Entergy Goes Nuclear over Vermont's Decision
The nuclear power boys are weaseling again, this time in Vermont.
Entergy Corporation, an electric utility giant based in New Orleans, owns the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant, which is nearing the end of its 40-year license to operate.
The nuclear power boys are weaseling again, this time in Vermont.

Entergy Corporation, an electric utility giant based in New Orleans, owns the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant, which is nearing the end of its 40-year license to operate.
No problem, here's a 20-year extension of your license, said the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission (a notorious industry lapdog). But, wait, said Vermont officials. Entergy signed an agreement with us to seek state approval for continuing to operate the 40-year old reactor--and our legislature has decided, in a word, "no."
So the corporation has gone running to federal court to weasel out of its state agreement, arguing that federal authority takes precedent over local on nuclear matters. Entergy insists that decisions made by Vermont's legislature are "political," whereas the NRC decision to extend the license is made by "experts." Besides, says an Entergy executive, Vermont Yankee has gotten good safety and performance ratings from an industry group. So trust us, says Entergy.
An industry group? Isn't that like saying your mother thinks you're doing a good job? Curiously, Entergy refuses to release the industry report. Trust us, it says again.
Uh, no. The Vermont Yankee nuke plant is the same vintage and make as the crippled reactors at Japan's Fukushima Dai-Ichi power station, and it has recently had embarrassing operational issues. For example, corporate officials testified to legislators in 2009 that radioactive tritium couldn't leak into soil and water because the facility had no buried pipes. Trust us, they reiterated. But only a few months later, a tritium leak from an underground pipe was discovered.
Trust us? Not on your life, much less our lives. That's why decisions on nuclear power must be political. The people -- not "experts" -- must rule.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The nuclear power boys are weaseling again, this time in Vermont.

Entergy Corporation, an electric utility giant based in New Orleans, owns the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant, which is nearing the end of its 40-year license to operate.
No problem, here's a 20-year extension of your license, said the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission (a notorious industry lapdog). But, wait, said Vermont officials. Entergy signed an agreement with us to seek state approval for continuing to operate the 40-year old reactor--and our legislature has decided, in a word, "no."
So the corporation has gone running to federal court to weasel out of its state agreement, arguing that federal authority takes precedent over local on nuclear matters. Entergy insists that decisions made by Vermont's legislature are "political," whereas the NRC decision to extend the license is made by "experts." Besides, says an Entergy executive, Vermont Yankee has gotten good safety and performance ratings from an industry group. So trust us, says Entergy.
An industry group? Isn't that like saying your mother thinks you're doing a good job? Curiously, Entergy refuses to release the industry report. Trust us, it says again.
Uh, no. The Vermont Yankee nuke plant is the same vintage and make as the crippled reactors at Japan's Fukushima Dai-Ichi power station, and it has recently had embarrassing operational issues. For example, corporate officials testified to legislators in 2009 that radioactive tritium couldn't leak into soil and water because the facility had no buried pipes. Trust us, they reiterated. But only a few months later, a tritium leak from an underground pipe was discovered.
Trust us? Not on your life, much less our lives. That's why decisions on nuclear power must be political. The people -- not "experts" -- must rule.
The nuclear power boys are weaseling again, this time in Vermont.

Entergy Corporation, an electric utility giant based in New Orleans, owns the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant, which is nearing the end of its 40-year license to operate.
No problem, here's a 20-year extension of your license, said the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission (a notorious industry lapdog). But, wait, said Vermont officials. Entergy signed an agreement with us to seek state approval for continuing to operate the 40-year old reactor--and our legislature has decided, in a word, "no."
So the corporation has gone running to federal court to weasel out of its state agreement, arguing that federal authority takes precedent over local on nuclear matters. Entergy insists that decisions made by Vermont's legislature are "political," whereas the NRC decision to extend the license is made by "experts." Besides, says an Entergy executive, Vermont Yankee has gotten good safety and performance ratings from an industry group. So trust us, says Entergy.
An industry group? Isn't that like saying your mother thinks you're doing a good job? Curiously, Entergy refuses to release the industry report. Trust us, it says again.
Uh, no. The Vermont Yankee nuke plant is the same vintage and make as the crippled reactors at Japan's Fukushima Dai-Ichi power station, and it has recently had embarrassing operational issues. For example, corporate officials testified to legislators in 2009 that radioactive tritium couldn't leak into soil and water because the facility had no buried pipes. Trust us, they reiterated. But only a few months later, a tritium leak from an underground pipe was discovered.
Trust us? Not on your life, much less our lives. That's why decisions on nuclear power must be political. The people -- not "experts" -- must rule.

