SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Cowed Interior to Consider Mountaintop Removal Rule Once Plundering Is Over in 2011
Nov 02, 2009
It's funny how these embarrassing announcements always come on late Friday afternoon.
While anti-mountaintop removal protests spread across the nation
and at the EPA headquarters in Washington, DC last Friday, a legal
representative for the Department of Interior checked the empty parking
lot of the National Press Club and then scurried over to the dark
corridors of the US District Court in Washington, DC, and filed the
DOI's intention to consider a revision of the blatant Bush-era hijacking of the 25-year-old stream buffer zone rule, which was intended to stop mine waste from being dumped within a 100 feet of streams...in 2011.
Wow, cracking down on mountaintop removal by 2011?
Hold on a minute, says Bush-relic and Acting OSMRE director Glenda
Owens. In her statement to the District Court, she resolutely declared, "it would be premature at this point to speculate on a timeline for completion of any final rule."
Noting that 1,400 miles of streams have been directly impacted by
coal mining waste in Kentucky alone, Teri Blanton, of Kentuckians for
the Commonwealth, asks: "In the meantime, what is the DOI's interim
plan? Without the Clean Water Protection Act, what rule is going to be
protecting the streams now? Where is the sound science in two more
years of unchecked destruction of the streams."
A critical process in mountaintop removal operations, the dumping of
coal mining waste has jammed and sullied an estimated 2,000 miles of
streams in the Appalachian mountain region headwaters and waterways.
As the DOI tarries, the plunder of Appalachia
for the small seams of needless coal will continue unabated, despite
Department of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar's statement in June that,
"The steps we are taking today are a firm departure from the previous
administration's approach to mountaintop coal mining, which failed to
protect our communities, water and wildlife in Appalachia."
Million of pounds of ammonium nitrate/fuel oil explosives detonate
daily across the lush Appalachian mountains through needless
mountaintop removal operations--including the clean energy landmark of
Coal River Mountain.
Owens, a career bureaucrat who infamously defended George Bush's disastrous mining policy
on mountaintop removal operations, is still sorta figuring out the
OSMRE's ruling on the "approximate original contour"--32 years after
the passing of SMCRA. Her testimony at the Congressional hearings for
the 30th anniversary of SMCRA in 2007 is now considered notoriously out of touch with coalfield realities.
In effect, Owens' embarrassing statement to the US District Court last Friday is a wakeup call on why Friend of Big Coal Joseph Pizarchik's
nomination for directorship of the demoralized OMSRE agency in charge
of administrating the rules of the Surface Mine Control and Reclamation
Act has been blocked in the Senate.
Given his disingenuous testimony
on mountaintop removal at his nomination hearing, Pizarchik would
simply continue the OMSRE lackluster reign of errors and delay.
According to the Alliance for Appalachia: "In April 2009, DOI
Secretary Salazar requested that the Stream Buffer Zone Rule change be
vacated; this decision was applauded by groups working to protect
Appalachian streams and communities. This recent decision by the
Department of the Interior appears to run counter to the Department's
earlier actions and statements, including those outlined in a June
inter-agency Memorandum of Understanding."
When a federal court rejected the DOI's initial attempt to reverse the Bush-era changes this summer, the cowed DOI pitifully responded
that it was "determined toimprove mining practices and we will do so
within the context of the court's ruling, which we are reviewing."
The Sierra Club points out that the DOI is spinning its wheels.
In the meantime, as the DOI flounders, lobby efforts by coalfield residents and national clean water advocates continue to appeal to the EPA, and to members of the US Congress to pass the Clean Water Protection Act and the Appalachian Restoration Act.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Jeff Biggers
Jeff Biggers is the author of In Sardinia: An Unexpected Journey in Italy, and other works of history.
It's funny how these embarrassing announcements always come on late Friday afternoon.
While anti-mountaintop removal protests spread across the nation
and at the EPA headquarters in Washington, DC last Friday, a legal
representative for the Department of Interior checked the empty parking
lot of the National Press Club and then scurried over to the dark
corridors of the US District Court in Washington, DC, and filed the
DOI's intention to consider a revision of the blatant Bush-era hijacking of the 25-year-old stream buffer zone rule, which was intended to stop mine waste from being dumped within a 100 feet of streams...in 2011.
Wow, cracking down on mountaintop removal by 2011?
Hold on a minute, says Bush-relic and Acting OSMRE director Glenda
Owens. In her statement to the District Court, she resolutely declared, "it would be premature at this point to speculate on a timeline for completion of any final rule."
Noting that 1,400 miles of streams have been directly impacted by
coal mining waste in Kentucky alone, Teri Blanton, of Kentuckians for
the Commonwealth, asks: "In the meantime, what is the DOI's interim
plan? Without the Clean Water Protection Act, what rule is going to be
protecting the streams now? Where is the sound science in two more
years of unchecked destruction of the streams."
A critical process in mountaintop removal operations, the dumping of
coal mining waste has jammed and sullied an estimated 2,000 miles of
streams in the Appalachian mountain region headwaters and waterways.
As the DOI tarries, the plunder of Appalachia
for the small seams of needless coal will continue unabated, despite
Department of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar's statement in June that,
"The steps we are taking today are a firm departure from the previous
administration's approach to mountaintop coal mining, which failed to
protect our communities, water and wildlife in Appalachia."
Million of pounds of ammonium nitrate/fuel oil explosives detonate
daily across the lush Appalachian mountains through needless
mountaintop removal operations--including the clean energy landmark of
Coal River Mountain.
Owens, a career bureaucrat who infamously defended George Bush's disastrous mining policy
on mountaintop removal operations, is still sorta figuring out the
OSMRE's ruling on the "approximate original contour"--32 years after
the passing of SMCRA. Her testimony at the Congressional hearings for
the 30th anniversary of SMCRA in 2007 is now considered notoriously out of touch with coalfield realities.
In effect, Owens' embarrassing statement to the US District Court last Friday is a wakeup call on why Friend of Big Coal Joseph Pizarchik's
nomination for directorship of the demoralized OMSRE agency in charge
of administrating the rules of the Surface Mine Control and Reclamation
Act has been blocked in the Senate.
Given his disingenuous testimony
on mountaintop removal at his nomination hearing, Pizarchik would
simply continue the OMSRE lackluster reign of errors and delay.
According to the Alliance for Appalachia: "In April 2009, DOI
Secretary Salazar requested that the Stream Buffer Zone Rule change be
vacated; this decision was applauded by groups working to protect
Appalachian streams and communities. This recent decision by the
Department of the Interior appears to run counter to the Department's
earlier actions and statements, including those outlined in a June
inter-agency Memorandum of Understanding."
When a federal court rejected the DOI's initial attempt to reverse the Bush-era changes this summer, the cowed DOI pitifully responded
that it was "determined toimprove mining practices and we will do so
within the context of the court's ruling, which we are reviewing."
The Sierra Club points out that the DOI is spinning its wheels.
In the meantime, as the DOI flounders, lobby efforts by coalfield residents and national clean water advocates continue to appeal to the EPA, and to members of the US Congress to pass the Clean Water Protection Act and the Appalachian Restoration Act.
Jeff Biggers
Jeff Biggers is the author of In Sardinia: An Unexpected Journey in Italy, and other works of history.
It's funny how these embarrassing announcements always come on late Friday afternoon.
While anti-mountaintop removal protests spread across the nation
and at the EPA headquarters in Washington, DC last Friday, a legal
representative for the Department of Interior checked the empty parking
lot of the National Press Club and then scurried over to the dark
corridors of the US District Court in Washington, DC, and filed the
DOI's intention to consider a revision of the blatant Bush-era hijacking of the 25-year-old stream buffer zone rule, which was intended to stop mine waste from being dumped within a 100 feet of streams...in 2011.
Wow, cracking down on mountaintop removal by 2011?
Hold on a minute, says Bush-relic and Acting OSMRE director Glenda
Owens. In her statement to the District Court, she resolutely declared, "it would be premature at this point to speculate on a timeline for completion of any final rule."
Noting that 1,400 miles of streams have been directly impacted by
coal mining waste in Kentucky alone, Teri Blanton, of Kentuckians for
the Commonwealth, asks: "In the meantime, what is the DOI's interim
plan? Without the Clean Water Protection Act, what rule is going to be
protecting the streams now? Where is the sound science in two more
years of unchecked destruction of the streams."
A critical process in mountaintop removal operations, the dumping of
coal mining waste has jammed and sullied an estimated 2,000 miles of
streams in the Appalachian mountain region headwaters and waterways.
As the DOI tarries, the plunder of Appalachia
for the small seams of needless coal will continue unabated, despite
Department of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar's statement in June that,
"The steps we are taking today are a firm departure from the previous
administration's approach to mountaintop coal mining, which failed to
protect our communities, water and wildlife in Appalachia."
Million of pounds of ammonium nitrate/fuel oil explosives detonate
daily across the lush Appalachian mountains through needless
mountaintop removal operations--including the clean energy landmark of
Coal River Mountain.
Owens, a career bureaucrat who infamously defended George Bush's disastrous mining policy
on mountaintop removal operations, is still sorta figuring out the
OSMRE's ruling on the "approximate original contour"--32 years after
the passing of SMCRA. Her testimony at the Congressional hearings for
the 30th anniversary of SMCRA in 2007 is now considered notoriously out of touch with coalfield realities.
In effect, Owens' embarrassing statement to the US District Court last Friday is a wakeup call on why Friend of Big Coal Joseph Pizarchik's
nomination for directorship of the demoralized OMSRE agency in charge
of administrating the rules of the Surface Mine Control and Reclamation
Act has been blocked in the Senate.
Given his disingenuous testimony
on mountaintop removal at his nomination hearing, Pizarchik would
simply continue the OMSRE lackluster reign of errors and delay.
According to the Alliance for Appalachia: "In April 2009, DOI
Secretary Salazar requested that the Stream Buffer Zone Rule change be
vacated; this decision was applauded by groups working to protect
Appalachian streams and communities. This recent decision by the
Department of the Interior appears to run counter to the Department's
earlier actions and statements, including those outlined in a June
inter-agency Memorandum of Understanding."
When a federal court rejected the DOI's initial attempt to reverse the Bush-era changes this summer, the cowed DOI pitifully responded
that it was "determined toimprove mining practices and we will do so
within the context of the court's ruling, which we are reviewing."
The Sierra Club points out that the DOI is spinning its wheels.
In the meantime, as the DOI flounders, lobby efforts by coalfield residents and national clean water advocates continue to appeal to the EPA, and to members of the US Congress to pass the Clean Water Protection Act and the Appalachian Restoration Act.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.