Torturer in Chief: Media Pick Pelosi over Cheney
Beltway journalists seem finally to have a found a torture story
they like. Mind you, not the one about the Bush/Cheney White House
possibly okaying drowning to extract "information" to justify an Iraq
attack -- not that story. The story the Beltway bulldogs have decided to get stuck into is a story about Democrats.
Beltway journalists seem finally to have a found a torture story
they like. Mind you, not the one about the Bush/Cheney White House
possibly okaying drowning to extract "information" to justify an Iraq
attack -- not that story. The story the Beltway bulldogs have decided to get stuck into is a story about Democrats.
Let's recap. Prosecutions of members of the Bush/Cheney
administration became a real possibility last month. As part of an
ongoing court case, the Department of Justice released memos detailing
techniques approved for use on terror suspects. CIA interrogators were
given legal authorization to use water torture, to slam an alleged
"high-value" detainee's head against a wall, to place insects inside a
"confinement box" to induce fear, and force a detainee to remain awake
for 11 consecutive days. All that, according to a memo signed by the
former head of the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC),
Jay Bybee now a federal judge.
Subsequent reports including commentary by an FBI interrogator who
interrogated one of the same suspects by traditional -- non-torture --
means, suggests that even knowing (as most interrogators did) that
torture produces untrustworthy evidence (because torture victims make
things up to make the torture stop), officials at the highest level in
the Bush/Cheney administration okayed torture tactics.
Did they order abuse specifically to extract an Al Qaeda/ Saddam
Hussein link ? Maybe. But we'll never know, because instead of even
asking the question, the headline story in the media has become: "Nancy
Pelosi is a hypocrite."
"Pelosi a hypocrite" vs. "Cheney okayed torture for political
reasons:" It seems easy to pick the hotter scoop. Yet David Gregory (of
Meet the Press) was all over Pelosi as were the rest of the
Sunday squawkers this weekend. On Fox News they talk about almost
nothing else. Why didn't the House speaker push back harder? When did
she actually know what? Was she right to hold a press conference
blaming the CIA? They're not bad questions. They're important
questions. But when it comes to torture, is Pelosi the thorn or the
point?
"This is not where the White House wants the public discussion to be," Gregory
said on Morning Joe. Too right. But it's bigger than that. On this
question of torture-for-war or Pelosi political mis-step, it's not just
the White House that wants a different conversation. It's America. We
need accountability for torture -- and prosecutions -- if we don't want
heinous practises to continue. And we need a press that grasps, not
avoids, the serious questions. Scrutinize Pelosi all you like -- but
right after Cheney's shut up and Bybee's off the bench.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Beltway journalists seem finally to have a found a torture story
they like. Mind you, not the one about the Bush/Cheney White House
possibly okaying drowning to extract "information" to justify an Iraq
attack -- not that story. The story the Beltway bulldogs have decided to get stuck into is a story about Democrats.
Let's recap. Prosecutions of members of the Bush/Cheney
administration became a real possibility last month. As part of an
ongoing court case, the Department of Justice released memos detailing
techniques approved for use on terror suspects. CIA interrogators were
given legal authorization to use water torture, to slam an alleged
"high-value" detainee's head against a wall, to place insects inside a
"confinement box" to induce fear, and force a detainee to remain awake
for 11 consecutive days. All that, according to a memo signed by the
former head of the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC),
Jay Bybee now a federal judge.
Subsequent reports including commentary by an FBI interrogator who
interrogated one of the same suspects by traditional -- non-torture --
means, suggests that even knowing (as most interrogators did) that
torture produces untrustworthy evidence (because torture victims make
things up to make the torture stop), officials at the highest level in
the Bush/Cheney administration okayed torture tactics.
Did they order abuse specifically to extract an Al Qaeda/ Saddam
Hussein link ? Maybe. But we'll never know, because instead of even
asking the question, the headline story in the media has become: "Nancy
Pelosi is a hypocrite."
"Pelosi a hypocrite" vs. "Cheney okayed torture for political
reasons:" It seems easy to pick the hotter scoop. Yet David Gregory (of
Meet the Press) was all over Pelosi as were the rest of the
Sunday squawkers this weekend. On Fox News they talk about almost
nothing else. Why didn't the House speaker push back harder? When did
she actually know what? Was she right to hold a press conference
blaming the CIA? They're not bad questions. They're important
questions. But when it comes to torture, is Pelosi the thorn or the
point?
"This is not where the White House wants the public discussion to be," Gregory
said on Morning Joe. Too right. But it's bigger than that. On this
question of torture-for-war or Pelosi political mis-step, it's not just
the White House that wants a different conversation. It's America. We
need accountability for torture -- and prosecutions -- if we don't want
heinous practises to continue. And we need a press that grasps, not
avoids, the serious questions. Scrutinize Pelosi all you like -- but
right after Cheney's shut up and Bybee's off the bench.
Beltway journalists seem finally to have a found a torture story
they like. Mind you, not the one about the Bush/Cheney White House
possibly okaying drowning to extract "information" to justify an Iraq
attack -- not that story. The story the Beltway bulldogs have decided to get stuck into is a story about Democrats.
Let's recap. Prosecutions of members of the Bush/Cheney
administration became a real possibility last month. As part of an
ongoing court case, the Department of Justice released memos detailing
techniques approved for use on terror suspects. CIA interrogators were
given legal authorization to use water torture, to slam an alleged
"high-value" detainee's head against a wall, to place insects inside a
"confinement box" to induce fear, and force a detainee to remain awake
for 11 consecutive days. All that, according to a memo signed by the
former head of the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC),
Jay Bybee now a federal judge.
Subsequent reports including commentary by an FBI interrogator who
interrogated one of the same suspects by traditional -- non-torture --
means, suggests that even knowing (as most interrogators did) that
torture produces untrustworthy evidence (because torture victims make
things up to make the torture stop), officials at the highest level in
the Bush/Cheney administration okayed torture tactics.
Did they order abuse specifically to extract an Al Qaeda/ Saddam
Hussein link ? Maybe. But we'll never know, because instead of even
asking the question, the headline story in the media has become: "Nancy
Pelosi is a hypocrite."
"Pelosi a hypocrite" vs. "Cheney okayed torture for political
reasons:" It seems easy to pick the hotter scoop. Yet David Gregory (of
Meet the Press) was all over Pelosi as were the rest of the
Sunday squawkers this weekend. On Fox News they talk about almost
nothing else. Why didn't the House speaker push back harder? When did
she actually know what? Was she right to hold a press conference
blaming the CIA? They're not bad questions. They're important
questions. But when it comes to torture, is Pelosi the thorn or the
point?
"This is not where the White House wants the public discussion to be," Gregory
said on Morning Joe. Too right. But it's bigger than that. On this
question of torture-for-war or Pelosi political mis-step, it's not just
the White House that wants a different conversation. It's America. We
need accountability for torture -- and prosecutions -- if we don't want
heinous practises to continue. And we need a press that grasps, not
avoids, the serious questions. Scrutinize Pelosi all you like -- but
right after Cheney's shut up and Bybee's off the bench.