SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The New York Times has
the story:
The Obama administration is proposing to
open vast expanses of water along the Atlantic coastline, the eastern
Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas
drilling, much of it for the first time, officials said Tuesday.The proposal - a compromise that will please oil companies and
domestic drilling advocates but anger some residents of affected states
and many environmental organizations - would end a longstanding
moratorium on oil exploration along the East Coast from the northern tip
of Delaware to the central coast of Florida, covering 167 million acres
of ocean.Under the plan, the coastline from New Jersey northward would remain
closed to all oil and gas activity. So would the Pacific Coast, from
Mexico to the Canadian border.The environmentally sensitive Bristol Bay in southwestern Alaska
would be protected and no drilling would be allowed under the plan,
officials said. But large tracts in the Chukchi Sea and Beaufort Sea in
the Arctic Ocean north of Alaska - nearly 130 million acres - would be
eligible for exploration and drilling after extensive studies.
Obama himself will make this announcement today, in just a couple
hours.
This is puzzling on a number of levels.
Either Obama thinks the climate bill is dead and he's handing out a
couple of the goodies he already promised, or his team has assessed that
these tracts won't
be cost-effective enough for oil companies to actually do the
drilling, so it's a low-cost hedge toward moderation. We know that oil
companies have thousands of reserve contracts for on-shore drilling
sites in the US that they haven't and probably will not ever explore.
They end up on company profiles as "future reserve sites" to prove the
stability of their operations to investors. In the end, this may end up
being a big giveaway to oil company balance sheets, without the
environmental hazards.
I'll close with this
statement from Jonathan Hiskes:
The substances at issue here-oil and
natural gas-will eventually be burned, releasing heat-trapping
pollutants that cause global warming. If that continues unchecked, it
could be the most destructive and unjust phenomena of the coming
century. There's no mention of any of this in the stories from major
news outlets. Just sayin'.
UPDATE: One other thing. The leaks I've heard about
offshore drilling in the climate bill emphasized local control, as in
"you can drill if your state wants it." Maybe that's a part of this
announcement. We'll have to see.
UPDATE II: Here's a shock, John
Boehner is upset that Obama didn't open up the entire American
coastline. Amazingly, compromising with Republicans doesn't yield
Republican support!
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
The New York Times has
the story:
The Obama administration is proposing to
open vast expanses of water along the Atlantic coastline, the eastern
Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas
drilling, much of it for the first time, officials said Tuesday.The proposal - a compromise that will please oil companies and
domestic drilling advocates but anger some residents of affected states
and many environmental organizations - would end a longstanding
moratorium on oil exploration along the East Coast from the northern tip
of Delaware to the central coast of Florida, covering 167 million acres
of ocean.Under the plan, the coastline from New Jersey northward would remain
closed to all oil and gas activity. So would the Pacific Coast, from
Mexico to the Canadian border.The environmentally sensitive Bristol Bay in southwestern Alaska
would be protected and no drilling would be allowed under the plan,
officials said. But large tracts in the Chukchi Sea and Beaufort Sea in
the Arctic Ocean north of Alaska - nearly 130 million acres - would be
eligible for exploration and drilling after extensive studies.
Obama himself will make this announcement today, in just a couple
hours.
This is puzzling on a number of levels.
Either Obama thinks the climate bill is dead and he's handing out a
couple of the goodies he already promised, or his team has assessed that
these tracts won't
be cost-effective enough for oil companies to actually do the
drilling, so it's a low-cost hedge toward moderation. We know that oil
companies have thousands of reserve contracts for on-shore drilling
sites in the US that they haven't and probably will not ever explore.
They end up on company profiles as "future reserve sites" to prove the
stability of their operations to investors. In the end, this may end up
being a big giveaway to oil company balance sheets, without the
environmental hazards.
I'll close with this
statement from Jonathan Hiskes:
The substances at issue here-oil and
natural gas-will eventually be burned, releasing heat-trapping
pollutants that cause global warming. If that continues unchecked, it
could be the most destructive and unjust phenomena of the coming
century. There's no mention of any of this in the stories from major
news outlets. Just sayin'.
UPDATE: One other thing. The leaks I've heard about
offshore drilling in the climate bill emphasized local control, as in
"you can drill if your state wants it." Maybe that's a part of this
announcement. We'll have to see.
UPDATE II: Here's a shock, John
Boehner is upset that Obama didn't open up the entire American
coastline. Amazingly, compromising with Republicans doesn't yield
Republican support!
The New York Times has
the story:
The Obama administration is proposing to
open vast expanses of water along the Atlantic coastline, the eastern
Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas
drilling, much of it for the first time, officials said Tuesday.The proposal - a compromise that will please oil companies and
domestic drilling advocates but anger some residents of affected states
and many environmental organizations - would end a longstanding
moratorium on oil exploration along the East Coast from the northern tip
of Delaware to the central coast of Florida, covering 167 million acres
of ocean.Under the plan, the coastline from New Jersey northward would remain
closed to all oil and gas activity. So would the Pacific Coast, from
Mexico to the Canadian border.The environmentally sensitive Bristol Bay in southwestern Alaska
would be protected and no drilling would be allowed under the plan,
officials said. But large tracts in the Chukchi Sea and Beaufort Sea in
the Arctic Ocean north of Alaska - nearly 130 million acres - would be
eligible for exploration and drilling after extensive studies.
Obama himself will make this announcement today, in just a couple
hours.
This is puzzling on a number of levels.
Either Obama thinks the climate bill is dead and he's handing out a
couple of the goodies he already promised, or his team has assessed that
these tracts won't
be cost-effective enough for oil companies to actually do the
drilling, so it's a low-cost hedge toward moderation. We know that oil
companies have thousands of reserve contracts for on-shore drilling
sites in the US that they haven't and probably will not ever explore.
They end up on company profiles as "future reserve sites" to prove the
stability of their operations to investors. In the end, this may end up
being a big giveaway to oil company balance sheets, without the
environmental hazards.
I'll close with this
statement from Jonathan Hiskes:
The substances at issue here-oil and
natural gas-will eventually be burned, releasing heat-trapping
pollutants that cause global warming. If that continues unchecked, it
could be the most destructive and unjust phenomena of the coming
century. There's no mention of any of this in the stories from major
news outlets. Just sayin'.
UPDATE: One other thing. The leaks I've heard about
offshore drilling in the climate bill emphasized local control, as in
"you can drill if your state wants it." Maybe that's a part of this
announcement. We'll have to see.
UPDATE II: Here's a shock, John
Boehner is upset that Obama didn't open up the entire American
coastline. Amazingly, compromising with Republicans doesn't yield
Republican support!