SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
How the US Can Really Combat Radicalism
The US government held yet another conference on how best to combat "Islamic radicalism." It is interesting that radicalism -- even without adding the Islamic adjective, as the Obama administration avoids the label -- is applied to only one cultural and religious milieu. Radicalism is thus assumed to be a phenomenon of one culture and one religion. When the US government speaks about radicalism, it ignores the radicalism that prevails in the US Congress or in the US churches. It has only one radicalism and one form of violence in mind.
Feb 24, 2015
The US government held yet another conference on how best to combat "Islamic radicalism." It is interesting that radicalism -- even without adding the Islamic adjective, as the Obama administration avoids the label -- is applied to only one cultural and religious milieu. Radicalism is thus assumed to be a phenomenon of one culture and one religion. When the US government speaks about radicalism, it ignores the radicalism that prevails in the US Congress or in the US churches. It has only one radicalism and one form of violence in mind. Thus the violence of the US government, visited upon people in many Muslim countries, is not seen as the product of radicalism, but of moderation and of lofty ideals. Furthermore, for the US to really demonstrate its willingness to effectively combat radicalism it has to undertake those steps and policies -- which it will never do:
1) End its bombing and covert operations in predominantly Muslim countries.
2) Break with the radical, reactionary regimes of the Gulf and the rest of the Middle East and North Africa, especially those regimes that are most responsible for arming and funding those radical ideologies.
3) Declare war on the ideology of Wahhabiyyah, which is the ideology of all terrorist Jihadist groups.
4) End its arming and/or funding of radical repressive regimes in the Middle East and North Africa.
5) Declare war on the radical ideology and practices of Zionism, and the various forms of terrorism that it has spawned over the decades.
6) End the use and misuse of Islam as a tool of US foreign policy to be used in the Cold War and in other wars (as in Syria) in order to help topple governments that the US does not like.
7) Admit that there are radical trends in all religions and in all governments, and that the West is not immune.
8) End the clear or camouflaged insistence on the conflation between Islam and radicalism.
9) Abandon the view that the usual suspects (discredited US tools and voices in the Arab world) would be the best preachers of "moderation" in the Arab world, especially since those voices are tied to the region's most repressive regimes.
10) Admit that the US government has been the biggest source of radicalism -- the right-wing kind -- all over the world for the last 70 years.
11) Admit that the US is the most unqualified party to combat radicalism.
12) Admit that progressive and leftist radicalism is the best antidote against Jihadi radicalism.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Al-Jazeera English
Asad Abukhalil
Dr. As'ad AbuKhalil is a Professor of Political Science at California State University, Stanislaus, a lecturer and the author of The Angry Arab News Service. He tweets @asadabukhalil
The US government held yet another conference on how best to combat "Islamic radicalism." It is interesting that radicalism -- even without adding the Islamic adjective, as the Obama administration avoids the label -- is applied to only one cultural and religious milieu. Radicalism is thus assumed to be a phenomenon of one culture and one religion. When the US government speaks about radicalism, it ignores the radicalism that prevails in the US Congress or in the US churches. It has only one radicalism and one form of violence in mind. Thus the violence of the US government, visited upon people in many Muslim countries, is not seen as the product of radicalism, but of moderation and of lofty ideals. Furthermore, for the US to really demonstrate its willingness to effectively combat radicalism it has to undertake those steps and policies -- which it will never do:
1) End its bombing and covert operations in predominantly Muslim countries.
2) Break with the radical, reactionary regimes of the Gulf and the rest of the Middle East and North Africa, especially those regimes that are most responsible for arming and funding those radical ideologies.
3) Declare war on the ideology of Wahhabiyyah, which is the ideology of all terrorist Jihadist groups.
4) End its arming and/or funding of radical repressive regimes in the Middle East and North Africa.
5) Declare war on the radical ideology and practices of Zionism, and the various forms of terrorism that it has spawned over the decades.
6) End the use and misuse of Islam as a tool of US foreign policy to be used in the Cold War and in other wars (as in Syria) in order to help topple governments that the US does not like.
7) Admit that there are radical trends in all religions and in all governments, and that the West is not immune.
8) End the clear or camouflaged insistence on the conflation between Islam and radicalism.
9) Abandon the view that the usual suspects (discredited US tools and voices in the Arab world) would be the best preachers of "moderation" in the Arab world, especially since those voices are tied to the region's most repressive regimes.
10) Admit that the US government has been the biggest source of radicalism -- the right-wing kind -- all over the world for the last 70 years.
11) Admit that the US is the most unqualified party to combat radicalism.
12) Admit that progressive and leftist radicalism is the best antidote against Jihadi radicalism.
Asad Abukhalil
Dr. As'ad AbuKhalil is a Professor of Political Science at California State University, Stanislaus, a lecturer and the author of The Angry Arab News Service. He tweets @asadabukhalil
The US government held yet another conference on how best to combat "Islamic radicalism." It is interesting that radicalism -- even without adding the Islamic adjective, as the Obama administration avoids the label -- is applied to only one cultural and religious milieu. Radicalism is thus assumed to be a phenomenon of one culture and one religion. When the US government speaks about radicalism, it ignores the radicalism that prevails in the US Congress or in the US churches. It has only one radicalism and one form of violence in mind. Thus the violence of the US government, visited upon people in many Muslim countries, is not seen as the product of radicalism, but of moderation and of lofty ideals. Furthermore, for the US to really demonstrate its willingness to effectively combat radicalism it has to undertake those steps and policies -- which it will never do:
1) End its bombing and covert operations in predominantly Muslim countries.
2) Break with the radical, reactionary regimes of the Gulf and the rest of the Middle East and North Africa, especially those regimes that are most responsible for arming and funding those radical ideologies.
3) Declare war on the ideology of Wahhabiyyah, which is the ideology of all terrorist Jihadist groups.
4) End its arming and/or funding of radical repressive regimes in the Middle East and North Africa.
5) Declare war on the radical ideology and practices of Zionism, and the various forms of terrorism that it has spawned over the decades.
6) End the use and misuse of Islam as a tool of US foreign policy to be used in the Cold War and in other wars (as in Syria) in order to help topple governments that the US does not like.
7) Admit that there are radical trends in all religions and in all governments, and that the West is not immune.
8) End the clear or camouflaged insistence on the conflation between Islam and radicalism.
9) Abandon the view that the usual suspects (discredited US tools and voices in the Arab world) would be the best preachers of "moderation" in the Arab world, especially since those voices are tied to the region's most repressive regimes.
10) Admit that the US government has been the biggest source of radicalism -- the right-wing kind -- all over the world for the last 70 years.
11) Admit that the US is the most unqualified party to combat radicalism.
12) Admit that progressive and leftist radicalism is the best antidote against Jihadi radicalism.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.