

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Ten minutes was the absolute maximum I could endure of any one
television news outlet last night without having to switch channels in
the futile search for something more bearable, but almost every time I
had MNSBC on, there was Lawrence O'Donnell trying to blame "the Left"
and "liberalism" for the Democrats' political woes. Alan Grayson's loss
was proof that outspoken liberalism fails. Blanche Lincoln's loss was
the fault of the Left for mounting a serious primary challenge against
her.
Ten minutes was the absolute maximum I could endure of any one
television news outlet last night without having to switch channels in
the futile search for something more bearable, but almost every time I
had MNSBC on, there was Lawrence O'Donnell trying to blame "the Left"
and "liberalism" for the Democrats' political woes. Alan Grayson's loss
was proof that outspoken liberalism fails. Blanche Lincoln's loss was
the fault of the Left for mounting a serious primary challenge against
her. Russ Feingold's defeat proved that voters reject liberalism in
favor of conservatism, etc. etc. It sounded as though he was reading
from some crusty script jointly prepared in 1995 by The New Republic, Lanny Davis and the DLC.
There are so many obvious reasons why this "analysis" is false:
Grayson represents a highly conservative district that hadn't been
Democratic for decades before he won in 2008 and he made serious
mistakes during the campaign; Lincoln was behind the GOP challenger by more than 20 points back in January,
before Bill Halter even announced his candidacy; Feingold was far from a
conventional liberal, having repeatedly opposed his own party on
multiple issues, and he ran in a state saddled with a Democratic
governor who was unpopular in the extreme. Beyond that, numerous
liberals who were alleged to be in serious electoral trouble kept their
seats: Barney Frank, John Dingell, Rush Holt, Raul Grijalva, and many
others. But there's one glaring, steadfastly ignored fact destroying
O'Donnell's attempt -- which is merely the standard pundit storyline
that has been baking for months and will now be served en masse -- to blame The Left and declare liberalism dead. It's this little inconvenient fact: Blue Dog Coalition Crushed By GOP Wave Election.
Read this entire article at Salon.com
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Ten minutes was the absolute maximum I could endure of any one
television news outlet last night without having to switch channels in
the futile search for something more bearable, but almost every time I
had MNSBC on, there was Lawrence O'Donnell trying to blame "the Left"
and "liberalism" for the Democrats' political woes. Alan Grayson's loss
was proof that outspoken liberalism fails. Blanche Lincoln's loss was
the fault of the Left for mounting a serious primary challenge against
her. Russ Feingold's defeat proved that voters reject liberalism in
favor of conservatism, etc. etc. It sounded as though he was reading
from some crusty script jointly prepared in 1995 by The New Republic, Lanny Davis and the DLC.
There are so many obvious reasons why this "analysis" is false:
Grayson represents a highly conservative district that hadn't been
Democratic for decades before he won in 2008 and he made serious
mistakes during the campaign; Lincoln was behind the GOP challenger by more than 20 points back in January,
before Bill Halter even announced his candidacy; Feingold was far from a
conventional liberal, having repeatedly opposed his own party on
multiple issues, and he ran in a state saddled with a Democratic
governor who was unpopular in the extreme. Beyond that, numerous
liberals who were alleged to be in serious electoral trouble kept their
seats: Barney Frank, John Dingell, Rush Holt, Raul Grijalva, and many
others. But there's one glaring, steadfastly ignored fact destroying
O'Donnell's attempt -- which is merely the standard pundit storyline
that has been baking for months and will now be served en masse -- to blame The Left and declare liberalism dead. It's this little inconvenient fact: Blue Dog Coalition Crushed By GOP Wave Election.
Read this entire article at Salon.com
Ten minutes was the absolute maximum I could endure of any one
television news outlet last night without having to switch channels in
the futile search for something more bearable, but almost every time I
had MNSBC on, there was Lawrence O'Donnell trying to blame "the Left"
and "liberalism" for the Democrats' political woes. Alan Grayson's loss
was proof that outspoken liberalism fails. Blanche Lincoln's loss was
the fault of the Left for mounting a serious primary challenge against
her. Russ Feingold's defeat proved that voters reject liberalism in
favor of conservatism, etc. etc. It sounded as though he was reading
from some crusty script jointly prepared in 1995 by The New Republic, Lanny Davis and the DLC.
There are so many obvious reasons why this "analysis" is false:
Grayson represents a highly conservative district that hadn't been
Democratic for decades before he won in 2008 and he made serious
mistakes during the campaign; Lincoln was behind the GOP challenger by more than 20 points back in January,
before Bill Halter even announced his candidacy; Feingold was far from a
conventional liberal, having repeatedly opposed his own party on
multiple issues, and he ran in a state saddled with a Democratic
governor who was unpopular in the extreme. Beyond that, numerous
liberals who were alleged to be in serious electoral trouble kept their
seats: Barney Frank, John Dingell, Rush Holt, Raul Grijalva, and many
others. But there's one glaring, steadfastly ignored fact destroying
O'Donnell's attempt -- which is merely the standard pundit storyline
that has been baking for months and will now be served en masse -- to blame The Left and declare liberalism dead. It's this little inconvenient fact: Blue Dog Coalition Crushed By GOP Wave Election.
Read this entire article at Salon.com