SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Freedom Industries, a Small Price to Pay for Poisoning West Virginia Water
Last week, Freedom Industries -- the now bankrupt company that was responsible for a chemical spill that tainted the drinking water of hundreds of thousands of West Virginians -- learned that there will be a small price to pay for its negligence.
Kevin Conlon reports for CNN:
Jul 22, 2014
Last week, Freedom Industries -- the now bankrupt company that was responsible for a chemical spill that tainted the drinking water of hundreds of thousands of West Virginians -- learned that there will be a small price to pay for its negligence.
Kevin Conlon reports for CNN:
A settlement was reached Friday with the company at the center of a January chemical leak that contaminated the water supply for 300,000 West Virginians, according to an attorney for the plaintiffs.
Freedom Industries Inc. would transfer $2.9 million into a trust fund that will be used "for the greater good," according to Anthony Majestro, one of the attorneys in the class-action lawsuit.
"Things like chemical testing and medical studies," said Majestro, who called the trust fund "a mechanism to answer some of the things that are still unanswered."
That works out to roughly $10 per person affected by the spill of the coal-processing chemical MCHM, or around $1.00 for each day they went without water.
According to Ken Ward, Jr., of the Charleston Gazette, " documents made public so far indicate that one condition to the settlement is that Freedom's remaining environmental remediation payments, excluding costs for legal help and consultants from the firm Arcadis, do not exceed $850,000."
The proposed settlement would resolve claims for all individuals and businesses in the area affected by the leak between January 9 and 19. According to Ward, it would not settle suits "against individuals related to Freedom Industries, such as cases that name former company officials as defendants, and it also would not resolve leak-related lawsuits filed against West Virginia American Water or against MCHM-manufacturer Eastman Chemical."
Earlier this month, The Gazette reported that the federal government has so far levied a total of $11,000 in fines stemming from the incident -- "$7,000 for keeping storage tanks containing crude MCHM behind a diked wall that was not liquid tight," and "$4,000 for failing to have standard railings on an elevated platform."
Last week, the poorly maintained tanks that leaked the chemicals were destroyed in what Freedom's Chief Restructuring Officer, Mark Welch, called a "visible end" to the company.
The good news, as Dana Kuhnline reported in March, is that the spill unleashed a torrent of grassroots organizing in a state where many tend to be hostile toward activism against the chemical industry.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 License.
Joshua Holland
Joshua Holland is a contributor to The Nation and a writing fellow with The Nation Institute. He's also the host of Politics and Reality Radio.
Last week, Freedom Industries -- the now bankrupt company that was responsible for a chemical spill that tainted the drinking water of hundreds of thousands of West Virginians -- learned that there will be a small price to pay for its negligence.
Kevin Conlon reports for CNN:
A settlement was reached Friday with the company at the center of a January chemical leak that contaminated the water supply for 300,000 West Virginians, according to an attorney for the plaintiffs.
Freedom Industries Inc. would transfer $2.9 million into a trust fund that will be used "for the greater good," according to Anthony Majestro, one of the attorneys in the class-action lawsuit.
"Things like chemical testing and medical studies," said Majestro, who called the trust fund "a mechanism to answer some of the things that are still unanswered."
That works out to roughly $10 per person affected by the spill of the coal-processing chemical MCHM, or around $1.00 for each day they went without water.
According to Ken Ward, Jr., of the Charleston Gazette, " documents made public so far indicate that one condition to the settlement is that Freedom's remaining environmental remediation payments, excluding costs for legal help and consultants from the firm Arcadis, do not exceed $850,000."
The proposed settlement would resolve claims for all individuals and businesses in the area affected by the leak between January 9 and 19. According to Ward, it would not settle suits "against individuals related to Freedom Industries, such as cases that name former company officials as defendants, and it also would not resolve leak-related lawsuits filed against West Virginia American Water or against MCHM-manufacturer Eastman Chemical."
Earlier this month, The Gazette reported that the federal government has so far levied a total of $11,000 in fines stemming from the incident -- "$7,000 for keeping storage tanks containing crude MCHM behind a diked wall that was not liquid tight," and "$4,000 for failing to have standard railings on an elevated platform."
Last week, the poorly maintained tanks that leaked the chemicals were destroyed in what Freedom's Chief Restructuring Officer, Mark Welch, called a "visible end" to the company.
The good news, as Dana Kuhnline reported in March, is that the spill unleashed a torrent of grassroots organizing in a state where many tend to be hostile toward activism against the chemical industry.
Joshua Holland
Joshua Holland is a contributor to The Nation and a writing fellow with The Nation Institute. He's also the host of Politics and Reality Radio.
Last week, Freedom Industries -- the now bankrupt company that was responsible for a chemical spill that tainted the drinking water of hundreds of thousands of West Virginians -- learned that there will be a small price to pay for its negligence.
Kevin Conlon reports for CNN:
A settlement was reached Friday with the company at the center of a January chemical leak that contaminated the water supply for 300,000 West Virginians, according to an attorney for the plaintiffs.
Freedom Industries Inc. would transfer $2.9 million into a trust fund that will be used "for the greater good," according to Anthony Majestro, one of the attorneys in the class-action lawsuit.
"Things like chemical testing and medical studies," said Majestro, who called the trust fund "a mechanism to answer some of the things that are still unanswered."
That works out to roughly $10 per person affected by the spill of the coal-processing chemical MCHM, or around $1.00 for each day they went without water.
According to Ken Ward, Jr., of the Charleston Gazette, " documents made public so far indicate that one condition to the settlement is that Freedom's remaining environmental remediation payments, excluding costs for legal help and consultants from the firm Arcadis, do not exceed $850,000."
The proposed settlement would resolve claims for all individuals and businesses in the area affected by the leak between January 9 and 19. According to Ward, it would not settle suits "against individuals related to Freedom Industries, such as cases that name former company officials as defendants, and it also would not resolve leak-related lawsuits filed against West Virginia American Water or against MCHM-manufacturer Eastman Chemical."
Earlier this month, The Gazette reported that the federal government has so far levied a total of $11,000 in fines stemming from the incident -- "$7,000 for keeping storage tanks containing crude MCHM behind a diked wall that was not liquid tight," and "$4,000 for failing to have standard railings on an elevated platform."
Last week, the poorly maintained tanks that leaked the chemicals were destroyed in what Freedom's Chief Restructuring Officer, Mark Welch, called a "visible end" to the company.
The good news, as Dana Kuhnline reported in March, is that the spill unleashed a torrent of grassroots organizing in a state where many tend to be hostile toward activism against the chemical industry.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.