The White House Gets It Right On Net Neutrality. Will the FCC?
Over the past year, millions of Internet users have spoken out in defense of the open Internet. Today, we know the White House heard us.
In a statement issued this morning, President Barack Obama has called on the Federal Communications Commission to develop new "net neutrality" rules and, equally importantly, establish the legal authority it needs to support those rules by reclassifying broadband service as a "telecommunications service."
This is very welcomed news. Back in May, the Federal Communications Commission proposed flawed "net neutrality" rules that would effectively bless the creation of Internet "slow lanes." After months of netroots protests, we learned the FCC began to settle on a "hybrid" proposal that, we fear, is legally unsustainable.
Here's why: if the FCC is going to craft and enforce clear and limited neutrality rules, it must first do one important thing. The FCC must reverse its 2002 decision to treat broadband as an "information service" rather than a "telecommunications service." This is what's known as Title II reclassification. According to the highest court to review the question, the rules that actually do what many of us want -- such as forbidding discrimination against certain applications -- require the FCC to treat access providers like "common carriers, " treatment that can only be applied to telecommunications services. Having chosen to define broadband as an "information service," the FCC can impose regulations that "promote competition" (good) but it cannot stop providers from giving their friends special access to Internet users (bad).
Today's statement stresses a few key principles:
- No blocking. If a consumer requests access to a website or service, and the content is legal, your ISP should not be permitted to block it. That way, every player -- not just those commercially affiliated with an ISP -- gets a fair shot at your business.
- No throttling.
- Increased transparency, including with respect to interconnection.
- No paid prioritization. "No service should be stuck in a 'slow lane' because it does not pay a fee."
Wisely, the statement explicitly notes the need for forbearance. As we have said for months, reclassification must be combined with a commitment to forbear from imposing aspects of Title II that were originally drafted for 20th century telephone services and that don't make sense for the Internet. While forbearance doesn't set the limits on the regulatory agency in stone, it does require the FCC to make a public commitment that is difficult to reverse.
This is an important moment in the fight for the open Internet. President Obama has chosen to stand with the us: the users, the innovators, the creators who depend on an open internet. But the fight isn't over yet: we still need to persuade the FCC to join him. Stay tuned for ways you can help.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Over the past year, millions of Internet users have spoken out in defense of the open Internet. Today, we know the White House heard us.
In a statement issued this morning, President Barack Obama has called on the Federal Communications Commission to develop new "net neutrality" rules and, equally importantly, establish the legal authority it needs to support those rules by reclassifying broadband service as a "telecommunications service."
This is very welcomed news. Back in May, the Federal Communications Commission proposed flawed "net neutrality" rules that would effectively bless the creation of Internet "slow lanes." After months of netroots protests, we learned the FCC began to settle on a "hybrid" proposal that, we fear, is legally unsustainable.
Here's why: if the FCC is going to craft and enforce clear and limited neutrality rules, it must first do one important thing. The FCC must reverse its 2002 decision to treat broadband as an "information service" rather than a "telecommunications service." This is what's known as Title II reclassification. According to the highest court to review the question, the rules that actually do what many of us want -- such as forbidding discrimination against certain applications -- require the FCC to treat access providers like "common carriers, " treatment that can only be applied to telecommunications services. Having chosen to define broadband as an "information service," the FCC can impose regulations that "promote competition" (good) but it cannot stop providers from giving their friends special access to Internet users (bad).
Today's statement stresses a few key principles:
- No blocking. If a consumer requests access to a website or service, and the content is legal, your ISP should not be permitted to block it. That way, every player -- not just those commercially affiliated with an ISP -- gets a fair shot at your business.
- No throttling.
- Increased transparency, including with respect to interconnection.
- No paid prioritization. "No service should be stuck in a 'slow lane' because it does not pay a fee."
Wisely, the statement explicitly notes the need for forbearance. As we have said for months, reclassification must be combined with a commitment to forbear from imposing aspects of Title II that were originally drafted for 20th century telephone services and that don't make sense for the Internet. While forbearance doesn't set the limits on the regulatory agency in stone, it does require the FCC to make a public commitment that is difficult to reverse.
This is an important moment in the fight for the open Internet. President Obama has chosen to stand with the us: the users, the innovators, the creators who depend on an open internet. But the fight isn't over yet: we still need to persuade the FCC to join him. Stay tuned for ways you can help.
Over the past year, millions of Internet users have spoken out in defense of the open Internet. Today, we know the White House heard us.
In a statement issued this morning, President Barack Obama has called on the Federal Communications Commission to develop new "net neutrality" rules and, equally importantly, establish the legal authority it needs to support those rules by reclassifying broadband service as a "telecommunications service."
This is very welcomed news. Back in May, the Federal Communications Commission proposed flawed "net neutrality" rules that would effectively bless the creation of Internet "slow lanes." After months of netroots protests, we learned the FCC began to settle on a "hybrid" proposal that, we fear, is legally unsustainable.
Here's why: if the FCC is going to craft and enforce clear and limited neutrality rules, it must first do one important thing. The FCC must reverse its 2002 decision to treat broadband as an "information service" rather than a "telecommunications service." This is what's known as Title II reclassification. According to the highest court to review the question, the rules that actually do what many of us want -- such as forbidding discrimination against certain applications -- require the FCC to treat access providers like "common carriers, " treatment that can only be applied to telecommunications services. Having chosen to define broadband as an "information service," the FCC can impose regulations that "promote competition" (good) but it cannot stop providers from giving their friends special access to Internet users (bad).
Today's statement stresses a few key principles:
- No blocking. If a consumer requests access to a website or service, and the content is legal, your ISP should not be permitted to block it. That way, every player -- not just those commercially affiliated with an ISP -- gets a fair shot at your business.
- No throttling.
- Increased transparency, including with respect to interconnection.
- No paid prioritization. "No service should be stuck in a 'slow lane' because it does not pay a fee."
Wisely, the statement explicitly notes the need for forbearance. As we have said for months, reclassification must be combined with a commitment to forbear from imposing aspects of Title II that were originally drafted for 20th century telephone services and that don't make sense for the Internet. While forbearance doesn't set the limits on the regulatory agency in stone, it does require the FCC to make a public commitment that is difficult to reverse.
This is an important moment in the fight for the open Internet. President Obama has chosen to stand with the us: the users, the innovators, the creators who depend on an open internet. But the fight isn't over yet: we still need to persuade the FCC to join him. Stay tuned for ways you can help.