Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Blowback: Why They Try to Bomb Us

David Sirota

 by Truthdig

Imagine, if you can, an alternate universe.

Imagine that in this alternate universe, a
foreign military power begins flying remote-controlled warplanes over
your town, using onboard missiles to kill hundreds of your innocent
neighbors.

Now imagine that when you read the
newspaper about this ongoing bloodbath, you learn that the foreign
nation's top general is nonchalantly telling reporters that his troops
are also killing "an amazing number" of your cultural brethren in an
adjacent country. Imagine further learning that this foreign power is
expanding the drone attacks on your community despite the attacks'
well-known record of killing innocents. And finally, imagine that when
you turn on your television, you see the perpetrator nation's
tuxedo-clad leader cracking stand-up comedy jokes about drone
strikes-jokes that prompt guffaws from an audience of that nation's
elite.

Ask yourself: How would you and your
fellow citizens respond? Would you call homegrown militias mounting a
defense "patriots" or would you call them "terrorists"? Would you agree
with your leaders when they angrily tell reporters that violent
defiance should be expected?

Fortunately, most Americans don't have to
worry about these queries in their own lives. But how we answer them in
a hypothetical thought experiment provides us insight into how
Pakistanis are likely to be feeling right now. Why? Because thanks to
our continued drone assaults on their country, Pakistanis now confront
these issues every day. And if they answer these questions as many of
us undoubtedly would in a similar situation-well, that should trouble
every American in this age of asymmetrical warfare.

Though we don't like to call it mass murder, the U.S. government's
undeclared drone war in Pakistan is devolving into just that. As noted
by a former counterinsurgency adviser to Gen. David Petraeus and a
former Army officer in Afghanistan, the operation has become a
haphazard massacre.

"Press reports suggest that over the last
three years drone strikes have killed about 14 terrorist leaders,"
David Kilcullen and Andrew Exum wrote in 2009. "But, according to
Pakistani sources, they have also killed some 700 civilians. This is 50
civilians for every militant killed."

Making matters worse, Gen. Stanley
McChrystal has, indeed, told journalists that in Afghanistan, U.S.
troops have "shot an amazing number of people" and "none has proven to
have been a real threat." Meanwhile, President Barack Obama used his
internationally televised speech at the White House Correspondents
Dinner to jest about drone warfare-and the assembled Washington
glitterati did, in fact, reward him with approving laughs.

By eerie coincidence, that latter display
of monstrous insouciance occurred on the same night as the failed
effort to raze Times Square. Though America reacted to that despicable
terrorism attempt with its routine spasms of cartoonish shock (why do
they hate us?!), the assailant's motive was anything but baffling. As
law enforcement officials soon reported, the accused bomber was
probably trained and inspired by Pakistani groups seeking revenge for
U.S. drone strikes.

"This is a blowback," said Pakistan's
foreign minister, Shah Mehmood Qureshi. "This is a reaction. And you
could expect that ... let's not be naive."

Obviously, regardless of rationale, a
"reaction" that involves trying to incinerate civilians in Manhattan is
abhorrent and unacceptable. But so is Obama's move to intensify drone
assaults that we know are regularly incinerating innocent civilians in
Pakistan. And while Qureshi's statement about "expecting" blowback
seems radical, he's merely echoing the CIA's reminder that
"possibilities of blowback" arise when we conduct martial operations
abroad.

We might remember that somehow-forgotten
warning come the next terrorist assault. No matter how surprised we may
feel after that inevitable (and inevitably deplorable) attack, the fact
remains that until we halt our own indiscriminately violent actions, we
ought to expect equally indiscriminate and equally violent reactions.


© 2020 TruthDig
David Sirota

David Sirota

David Sirota is a best-selling author whose books  "Back to Our Future" and "Hostile Takeover: How Big Money & Corruption Conquered Our Government--And How We Take It Back"  are available. He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado and is a contributing writer at Salon.com. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com, follow him on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at www.davidsirota.com.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

11 Senators Support House Progressives' Push to Pass Full Biden Agenda

"We voted for the bipartisan infrastructure bill with the clear commitment that the two pieces of the package would move together along a dual track."

Jessica Corbett ·


Ex-Prisoners Recall US Torture at 'Afghanistan's Abu Ghraib'

"It is psychologically hard for me to recall all that was happening," said one former Bagram Air Base inmate. "The torture was mostly done by Afghans, sometimes the Americans. But the orders came from the U.S."

Brett Wilkins ·


Rapid Shift to Electric Vehicles Could Create Over 150,000 Jobs in US by 2030

A new report says "smart" pro-labor policies by lawmakers would transform the "inevitable" shift to EVs "into a new beginning for U.S. producers and the rebuilding of a foundation for good jobs."

Kenny Stancil ·


'Groundbreaking' Win as Court Rules USFWS Can't Ignore Climate Impacts on Joshua Tree

The ruling represents a step forward "for all climate-imperiled species whose fate relies upon the service following the law," said advocacy group WildEarth Guardians.

Julia Conley ·


WHO's New Air Pollution Guidelines Reflect Deadly Toll of Fossil Fuels

"What matters most is whether governments implement impactful policies to reduce pollutant emissions, such as ending investments in coal, oil, and gas and prioritizing the transition to clean energy," said a Greenpeace scientist.

Jessica Corbett ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.


Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo