Obama Should Meet 'Rethink Afghanistan' Caucus
President Obama, who is under pressure from the Pentagon and defense
contractors to surge 40,000 additional U.S. troops into occupied
Afghanistan, will meet Tuesday with members of Congress to discuss the sorry state of the mission and its uncertain future.
That's the good news -- sort of.
At least the president is talking to the civilian leaders who,
according to the U.S. Constitution, are supposed to be making decisions
about whether to engage in and escalate wars.
The bad news is that the president and Vice President Joe Biden (who
is reportedly skeptical about expanding the occupation force) are not
planning to meet with members of Congress who have studied the conflict
and determined that it is time to develop a flexible exit strategy.
Here is the list of House and Senate members who got the White House invite:
SENATORS
* Harry Reid, Majority Leader, D-NV
* Dick Durbin, Majority Whip, D-IL
* Mitch McConnell, Republican Leader, R-KY
* Jon Kyl, Republican Whip, R-AZ
* Carl Levin, Armed Services Chair, D-MI
* John McCain, Armed Services Ranking Member, R-AZ
* Daniel Inouye, Appropriations Chair and Defense Subcommittee Chair, D-HI
* Thad Cochran, Appropriations Ranking Member and Defense Subcommittee Ranking, R-MS
* John Kerry, Foreign Affairs Chair, D-MA
* Richard Lugar, Foreign Affairs Ranking Member, R-IN
* Patrick Leahy, Foreign Operations Appropriations Chair, D-VT
* Judd Gregg, Foreign Operations Appropriations Ranking Member, R-NH
* Dianne Feinstein, Intelligence Committee Chair, D-CA
* Kit Bond, Intelligence Committee Ranking Member, R-MOREPRESENTATIVES
* Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA
* Steny Hoyer, Majority Leader, D-MD
* John Boehner, Republican Leader, R-OH
* James Clyburn, Majority Whip, D-SC
* Eric Cantor, Republican Whip, R-VA
* Ike Skelton, Armed Services Chair, D-MO
* Howard McKeon, Armed Services Ranking Member, R-CA
* Howard Berman, Foreign Affairs Chair, D-CA
* Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Foreign Affairs Ranking Member, R-FL
* David Obey, Appropriations Chair, D-WI
* Jerry Lewis, Appropriations Ranking Member, R-CA
* Nita Lowey, Foreign Operations Appropriations Chair, D-NY
* Kay Granger, Foreign Operations Appropriations Ranking Member, R-TX
* John Murtha, Appropriations, Defense Subcommittee Chair, D-PA
* Bill Young, Appropriations, Defense Subcommittee Ranking Member, R-FL
* Silvestre Reyes, Intelligence Committee Chairman, D-TX
* Peter Hoekstra, Intelligence Committee Ranking Member, R-MI
Readers will note that there are plenty of Republican hawks -- led by McCain -- on the list.
And, yes, there are some skeptics -- such as Durbin and Kerry.
But where are Senator Russ Feingold, D-Wisconsin, and Senator Bernie
Sanders, I-Vermont, who have emerged as outspoken advocates for a
rethink of the occupation and, in Feingold's case, a flexible exit
strategy? Feingold, a member of the Intelligence Committee who has
spent more time than most members in southern Asia, knows the territory
well. And he would bring an alternative point of view to what is, after
all, being billed as a frank and open discussions of strategy. (White
House spokesman Robert Gibbs says: "The president has discussed wanting
to hear from all of those that are involved in this, and certainly
Congress plays a big role in this.")
Where is Massachusetts Congressman Jim McGovern's name on the list?
McGovern has visited Afghanistan, met with troops and commanders,
consulted with international security and development strategists, and
come to share their conclusion that an escalation of U.S. forces would
be a bad idea. The well-regarded vice chair of the Rules Committee is,
as well, the sponsor of legislation demanding the development of an
exit strategy. That legislation just attracted its 99th cosponsor in
the House, meaning that with McGovern himself it now has 100 signed-on
backers -- including a number of conservative Republicans.
McGovern and Congressman Walter Jones, R-North Carolina, recently circulated a letter opposing General Stanley McChrystal's bid to shift 40,000 additional troops to Afghanistan.
More than 50 House Democrats and Republicans signed the letter,
which argues that "the last thing that our nation needs as it struggles
with the pain of a severe economic crisis and a mountain of debt is
another military quagmire. We believe that is why recent polls
consistently show that a majority of Americans are opposed to a
military escalation in Afghanistan."
The dissenting members are right about the polls.
They are right about the quagmire, a point brilliantly made by Robert Greenwald's just-released documentary "Rethink Afghanistan".
The president is right to consult Congress.
But he is wrong -- very wrong -- to consult only with supporters of
the escalation and cautious critics. It reinforces a problem
highlighted by Greenwald. "The echo chambers in Washington have long
argued that Afghanistan is the war of necessity," the director
explains. "This reasoning excluded any opposing viewpoints and has
mired us in what is now perceived as the endless war."
The president should at least give a hearing to those members of the
House and Senate who have had the wherewithal and the courage to
challenge the convention wisdom that says the occupation of Afghanistan
must continue -- and must continue to expand.
Instead of the defenders of the status quo, Obama should consult the "Rethink Afghanistan" caucus.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
President Obama, who is under pressure from the Pentagon and defense
contractors to surge 40,000 additional U.S. troops into occupied
Afghanistan, will meet Tuesday with members of Congress to discuss the sorry state of the mission and its uncertain future.
That's the good news -- sort of.
At least the president is talking to the civilian leaders who,
according to the U.S. Constitution, are supposed to be making decisions
about whether to engage in and escalate wars.
The bad news is that the president and Vice President Joe Biden (who
is reportedly skeptical about expanding the occupation force) are not
planning to meet with members of Congress who have studied the conflict
and determined that it is time to develop a flexible exit strategy.
Here is the list of House and Senate members who got the White House invite:
SENATORS
* Harry Reid, Majority Leader, D-NV
* Dick Durbin, Majority Whip, D-IL
* Mitch McConnell, Republican Leader, R-KY
* Jon Kyl, Republican Whip, R-AZ
* Carl Levin, Armed Services Chair, D-MI
* John McCain, Armed Services Ranking Member, R-AZ
* Daniel Inouye, Appropriations Chair and Defense Subcommittee Chair, D-HI
* Thad Cochran, Appropriations Ranking Member and Defense Subcommittee Ranking, R-MS
* John Kerry, Foreign Affairs Chair, D-MA
* Richard Lugar, Foreign Affairs Ranking Member, R-IN
* Patrick Leahy, Foreign Operations Appropriations Chair, D-VT
* Judd Gregg, Foreign Operations Appropriations Ranking Member, R-NH
* Dianne Feinstein, Intelligence Committee Chair, D-CA
* Kit Bond, Intelligence Committee Ranking Member, R-MOREPRESENTATIVES
* Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA
* Steny Hoyer, Majority Leader, D-MD
* John Boehner, Republican Leader, R-OH
* James Clyburn, Majority Whip, D-SC
* Eric Cantor, Republican Whip, R-VA
* Ike Skelton, Armed Services Chair, D-MO
* Howard McKeon, Armed Services Ranking Member, R-CA
* Howard Berman, Foreign Affairs Chair, D-CA
* Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Foreign Affairs Ranking Member, R-FL
* David Obey, Appropriations Chair, D-WI
* Jerry Lewis, Appropriations Ranking Member, R-CA
* Nita Lowey, Foreign Operations Appropriations Chair, D-NY
* Kay Granger, Foreign Operations Appropriations Ranking Member, R-TX
* John Murtha, Appropriations, Defense Subcommittee Chair, D-PA
* Bill Young, Appropriations, Defense Subcommittee Ranking Member, R-FL
* Silvestre Reyes, Intelligence Committee Chairman, D-TX
* Peter Hoekstra, Intelligence Committee Ranking Member, R-MI
Readers will note that there are plenty of Republican hawks -- led by McCain -- on the list.
And, yes, there are some skeptics -- such as Durbin and Kerry.
But where are Senator Russ Feingold, D-Wisconsin, and Senator Bernie
Sanders, I-Vermont, who have emerged as outspoken advocates for a
rethink of the occupation and, in Feingold's case, a flexible exit
strategy? Feingold, a member of the Intelligence Committee who has
spent more time than most members in southern Asia, knows the territory
well. And he would bring an alternative point of view to what is, after
all, being billed as a frank and open discussions of strategy. (White
House spokesman Robert Gibbs says: "The president has discussed wanting
to hear from all of those that are involved in this, and certainly
Congress plays a big role in this.")
Where is Massachusetts Congressman Jim McGovern's name on the list?
McGovern has visited Afghanistan, met with troops and commanders,
consulted with international security and development strategists, and
come to share their conclusion that an escalation of U.S. forces would
be a bad idea. The well-regarded vice chair of the Rules Committee is,
as well, the sponsor of legislation demanding the development of an
exit strategy. That legislation just attracted its 99th cosponsor in
the House, meaning that with McGovern himself it now has 100 signed-on
backers -- including a number of conservative Republicans.
McGovern and Congressman Walter Jones, R-North Carolina, recently circulated a letter opposing General Stanley McChrystal's bid to shift 40,000 additional troops to Afghanistan.
More than 50 House Democrats and Republicans signed the letter,
which argues that "the last thing that our nation needs as it struggles
with the pain of a severe economic crisis and a mountain of debt is
another military quagmire. We believe that is why recent polls
consistently show that a majority of Americans are opposed to a
military escalation in Afghanistan."
The dissenting members are right about the polls.
They are right about the quagmire, a point brilliantly made by Robert Greenwald's just-released documentary "Rethink Afghanistan".
The president is right to consult Congress.
But he is wrong -- very wrong -- to consult only with supporters of
the escalation and cautious critics. It reinforces a problem
highlighted by Greenwald. "The echo chambers in Washington have long
argued that Afghanistan is the war of necessity," the director
explains. "This reasoning excluded any opposing viewpoints and has
mired us in what is now perceived as the endless war."
The president should at least give a hearing to those members of the
House and Senate who have had the wherewithal and the courage to
challenge the convention wisdom that says the occupation of Afghanistan
must continue -- and must continue to expand.
Instead of the defenders of the status quo, Obama should consult the "Rethink Afghanistan" caucus.
President Obama, who is under pressure from the Pentagon and defense
contractors to surge 40,000 additional U.S. troops into occupied
Afghanistan, will meet Tuesday with members of Congress to discuss the sorry state of the mission and its uncertain future.
That's the good news -- sort of.
At least the president is talking to the civilian leaders who,
according to the U.S. Constitution, are supposed to be making decisions
about whether to engage in and escalate wars.
The bad news is that the president and Vice President Joe Biden (who
is reportedly skeptical about expanding the occupation force) are not
planning to meet with members of Congress who have studied the conflict
and determined that it is time to develop a flexible exit strategy.
Here is the list of House and Senate members who got the White House invite:
SENATORS
* Harry Reid, Majority Leader, D-NV
* Dick Durbin, Majority Whip, D-IL
* Mitch McConnell, Republican Leader, R-KY
* Jon Kyl, Republican Whip, R-AZ
* Carl Levin, Armed Services Chair, D-MI
* John McCain, Armed Services Ranking Member, R-AZ
* Daniel Inouye, Appropriations Chair and Defense Subcommittee Chair, D-HI
* Thad Cochran, Appropriations Ranking Member and Defense Subcommittee Ranking, R-MS
* John Kerry, Foreign Affairs Chair, D-MA
* Richard Lugar, Foreign Affairs Ranking Member, R-IN
* Patrick Leahy, Foreign Operations Appropriations Chair, D-VT
* Judd Gregg, Foreign Operations Appropriations Ranking Member, R-NH
* Dianne Feinstein, Intelligence Committee Chair, D-CA
* Kit Bond, Intelligence Committee Ranking Member, R-MOREPRESENTATIVES
* Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA
* Steny Hoyer, Majority Leader, D-MD
* John Boehner, Republican Leader, R-OH
* James Clyburn, Majority Whip, D-SC
* Eric Cantor, Republican Whip, R-VA
* Ike Skelton, Armed Services Chair, D-MO
* Howard McKeon, Armed Services Ranking Member, R-CA
* Howard Berman, Foreign Affairs Chair, D-CA
* Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Foreign Affairs Ranking Member, R-FL
* David Obey, Appropriations Chair, D-WI
* Jerry Lewis, Appropriations Ranking Member, R-CA
* Nita Lowey, Foreign Operations Appropriations Chair, D-NY
* Kay Granger, Foreign Operations Appropriations Ranking Member, R-TX
* John Murtha, Appropriations, Defense Subcommittee Chair, D-PA
* Bill Young, Appropriations, Defense Subcommittee Ranking Member, R-FL
* Silvestre Reyes, Intelligence Committee Chairman, D-TX
* Peter Hoekstra, Intelligence Committee Ranking Member, R-MI
Readers will note that there are plenty of Republican hawks -- led by McCain -- on the list.
And, yes, there are some skeptics -- such as Durbin and Kerry.
But where are Senator Russ Feingold, D-Wisconsin, and Senator Bernie
Sanders, I-Vermont, who have emerged as outspoken advocates for a
rethink of the occupation and, in Feingold's case, a flexible exit
strategy? Feingold, a member of the Intelligence Committee who has
spent more time than most members in southern Asia, knows the territory
well. And he would bring an alternative point of view to what is, after
all, being billed as a frank and open discussions of strategy. (White
House spokesman Robert Gibbs says: "The president has discussed wanting
to hear from all of those that are involved in this, and certainly
Congress plays a big role in this.")
Where is Massachusetts Congressman Jim McGovern's name on the list?
McGovern has visited Afghanistan, met with troops and commanders,
consulted with international security and development strategists, and
come to share their conclusion that an escalation of U.S. forces would
be a bad idea. The well-regarded vice chair of the Rules Committee is,
as well, the sponsor of legislation demanding the development of an
exit strategy. That legislation just attracted its 99th cosponsor in
the House, meaning that with McGovern himself it now has 100 signed-on
backers -- including a number of conservative Republicans.
McGovern and Congressman Walter Jones, R-North Carolina, recently circulated a letter opposing General Stanley McChrystal's bid to shift 40,000 additional troops to Afghanistan.
More than 50 House Democrats and Republicans signed the letter,
which argues that "the last thing that our nation needs as it struggles
with the pain of a severe economic crisis and a mountain of debt is
another military quagmire. We believe that is why recent polls
consistently show that a majority of Americans are opposed to a
military escalation in Afghanistan."
The dissenting members are right about the polls.
They are right about the quagmire, a point brilliantly made by Robert Greenwald's just-released documentary "Rethink Afghanistan".
The president is right to consult Congress.
But he is wrong -- very wrong -- to consult only with supporters of
the escalation and cautious critics. It reinforces a problem
highlighted by Greenwald. "The echo chambers in Washington have long
argued that Afghanistan is the war of necessity," the director
explains. "This reasoning excluded any opposing viewpoints and has
mired us in what is now perceived as the endless war."
The president should at least give a hearing to those members of the
House and Senate who have had the wherewithal and the courage to
challenge the convention wisdom that says the occupation of Afghanistan
must continue -- and must continue to expand.
Instead of the defenders of the status quo, Obama should consult the "Rethink Afghanistan" caucus.