SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Even Praising His Political Skills, Washington Post Still Side-Eyes Sanders
Despite some by-now familiar imagery--Bernie Sanders is a "self-described democratic socialist" who has been "traveling the country venting his outrage"--the Washington Post's post-Iowa rundown (2/2/16) is in some ways an uncomplicated report on a Sanders showing that was "surprising" to a press corps intent on dismissing him into invisibility.
Feb 03, 2016
Despite some by-now familiar imagery--Bernie Sanders is a "self-described democratic socialist" who has been "traveling the country venting his outrage"--the Washington Post's post-Iowa rundown (2/2/16) is in some ways an uncomplicated report on a Sanders showing that was "surprising" to a press corps intent on dismissing him into invisibility.
But even in a piece that seems to straightforwardly chart Sanders' success in galvanizing new voters and laud his "political skills"--turning what looked like a sleepwalk into "a real race"--political reporter Karen Tumulty still manages to side-eye the candidate with the thumbnail description that his Iowa showing indicates that "Republicans are not the only voters looking for qualities beyond experience and electability."
It isn't just that--once more with feeling--Sanders has experience, and it should be voters, not media, who decide who's electable. The Post is displaying a double standard that allows them to sometimes celebrate political "outsiders"--when they rail against earmarks and the like--while reserving the right to dismiss them when they pose substantive challenge to neoliberal orthodoxy.
(As for the idea that "Sanders's vow to blow up the big banks effectively painted Clinton as an ally of Wall Street"--well, it was likely her taking millions from them that did that.)
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
Janine Jackson
Janine Jackson is Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) program director and producer/co-host of FAIR's syndicated radio show CounterSpin. She contributes frequently to FAIR's magazine, Extra! and co-edited "The FAIR Reader: An Extra! Review of Press and Politics in the '90s" (2019).
Despite some by-now familiar imagery--Bernie Sanders is a "self-described democratic socialist" who has been "traveling the country venting his outrage"--the Washington Post's post-Iowa rundown (2/2/16) is in some ways an uncomplicated report on a Sanders showing that was "surprising" to a press corps intent on dismissing him into invisibility.
But even in a piece that seems to straightforwardly chart Sanders' success in galvanizing new voters and laud his "political skills"--turning what looked like a sleepwalk into "a real race"--political reporter Karen Tumulty still manages to side-eye the candidate with the thumbnail description that his Iowa showing indicates that "Republicans are not the only voters looking for qualities beyond experience and electability."
It isn't just that--once more with feeling--Sanders has experience, and it should be voters, not media, who decide who's electable. The Post is displaying a double standard that allows them to sometimes celebrate political "outsiders"--when they rail against earmarks and the like--while reserving the right to dismiss them when they pose substantive challenge to neoliberal orthodoxy.
(As for the idea that "Sanders's vow to blow up the big banks effectively painted Clinton as an ally of Wall Street"--well, it was likely her taking millions from them that did that.)
Janine Jackson
Janine Jackson is Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) program director and producer/co-host of FAIR's syndicated radio show CounterSpin. She contributes frequently to FAIR's magazine, Extra! and co-edited "The FAIR Reader: An Extra! Review of Press and Politics in the '90s" (2019).
Despite some by-now familiar imagery--Bernie Sanders is a "self-described democratic socialist" who has been "traveling the country venting his outrage"--the Washington Post's post-Iowa rundown (2/2/16) is in some ways an uncomplicated report on a Sanders showing that was "surprising" to a press corps intent on dismissing him into invisibility.
But even in a piece that seems to straightforwardly chart Sanders' success in galvanizing new voters and laud his "political skills"--turning what looked like a sleepwalk into "a real race"--political reporter Karen Tumulty still manages to side-eye the candidate with the thumbnail description that his Iowa showing indicates that "Republicans are not the only voters looking for qualities beyond experience and electability."
It isn't just that--once more with feeling--Sanders has experience, and it should be voters, not media, who decide who's electable. The Post is displaying a double standard that allows them to sometimes celebrate political "outsiders"--when they rail against earmarks and the like--while reserving the right to dismiss them when they pose substantive challenge to neoliberal orthodoxy.
(As for the idea that "Sanders's vow to blow up the big banks effectively painted Clinton as an ally of Wall Street"--well, it was likely her taking millions from them that did that.)
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.