

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
I knew Christine O'Donnell as an ideologue of uptightness -- with a
fervent position on every issue under the sun. I saw her up close
when we debated during one of her several Phil Donahue show
appearances in 2002-03 on MSNBC, where I worked as an on-air
contributor and Donahue senior producer.
I knew Christine O'Donnell as an ideologue of uptightness -- with a
fervent position on every issue under the sun. I saw her up close
when we debated during one of her several Phil Donahue show
appearances in 2002-03 on MSNBC, where I worked as an on-air
contributor and Donahue senior producer.
Like Sarah Palin, O'Donnell has that dangerous mix of arrogance and
ignorance. Years before there was a Tea Party to put her in orbit,
O'Donnell was already adept at blending paranoia about Democrats
with blind faith in religious and market fundamentalism.
But even in the dark days of Bushmania eight years ago, I could not
have foreseen this foe of masturbation
and friend of for-profit healthcare as a serious U.S. senate
contender.
During a Donahue discussion on the rumor that Bill Clinton might
host a syndicated daytime TV talkshow, O'Donnell's opposition went
beyond her complaint that it's "so undignified":
O'DONNELL: One reason I care is because it's also a threat to our
national security.
DONAHUE: How's that?
O'DONNELL: You mentioned what is he going to do when the ratings
start to fall? Well, he's got access to classified information
that Anna Nicole Smith [then hosting a TV show] does not . . . So do
you really think the networks are going to sacrifice ratings for the
sake of not revealing information that he has?
After acknowledging that she "would certainly be a guest" on a
Clinton talkshow, O'Donnell repeated her fear about "this classified
data that he will have access to and that he will bring to the
discussion." It was so embarrassing that a fellow guest critical of
a Clinton show had to chime in: "He's not going to reveal state
secrets on the show!"
In our joint appearance on Donahue in November 2002, a panel
debated big and small news, including the Michael Jackson
baby-dangling incident. "Perhaps one thing they can do is revoke his
passport," she said, suggesting a Big Government approach.
Ironically, given the state of her race today, she expressed hope
that Al Gore would be the 2004 Democratic nominee because he was
somehow unelectable in the general election: "So let him be your
front man, Democratic Party. And you guys will lose for sure."
O'Donnell was a Tea Party candidate way before the party started --
with a faux-populism quick to defend corporate interests. Years
before the battle over Obamacare, she was already steeped in
obstruction and fear of change.
O'DONNELL: And why do we want universal health care?
COHEN: I guess you're not one of the 40 million people that has no
health insurance, are you?
O'DONNELL: Because -- No, actually I don't have health insurance
right now.
COHEN: And you think that's a good thing?
O'DONNELL: I pay out of my own pocket right now.
COHEN: We're the only advanced industrial country that does not have
health care.
O'DONNELL: Let me tell you. I would rather pay out of my own pocket
than have to wait two hours for some shoddy doctor to give me a
misdiagnosis. . . And pay more than half my wages in taxes to cover
this. It's ridiculous.
COHEN: We're the wealthiest country in the world and we've got 40
million people without health insurance. There's no advanced
industrial country that has that.
O'DONNELL: And throwing money into something like is not going to
help.
When she appeared on Donahue shows, O'Donnell represented The
Savior's Alliance for Lifting the Truth (SALT) -- the youth group
opposing pre-marital sex and intra-marital masturbation that she was
apparently still associated with last year.
On one episode, she repeatedly equated nudity with pornography.
On another show, she belittled an obesity suit against McDonald's as
frivolous ("what I want to know is, did the lawyer go to her or did
she go to the lawyer?"), but O'Donnell famously and somewhat
capriciously sued a rightwing nonprofit ex-employer for $6.9
million for wrongful termination.
In normal times, it would be hard to believe that a religious
fundamentalist like Christine O'Donnell could be a triumphant major
party nominee for U.S. senate. With the rise of Palin and Beck above
their hordes of fearful and energized followers, these are clearly
not normal times.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
I knew Christine O'Donnell as an ideologue of uptightness -- with a
fervent position on every issue under the sun. I saw her up close
when we debated during one of her several Phil Donahue show
appearances in 2002-03 on MSNBC, where I worked as an on-air
contributor and Donahue senior producer.
Like Sarah Palin, O'Donnell has that dangerous mix of arrogance and
ignorance. Years before there was a Tea Party to put her in orbit,
O'Donnell was already adept at blending paranoia about Democrats
with blind faith in religious and market fundamentalism.
But even in the dark days of Bushmania eight years ago, I could not
have foreseen this foe of masturbation
and friend of for-profit healthcare as a serious U.S. senate
contender.
During a Donahue discussion on the rumor that Bill Clinton might
host a syndicated daytime TV talkshow, O'Donnell's opposition went
beyond her complaint that it's "so undignified":
O'DONNELL: One reason I care is because it's also a threat to our
national security.
DONAHUE: How's that?
O'DONNELL: You mentioned what is he going to do when the ratings
start to fall? Well, he's got access to classified information
that Anna Nicole Smith [then hosting a TV show] does not . . . So do
you really think the networks are going to sacrifice ratings for the
sake of not revealing information that he has?
After acknowledging that she "would certainly be a guest" on a
Clinton talkshow, O'Donnell repeated her fear about "this classified
data that he will have access to and that he will bring to the
discussion." It was so embarrassing that a fellow guest critical of
a Clinton show had to chime in: "He's not going to reveal state
secrets on the show!"
In our joint appearance on Donahue in November 2002, a panel
debated big and small news, including the Michael Jackson
baby-dangling incident. "Perhaps one thing they can do is revoke his
passport," she said, suggesting a Big Government approach.
Ironically, given the state of her race today, she expressed hope
that Al Gore would be the 2004 Democratic nominee because he was
somehow unelectable in the general election: "So let him be your
front man, Democratic Party. And you guys will lose for sure."
O'Donnell was a Tea Party candidate way before the party started --
with a faux-populism quick to defend corporate interests. Years
before the battle over Obamacare, she was already steeped in
obstruction and fear of change.
O'DONNELL: And why do we want universal health care?
COHEN: I guess you're not one of the 40 million people that has no
health insurance, are you?
O'DONNELL: Because -- No, actually I don't have health insurance
right now.
COHEN: And you think that's a good thing?
O'DONNELL: I pay out of my own pocket right now.
COHEN: We're the only advanced industrial country that does not have
health care.
O'DONNELL: Let me tell you. I would rather pay out of my own pocket
than have to wait two hours for some shoddy doctor to give me a
misdiagnosis. . . And pay more than half my wages in taxes to cover
this. It's ridiculous.
COHEN: We're the wealthiest country in the world and we've got 40
million people without health insurance. There's no advanced
industrial country that has that.
O'DONNELL: And throwing money into something like is not going to
help.
When she appeared on Donahue shows, O'Donnell represented The
Savior's Alliance for Lifting the Truth (SALT) -- the youth group
opposing pre-marital sex and intra-marital masturbation that she was
apparently still associated with last year.
On one episode, she repeatedly equated nudity with pornography.
On another show, she belittled an obesity suit against McDonald's as
frivolous ("what I want to know is, did the lawyer go to her or did
she go to the lawyer?"), but O'Donnell famously and somewhat
capriciously sued a rightwing nonprofit ex-employer for $6.9
million for wrongful termination.
In normal times, it would be hard to believe that a religious
fundamentalist like Christine O'Donnell could be a triumphant major
party nominee for U.S. senate. With the rise of Palin and Beck above
their hordes of fearful and energized followers, these are clearly
not normal times.
I knew Christine O'Donnell as an ideologue of uptightness -- with a
fervent position on every issue under the sun. I saw her up close
when we debated during one of her several Phil Donahue show
appearances in 2002-03 on MSNBC, where I worked as an on-air
contributor and Donahue senior producer.
Like Sarah Palin, O'Donnell has that dangerous mix of arrogance and
ignorance. Years before there was a Tea Party to put her in orbit,
O'Donnell was already adept at blending paranoia about Democrats
with blind faith in religious and market fundamentalism.
But even in the dark days of Bushmania eight years ago, I could not
have foreseen this foe of masturbation
and friend of for-profit healthcare as a serious U.S. senate
contender.
During a Donahue discussion on the rumor that Bill Clinton might
host a syndicated daytime TV talkshow, O'Donnell's opposition went
beyond her complaint that it's "so undignified":
O'DONNELL: One reason I care is because it's also a threat to our
national security.
DONAHUE: How's that?
O'DONNELL: You mentioned what is he going to do when the ratings
start to fall? Well, he's got access to classified information
that Anna Nicole Smith [then hosting a TV show] does not . . . So do
you really think the networks are going to sacrifice ratings for the
sake of not revealing information that he has?
After acknowledging that she "would certainly be a guest" on a
Clinton talkshow, O'Donnell repeated her fear about "this classified
data that he will have access to and that he will bring to the
discussion." It was so embarrassing that a fellow guest critical of
a Clinton show had to chime in: "He's not going to reveal state
secrets on the show!"
In our joint appearance on Donahue in November 2002, a panel
debated big and small news, including the Michael Jackson
baby-dangling incident. "Perhaps one thing they can do is revoke his
passport," she said, suggesting a Big Government approach.
Ironically, given the state of her race today, she expressed hope
that Al Gore would be the 2004 Democratic nominee because he was
somehow unelectable in the general election: "So let him be your
front man, Democratic Party. And you guys will lose for sure."
O'Donnell was a Tea Party candidate way before the party started --
with a faux-populism quick to defend corporate interests. Years
before the battle over Obamacare, she was already steeped in
obstruction and fear of change.
O'DONNELL: And why do we want universal health care?
COHEN: I guess you're not one of the 40 million people that has no
health insurance, are you?
O'DONNELL: Because -- No, actually I don't have health insurance
right now.
COHEN: And you think that's a good thing?
O'DONNELL: I pay out of my own pocket right now.
COHEN: We're the only advanced industrial country that does not have
health care.
O'DONNELL: Let me tell you. I would rather pay out of my own pocket
than have to wait two hours for some shoddy doctor to give me a
misdiagnosis. . . And pay more than half my wages in taxes to cover
this. It's ridiculous.
COHEN: We're the wealthiest country in the world and we've got 40
million people without health insurance. There's no advanced
industrial country that has that.
O'DONNELL: And throwing money into something like is not going to
help.
When she appeared on Donahue shows, O'Donnell represented The
Savior's Alliance for Lifting the Truth (SALT) -- the youth group
opposing pre-marital sex and intra-marital masturbation that she was
apparently still associated with last year.
On one episode, she repeatedly equated nudity with pornography.
On another show, she belittled an obesity suit against McDonald's as
frivolous ("what I want to know is, did the lawyer go to her or did
she go to the lawyer?"), but O'Donnell famously and somewhat
capriciously sued a rightwing nonprofit ex-employer for $6.9
million for wrongful termination.
In normal times, it would be hard to believe that a religious
fundamentalist like Christine O'Donnell could be a triumphant major
party nominee for U.S. senate. With the rise of Palin and Beck above
their hordes of fearful and energized followers, these are clearly
not normal times.