demanded inasmuch as is possible that we are honest about those issues that threaten us most. We live in a digital world, and even if the emails may not matter, the videos don't fib. We may just need to give a damn about that.
At the heart of the matter is Bernie calling out the way Wall Street money has corrupted our democracy and perhaps most especially our election process. So when I went looking for ways to illustrate how that might have come into play on issues of deep concern to me, I found something that was instructive.
Bernie's direct statements about the demands Wall Street makes on elected officials are not part of any "artful smear" campaign, as has been suggested.
The issue of medical debt and bankruptcy has been a part of my life since I first discovered how many Americans are driven into bankruptcy by our for-profit healthcare system. On July 17, 2007, I testified on a witness panel for the U.S. House Judiciary Committee as an American who went bankrupt while insured. Sitting next to me on that witness panel was then Harvard Law Professor Elizabeth Warren, who was one of the co-authors of a groundbreaking study on medical debt and bankruptcy. Neither one of us knew each other nor did we have any way to know we would follow our respective paths into this election cycle. Despite a few subtle hints, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has stayed out of the endorsement game so far.
Two years later, I would appear on Bill Moyers Journal where they were able to retrieve a bit of that congressional testimony about 10.34 minutes into this segment that aired on May 22, 2009. From that momentous point in my life forward, I have kept up with Sen. Warren's career, especially on the topics of interest to me. So when I recalled another time I heard Sen. Warren discuss issues related to bankruptcy law, I was taken by her clarity about what happens when representing Wall Street interests becomes more important than doing what is right for large numbers of Americans who have been devastated financially by health crises, medical debt and bankruptcy.
During Elizabeth Warren's own appearance on Bill Moyers Journal, she describes in vivid detail one time when Wall Street influence appeared to have caused Bernie's primary opponent, then Sen. Hillary Clinton, to change her position on bankruptcy law in a very significant way. Before she was a U.S. senator representing New York, Hillary knew the bankruptcy law would hurt people like me and millions of Americans. Hillary changed her mind after being elected to the Senate. If the influence of the financial service industry wasn't a factor in that change of position, then perhaps another explanation will be forthcoming. Let me be very clear, this appearance by Warren was years ago and well before anyone could have envisioned a Bernie run at the presidency. The video seems to confirm the sort of influence peddling Wall Street does and just how accurate Bernie's reflections are in 2016 about and what is at stake.
Bernie is right. And if we are to carry this political revolution forward as it now appears we will, rigorous honesty is demanded inasmuch as is possible that we are honest about those issues that threaten us most. We live in a digital world, and even if the emails may not matter, the videos don't fib. We may just need to give a damn about that.