SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Senate Intelligence Chair to Constituents: I Don't Care What You Think
May 18, 2015
The House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed HR 2048, the USA Freedom Act last week. The bill is an attempt by lawmakers to rein in the NSA and fix the infamous "business records program," which uses Section 215 of the Patriot Act to order telephone companies to hand over Americans' daily calling records. When asked if the Senate would take up the bill, Senate Intelligence Chair Richard Burr said, "The program as designed is effective, and members are reluctant to change things that are effective just because of public opinion."
But isn't public opinion exactly what Senator Burr should have an ear towards as the people of North Carolina's representative? When it comes to public opinion, Americans are loud and clear that they not only want the specific calling records program to end, but that they are also incredibly dubious about the NSA's collection practices.
His reliance on the program being effective ignores the conclusions of two independent investigations tasked with looking at the calling records program. The first, appointed by President Obama and Called the President's Review Group on Signals Intelligence Capabilities, concluded the program was not effective and should be stopped. Another investigation led by an independent executive agency called the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board concluded the program as not only ineffective, but that it was illegal. The government had no statutory basis to be running the collection. In addition, both the Director of National Intelligence and the Attorney General have written a letter expressing the need to reform the authorities, and essentially end the current program as it currently is.
The judiciary has also weighed in. Last week, the Second Circuit court ruled the government's program illegal. The court held that the NSA's telephone records program went far beyond what Congress authorized when it passed Section 215 of the Patriot Act in 2001 and completely rejected the government's secret reinterpretation of Section 215 that has served as the basis for the telephone records collection program.
As the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee--a committee originally created to ensure Congress kept a watchful eye over an Intelligence Community with a history of spying on innocent Americans--it's his duty to advance the interests of North Carolinians and everyday Americans. A duty that, when combined with the overwhelming evidence, demands he stop the program and vote against any short term reauthorization.
If the Executive branch, the Judicial branch, and two independent commissions can't convince Senator Burr, then maybe their fellow lawmakers can. On May 13, the House overwhelmingly decided to end the program and rein in the NSA. The USA Freedom Act, which ends the program, passed the House with over 330 votes. And last year 58 Senators voted in favor of Senator Patrick Leahy and Mike Lee's reform bill. While the vote may have been for tepid reform, it's reform that signals Congress is ready to stop the illegal program run by the NSA.
At the minimum, it's time for Congress to speak loudly and clearly on the issue. Tell your lawmaker now to vote against any short term reauthorization.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Mark Jaycox
Mark Jaycox is a Policy Analyst and Legislative Assistant for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. His issues include user privacy, civil liberties, EULAs, and current legislation or policy rising out of Washington, DC
The House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed HR 2048, the USA Freedom Act last week. The bill is an attempt by lawmakers to rein in the NSA and fix the infamous "business records program," which uses Section 215 of the Patriot Act to order telephone companies to hand over Americans' daily calling records. When asked if the Senate would take up the bill, Senate Intelligence Chair Richard Burr said, "The program as designed is effective, and members are reluctant to change things that are effective just because of public opinion."
But isn't public opinion exactly what Senator Burr should have an ear towards as the people of North Carolina's representative? When it comes to public opinion, Americans are loud and clear that they not only want the specific calling records program to end, but that they are also incredibly dubious about the NSA's collection practices.
His reliance on the program being effective ignores the conclusions of two independent investigations tasked with looking at the calling records program. The first, appointed by President Obama and Called the President's Review Group on Signals Intelligence Capabilities, concluded the program was not effective and should be stopped. Another investigation led by an independent executive agency called the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board concluded the program as not only ineffective, but that it was illegal. The government had no statutory basis to be running the collection. In addition, both the Director of National Intelligence and the Attorney General have written a letter expressing the need to reform the authorities, and essentially end the current program as it currently is.
The judiciary has also weighed in. Last week, the Second Circuit court ruled the government's program illegal. The court held that the NSA's telephone records program went far beyond what Congress authorized when it passed Section 215 of the Patriot Act in 2001 and completely rejected the government's secret reinterpretation of Section 215 that has served as the basis for the telephone records collection program.
As the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee--a committee originally created to ensure Congress kept a watchful eye over an Intelligence Community with a history of spying on innocent Americans--it's his duty to advance the interests of North Carolinians and everyday Americans. A duty that, when combined with the overwhelming evidence, demands he stop the program and vote against any short term reauthorization.
If the Executive branch, the Judicial branch, and two independent commissions can't convince Senator Burr, then maybe their fellow lawmakers can. On May 13, the House overwhelmingly decided to end the program and rein in the NSA. The USA Freedom Act, which ends the program, passed the House with over 330 votes. And last year 58 Senators voted in favor of Senator Patrick Leahy and Mike Lee's reform bill. While the vote may have been for tepid reform, it's reform that signals Congress is ready to stop the illegal program run by the NSA.
At the minimum, it's time for Congress to speak loudly and clearly on the issue. Tell your lawmaker now to vote against any short term reauthorization.
Mark Jaycox
Mark Jaycox is a Policy Analyst and Legislative Assistant for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. His issues include user privacy, civil liberties, EULAs, and current legislation or policy rising out of Washington, DC
The House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed HR 2048, the USA Freedom Act last week. The bill is an attempt by lawmakers to rein in the NSA and fix the infamous "business records program," which uses Section 215 of the Patriot Act to order telephone companies to hand over Americans' daily calling records. When asked if the Senate would take up the bill, Senate Intelligence Chair Richard Burr said, "The program as designed is effective, and members are reluctant to change things that are effective just because of public opinion."
But isn't public opinion exactly what Senator Burr should have an ear towards as the people of North Carolina's representative? When it comes to public opinion, Americans are loud and clear that they not only want the specific calling records program to end, but that they are also incredibly dubious about the NSA's collection practices.
His reliance on the program being effective ignores the conclusions of two independent investigations tasked with looking at the calling records program. The first, appointed by President Obama and Called the President's Review Group on Signals Intelligence Capabilities, concluded the program was not effective and should be stopped. Another investigation led by an independent executive agency called the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board concluded the program as not only ineffective, but that it was illegal. The government had no statutory basis to be running the collection. In addition, both the Director of National Intelligence and the Attorney General have written a letter expressing the need to reform the authorities, and essentially end the current program as it currently is.
The judiciary has also weighed in. Last week, the Second Circuit court ruled the government's program illegal. The court held that the NSA's telephone records program went far beyond what Congress authorized when it passed Section 215 of the Patriot Act in 2001 and completely rejected the government's secret reinterpretation of Section 215 that has served as the basis for the telephone records collection program.
As the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee--a committee originally created to ensure Congress kept a watchful eye over an Intelligence Community with a history of spying on innocent Americans--it's his duty to advance the interests of North Carolinians and everyday Americans. A duty that, when combined with the overwhelming evidence, demands he stop the program and vote against any short term reauthorization.
If the Executive branch, the Judicial branch, and two independent commissions can't convince Senator Burr, then maybe their fellow lawmakers can. On May 13, the House overwhelmingly decided to end the program and rein in the NSA. The USA Freedom Act, which ends the program, passed the House with over 330 votes. And last year 58 Senators voted in favor of Senator Patrick Leahy and Mike Lee's reform bill. While the vote may have been for tepid reform, it's reform that signals Congress is ready to stop the illegal program run by the NSA.
At the minimum, it's time for Congress to speak loudly and clearly on the issue. Tell your lawmaker now to vote against any short term reauthorization.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.