Jan 03, 2011
My greatness as a writer is simply a fact.
You don't agree? Well, then obviously you are churlish or malevolent.
If
I were serious about such a claim of superiority, now would be the time
to stop reading -- on the reasonable assumption that I'm a dull-witted
bore with no capacity for critical self-reflection. What applies to
individual declarations is also true of nations, yet in the United
States such statements about our greatness are common.
Rich Lowry of the National Review
closed out 2010 with a particularly bombastic piece reasserting U.S.
greatness. Though Lowry is a conservative, his argument is conventional:
The United States has brought prosperity to the world, protecting all
that is decent against evil. Yes, we've had to muscle others out of the
way on occasion, but that was necessary to bring order and liberty. Yes,
we've made some mistakes along the way, but those are all safely in the
past and, besides, they have to be understood in context.
His
conclusion: "Our greatness is simply a fact. Only the churlish or
malevolent can deny it, or even get irked at its assertion." ("Yes, the
Greatest Country Ever".)
This
expression of American exceptionalism is unexceptional in U.S.
political history, but it roared back stronger than ever in 2010,
especially in the rhetoric of the Tea Party movement. As it becomes
harder to ignore the United States' decline as an economic power --
which will limit the capacity for imperial marauding around the world --
the inclination of most mainstream politicians to assert our greatness
will intensify.
Those
of us with radical or progressive politics need to challenge these
kinds of slogans when we talk with friends, family, and co-workers. In
my 2004 book Citizens of the Empire: The Struggle to Claim Our Humanity,
I offered common-sense responses in plain language, and as we get ready
for a more right-wing Congress and the political discussions that lie
ahead, I thought it would be helpful to revisit some of those points.
With
the permission of publisher City Lights Books, I have posted online two
chapters from that book -- one that deconstructs "the greatest nation"
rhetoric and another that challenges the concept of patriotism.
It
is neither churlish nor malevolent to want to honestly assess the
accomplishments and failures of one's country. Rather, it is the
obligation of every citizen.
Robert Jensen
Robert Jensen, is professor emeritus in the School of Journalism and Media at the University of Texas at Austin. He is the author of many books including The Restless and Relentless Mind of Wes Jackson: Searching for Sustainability and Plain Radical: Living, Loving, and Learning to Leave the Planet Gracefully. He is the co-author, with Wes Jackson, of An Inconvenient Apocalypse: Environmental Collapse, Climate Crisis, and the Fate of Humanity, which will be published by the University of Notre Dame Press in fall 2022.
My greatness as a writer is simply a fact.
You don't agree? Well, then obviously you are churlish or malevolent.
If
I were serious about such a claim of superiority, now would be the time
to stop reading -- on the reasonable assumption that I'm a dull-witted
bore with no capacity for critical self-reflection. What applies to
individual declarations is also true of nations, yet in the United
States such statements about our greatness are common.
Rich Lowry of the National Review
closed out 2010 with a particularly bombastic piece reasserting U.S.
greatness. Though Lowry is a conservative, his argument is conventional:
The United States has brought prosperity to the world, protecting all
that is decent against evil. Yes, we've had to muscle others out of the
way on occasion, but that was necessary to bring order and liberty. Yes,
we've made some mistakes along the way, but those are all safely in the
past and, besides, they have to be understood in context.
His
conclusion: "Our greatness is simply a fact. Only the churlish or
malevolent can deny it, or even get irked at its assertion." ("Yes, the
Greatest Country Ever".)
This
expression of American exceptionalism is unexceptional in U.S.
political history, but it roared back stronger than ever in 2010,
especially in the rhetoric of the Tea Party movement. As it becomes
harder to ignore the United States' decline as an economic power --
which will limit the capacity for imperial marauding around the world --
the inclination of most mainstream politicians to assert our greatness
will intensify.
Those
of us with radical or progressive politics need to challenge these
kinds of slogans when we talk with friends, family, and co-workers. In
my 2004 book Citizens of the Empire: The Struggle to Claim Our Humanity,
I offered common-sense responses in plain language, and as we get ready
for a more right-wing Congress and the political discussions that lie
ahead, I thought it would be helpful to revisit some of those points.
With
the permission of publisher City Lights Books, I have posted online two
chapters from that book -- one that deconstructs "the greatest nation"
rhetoric and another that challenges the concept of patriotism.
It
is neither churlish nor malevolent to want to honestly assess the
accomplishments and failures of one's country. Rather, it is the
obligation of every citizen.
Robert Jensen
Robert Jensen, is professor emeritus in the School of Journalism and Media at the University of Texas at Austin. He is the author of many books including The Restless and Relentless Mind of Wes Jackson: Searching for Sustainability and Plain Radical: Living, Loving, and Learning to Leave the Planet Gracefully. He is the co-author, with Wes Jackson, of An Inconvenient Apocalypse: Environmental Collapse, Climate Crisis, and the Fate of Humanity, which will be published by the University of Notre Dame Press in fall 2022.
My greatness as a writer is simply a fact.
You don't agree? Well, then obviously you are churlish or malevolent.
If
I were serious about such a claim of superiority, now would be the time
to stop reading -- on the reasonable assumption that I'm a dull-witted
bore with no capacity for critical self-reflection. What applies to
individual declarations is also true of nations, yet in the United
States such statements about our greatness are common.
Rich Lowry of the National Review
closed out 2010 with a particularly bombastic piece reasserting U.S.
greatness. Though Lowry is a conservative, his argument is conventional:
The United States has brought prosperity to the world, protecting all
that is decent against evil. Yes, we've had to muscle others out of the
way on occasion, but that was necessary to bring order and liberty. Yes,
we've made some mistakes along the way, but those are all safely in the
past and, besides, they have to be understood in context.
His
conclusion: "Our greatness is simply a fact. Only the churlish or
malevolent can deny it, or even get irked at its assertion." ("Yes, the
Greatest Country Ever".)
This
expression of American exceptionalism is unexceptional in U.S.
political history, but it roared back stronger than ever in 2010,
especially in the rhetoric of the Tea Party movement. As it becomes
harder to ignore the United States' decline as an economic power --
which will limit the capacity for imperial marauding around the world --
the inclination of most mainstream politicians to assert our greatness
will intensify.
Those
of us with radical or progressive politics need to challenge these
kinds of slogans when we talk with friends, family, and co-workers. In
my 2004 book Citizens of the Empire: The Struggle to Claim Our Humanity,
I offered common-sense responses in plain language, and as we get ready
for a more right-wing Congress and the political discussions that lie
ahead, I thought it would be helpful to revisit some of those points.
With
the permission of publisher City Lights Books, I have posted online two
chapters from that book -- one that deconstructs "the greatest nation"
rhetoric and another that challenges the concept of patriotism.
It
is neither churlish nor malevolent to want to honestly assess the
accomplishments and failures of one's country. Rather, it is the
obligation of every citizen.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.