SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Obama's FCC to Abandon Net Neutrality?
May 03, 2010
Is the Obama FCC siding with the largest cable and phone
companies, and against Net Neutrality and universal Internet access?
The Obama administration has long vowed to protect Net Neutrality and
bridge the digital divide, and FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski picked
up this baton when he took up his post last year. But now Genachowski
appears to be wavering.
According to an article in the Washington
Post, Genachowski may sit on his hands rather than
"reclassify" broadband to make sure the FCC can protect Internet users.
The decision not to reclassify would be a grave mistake - one that would
threaten the Internet as we know it.
A recent federal appeals court
decision jeopardized the FCC's authority to establish Net
Neutrality protections and carry out its National Broadband Plan.
Chairman Genachowski can fix this by reclassifying broadband as a
"telecommunications service" under Title II of the Communications Act -
where it was in the first place before a Bush
FCC changed it, creating the mess we're encountering now.
If Chairman Genachowski fails to re-establish the FCC's authority to
protect Internet users, he will be allowing companies like Comcast,
AT&T and Verizon to slow down, block or censor content at will. And
it will cripple the FCC's ability to ensure universal Internet access
for rural, low-income and disabled Americans.
If he doesn't reclassify broadband, the phone and cable giants will
be able to block any website, blog post, tweet or outreach by a
political campaign - and the FCC will be powerless to stop them.
Basically, without reclassification, nearly every broadband-related
decision the agency makes from here forward will be aggressively
challenged in court by companies who know the FCC stands on shaky legal
ground, and the FCC will likely lose.
Which means, we could lose the Internet as we know it - the only
remaining open communications platform where we all have a voice.
Genachowski's inaction would be an outrage. But we can't just
grimace, sigh and resign ourselves to yet another broken promise, one
more Washington letdown. We have to draw the line.
Tell the FCC
chairman to stand up to the industry pressure, keep his promises and
do the right thing: Reclassify broadband, protect Net Neutrality and
promote universal Internet access.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Megan Tady
Megan Tady runs Word-Lift, a consulting and copywriting service in western Massachusetts. Previously, she was Campaign Coordinator for Free Press. Prior to joining Free Press, Megan was a national political reporter for In These Times, The New Standard, and worked extensively as a freelance journalist.
Is the Obama FCC siding with the largest cable and phone
companies, and against Net Neutrality and universal Internet access?
The Obama administration has long vowed to protect Net Neutrality and
bridge the digital divide, and FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski picked
up this baton when he took up his post last year. But now Genachowski
appears to be wavering.
According to an article in the Washington
Post, Genachowski may sit on his hands rather than
"reclassify" broadband to make sure the FCC can protect Internet users.
The decision not to reclassify would be a grave mistake - one that would
threaten the Internet as we know it.
A recent federal appeals court
decision jeopardized the FCC's authority to establish Net
Neutrality protections and carry out its National Broadband Plan.
Chairman Genachowski can fix this by reclassifying broadband as a
"telecommunications service" under Title II of the Communications Act -
where it was in the first place before a Bush
FCC changed it, creating the mess we're encountering now.
If Chairman Genachowski fails to re-establish the FCC's authority to
protect Internet users, he will be allowing companies like Comcast,
AT&T and Verizon to slow down, block or censor content at will. And
it will cripple the FCC's ability to ensure universal Internet access
for rural, low-income and disabled Americans.
If he doesn't reclassify broadband, the phone and cable giants will
be able to block any website, blog post, tweet or outreach by a
political campaign - and the FCC will be powerless to stop them.
Basically, without reclassification, nearly every broadband-related
decision the agency makes from here forward will be aggressively
challenged in court by companies who know the FCC stands on shaky legal
ground, and the FCC will likely lose.
Which means, we could lose the Internet as we know it - the only
remaining open communications platform where we all have a voice.
Genachowski's inaction would be an outrage. But we can't just
grimace, sigh and resign ourselves to yet another broken promise, one
more Washington letdown. We have to draw the line.
Tell the FCC
chairman to stand up to the industry pressure, keep his promises and
do the right thing: Reclassify broadband, protect Net Neutrality and
promote universal Internet access.
Megan Tady
Megan Tady runs Word-Lift, a consulting and copywriting service in western Massachusetts. Previously, she was Campaign Coordinator for Free Press. Prior to joining Free Press, Megan was a national political reporter for In These Times, The New Standard, and worked extensively as a freelance journalist.
Is the Obama FCC siding with the largest cable and phone
companies, and against Net Neutrality and universal Internet access?
The Obama administration has long vowed to protect Net Neutrality and
bridge the digital divide, and FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski picked
up this baton when he took up his post last year. But now Genachowski
appears to be wavering.
According to an article in the Washington
Post, Genachowski may sit on his hands rather than
"reclassify" broadband to make sure the FCC can protect Internet users.
The decision not to reclassify would be a grave mistake - one that would
threaten the Internet as we know it.
A recent federal appeals court
decision jeopardized the FCC's authority to establish Net
Neutrality protections and carry out its National Broadband Plan.
Chairman Genachowski can fix this by reclassifying broadband as a
"telecommunications service" under Title II of the Communications Act -
where it was in the first place before a Bush
FCC changed it, creating the mess we're encountering now.
If Chairman Genachowski fails to re-establish the FCC's authority to
protect Internet users, he will be allowing companies like Comcast,
AT&T and Verizon to slow down, block or censor content at will. And
it will cripple the FCC's ability to ensure universal Internet access
for rural, low-income and disabled Americans.
If he doesn't reclassify broadband, the phone and cable giants will
be able to block any website, blog post, tweet or outreach by a
political campaign - and the FCC will be powerless to stop them.
Basically, without reclassification, nearly every broadband-related
decision the agency makes from here forward will be aggressively
challenged in court by companies who know the FCC stands on shaky legal
ground, and the FCC will likely lose.
Which means, we could lose the Internet as we know it - the only
remaining open communications platform where we all have a voice.
Genachowski's inaction would be an outrage. But we can't just
grimace, sigh and resign ourselves to yet another broken promise, one
more Washington letdown. We have to draw the line.
Tell the FCC
chairman to stand up to the industry pressure, keep his promises and
do the right thing: Reclassify broadband, protect Net Neutrality and
promote universal Internet access.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.