The Dangers of Obama's Cyber War Power Grab
When our founders were drafting the Constitution, they went out of their way to give warmaking powers to Congress, not the President.
They understood that if the President could make war on his own, he'd be no different than a king.
And they also understood, as James Madison said, that such power "would be too much temptation" for one man.
And so they vested that power in Congress.
When our founders were drafting the Constitution, they went out of their way to give

They understood that if the President could make war on his own, he'd be no different than a king.
And they also understood, as James Madison said, that such power "would be too much temptation" for one man.
And so they vested that power in Congress.
But since World War II, one President after another has usurped that power.
The latest usurper is President Obama, who did so in Libya, and with drones, and now is prepared to do so in cyberspace.
According to The New York Times, the Obama Administration has concluded that the President has the authority to launch preemptive cyberattacks.
This is a very dangerous, and very undemocratic power grab.
There are no checks or balances when the President, alone, decides when to engage in an act of war.
And this new aggressive stance will lead to a cyber arms race. The United States has evidently already used cyber weapons against Iran, and so many other countries will assume that cyber warfare is an acceptable tool and will try to use it themselves.
Most troubling, U.S. cybersupremacy--and that is Pentagon doctrine--will also raise fears among nuclear powers like Russia, China, and North Korea that the United States may use a cyberattack as the opening move in a nuclear attack.
For if the United States can knock out the command and control structure of an enemy's nuclear arsenal, it can then launch an all-out nuclear attack on that enemy with impunity. This would make such nuclear powers more ready to launch their nuclear weapons preemptively for fear that they would be rendered useless. So we've just moved a little closer to midnight.
Now, I don't think Obama would use cyberwafare as a first strike in a nuclear war. But our adversaries may not be so sure, either about Obama or his successors.
They, too, worry about the temptations of a President.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
When our founders were drafting the Constitution, they went out of their way to give

They understood that if the President could make war on his own, he'd be no different than a king.
And they also understood, as James Madison said, that such power "would be too much temptation" for one man.
And so they vested that power in Congress.
But since World War II, one President after another has usurped that power.
The latest usurper is President Obama, who did so in Libya, and with drones, and now is prepared to do so in cyberspace.
According to The New York Times, the Obama Administration has concluded that the President has the authority to launch preemptive cyberattacks.
This is a very dangerous, and very undemocratic power grab.
There are no checks or balances when the President, alone, decides when to engage in an act of war.
And this new aggressive stance will lead to a cyber arms race. The United States has evidently already used cyber weapons against Iran, and so many other countries will assume that cyber warfare is an acceptable tool and will try to use it themselves.
Most troubling, U.S. cybersupremacy--and that is Pentagon doctrine--will also raise fears among nuclear powers like Russia, China, and North Korea that the United States may use a cyberattack as the opening move in a nuclear attack.
For if the United States can knock out the command and control structure of an enemy's nuclear arsenal, it can then launch an all-out nuclear attack on that enemy with impunity. This would make such nuclear powers more ready to launch their nuclear weapons preemptively for fear that they would be rendered useless. So we've just moved a little closer to midnight.
Now, I don't think Obama would use cyberwafare as a first strike in a nuclear war. But our adversaries may not be so sure, either about Obama or his successors.
They, too, worry about the temptations of a President.
When our founders were drafting the Constitution, they went out of their way to give

They understood that if the President could make war on his own, he'd be no different than a king.
And they also understood, as James Madison said, that such power "would be too much temptation" for one man.
And so they vested that power in Congress.
But since World War II, one President after another has usurped that power.
The latest usurper is President Obama, who did so in Libya, and with drones, and now is prepared to do so in cyberspace.
According to The New York Times, the Obama Administration has concluded that the President has the authority to launch preemptive cyberattacks.
This is a very dangerous, and very undemocratic power grab.
There are no checks or balances when the President, alone, decides when to engage in an act of war.
And this new aggressive stance will lead to a cyber arms race. The United States has evidently already used cyber weapons against Iran, and so many other countries will assume that cyber warfare is an acceptable tool and will try to use it themselves.
Most troubling, U.S. cybersupremacy--and that is Pentagon doctrine--will also raise fears among nuclear powers like Russia, China, and North Korea that the United States may use a cyberattack as the opening move in a nuclear attack.
For if the United States can knock out the command and control structure of an enemy's nuclear arsenal, it can then launch an all-out nuclear attack on that enemy with impunity. This would make such nuclear powers more ready to launch their nuclear weapons preemptively for fear that they would be rendered useless. So we've just moved a little closer to midnight.
Now, I don't think Obama would use cyberwafare as a first strike in a nuclear war. But our adversaries may not be so sure, either about Obama or his successors.
They, too, worry about the temptations of a President.

