

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Wyoming's largest coal producer has just placed a $2 million bet on the controversial Gateway Pacific Coal Terminal, a facility proposed to export American coal to be burned in China. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is reviewing the environmental impacts of the proposed project, which would be massive. This permit should be denied because exporting coal is against our national interest.
American coal mining is a dying industry as the nation turns away from coal as an energy source. As Pope Francis proclaimed in his recent encyclical, "We know that technology based on the use of highly polluting fossil fuels -- especially coal, but also oil and, to a lesser degree, gas -- needs to be progressively replaced without delay." American businesses and local and state governments are already weaning themselves off coal. An 1800s-era industrial behemoth, the coal industry is on its last legs as mining companies file for bankruptcy and utilities scale back the numbers of coal-fired power plants.
"As we continue to burn fossil fuels that destroy the Earth's climate, we humans can no longer deny that we too have become one of these endangered species as a result of our harmful addiction to fossil fuels. Let's redirect our efforts away from making these problems worse, and toward building clean energy solutions."
The Gateway Pacific Coal Terminal would extend the life of tottering coal mines in the United States by shipping American coal overseas to be burned. This reverses hard-won carbon pollution progress achieved here at home. It's not like coal that's burned in China doesn't contribute to global warming.
In fact, burning American coal in China is even worse. China has fewer environmental regulations to safeguard air quality, and sending millions of tons of coal overseas by ship requires the burning of additional massive quantities of diesel to fuel super-sized freighters.
Burning all that American coal in China ensures that global climate problems will worsen, accelerating the desertification of the breadbasket regions that feed the world's human population; creating more catastrophic storms like Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy that devastate coastal cities; increasing the number of forest fires; and killings coral reefs, signaling a loss of productive ocean ecosystems that are a major food source (greater than 20 percent of animal protein) for more than a third of the world's population, according to the Marine Stewardship Council. When you balance out the huge job and economic losses from climate-related problems against the jobs generated at coal mines, it becomes obvious that mining and exporting American coal is a losing proposition.
Wouldn't it be smarter to transition to clean, renewable energy sources today and save ourselves the worsening climate catastrophe that impacts every other sector of the global economy? Or should we keep the coal industry on life support, extending a relatively limited number of mining jobs so we can continue to destroy the planet for everyone else?
There is a limited supply of lucrative jobs to be had at coal mines and power plants. The same can be said for meth labs. But each type of operation is damaging to society as a whole.
The Dust Bowl signaled an ecological crisis, and the federal government responded by creating the Soil Conservation Service, bought up excess livestock for slaughter and planted over 200 million trees to create shelterbelts to protect farmland soils from wind erosion. Today we are in the midst of a climate crisis, and the federal government needs to respond decisively to take corrective action.
Let's phase out coal mining and keep it in the ground. Federal agencies must now lead by redirecting subsidies for fossil fuels and using them instead to retrain coal miners and power-plant workers and pay them to build and install affordable, subsidized solar panels on every building that can accommodate them. Let's pay miners and coal plant workers the same wages they're paid today, and instead of digging our climate hole deeper, they can build a clean and sustainable energy future where America can lead. This effort will require a retooling of our electrical grid -- a major undertaking, to be sure. So let's get started right away and harness American ingenuity to overcome the engineering challenges.
The International Union for the Conservation of Nature recently listed 1,400 species endangered by global climate change. As we continue to burn fossil fuels that destroy the Earth's climate, we humans can no longer deny that we too have become one of these endangered species as a result of our harmful addiction to fossil fuels. Let's redirect our efforts away from making these problems worse, and toward building clean energy solutions.
Coal is a dirty word. A four-letter word. It's time to delete it from the vocabulary of American energy production so the only people who use it are research geologists in university settings and historians.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Wyoming's largest coal producer has just placed a $2 million bet on the controversial Gateway Pacific Coal Terminal, a facility proposed to export American coal to be burned in China. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is reviewing the environmental impacts of the proposed project, which would be massive. This permit should be denied because exporting coal is against our national interest.
American coal mining is a dying industry as the nation turns away from coal as an energy source. As Pope Francis proclaimed in his recent encyclical, "We know that technology based on the use of highly polluting fossil fuels -- especially coal, but also oil and, to a lesser degree, gas -- needs to be progressively replaced without delay." American businesses and local and state governments are already weaning themselves off coal. An 1800s-era industrial behemoth, the coal industry is on its last legs as mining companies file for bankruptcy and utilities scale back the numbers of coal-fired power plants.
"As we continue to burn fossil fuels that destroy the Earth's climate, we humans can no longer deny that we too have become one of these endangered species as a result of our harmful addiction to fossil fuels. Let's redirect our efforts away from making these problems worse, and toward building clean energy solutions."
The Gateway Pacific Coal Terminal would extend the life of tottering coal mines in the United States by shipping American coal overseas to be burned. This reverses hard-won carbon pollution progress achieved here at home. It's not like coal that's burned in China doesn't contribute to global warming.
In fact, burning American coal in China is even worse. China has fewer environmental regulations to safeguard air quality, and sending millions of tons of coal overseas by ship requires the burning of additional massive quantities of diesel to fuel super-sized freighters.
Burning all that American coal in China ensures that global climate problems will worsen, accelerating the desertification of the breadbasket regions that feed the world's human population; creating more catastrophic storms like Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy that devastate coastal cities; increasing the number of forest fires; and killings coral reefs, signaling a loss of productive ocean ecosystems that are a major food source (greater than 20 percent of animal protein) for more than a third of the world's population, according to the Marine Stewardship Council. When you balance out the huge job and economic losses from climate-related problems against the jobs generated at coal mines, it becomes obvious that mining and exporting American coal is a losing proposition.
Wouldn't it be smarter to transition to clean, renewable energy sources today and save ourselves the worsening climate catastrophe that impacts every other sector of the global economy? Or should we keep the coal industry on life support, extending a relatively limited number of mining jobs so we can continue to destroy the planet for everyone else?
There is a limited supply of lucrative jobs to be had at coal mines and power plants. The same can be said for meth labs. But each type of operation is damaging to society as a whole.
The Dust Bowl signaled an ecological crisis, and the federal government responded by creating the Soil Conservation Service, bought up excess livestock for slaughter and planted over 200 million trees to create shelterbelts to protect farmland soils from wind erosion. Today we are in the midst of a climate crisis, and the federal government needs to respond decisively to take corrective action.
Let's phase out coal mining and keep it in the ground. Federal agencies must now lead by redirecting subsidies for fossil fuels and using them instead to retrain coal miners and power-plant workers and pay them to build and install affordable, subsidized solar panels on every building that can accommodate them. Let's pay miners and coal plant workers the same wages they're paid today, and instead of digging our climate hole deeper, they can build a clean and sustainable energy future where America can lead. This effort will require a retooling of our electrical grid -- a major undertaking, to be sure. So let's get started right away and harness American ingenuity to overcome the engineering challenges.
The International Union for the Conservation of Nature recently listed 1,400 species endangered by global climate change. As we continue to burn fossil fuels that destroy the Earth's climate, we humans can no longer deny that we too have become one of these endangered species as a result of our harmful addiction to fossil fuels. Let's redirect our efforts away from making these problems worse, and toward building clean energy solutions.
Coal is a dirty word. A four-letter word. It's time to delete it from the vocabulary of American energy production so the only people who use it are research geologists in university settings and historians.
Wyoming's largest coal producer has just placed a $2 million bet on the controversial Gateway Pacific Coal Terminal, a facility proposed to export American coal to be burned in China. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is reviewing the environmental impacts of the proposed project, which would be massive. This permit should be denied because exporting coal is against our national interest.
American coal mining is a dying industry as the nation turns away from coal as an energy source. As Pope Francis proclaimed in his recent encyclical, "We know that technology based on the use of highly polluting fossil fuels -- especially coal, but also oil and, to a lesser degree, gas -- needs to be progressively replaced without delay." American businesses and local and state governments are already weaning themselves off coal. An 1800s-era industrial behemoth, the coal industry is on its last legs as mining companies file for bankruptcy and utilities scale back the numbers of coal-fired power plants.
"As we continue to burn fossil fuels that destroy the Earth's climate, we humans can no longer deny that we too have become one of these endangered species as a result of our harmful addiction to fossil fuels. Let's redirect our efforts away from making these problems worse, and toward building clean energy solutions."
The Gateway Pacific Coal Terminal would extend the life of tottering coal mines in the United States by shipping American coal overseas to be burned. This reverses hard-won carbon pollution progress achieved here at home. It's not like coal that's burned in China doesn't contribute to global warming.
In fact, burning American coal in China is even worse. China has fewer environmental regulations to safeguard air quality, and sending millions of tons of coal overseas by ship requires the burning of additional massive quantities of diesel to fuel super-sized freighters.
Burning all that American coal in China ensures that global climate problems will worsen, accelerating the desertification of the breadbasket regions that feed the world's human population; creating more catastrophic storms like Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy that devastate coastal cities; increasing the number of forest fires; and killings coral reefs, signaling a loss of productive ocean ecosystems that are a major food source (greater than 20 percent of animal protein) for more than a third of the world's population, according to the Marine Stewardship Council. When you balance out the huge job and economic losses from climate-related problems against the jobs generated at coal mines, it becomes obvious that mining and exporting American coal is a losing proposition.
Wouldn't it be smarter to transition to clean, renewable energy sources today and save ourselves the worsening climate catastrophe that impacts every other sector of the global economy? Or should we keep the coal industry on life support, extending a relatively limited number of mining jobs so we can continue to destroy the planet for everyone else?
There is a limited supply of lucrative jobs to be had at coal mines and power plants. The same can be said for meth labs. But each type of operation is damaging to society as a whole.
The Dust Bowl signaled an ecological crisis, and the federal government responded by creating the Soil Conservation Service, bought up excess livestock for slaughter and planted over 200 million trees to create shelterbelts to protect farmland soils from wind erosion. Today we are in the midst of a climate crisis, and the federal government needs to respond decisively to take corrective action.
Let's phase out coal mining and keep it in the ground. Federal agencies must now lead by redirecting subsidies for fossil fuels and using them instead to retrain coal miners and power-plant workers and pay them to build and install affordable, subsidized solar panels on every building that can accommodate them. Let's pay miners and coal plant workers the same wages they're paid today, and instead of digging our climate hole deeper, they can build a clean and sustainable energy future where America can lead. This effort will require a retooling of our electrical grid -- a major undertaking, to be sure. So let's get started right away and harness American ingenuity to overcome the engineering challenges.
The International Union for the Conservation of Nature recently listed 1,400 species endangered by global climate change. As we continue to burn fossil fuels that destroy the Earth's climate, we humans can no longer deny that we too have become one of these endangered species as a result of our harmful addiction to fossil fuels. Let's redirect our efforts away from making these problems worse, and toward building clean energy solutions.
Coal is a dirty word. A four-letter word. It's time to delete it from the vocabulary of American energy production so the only people who use it are research geologists in university settings and historians.