SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"Inside Urban Shield" (Photo: Daniel Arauz/flickr/cc)
Disturbing displays of military and surveillance equipment being used by state and local police have become commonplace. So it's not hard to imagine why Urban Shield, a four-day long "preparedness" exercise and equipment exhibition coordinated by the Alameda County Sheriff's Department, was asked not to return to Oakland last year after community opposition.
But the Stop Urban Shield coalition wants more. They want the event cancelled entirely.
They say Urban Shield "brings together local, regional, and international police-military units to collaborate on and profit from new forms of surveillance." They've also pointed out that " Local police departments are now directly funded and trained by the Department of Homeland Security and many receive military-grade equipment from the Department of Defense." The event includes law enforcement agencies from around the world, and in the past has included activities such as a simulated hostage situation or terrorist threat.
It also acts as a marketplace for the kind of technology grassroots activists are especially concerned about. In addition to myriad arms dealers, the exhibition includes:
Residents in Alameda County are very engaged in local government, and haven't hesitated to spend long hours at city and county council meetings telling lawmakers that they don't want surveillance and military equipment on their streets. Unfortunately, they've had a lot of opportunities to do so:
Grassroots activism is making a difference. Urban Shield can't happen in Oakland anymore, the Sheriff had to use his own money to purchase a drone, the Domain Awareness Center was scaled back to the Port of Oakland only, and Oakland's Public Safety Committee will be voting on a FLIR privacy policy next week.
The Stop Urban Shield coalition is asking city and county agencies to end their participation in the event entirely, and they've organized a demonstration for September 11, the first day of the event. Their coordination around this event serves as a reminder: while surveillance and militarization are a huge problem, they aren't insurmountable.
If you're concerned about the use of surveillance technology in your own community, check out EFF's new Street Level Surveillance Project. We have resources for activists, including a way to easily file a public records act request about biometrics, and talking points about ALPRs.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Disturbing displays of military and surveillance equipment being used by state and local police have become commonplace. So it's not hard to imagine why Urban Shield, a four-day long "preparedness" exercise and equipment exhibition coordinated by the Alameda County Sheriff's Department, was asked not to return to Oakland last year after community opposition.
But the Stop Urban Shield coalition wants more. They want the event cancelled entirely.
They say Urban Shield "brings together local, regional, and international police-military units to collaborate on and profit from new forms of surveillance." They've also pointed out that " Local police departments are now directly funded and trained by the Department of Homeland Security and many receive military-grade equipment from the Department of Defense." The event includes law enforcement agencies from around the world, and in the past has included activities such as a simulated hostage situation or terrorist threat.
It also acts as a marketplace for the kind of technology grassroots activists are especially concerned about. In addition to myriad arms dealers, the exhibition includes:
Residents in Alameda County are very engaged in local government, and haven't hesitated to spend long hours at city and county council meetings telling lawmakers that they don't want surveillance and military equipment on their streets. Unfortunately, they've had a lot of opportunities to do so:
Grassroots activism is making a difference. Urban Shield can't happen in Oakland anymore, the Sheriff had to use his own money to purchase a drone, the Domain Awareness Center was scaled back to the Port of Oakland only, and Oakland's Public Safety Committee will be voting on a FLIR privacy policy next week.
The Stop Urban Shield coalition is asking city and county agencies to end their participation in the event entirely, and they've organized a demonstration for September 11, the first day of the event. Their coordination around this event serves as a reminder: while surveillance and militarization are a huge problem, they aren't insurmountable.
If you're concerned about the use of surveillance technology in your own community, check out EFF's new Street Level Surveillance Project. We have resources for activists, including a way to easily file a public records act request about biometrics, and talking points about ALPRs.
Disturbing displays of military and surveillance equipment being used by state and local police have become commonplace. So it's not hard to imagine why Urban Shield, a four-day long "preparedness" exercise and equipment exhibition coordinated by the Alameda County Sheriff's Department, was asked not to return to Oakland last year after community opposition.
But the Stop Urban Shield coalition wants more. They want the event cancelled entirely.
They say Urban Shield "brings together local, regional, and international police-military units to collaborate on and profit from new forms of surveillance." They've also pointed out that " Local police departments are now directly funded and trained by the Department of Homeland Security and many receive military-grade equipment from the Department of Defense." The event includes law enforcement agencies from around the world, and in the past has included activities such as a simulated hostage situation or terrorist threat.
It also acts as a marketplace for the kind of technology grassroots activists are especially concerned about. In addition to myriad arms dealers, the exhibition includes:
Residents in Alameda County are very engaged in local government, and haven't hesitated to spend long hours at city and county council meetings telling lawmakers that they don't want surveillance and military equipment on their streets. Unfortunately, they've had a lot of opportunities to do so:
Grassroots activism is making a difference. Urban Shield can't happen in Oakland anymore, the Sheriff had to use his own money to purchase a drone, the Domain Awareness Center was scaled back to the Port of Oakland only, and Oakland's Public Safety Committee will be voting on a FLIR privacy policy next week.
The Stop Urban Shield coalition is asking city and county agencies to end their participation in the event entirely, and they've organized a demonstration for September 11, the first day of the event. Their coordination around this event serves as a reminder: while surveillance and militarization are a huge problem, they aren't insurmountable.
If you're concerned about the use of surveillance technology in your own community, check out EFF's new Street Level Surveillance Project. We have resources for activists, including a way to easily file a public records act request about biometrics, and talking points about ALPRs.