SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Bernie Sanders supporters attend a campaign event in Chicago last year. (Photo: Jim Young/Reuters)
Even Praising His Political Skills, Washington Post Still Side-Eyes Sanders
Despite some by-now familiar imagery--Bernie Sanders is a "self-described democratic socialist" who has been "traveling the country venting his outrage"--the Washington Post's post-Iowa rundown (2/2/16) is in some ways an uncomplicated report on a Sanders showing that was "surprising" to a press corps intent on dismissing him into invisibility.
Feb 03, 2016
Despite some by-now familiar imagery--Bernie Sanders is a "self-described democratic socialist" who has been "traveling the country venting his outrage"--the Washington Post's post-Iowa rundown (2/2/16) is in some ways an uncomplicated report on a Sanders showing that was "surprising" to a press corps intent on dismissing him into invisibility.
But even in a piece that seems to straightforwardly chart Sanders' success in galvanizing new voters and laud his "political skills"--turning what looked like a sleepwalk into "a real race"--political reporter Karen Tumulty still manages to side-eye the candidate with the thumbnail description that his Iowa showing indicates that "Republicans are not the only voters looking for qualities beyond experience and electability."
It isn't just that--once more with feeling--Sanders has experience, and it should be voters, not media, who decide who's electable. The Post is displaying a double standard that allows them to sometimes celebrate political "outsiders"--when they rail against earmarks and the like--while reserving the right to dismiss them when they pose substantive challenge to neoliberal orthodoxy.
(As for the idea that "Sanders's vow to blow up the big banks effectively painted Clinton as an ally of Wall Street"--well, it was likely her taking millions from them that did that.)
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
Janine Jackson
Janine Jackson is Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) program director and producer/co-host of FAIR's syndicated radio show CounterSpin. She contributes frequently to FAIR's magazine, Extra! and co-edited "The FAIR Reader: An Extra! Review of Press and Politics in the '90s" (2019).
Despite some by-now familiar imagery--Bernie Sanders is a "self-described democratic socialist" who has been "traveling the country venting his outrage"--the Washington Post's post-Iowa rundown (2/2/16) is in some ways an uncomplicated report on a Sanders showing that was "surprising" to a press corps intent on dismissing him into invisibility.
But even in a piece that seems to straightforwardly chart Sanders' success in galvanizing new voters and laud his "political skills"--turning what looked like a sleepwalk into "a real race"--political reporter Karen Tumulty still manages to side-eye the candidate with the thumbnail description that his Iowa showing indicates that "Republicans are not the only voters looking for qualities beyond experience and electability."
It isn't just that--once more with feeling--Sanders has experience, and it should be voters, not media, who decide who's electable. The Post is displaying a double standard that allows them to sometimes celebrate political "outsiders"--when they rail against earmarks and the like--while reserving the right to dismiss them when they pose substantive challenge to neoliberal orthodoxy.
(As for the idea that "Sanders's vow to blow up the big banks effectively painted Clinton as an ally of Wall Street"--well, it was likely her taking millions from them that did that.)
Janine Jackson
Janine Jackson is Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) program director and producer/co-host of FAIR's syndicated radio show CounterSpin. She contributes frequently to FAIR's magazine, Extra! and co-edited "The FAIR Reader: An Extra! Review of Press and Politics in the '90s" (2019).
Despite some by-now familiar imagery--Bernie Sanders is a "self-described democratic socialist" who has been "traveling the country venting his outrage"--the Washington Post's post-Iowa rundown (2/2/16) is in some ways an uncomplicated report on a Sanders showing that was "surprising" to a press corps intent on dismissing him into invisibility.
But even in a piece that seems to straightforwardly chart Sanders' success in galvanizing new voters and laud his "political skills"--turning what looked like a sleepwalk into "a real race"--political reporter Karen Tumulty still manages to side-eye the candidate with the thumbnail description that his Iowa showing indicates that "Republicans are not the only voters looking for qualities beyond experience and electability."
It isn't just that--once more with feeling--Sanders has experience, and it should be voters, not media, who decide who's electable. The Post is displaying a double standard that allows them to sometimes celebrate political "outsiders"--when they rail against earmarks and the like--while reserving the right to dismiss them when they pose substantive challenge to neoliberal orthodoxy.
(As for the idea that "Sanders's vow to blow up the big banks effectively painted Clinton as an ally of Wall Street"--well, it was likely her taking millions from them that did that.)
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.