Same-Sex Marriage Isn't Equality for All LGBT People. Our Movement Can't End
Who in our community will be left to push for full equality for all transgender and queer people, now that this one fight has been won?
It wasn't that long ago - 4 November 2008 - that the US had an election that galvanized a generation of activists to change policies in this country that would have enshrined into law the continued marginalization of a large group of people. I'm not talking about who was elected president, or which political party took the most seats in Congress: rather, a ballot initiative in the state of California, called Proposition 8, passed by a four-point margin that night and successfully amended the state's constitution by adding language that defined marriage as being between "one man and one woman".
Now, not fully eight years later, the US supreme court ruled in favor of full marriage equality across America. And while on that night back in 2008, as I considered the long-term consequences of California's newly enshrined discrimination against same-sex couples - including the possibility that the thousands of couples who married in the months prior might have effectively been "divorced" by a voting majority of their neighbors, coworkers and families - I felt faint and ran to the bathroom to throw up, today I am happy for that part of my LGBT community which has gained a well-deserved measure of equality.
But I worry that, with full marriage equality, much of the queer community will be left wondering how else to engage with a society that still wants to define who we are - and who in our community will be left to push for full equality for all transgender and queer people, now that this one fight has been won. I fear that our precious movements for social justice and all the remarkable advancements we have made are now vulnerable to being taken over by monied people and institutions and that those of us for whom same-sex marriage rights bring no equality will be slowly erased from our movement and our history.
The unexpected shock of a marriage equality loss in California in 2008 - a state that I, like many others, ignorantly deemed "too liberal" to actually pass such a measure - brought millions of people together to focus on marriage equality - crystallizing a previously fractured LGBT rights movement that had seemed to have lost its way politically. The purpose of the movement was to educate and promote the equality of all people.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
It wasn't that long ago - 4 November 2008 - that the US had an election that galvanized a generation of activists to change policies in this country that would have enshrined into law the continued marginalization of a large group of people. I'm not talking about who was elected president, or which political party took the most seats in Congress: rather, a ballot initiative in the state of California, called Proposition 8, passed by a four-point margin that night and successfully amended the state's constitution by adding language that defined marriage as being between "one man and one woman".
Now, not fully eight years later, the US supreme court ruled in favor of full marriage equality across America. And while on that night back in 2008, as I considered the long-term consequences of California's newly enshrined discrimination against same-sex couples - including the possibility that the thousands of couples who married in the months prior might have effectively been "divorced" by a voting majority of their neighbors, coworkers and families - I felt faint and ran to the bathroom to throw up, today I am happy for that part of my LGBT community which has gained a well-deserved measure of equality.
But I worry that, with full marriage equality, much of the queer community will be left wondering how else to engage with a society that still wants to define who we are - and who in our community will be left to push for full equality for all transgender and queer people, now that this one fight has been won. I fear that our precious movements for social justice and all the remarkable advancements we have made are now vulnerable to being taken over by monied people and institutions and that those of us for whom same-sex marriage rights bring no equality will be slowly erased from our movement and our history.
The unexpected shock of a marriage equality loss in California in 2008 - a state that I, like many others, ignorantly deemed "too liberal" to actually pass such a measure - brought millions of people together to focus on marriage equality - crystallizing a previously fractured LGBT rights movement that had seemed to have lost its way politically. The purpose of the movement was to educate and promote the equality of all people.
It wasn't that long ago - 4 November 2008 - that the US had an election that galvanized a generation of activists to change policies in this country that would have enshrined into law the continued marginalization of a large group of people. I'm not talking about who was elected president, or which political party took the most seats in Congress: rather, a ballot initiative in the state of California, called Proposition 8, passed by a four-point margin that night and successfully amended the state's constitution by adding language that defined marriage as being between "one man and one woman".
Now, not fully eight years later, the US supreme court ruled in favor of full marriage equality across America. And while on that night back in 2008, as I considered the long-term consequences of California's newly enshrined discrimination against same-sex couples - including the possibility that the thousands of couples who married in the months prior might have effectively been "divorced" by a voting majority of their neighbors, coworkers and families - I felt faint and ran to the bathroom to throw up, today I am happy for that part of my LGBT community which has gained a well-deserved measure of equality.
But I worry that, with full marriage equality, much of the queer community will be left wondering how else to engage with a society that still wants to define who we are - and who in our community will be left to push for full equality for all transgender and queer people, now that this one fight has been won. I fear that our precious movements for social justice and all the remarkable advancements we have made are now vulnerable to being taken over by monied people and institutions and that those of us for whom same-sex marriage rights bring no equality will be slowly erased from our movement and our history.
The unexpected shock of a marriage equality loss in California in 2008 - a state that I, like many others, ignorantly deemed "too liberal" to actually pass such a measure - brought millions of people together to focus on marriage equality - crystallizing a previously fractured LGBT rights movement that had seemed to have lost its way politically. The purpose of the movement was to educate and promote the equality of all people.