

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
As the world awaits Barack Obama's decision on Afghanistan, a lethal
myth has spread. It says that standing up to the military will doom him
to be a single-term president.
The "one if by peace" myth comes most recently from Garry Wills in the
New York Review of Books. Wills mourns that Obama would commit
political suicide by pulling out of both Iraq and Afghanistan because
"the charges from various quarters would be toxic---that he was weak,
unpatriotic, sacrificing the sacrifices that have been made, betraying
our dead, throwing away all former investments in lives and treasure."
Against all that, says Wills, "he could have little defense in the quarters where such charges would originate."
Coming from an astute observer like Wills, this is a stunning analysis---and dead wrong.
In fact, the only way Obama can begin to think about getting
re-elected is to leave the Afghan quagmire and do the same from Iraq.
The key phrase here is "the quarters where such charges would originate."
The battle cries originate with the military which, as Will Rogers once
put it, "never saw a war it didn't like." General Stanley McChrystal
and Defense Secretary Robert Gates have spearheaded an unsavory,
unethical media assault to force a quick escalation.
Their core support comes from the Rogue/Rouge Right now
shattering the Republican Party. This media-based Palin paramilitary
has just driven the GOP to defeat in a New York Congressional district,
Republican for more than a century. It's now assaulting Charlie Crist,
the very popular moderate Governor of Florida, and others like him. Any
Republican caught whispering that Obama is other than a baby-killing
Muslim gay terrorist is being condemned in ways not seen since Salem,
1692.
This might seem good for the Democrats. But Obama can blow it
all by escalating in Afghanistan. His core support---a substantial
majority of Democrats, and any number of moderate Republicans---wants
out. The California Democrats have formalized the message.
National health care and climate change remain hugely
important. They are divisive and difficult. And there will be no
meaningful progress on either without a draw-down on our overseas
adventurism and the larger military budget.
Thus Afghanistan towers above all. The decline of the Democratic Party
and the US as a whole dates directly to March, 1965, when Lyndon
Johnson escalated the war in Vietnam. The ensuing decade of futility
overflowed with agonized analysis and absurd apologia.
In the end, all the US could do was spend, destroy, kill, die and flee.
So, too, Afghanistan. Be the motive geo-political,
anti-terrorist, petro-chemical, feminist, humanitarian, or just plain
not wanting to "lose," American bombs from the air and boots on the
ground will simply dissolve and disappear in an ocean of shifting sands
and ancient enmities.
Whatever his admirers fear might be said about Obama "losing" this
hopeless sinkhole will be screamed anyway by the Rogue/Rouge Right, no
matter what he does. In their eyes, all ensuing terror attacks,
economic downturns, human frailties, stubs of the toe and twists of
inscrutable fate will be Barack Obama's fault, no matter what or why.
Standing down in Afghanistan and Iraq would be truly historic. It could
end the epoch---dating to 1492---when Europe continually marched
throughout the Third World. More narrowly, it would acknowledge, at
last, America's inability to shape every corner of the Earth to its
overbearing whim.
Perhaps it would finally curb this nation's addiction to squandering
blood and treasure on these absurd, hopeless and ultimately suicidal
military excursions.
For Obama and 2012, it might make the dream of meaningful health and
energy reform financially feasible. It could prevent the liberal base
in this country from shattering, as it did in 1968, opening the door to
Nixon, Reagan, Bush and Bush....and now to the likes of Limbaugh, Beck,
Palin and Dobbs.
Few things are guaranteed in politics. But one certainty is
that an escalation in Afghanistan will again poison the Democratic
Party and leave Barack Obama an empty political husk. The brilliant,
good-hearted Garry Wills begs Obama to do the right thing for the sake
of morality and sanity.
But if Obama has any hope of guiding a coherent administration
for the rest of this term, or of winning a second one, he has no
choice. The Graveyard of Great Powers awaits yet another misguided
imperial attacker.
Let's hope, pray, work and fight to make sure that this time, we step aside.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As the world awaits Barack Obama's decision on Afghanistan, a lethal
myth has spread. It says that standing up to the military will doom him
to be a single-term president.
The "one if by peace" myth comes most recently from Garry Wills in the
New York Review of Books. Wills mourns that Obama would commit
political suicide by pulling out of both Iraq and Afghanistan because
"the charges from various quarters would be toxic---that he was weak,
unpatriotic, sacrificing the sacrifices that have been made, betraying
our dead, throwing away all former investments in lives and treasure."
Against all that, says Wills, "he could have little defense in the quarters where such charges would originate."
Coming from an astute observer like Wills, this is a stunning analysis---and dead wrong.
In fact, the only way Obama can begin to think about getting
re-elected is to leave the Afghan quagmire and do the same from Iraq.
The key phrase here is "the quarters where such charges would originate."
The battle cries originate with the military which, as Will Rogers once
put it, "never saw a war it didn't like." General Stanley McChrystal
and Defense Secretary Robert Gates have spearheaded an unsavory,
unethical media assault to force a quick escalation.
Their core support comes from the Rogue/Rouge Right now
shattering the Republican Party. This media-based Palin paramilitary
has just driven the GOP to defeat in a New York Congressional district,
Republican for more than a century. It's now assaulting Charlie Crist,
the very popular moderate Governor of Florida, and others like him. Any
Republican caught whispering that Obama is other than a baby-killing
Muslim gay terrorist is being condemned in ways not seen since Salem,
1692.
This might seem good for the Democrats. But Obama can blow it
all by escalating in Afghanistan. His core support---a substantial
majority of Democrats, and any number of moderate Republicans---wants
out. The California Democrats have formalized the message.
National health care and climate change remain hugely
important. They are divisive and difficult. And there will be no
meaningful progress on either without a draw-down on our overseas
adventurism and the larger military budget.
Thus Afghanistan towers above all. The decline of the Democratic Party
and the US as a whole dates directly to March, 1965, when Lyndon
Johnson escalated the war in Vietnam. The ensuing decade of futility
overflowed with agonized analysis and absurd apologia.
In the end, all the US could do was spend, destroy, kill, die and flee.
So, too, Afghanistan. Be the motive geo-political,
anti-terrorist, petro-chemical, feminist, humanitarian, or just plain
not wanting to "lose," American bombs from the air and boots on the
ground will simply dissolve and disappear in an ocean of shifting sands
and ancient enmities.
Whatever his admirers fear might be said about Obama "losing" this
hopeless sinkhole will be screamed anyway by the Rogue/Rouge Right, no
matter what he does. In their eyes, all ensuing terror attacks,
economic downturns, human frailties, stubs of the toe and twists of
inscrutable fate will be Barack Obama's fault, no matter what or why.
Standing down in Afghanistan and Iraq would be truly historic. It could
end the epoch---dating to 1492---when Europe continually marched
throughout the Third World. More narrowly, it would acknowledge, at
last, America's inability to shape every corner of the Earth to its
overbearing whim.
Perhaps it would finally curb this nation's addiction to squandering
blood and treasure on these absurd, hopeless and ultimately suicidal
military excursions.
For Obama and 2012, it might make the dream of meaningful health and
energy reform financially feasible. It could prevent the liberal base
in this country from shattering, as it did in 1968, opening the door to
Nixon, Reagan, Bush and Bush....and now to the likes of Limbaugh, Beck,
Palin and Dobbs.
Few things are guaranteed in politics. But one certainty is
that an escalation in Afghanistan will again poison the Democratic
Party and leave Barack Obama an empty political husk. The brilliant,
good-hearted Garry Wills begs Obama to do the right thing for the sake
of morality and sanity.
But if Obama has any hope of guiding a coherent administration
for the rest of this term, or of winning a second one, he has no
choice. The Graveyard of Great Powers awaits yet another misguided
imperial attacker.
Let's hope, pray, work and fight to make sure that this time, we step aside.
As the world awaits Barack Obama's decision on Afghanistan, a lethal
myth has spread. It says that standing up to the military will doom him
to be a single-term president.
The "one if by peace" myth comes most recently from Garry Wills in the
New York Review of Books. Wills mourns that Obama would commit
political suicide by pulling out of both Iraq and Afghanistan because
"the charges from various quarters would be toxic---that he was weak,
unpatriotic, sacrificing the sacrifices that have been made, betraying
our dead, throwing away all former investments in lives and treasure."
Against all that, says Wills, "he could have little defense in the quarters where such charges would originate."
Coming from an astute observer like Wills, this is a stunning analysis---and dead wrong.
In fact, the only way Obama can begin to think about getting
re-elected is to leave the Afghan quagmire and do the same from Iraq.
The key phrase here is "the quarters where such charges would originate."
The battle cries originate with the military which, as Will Rogers once
put it, "never saw a war it didn't like." General Stanley McChrystal
and Defense Secretary Robert Gates have spearheaded an unsavory,
unethical media assault to force a quick escalation.
Their core support comes from the Rogue/Rouge Right now
shattering the Republican Party. This media-based Palin paramilitary
has just driven the GOP to defeat in a New York Congressional district,
Republican for more than a century. It's now assaulting Charlie Crist,
the very popular moderate Governor of Florida, and others like him. Any
Republican caught whispering that Obama is other than a baby-killing
Muslim gay terrorist is being condemned in ways not seen since Salem,
1692.
This might seem good for the Democrats. But Obama can blow it
all by escalating in Afghanistan. His core support---a substantial
majority of Democrats, and any number of moderate Republicans---wants
out. The California Democrats have formalized the message.
National health care and climate change remain hugely
important. They are divisive and difficult. And there will be no
meaningful progress on either without a draw-down on our overseas
adventurism and the larger military budget.
Thus Afghanistan towers above all. The decline of the Democratic Party
and the US as a whole dates directly to March, 1965, when Lyndon
Johnson escalated the war in Vietnam. The ensuing decade of futility
overflowed with agonized analysis and absurd apologia.
In the end, all the US could do was spend, destroy, kill, die and flee.
So, too, Afghanistan. Be the motive geo-political,
anti-terrorist, petro-chemical, feminist, humanitarian, or just plain
not wanting to "lose," American bombs from the air and boots on the
ground will simply dissolve and disappear in an ocean of shifting sands
and ancient enmities.
Whatever his admirers fear might be said about Obama "losing" this
hopeless sinkhole will be screamed anyway by the Rogue/Rouge Right, no
matter what he does. In their eyes, all ensuing terror attacks,
economic downturns, human frailties, stubs of the toe and twists of
inscrutable fate will be Barack Obama's fault, no matter what or why.
Standing down in Afghanistan and Iraq would be truly historic. It could
end the epoch---dating to 1492---when Europe continually marched
throughout the Third World. More narrowly, it would acknowledge, at
last, America's inability to shape every corner of the Earth to its
overbearing whim.
Perhaps it would finally curb this nation's addiction to squandering
blood and treasure on these absurd, hopeless and ultimately suicidal
military excursions.
For Obama and 2012, it might make the dream of meaningful health and
energy reform financially feasible. It could prevent the liberal base
in this country from shattering, as it did in 1968, opening the door to
Nixon, Reagan, Bush and Bush....and now to the likes of Limbaugh, Beck,
Palin and Dobbs.
Few things are guaranteed in politics. But one certainty is
that an escalation in Afghanistan will again poison the Democratic
Party and leave Barack Obama an empty political husk. The brilliant,
good-hearted Garry Wills begs Obama to do the right thing for the sake
of morality and sanity.
But if Obama has any hope of guiding a coherent administration
for the rest of this term, or of winning a second one, he has no
choice. The Graveyard of Great Powers awaits yet another misguided
imperial attacker.
Let's hope, pray, work and fight to make sure that this time, we step aside.