Obama's Chained-CPI Social Security Cut is Smart Politics... For the GOP

The most misread -- perhaps the proper word is "miscovered" -- story of the current budget wrangling in Washington is that of Republican Congressman Greg Walden's savage condemnation of President Obama's proposal of the "Chained-CPI" Social Security cut.

The most misread -- perhaps the proper word is "miscovered" -- story of the current budget wrangling in Washington is that of Republican Congressman Greg Walden's savage condemnation of President Obama's proposal of the "Chained-CPI" Social Security cut.

"When you're going after seniors the way he's already done on Obamacare, taken $700 billion out of Medicare to put into Obamacare and now coming back at seniors again," declared the congressman from Oregon, "I think you're crossing that line very quickly here in terms of denying access to seniors for health care in districts like mine certainly and around the country."

That stirred a fair measure of criticism from the regular readers of talking points distributed by the "Fix the Debt" coalition of Wall Street billionaires who want to cut benefits for the vulnerable in able to fund tax cuts for, um, Wall Street billionaires. MSNBC's "Morning Joe" Scarborough ripped Walden: "(He) attacked the president from the left. He was harsher than I think Bernie Sanders was. He was harder on the president than I've seen Robert Reich be."

True believers in the austerity fantasy were upset that a Republican was objecting to balancing the budget on the backs of seniors, orphans and people with disabilities. The Club for Growth complained that "the last thing Republicans should attack the Democrats for is for making the most minor reforms to our entitlement programs." Conservative columnist Jennifer Rubin proposed that Republicans "muzzle" Walden. Scarborough, a former Republican congressman who knows Walden, was so upset about anti-cuts talk coming from his side of the aisle that he declared that "for Republicans to do this is beyond shameless."

So the headlines announced that Republicans were squabbling. As if that is news.

The real news, the story that is not getting the attention it should from Sunday talk-show pundits and Sunday talk-show politicians, is the story of why Walden is saying what he is saying. And why the austerity caucus is so upset.

If Walden was merely a Republican backbencher representing a retirement community, or if he was a freshman congressman from a swing district, his remarks would be dismissed as a predictable exercise in political self-service.

But Walden is no newcomer to the House, or to high-stakes political campaigning.

He's one of the savviest political players in Congress. A veteran state legislator who managed congressional campaigns before his own election to the House in 1999, he "gets" how to win elections in competitive regions and states. And his fellow Republicans recognize this reality: He chaired the House Republican Leadership through 2010 and, when Republicans retook the chamber that year, he chaired the House Majority Transition Committee.

Walden is now the head of the National Republican Campaign Committee, meaning that he is responsible for making sure that Republicans hold their House majority in 2014. That explains why Walden is ripping the president's decision to go with "Chained-CPI." And it explains why austerity opponents are ripping Walden - they fear any tears in the fabric of fantasy that suggests only a cuts agenda (as opposed to a growth agenda) can balance budget.

Walden is not reading from the "Fix the Debt" playbook.

He is interested in winning elections.

And he knows that a Democratic president talking about Social Security cuts is a winning issue for Republicans.

A cynical winning issue, to be sure. But a winning one all the same.

Indeed, even as top Republicans went through the motions of criticizing Walden, one of his closest aides pointed to polling that shows overwhelming opposition to Social Security cuts and explained with regard to the congressman: "His job is to hold the House."

Translation: Opposing the president's "Chained-CPI" proposal is smart politics.

Here's why?

Even if it is cynical for the party of Paul Ryan to object to assaults on Social Security and Medicare by a Democratic president, the cynicism works. Pointing out - loudly - that a Democratic president and his allies are abandoning historic Democratic commitment does not turn Democratic voters into Republican voters, it turns Democrats and Democrat-leaning independents into non-voters.

This has long been the essential element to Republican success in mid-term elections.

A key to the Republican breakthrough of 1994 was the fact that former President Bill Clinton had advocated for and eventually signed the North American Free Trade Agreement. The scheme, while enormously popular with Wall Street speculators and newspaper editorial writers, was feared and despised by union members. Those voters stood down in congressional districts across the country. Turnout was abysmal, dozens of Democratic House members lost, and Newt Gingrich became the Speaker of the House.

Never mind that Clinton had secured passage of NAFTA with the help of Gingrich and the Republicans, frustration among union voters who had enthusiastically backed Democrats in 1992, gave the advantage to the GOP in 1994.

Similarly, in 2010, many of the prime talking point for Republicans as they displaced Democrats in congressional districts across the country were taken from the traditional Democratic playbook: Obama had not done enough to create jobs, it was said, and Obama's health reforms "took" $700 billion from Medicare. Turnout tanked among likely Democratic voters.

Never mind that the obstruction of job creation came from the Republicans, and never mind that Medicare efficiencies associated with the Affordable Care Act project were embraced by Republicans like Ryan embraced in their budget plans. The disappointment among Democrats created an "enthusiasm gap" that favored the Republicans.

Greg Walden, who was a prominent Oregon legislator and potential gubernatorial candidate in 1994, and who was an essential player in the House Republican leadership in 2010, knows the history.

That's why Walden is saying what he is saying.

Anyone who is interested in the politics of 2014 knows that Greg Walden is not pontificating about policy. He is laying political traps that will spring on the Democrats if they put their party on the side of "Chained-CPI" and the austerity agenda.

Join Us: News for people demanding a better world


Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.

We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference.

Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!

© 2023 The Nation