SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The Obama Administration's move to
the right is about to give conservatives a victory they could not have
anticipated, even under Bush. HUD, under Obama, submitted legislation
called PETRA to Congress that would result in the privatization of all
public housing in America.
The new owners would charge ten percent
above market rates to impoverished tenants, money that would be
mostly paid by the US government (you and me, the taxpayers). To maintain
the property, the new owners would take out a mortgage for building
repair and maintenance (like a home equity loan), with no cap on interest
rates.
With rents set above market rates,
the mortgage risk would be attractive to banks. Either they make a huge
profit on the mortgages paid for by the government. Or if the government
lowers what it will pay for rents, the property goes into foreclosure.
The banks get it and can sell it off to developers.
Sooner or later, the housing budget
will be cut back and such foreclosures will happen. The structure of
the proposal and the realities of Washington make it a virtual certainty.
The banks and developers make a fortune,
with the taxpayers paying for it. The public loses its public housing
property. The impoverished tenants lose their apartments, or have their
rents go way up if they are forced into the private market. Homelessness
increases. Government gets smaller. The banks and developers win. It
is a Bank Bonanza! The poor and the public lose.
And a precedent is set. The government
can privatize any public property: Schools, libraries, national parks,
federal buildings - just as has begun to happen in California, where
the right-wing governor has started to auction off state property and
has even suggested selling off the Supreme Court building.
The rich will get richer, the poor
and public get poorer. And the very idea of the public good withers.
This is central to the conservative
dream, in which there is no public good - only private goods. And
it is a nightmare for democracy.
The irony is that it is happening under
the Obama administration. Barack Obama, running for office, gave perhaps
the best and clearest characterization of what democracy is about. Democracy,
he has said, is based on empathy - on citizens caring about and for
each other. That is why we have principles like freedom and fairness
for everyone. It is why social responsibility is necessary. The monstrous
alternative is having a society where no one cares about or for anyone
else.
HUD, under the Obama administration,
is about to take a giant step toward that monstrous society.
Here is a quote from the PETRA bill.
It's intent is to:
provide the opportunity for public
housing agencies and private owners to convert from current forms of rental assistance
under a variety of programs to long-term, property-based contracts that will enhance
market-based discipline and enable owners to sustain operations and
leverage private financing to address immediate and long-term capital
needs and implement energy-efficiency improvements.
Along the way, tenants' rights will
be trampled, since tenants could not longer seek redress from the government
through their public officials - because the government would no longer
own the buildings.
Stop PETRA. This is urgent. There is
a hearing next Tuesday, May 25, before the House Financial Services
Committee and the Subcommittee on Housing, organized by Rep. Maxine
Waters. Phone: 202-225-2201. Fax: 202-225-7854.
To write to the committee:
https://financialservices.house.gov/contact.html
Write to your Congressperson now.
If you want to sign a petition, go
to:
https://www.gopetition.com/petitions/save-public-housing.html
Here is a letter from the National
Association of HUD Tenants:
https://www.saveourhomes.org/kaymathew/trapositionpaper.pdf
Here is an informational website, with
letters, background information, and alternative proposals:
And do what you can to get the word
out. This requires a national discussion.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Obama Administration's move to
the right is about to give conservatives a victory they could not have
anticipated, even under Bush. HUD, under Obama, submitted legislation
called PETRA to Congress that would result in the privatization of all
public housing in America.
The new owners would charge ten percent
above market rates to impoverished tenants, money that would be
mostly paid by the US government (you and me, the taxpayers). To maintain
the property, the new owners would take out a mortgage for building
repair and maintenance (like a home equity loan), with no cap on interest
rates.
With rents set above market rates,
the mortgage risk would be attractive to banks. Either they make a huge
profit on the mortgages paid for by the government. Or if the government
lowers what it will pay for rents, the property goes into foreclosure.
The banks get it and can sell it off to developers.
Sooner or later, the housing budget
will be cut back and such foreclosures will happen. The structure of
the proposal and the realities of Washington make it a virtual certainty.
The banks and developers make a fortune,
with the taxpayers paying for it. The public loses its public housing
property. The impoverished tenants lose their apartments, or have their
rents go way up if they are forced into the private market. Homelessness
increases. Government gets smaller. The banks and developers win. It
is a Bank Bonanza! The poor and the public lose.
And a precedent is set. The government
can privatize any public property: Schools, libraries, national parks,
federal buildings - just as has begun to happen in California, where
the right-wing governor has started to auction off state property and
has even suggested selling off the Supreme Court building.
The rich will get richer, the poor
and public get poorer. And the very idea of the public good withers.
This is central to the conservative
dream, in which there is no public good - only private goods. And
it is a nightmare for democracy.
The irony is that it is happening under
the Obama administration. Barack Obama, running for office, gave perhaps
the best and clearest characterization of what democracy is about. Democracy,
he has said, is based on empathy - on citizens caring about and for
each other. That is why we have principles like freedom and fairness
for everyone. It is why social responsibility is necessary. The monstrous
alternative is having a society where no one cares about or for anyone
else.
HUD, under the Obama administration,
is about to take a giant step toward that monstrous society.
Here is a quote from the PETRA bill.
It's intent is to:
provide the opportunity for public
housing agencies and private owners to convert from current forms of rental assistance
under a variety of programs to long-term, property-based contracts that will enhance
market-based discipline and enable owners to sustain operations and
leverage private financing to address immediate and long-term capital
needs and implement energy-efficiency improvements.
Along the way, tenants' rights will
be trampled, since tenants could not longer seek redress from the government
through their public officials - because the government would no longer
own the buildings.
Stop PETRA. This is urgent. There is
a hearing next Tuesday, May 25, before the House Financial Services
Committee and the Subcommittee on Housing, organized by Rep. Maxine
Waters. Phone: 202-225-2201. Fax: 202-225-7854.
To write to the committee:
https://financialservices.house.gov/contact.html
Write to your Congressperson now.
If you want to sign a petition, go
to:
https://www.gopetition.com/petitions/save-public-housing.html
Here is a letter from the National
Association of HUD Tenants:
https://www.saveourhomes.org/kaymathew/trapositionpaper.pdf
Here is an informational website, with
letters, background information, and alternative proposals:
And do what you can to get the word
out. This requires a national discussion.
The Obama Administration's move to
the right is about to give conservatives a victory they could not have
anticipated, even under Bush. HUD, under Obama, submitted legislation
called PETRA to Congress that would result in the privatization of all
public housing in America.
The new owners would charge ten percent
above market rates to impoverished tenants, money that would be
mostly paid by the US government (you and me, the taxpayers). To maintain
the property, the new owners would take out a mortgage for building
repair and maintenance (like a home equity loan), with no cap on interest
rates.
With rents set above market rates,
the mortgage risk would be attractive to banks. Either they make a huge
profit on the mortgages paid for by the government. Or if the government
lowers what it will pay for rents, the property goes into foreclosure.
The banks get it and can sell it off to developers.
Sooner or later, the housing budget
will be cut back and such foreclosures will happen. The structure of
the proposal and the realities of Washington make it a virtual certainty.
The banks and developers make a fortune,
with the taxpayers paying for it. The public loses its public housing
property. The impoverished tenants lose their apartments, or have their
rents go way up if they are forced into the private market. Homelessness
increases. Government gets smaller. The banks and developers win. It
is a Bank Bonanza! The poor and the public lose.
And a precedent is set. The government
can privatize any public property: Schools, libraries, national parks,
federal buildings - just as has begun to happen in California, where
the right-wing governor has started to auction off state property and
has even suggested selling off the Supreme Court building.
The rich will get richer, the poor
and public get poorer. And the very idea of the public good withers.
This is central to the conservative
dream, in which there is no public good - only private goods. And
it is a nightmare for democracy.
The irony is that it is happening under
the Obama administration. Barack Obama, running for office, gave perhaps
the best and clearest characterization of what democracy is about. Democracy,
he has said, is based on empathy - on citizens caring about and for
each other. That is why we have principles like freedom and fairness
for everyone. It is why social responsibility is necessary. The monstrous
alternative is having a society where no one cares about or for anyone
else.
HUD, under the Obama administration,
is about to take a giant step toward that monstrous society.
Here is a quote from the PETRA bill.
It's intent is to:
provide the opportunity for public
housing agencies and private owners to convert from current forms of rental assistance
under a variety of programs to long-term, property-based contracts that will enhance
market-based discipline and enable owners to sustain operations and
leverage private financing to address immediate and long-term capital
needs and implement energy-efficiency improvements.
Along the way, tenants' rights will
be trampled, since tenants could not longer seek redress from the government
through their public officials - because the government would no longer
own the buildings.
Stop PETRA. This is urgent. There is
a hearing next Tuesday, May 25, before the House Financial Services
Committee and the Subcommittee on Housing, organized by Rep. Maxine
Waters. Phone: 202-225-2201. Fax: 202-225-7854.
To write to the committee:
https://financialservices.house.gov/contact.html
Write to your Congressperson now.
If you want to sign a petition, go
to:
https://www.gopetition.com/petitions/save-public-housing.html
Here is a letter from the National
Association of HUD Tenants:
https://www.saveourhomes.org/kaymathew/trapositionpaper.pdf
Here is an informational website, with
letters, background information, and alternative proposals:
And do what you can to get the word
out. This requires a national discussion.