

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Minnesota Congressman Keith
Ellison did a terrific job of explaining Monday why Democrats ought not
fear the sad little debate about whether to allow a moderate
Muslim group to build an Islamic Center near the site of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center.
Minnesota Congressman Keith
Ellison did a terrific job of explaining Monday why Democrats ought not
fear the sad little debate about whether to allow a moderate
Muslim group to build an Islamic Center near the site of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center.
Asked on ABC-TV's "Good Morning America" whether President Obama's
support of a New York group's right to develop the Islamic Center would
hurt Democrats running in this fall's volatile election cycle,
the Minneapolis Democrat who was the first Muslim elected to
Congress answered: "Absolutely not."
"The truth is that we're a party of principle," Ellison continued. "We believe in the idea of religious liberty."
In fact, despite Republiacn harping on the issue, Ellison argued that
Democrats can and should position themselves as the party that respects
the whole Constitution -- including the part about "freedom of
religion."
"There's also a more important principle at work here: And that is that
the transnational terrorists who committed this outrageous act on 9/11,
they are arguing that America is at war with Islam," explained
the Minnesota Democrat, who has at the behest of the Bush and Obama
administrations taken to the international stage to champion the
U.S. commitment of the United States to religious diverity. "The
way to undermine and counteract that false narrative is to stand on our
sacredly held beliefs of religious liberty. That's how we demonstrate
that, no, America is a country ... for everyone where people worship as
they see fit. The problem with stopping this Islamic center is that it
implies that the Muslim world is responsible for it, when it was al
Qaeda that was responsible."
Ellison was offering Democrats exactly the counsel they need.
Unfortunately, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid wasn't listening. The
embattled Nevada Democrat joined right-wing radio hosts, Republicans
flamers and Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman in the chorus of
oppositiuon to construction of the Islamic Center in southern
Manhattan.
"The First Amendment protects freedom of religion," read a statement from Reid's office. "Sen. Reid respects that but thinks that the mosque should be built someplace else."
Ellison's right. His Democratic Party is "a party of principle" -- and a
party that has faith in the American people to reject the spin and
embrace the Constitution.
Unfortunately, Harry Reid is a member of the other Democratic Party -- the one that never quite "gets it.".
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Minnesota Congressman Keith
Ellison did a terrific job of explaining Monday why Democrats ought not
fear the sad little debate about whether to allow a moderate
Muslim group to build an Islamic Center near the site of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center.
Asked on ABC-TV's "Good Morning America" whether President Obama's
support of a New York group's right to develop the Islamic Center would
hurt Democrats running in this fall's volatile election cycle,
the Minneapolis Democrat who was the first Muslim elected to
Congress answered: "Absolutely not."
"The truth is that we're a party of principle," Ellison continued. "We believe in the idea of religious liberty."
In fact, despite Republiacn harping on the issue, Ellison argued that
Democrats can and should position themselves as the party that respects
the whole Constitution -- including the part about "freedom of
religion."
"There's also a more important principle at work here: And that is that
the transnational terrorists who committed this outrageous act on 9/11,
they are arguing that America is at war with Islam," explained
the Minnesota Democrat, who has at the behest of the Bush and Obama
administrations taken to the international stage to champion the
U.S. commitment of the United States to religious diverity. "The
way to undermine and counteract that false narrative is to stand on our
sacredly held beliefs of religious liberty. That's how we demonstrate
that, no, America is a country ... for everyone where people worship as
they see fit. The problem with stopping this Islamic center is that it
implies that the Muslim world is responsible for it, when it was al
Qaeda that was responsible."
Ellison was offering Democrats exactly the counsel they need.
Unfortunately, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid wasn't listening. The
embattled Nevada Democrat joined right-wing radio hosts, Republicans
flamers and Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman in the chorus of
oppositiuon to construction of the Islamic Center in southern
Manhattan.
"The First Amendment protects freedom of religion," read a statement from Reid's office. "Sen. Reid respects that but thinks that the mosque should be built someplace else."
Ellison's right. His Democratic Party is "a party of principle" -- and a
party that has faith in the American people to reject the spin and
embrace the Constitution.
Unfortunately, Harry Reid is a member of the other Democratic Party -- the one that never quite "gets it.".
Minnesota Congressman Keith
Ellison did a terrific job of explaining Monday why Democrats ought not
fear the sad little debate about whether to allow a moderate
Muslim group to build an Islamic Center near the site of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center.
Asked on ABC-TV's "Good Morning America" whether President Obama's
support of a New York group's right to develop the Islamic Center would
hurt Democrats running in this fall's volatile election cycle,
the Minneapolis Democrat who was the first Muslim elected to
Congress answered: "Absolutely not."
"The truth is that we're a party of principle," Ellison continued. "We believe in the idea of religious liberty."
In fact, despite Republiacn harping on the issue, Ellison argued that
Democrats can and should position themselves as the party that respects
the whole Constitution -- including the part about "freedom of
religion."
"There's also a more important principle at work here: And that is that
the transnational terrorists who committed this outrageous act on 9/11,
they are arguing that America is at war with Islam," explained
the Minnesota Democrat, who has at the behest of the Bush and Obama
administrations taken to the international stage to champion the
U.S. commitment of the United States to religious diverity. "The
way to undermine and counteract that false narrative is to stand on our
sacredly held beliefs of religious liberty. That's how we demonstrate
that, no, America is a country ... for everyone where people worship as
they see fit. The problem with stopping this Islamic center is that it
implies that the Muslim world is responsible for it, when it was al
Qaeda that was responsible."
Ellison was offering Democrats exactly the counsel they need.
Unfortunately, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid wasn't listening. The
embattled Nevada Democrat joined right-wing radio hosts, Republicans
flamers and Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman in the chorus of
oppositiuon to construction of the Islamic Center in southern
Manhattan.
"The First Amendment protects freedom of religion," read a statement from Reid's office. "Sen. Reid respects that but thinks that the mosque should be built someplace else."
Ellison's right. His Democratic Party is "a party of principle" -- and a
party that has faith in the American people to reject the spin and
embrace the Constitution.
Unfortunately, Harry Reid is a member of the other Democratic Party -- the one that never quite "gets it.".