SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Bernie Sanders supporters attend a campaign event in Chicago last year. (Photo: Jim Young/Reuters)
Even Praising His Political Skills, Washington Post Still Side-Eyes Sanders
Despite some by-now familiar imagery--Bernie Sanders is a "self-described democratic socialist" who has been "traveling the country venting his outrage"--the Washington Post's post-Iowa rundown (2/2/16) is in some ways an uncomplicated report on a Sanders showing that was "surprising" to a press corps intent on dismissing him into invisibility.
Feb 03, 2016
Despite some by-now familiar imagery--Bernie Sanders is a "self-described democratic socialist" who has been "traveling the country venting his outrage"--the Washington Post's post-Iowa rundown (2/2/16) is in some ways an uncomplicated report on a Sanders showing that was "surprising" to a press corps intent on dismissing him into invisibility.
But even in a piece that seems to straightforwardly chart Sanders' success in galvanizing new voters and laud his "political skills"--turning what looked like a sleepwalk into "a real race"--political reporter Karen Tumulty still manages to side-eye the candidate with the thumbnail description that his Iowa showing indicates that "Republicans are not the only voters looking for qualities beyond experience and electability."
It isn't just that--once more with feeling--Sanders has experience, and it should be voters, not media, who decide who's electable. The Post is displaying a double standard that allows them to sometimes celebrate political "outsiders"--when they rail against earmarks and the like--while reserving the right to dismiss them when they pose substantive challenge to neoliberal orthodoxy.
(As for the idea that "Sanders's vow to blow up the big banks effectively painted Clinton as an ally of Wall Street"--well, it was likely her taking millions from them that did that.)
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
Janine Jackson
Janine Jackson is Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) program director and producer/co-host of FAIR's syndicated radio show CounterSpin. She contributes frequently to FAIR's magazine, Extra! and co-edited "The FAIR Reader: An Extra! Review of Press and Politics in the '90s" (2019).
Despite some by-now familiar imagery--Bernie Sanders is a "self-described democratic socialist" who has been "traveling the country venting his outrage"--the Washington Post's post-Iowa rundown (2/2/16) is in some ways an uncomplicated report on a Sanders showing that was "surprising" to a press corps intent on dismissing him into invisibility.
But even in a piece that seems to straightforwardly chart Sanders' success in galvanizing new voters and laud his "political skills"--turning what looked like a sleepwalk into "a real race"--political reporter Karen Tumulty still manages to side-eye the candidate with the thumbnail description that his Iowa showing indicates that "Republicans are not the only voters looking for qualities beyond experience and electability."
It isn't just that--once more with feeling--Sanders has experience, and it should be voters, not media, who decide who's electable. The Post is displaying a double standard that allows them to sometimes celebrate political "outsiders"--when they rail against earmarks and the like--while reserving the right to dismiss them when they pose substantive challenge to neoliberal orthodoxy.
(As for the idea that "Sanders's vow to blow up the big banks effectively painted Clinton as an ally of Wall Street"--well, it was likely her taking millions from them that did that.)
Janine Jackson
Janine Jackson is Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) program director and producer/co-host of FAIR's syndicated radio show CounterSpin. She contributes frequently to FAIR's magazine, Extra! and co-edited "The FAIR Reader: An Extra! Review of Press and Politics in the '90s" (2019).
Despite some by-now familiar imagery--Bernie Sanders is a "self-described democratic socialist" who has been "traveling the country venting his outrage"--the Washington Post's post-Iowa rundown (2/2/16) is in some ways an uncomplicated report on a Sanders showing that was "surprising" to a press corps intent on dismissing him into invisibility.
But even in a piece that seems to straightforwardly chart Sanders' success in galvanizing new voters and laud his "political skills"--turning what looked like a sleepwalk into "a real race"--political reporter Karen Tumulty still manages to side-eye the candidate with the thumbnail description that his Iowa showing indicates that "Republicans are not the only voters looking for qualities beyond experience and electability."
It isn't just that--once more with feeling--Sanders has experience, and it should be voters, not media, who decide who's electable. The Post is displaying a double standard that allows them to sometimes celebrate political "outsiders"--when they rail against earmarks and the like--while reserving the right to dismiss them when they pose substantive challenge to neoliberal orthodoxy.
(As for the idea that "Sanders's vow to blow up the big banks effectively painted Clinton as an ally of Wall Street"--well, it was likely her taking millions from them that did that.)
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.