SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The New York Times has
the story:
The Obama administration is proposing to
open vast expanses of water along the Atlantic coastline, the eastern
Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas
drilling, much of it for the first time, officials said Tuesday.The proposal - a compromise that will please oil companies and
domestic drilling advocates but anger some residents of affected states
and many environmental organizations - would end a longstanding
moratorium on oil exploration along the East Coast from the northern tip
of Delaware to the central coast of Florida, covering 167 million acres
of ocean.Under the plan, the coastline from New Jersey northward would remain
closed to all oil and gas activity. So would the Pacific Coast, from
Mexico to the Canadian border.The environmentally sensitive Bristol Bay in southwestern Alaska
would be protected and no drilling would be allowed under the plan,
officials said. But large tracts in the Chukchi Sea and Beaufort Sea in
the Arctic Ocean north of Alaska - nearly 130 million acres - would be
eligible for exploration and drilling after extensive studies.
Obama himself will make this announcement today, in just a couple
hours.
This is puzzling on a number of levels.
Either Obama thinks the climate bill is dead and he's handing out a
couple of the goodies he already promised, or his team has assessed that
these tracts won't
be cost-effective enough for oil companies to actually do the
drilling, so it's a low-cost hedge toward moderation. We know that oil
companies have thousands of reserve contracts for on-shore drilling
sites in the US that they haven't and probably will not ever explore.
They end up on company profiles as "future reserve sites" to prove the
stability of their operations to investors. In the end, this may end up
being a big giveaway to oil company balance sheets, without the
environmental hazards.
I'll close with this
statement from Jonathan Hiskes:
The substances at issue here-oil and
natural gas-will eventually be burned, releasing heat-trapping
pollutants that cause global warming. If that continues unchecked, it
could be the most destructive and unjust phenomena of the coming
century. There's no mention of any of this in the stories from major
news outlets. Just sayin'.
UPDATE: One other thing. The leaks I've heard about
offshore drilling in the climate bill emphasized local control, as in
"you can drill if your state wants it." Maybe that's a part of this
announcement. We'll have to see.
UPDATE II: Here's a shock, John
Boehner is upset that Obama didn't open up the entire American
coastline. Amazingly, compromising with Republicans doesn't yield
Republican support!
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
The New York Times has
the story:
The Obama administration is proposing to
open vast expanses of water along the Atlantic coastline, the eastern
Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas
drilling, much of it for the first time, officials said Tuesday.The proposal - a compromise that will please oil companies and
domestic drilling advocates but anger some residents of affected states
and many environmental organizations - would end a longstanding
moratorium on oil exploration along the East Coast from the northern tip
of Delaware to the central coast of Florida, covering 167 million acres
of ocean.Under the plan, the coastline from New Jersey northward would remain
closed to all oil and gas activity. So would the Pacific Coast, from
Mexico to the Canadian border.The environmentally sensitive Bristol Bay in southwestern Alaska
would be protected and no drilling would be allowed under the plan,
officials said. But large tracts in the Chukchi Sea and Beaufort Sea in
the Arctic Ocean north of Alaska - nearly 130 million acres - would be
eligible for exploration and drilling after extensive studies.
Obama himself will make this announcement today, in just a couple
hours.
This is puzzling on a number of levels.
Either Obama thinks the climate bill is dead and he's handing out a
couple of the goodies he already promised, or his team has assessed that
these tracts won't
be cost-effective enough for oil companies to actually do the
drilling, so it's a low-cost hedge toward moderation. We know that oil
companies have thousands of reserve contracts for on-shore drilling
sites in the US that they haven't and probably will not ever explore.
They end up on company profiles as "future reserve sites" to prove the
stability of their operations to investors. In the end, this may end up
being a big giveaway to oil company balance sheets, without the
environmental hazards.
I'll close with this
statement from Jonathan Hiskes:
The substances at issue here-oil and
natural gas-will eventually be burned, releasing heat-trapping
pollutants that cause global warming. If that continues unchecked, it
could be the most destructive and unjust phenomena of the coming
century. There's no mention of any of this in the stories from major
news outlets. Just sayin'.
UPDATE: One other thing. The leaks I've heard about
offshore drilling in the climate bill emphasized local control, as in
"you can drill if your state wants it." Maybe that's a part of this
announcement. We'll have to see.
UPDATE II: Here's a shock, John
Boehner is upset that Obama didn't open up the entire American
coastline. Amazingly, compromising with Republicans doesn't yield
Republican support!
The New York Times has
the story:
The Obama administration is proposing to
open vast expanses of water along the Atlantic coastline, the eastern
Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas
drilling, much of it for the first time, officials said Tuesday.The proposal - a compromise that will please oil companies and
domestic drilling advocates but anger some residents of affected states
and many environmental organizations - would end a longstanding
moratorium on oil exploration along the East Coast from the northern tip
of Delaware to the central coast of Florida, covering 167 million acres
of ocean.Under the plan, the coastline from New Jersey northward would remain
closed to all oil and gas activity. So would the Pacific Coast, from
Mexico to the Canadian border.The environmentally sensitive Bristol Bay in southwestern Alaska
would be protected and no drilling would be allowed under the plan,
officials said. But large tracts in the Chukchi Sea and Beaufort Sea in
the Arctic Ocean north of Alaska - nearly 130 million acres - would be
eligible for exploration and drilling after extensive studies.
Obama himself will make this announcement today, in just a couple
hours.
This is puzzling on a number of levels.
Either Obama thinks the climate bill is dead and he's handing out a
couple of the goodies he already promised, or his team has assessed that
these tracts won't
be cost-effective enough for oil companies to actually do the
drilling, so it's a low-cost hedge toward moderation. We know that oil
companies have thousands of reserve contracts for on-shore drilling
sites in the US that they haven't and probably will not ever explore.
They end up on company profiles as "future reserve sites" to prove the
stability of their operations to investors. In the end, this may end up
being a big giveaway to oil company balance sheets, without the
environmental hazards.
I'll close with this
statement from Jonathan Hiskes:
The substances at issue here-oil and
natural gas-will eventually be burned, releasing heat-trapping
pollutants that cause global warming. If that continues unchecked, it
could be the most destructive and unjust phenomena of the coming
century. There's no mention of any of this in the stories from major
news outlets. Just sayin'.
UPDATE: One other thing. The leaks I've heard about
offshore drilling in the climate bill emphasized local control, as in
"you can drill if your state wants it." Maybe that's a part of this
announcement. We'll have to see.
UPDATE II: Here's a shock, John
Boehner is upset that Obama didn't open up the entire American
coastline. Amazingly, compromising with Republicans doesn't yield
Republican support!