SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Scholastic, the nation's largest purveyor of school-based book clubs and book fairs, bills itself as the "most trusted name in learning."
But lately the company has come under fire for its "InSchool Marketing" division -- a program that cashes-in on this trusted name by allowing corporations to create teaching materials designed to further "client interests," and create "brand awareness" and "consumer loyalty." The program has been used to promote everything in classrooms from ice cream to television programming to sugary beverages to the world's dirtiest form of energy.
Esteemed opinion-makers including the New York Times and Los Angeles Times editorial boards recently slammed Scholastic for selling out, spurred by the company's now-defunct partnership with The American Coal Foundation.
But the most succinct statement of outrage comes, of course, from the Twitterverse.
Last week, @Scholastic4Sale -- with its proclaimed mission to help "underserved corporations reach children's classrooms" -- began a satiric skewering of Scholastic with series of mashups of classic Scholastic book covers combined with real InSchool Marketing partners (see slideshow here).
Titles included Harry Potter and the Chamber of Commerce, The Polar Express, Powered by The American Coal Foundation, and Green Eggs and SunnyD. As one account follower put it: "Sometimes a joke is worth a thousand-word editorial."
The mashups and account are the brainchild of a supporter of our campaign. On Thursday, Twitter suspended her account after someone (I wonder who?!) complained that it violated the site's trademark policy, which states that a company or business name cannot be used "in a manner that may mislead or confuse others." She later added a disclaimer, and now the account is back up and running.
So if the trademark police are watching, let me be clear that the images you're about to see are parodies. Unfortunately, however, Scholastic's InSchool Marketing division is no joke.
After a PR nightmare in May around The American Coal Foundation partnership, Scholastic vowed to review its policies and procedures on all sponsored classroom materials. More than 50,000 people have now signed the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood's petition on Change.org urging the publisher to shelve the InSchool Marketing program entirely.
Check out the slideshow of @Scholastic4Sale's handiwork, and then tell Scholastic to stop using its privileged position to serve as Trojan horse for inappropriate marketing.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Scholastic, the nation's largest purveyor of school-based book clubs and book fairs, bills itself as the "most trusted name in learning."
But lately the company has come under fire for its "InSchool Marketing" division -- a program that cashes-in on this trusted name by allowing corporations to create teaching materials designed to further "client interests," and create "brand awareness" and "consumer loyalty." The program has been used to promote everything in classrooms from ice cream to television programming to sugary beverages to the world's dirtiest form of energy.
Esteemed opinion-makers including the New York Times and Los Angeles Times editorial boards recently slammed Scholastic for selling out, spurred by the company's now-defunct partnership with The American Coal Foundation.
But the most succinct statement of outrage comes, of course, from the Twitterverse.
Last week, @Scholastic4Sale -- with its proclaimed mission to help "underserved corporations reach children's classrooms" -- began a satiric skewering of Scholastic with series of mashups of classic Scholastic book covers combined with real InSchool Marketing partners (see slideshow here).
Titles included Harry Potter and the Chamber of Commerce, The Polar Express, Powered by The American Coal Foundation, and Green Eggs and SunnyD. As one account follower put it: "Sometimes a joke is worth a thousand-word editorial."
The mashups and account are the brainchild of a supporter of our campaign. On Thursday, Twitter suspended her account after someone (I wonder who?!) complained that it violated the site's trademark policy, which states that a company or business name cannot be used "in a manner that may mislead or confuse others." She later added a disclaimer, and now the account is back up and running.
So if the trademark police are watching, let me be clear that the images you're about to see are parodies. Unfortunately, however, Scholastic's InSchool Marketing division is no joke.
After a PR nightmare in May around The American Coal Foundation partnership, Scholastic vowed to review its policies and procedures on all sponsored classroom materials. More than 50,000 people have now signed the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood's petition on Change.org urging the publisher to shelve the InSchool Marketing program entirely.
Check out the slideshow of @Scholastic4Sale's handiwork, and then tell Scholastic to stop using its privileged position to serve as Trojan horse for inappropriate marketing.
Scholastic, the nation's largest purveyor of school-based book clubs and book fairs, bills itself as the "most trusted name in learning."
But lately the company has come under fire for its "InSchool Marketing" division -- a program that cashes-in on this trusted name by allowing corporations to create teaching materials designed to further "client interests," and create "brand awareness" and "consumer loyalty." The program has been used to promote everything in classrooms from ice cream to television programming to sugary beverages to the world's dirtiest form of energy.
Esteemed opinion-makers including the New York Times and Los Angeles Times editorial boards recently slammed Scholastic for selling out, spurred by the company's now-defunct partnership with The American Coal Foundation.
But the most succinct statement of outrage comes, of course, from the Twitterverse.
Last week, @Scholastic4Sale -- with its proclaimed mission to help "underserved corporations reach children's classrooms" -- began a satiric skewering of Scholastic with series of mashups of classic Scholastic book covers combined with real InSchool Marketing partners (see slideshow here).
Titles included Harry Potter and the Chamber of Commerce, The Polar Express, Powered by The American Coal Foundation, and Green Eggs and SunnyD. As one account follower put it: "Sometimes a joke is worth a thousand-word editorial."
The mashups and account are the brainchild of a supporter of our campaign. On Thursday, Twitter suspended her account after someone (I wonder who?!) complained that it violated the site's trademark policy, which states that a company or business name cannot be used "in a manner that may mislead or confuse others." She later added a disclaimer, and now the account is back up and running.
So if the trademark police are watching, let me be clear that the images you're about to see are parodies. Unfortunately, however, Scholastic's InSchool Marketing division is no joke.
After a PR nightmare in May around The American Coal Foundation partnership, Scholastic vowed to review its policies and procedures on all sponsored classroom materials. More than 50,000 people have now signed the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood's petition on Change.org urging the publisher to shelve the InSchool Marketing program entirely.
Check out the slideshow of @Scholastic4Sale's handiwork, and then tell Scholastic to stop using its privileged position to serve as Trojan horse for inappropriate marketing.