War Won With Talks, Not Troops
The answer to ending conflict in Afghanistan does not lie in guns and money
The U.S. and its NATO allies are losing the nine-year-old war in Afghanistan. So Washington and London, both in dire financial straits, say they are now ready for a possible face-saving peace deal with the Pashtun Taliban and its nationalist allies.
If you can't bomb them into submission, buy them off.
A conference was held in London last Thursday to raise tens of millions of dollars to try to bribe lower level Taliban to co-operate with the western occupation and/or lay down its arms.
Bribery is a time-honoured tool of war. But it's not the answer in Afghanistan.
The bloody Afghan conflict can only be ended by genuine peace negotiations and withdrawal of all foreign troops.
U.S. commanders in Afghanistan admit they have lost the military initiative.
The resistance is steadily gaining ground. Increasing U.S. and allied troops to 150,000 won't be enough to defeat Taliban.
By year end, U.S. and NATO forces will only equal the number of Soviet forces committed to Afghanistan in the 1980s.
Meanwhile Pakistan, without whose co-operation the U.S. cannot wage war in Afghanistan, is in turmoil.
The U.S. is infiltrating Xe (formerly Blackwater) and DynCorp mercenaries into Pakistan to protect U.S. military supply routes north from Karachi to Afghanistan, and to operate or defend American air bases in Pakistan.
American mercenaries are being used to assassinate militants and enemies of Pakistan's U.S.-installed government and to target Pakistan's nuclear installations for future U.S. action.
This, and increasing attacks by American killer drones, have sparked outrage across Pakistan and brought warnings of creeping U.S. occupation.
U.S. and Canadian forces in Afghanistan are like a man trying to fix a chimney on the roof of a burning house. As Pakistan burns, so will Afghanistan.
Washington lacks the men, money and understanding to deal with chaotic Pakistan - never mind chaotic Afghanistan.
Washington, London, Ottawa, Berlin and Paris share the same problem: Their war propaganda has so demonized Taliban as terrorists and woman abusers that western politicians are petrified to deal with the tribal movement, and risk being accused of sending soldiers to their deaths in a futile war.
The far right will howl "appeasement," "giving in to terrorism" and "betraying our boys."
Ignore the advocates of permanent war and torture. Afghans have suffered more than 3 million deaths in 30 years of wars. They desperately need peace, political stability and rebuilding, not the current western-installed puppet regime of thieving war lords, drug mafias and thugs of the old Afghan Communist Party.
The best thing we can do for our soldiers is to get them out of the Afghan hell hole before they die in this pointless war.
The west can't "win" in Afghanistan. In fact, Washington cannot even define what victory means. The intelligent, straight-talking American ambassador to Kabul, former general Karl Eikenberry, as well as VP Joe Biden insist it's time to start peace talks. We should heed their sensible advice.
Real peace talks are the answer. Not the ruse long proposed by U.S. Gen. Stanley McChrystal to try to bribe away low-ranking Taliban and so split the Afghan resistance. This stratagem worked to a degree with Sunni tribesmen in Iraq, but it is unlikely to succeed with the proud Pashtun tribes who value honour more than money. Theirs is an antique concept most westerners cannot understand.
The Taliban, an anti-Communist religious movement, knew nothing about al-Qaida's plans to attack the United States.
That plot was hatched in Europe, not Afghanistan. Many members of the anti-Communist Taliban and its allies were former allies of the West and were hailed by former president Ronald Reagan as "freedom fighters."
After 9/11, the Taliban refused to hand over Osama bin Laden to the enraged United States without proper evidence of his guilt because he was an honoured guest and hero of the anti-Soviet jihad.
The Taliban chose war with the U.S. before betraying a guest. Such men are not to be easily bought.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The U.S. and its NATO allies are losing the nine-year-old war in Afghanistan. So Washington and London, both in dire financial straits, say they are now ready for a possible face-saving peace deal with the Pashtun Taliban and its nationalist allies.
If you can't bomb them into submission, buy them off.
A conference was held in London last Thursday to raise tens of millions of dollars to try to bribe lower level Taliban to co-operate with the western occupation and/or lay down its arms.
Bribery is a time-honoured tool of war. But it's not the answer in Afghanistan.
The bloody Afghan conflict can only be ended by genuine peace negotiations and withdrawal of all foreign troops.
U.S. commanders in Afghanistan admit they have lost the military initiative.
The resistance is steadily gaining ground. Increasing U.S. and allied troops to 150,000 won't be enough to defeat Taliban.
By year end, U.S. and NATO forces will only equal the number of Soviet forces committed to Afghanistan in the 1980s.
Meanwhile Pakistan, without whose co-operation the U.S. cannot wage war in Afghanistan, is in turmoil.
The U.S. is infiltrating Xe (formerly Blackwater) and DynCorp mercenaries into Pakistan to protect U.S. military supply routes north from Karachi to Afghanistan, and to operate or defend American air bases in Pakistan.
American mercenaries are being used to assassinate militants and enemies of Pakistan's U.S.-installed government and to target Pakistan's nuclear installations for future U.S. action.
This, and increasing attacks by American killer drones, have sparked outrage across Pakistan and brought warnings of creeping U.S. occupation.
U.S. and Canadian forces in Afghanistan are like a man trying to fix a chimney on the roof of a burning house. As Pakistan burns, so will Afghanistan.
Washington lacks the men, money and understanding to deal with chaotic Pakistan - never mind chaotic Afghanistan.
Washington, London, Ottawa, Berlin and Paris share the same problem: Their war propaganda has so demonized Taliban as terrorists and woman abusers that western politicians are petrified to deal with the tribal movement, and risk being accused of sending soldiers to their deaths in a futile war.
The far right will howl "appeasement," "giving in to terrorism" and "betraying our boys."
Ignore the advocates of permanent war and torture. Afghans have suffered more than 3 million deaths in 30 years of wars. They desperately need peace, political stability and rebuilding, not the current western-installed puppet regime of thieving war lords, drug mafias and thugs of the old Afghan Communist Party.
The best thing we can do for our soldiers is to get them out of the Afghan hell hole before they die in this pointless war.
The west can't "win" in Afghanistan. In fact, Washington cannot even define what victory means. The intelligent, straight-talking American ambassador to Kabul, former general Karl Eikenberry, as well as VP Joe Biden insist it's time to start peace talks. We should heed their sensible advice.
Real peace talks are the answer. Not the ruse long proposed by U.S. Gen. Stanley McChrystal to try to bribe away low-ranking Taliban and so split the Afghan resistance. This stratagem worked to a degree with Sunni tribesmen in Iraq, but it is unlikely to succeed with the proud Pashtun tribes who value honour more than money. Theirs is an antique concept most westerners cannot understand.
The Taliban, an anti-Communist religious movement, knew nothing about al-Qaida's plans to attack the United States.
That plot was hatched in Europe, not Afghanistan. Many members of the anti-Communist Taliban and its allies were former allies of the West and were hailed by former president Ronald Reagan as "freedom fighters."
After 9/11, the Taliban refused to hand over Osama bin Laden to the enraged United States without proper evidence of his guilt because he was an honoured guest and hero of the anti-Soviet jihad.
The Taliban chose war with the U.S. before betraying a guest. Such men are not to be easily bought.
The U.S. and its NATO allies are losing the nine-year-old war in Afghanistan. So Washington and London, both in dire financial straits, say they are now ready for a possible face-saving peace deal with the Pashtun Taliban and its nationalist allies.
If you can't bomb them into submission, buy them off.
A conference was held in London last Thursday to raise tens of millions of dollars to try to bribe lower level Taliban to co-operate with the western occupation and/or lay down its arms.
Bribery is a time-honoured tool of war. But it's not the answer in Afghanistan.
The bloody Afghan conflict can only be ended by genuine peace negotiations and withdrawal of all foreign troops.
U.S. commanders in Afghanistan admit they have lost the military initiative.
The resistance is steadily gaining ground. Increasing U.S. and allied troops to 150,000 won't be enough to defeat Taliban.
By year end, U.S. and NATO forces will only equal the number of Soviet forces committed to Afghanistan in the 1980s.
Meanwhile Pakistan, without whose co-operation the U.S. cannot wage war in Afghanistan, is in turmoil.
The U.S. is infiltrating Xe (formerly Blackwater) and DynCorp mercenaries into Pakistan to protect U.S. military supply routes north from Karachi to Afghanistan, and to operate or defend American air bases in Pakistan.
American mercenaries are being used to assassinate militants and enemies of Pakistan's U.S.-installed government and to target Pakistan's nuclear installations for future U.S. action.
This, and increasing attacks by American killer drones, have sparked outrage across Pakistan and brought warnings of creeping U.S. occupation.
U.S. and Canadian forces in Afghanistan are like a man trying to fix a chimney on the roof of a burning house. As Pakistan burns, so will Afghanistan.
Washington lacks the men, money and understanding to deal with chaotic Pakistan - never mind chaotic Afghanistan.
Washington, London, Ottawa, Berlin and Paris share the same problem: Their war propaganda has so demonized Taliban as terrorists and woman abusers that western politicians are petrified to deal with the tribal movement, and risk being accused of sending soldiers to their deaths in a futile war.
The far right will howl "appeasement," "giving in to terrorism" and "betraying our boys."
Ignore the advocates of permanent war and torture. Afghans have suffered more than 3 million deaths in 30 years of wars. They desperately need peace, political stability and rebuilding, not the current western-installed puppet regime of thieving war lords, drug mafias and thugs of the old Afghan Communist Party.
The best thing we can do for our soldiers is to get them out of the Afghan hell hole before they die in this pointless war.
The west can't "win" in Afghanistan. In fact, Washington cannot even define what victory means. The intelligent, straight-talking American ambassador to Kabul, former general Karl Eikenberry, as well as VP Joe Biden insist it's time to start peace talks. We should heed their sensible advice.
Real peace talks are the answer. Not the ruse long proposed by U.S. Gen. Stanley McChrystal to try to bribe away low-ranking Taliban and so split the Afghan resistance. This stratagem worked to a degree with Sunni tribesmen in Iraq, but it is unlikely to succeed with the proud Pashtun tribes who value honour more than money. Theirs is an antique concept most westerners cannot understand.
The Taliban, an anti-Communist religious movement, knew nothing about al-Qaida's plans to attack the United States.
That plot was hatched in Europe, not Afghanistan. Many members of the anti-Communist Taliban and its allies were former allies of the West and were hailed by former president Ronald Reagan as "freedom fighters."
After 9/11, the Taliban refused to hand over Osama bin Laden to the enraged United States without proper evidence of his guilt because he was an honoured guest and hero of the anti-Soviet jihad.
The Taliban chose war with the U.S. before betraying a guest. Such men are not to be easily bought.