SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Progressive Caucus Report on Afghanistan
May 13, 2009
The Congressional Progressive Caucus has released a set of
recommendations based on its series of forums on Afghanistan--the
sixth and last of which will be held Wednesday. It's releasing the
report now so its membership may consider it in deciding how to vote
on the $96 billion War Supplemental this week.
Here is a preview of just a few of the valuable recommendations in the
report:
"Require an 80-20 ratio (political-military) with all future US funding,
with a special inspector general to monitor the implementation of this
ratio"
Even Gen. Petraeus calls for this 80-20 ratio in his counterinsurgency
strategy, but a panelist on the Afghanistan Forum, Gen. Paul Eaton,
former commander of Iraq's security forces,pointed out that funding in
Afghanistan is 90 percent military.
"Require the immediate cessation of drone attacks
Many of the panelists, including Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson--Colin
Powell's former Chief of Staff -- pointed out that the high number of
civilian deaths from drone attacks creates more enemies and fuels the
insurgency rather than undermining it.
"Require UN involvement in overseeing and mandating the role of US and
international military operations.... Require any increase in US troop
presence is oriented to training and support roles for Afghan security
forces...not for US-led counterinsurgency efforts."
The report reads, "17,000 additional troops are neither sufficient to
manage the conflict nor a useful contribution because the already
deployed US/international forces are not being presently utilized." It
is worth noting that the Petraeus counterinsurgency strategy calls for
upwards of 400,000 troops. Col. Wilkerson recommended the
support/training role of any additional troops.
"Require the initiative of a dialogue process, with Saudi Arabia--who
initiated previous talks between Afghan government and ethnic/tribal
leaders--taking the lead, or with other international organization
taking the lead."
Its clear that the insurgency will not be defeated and security not
achieved until ethnic and tribal leaders are brought into the fold.
While I personally would like to see a call for immediate withdrawal of
US troops, and a sharp and smart focus on diplomatic and political
solutions to the conflict, these recommendations would improve the
current strategy of escalation that destabilizes the region and
threatens President Obama's domestic and international agenda. Kudos to
the Progressive Caucus for setting up these forums, listening to people
with a deep understanding of the issues, and putting forth
recommendations in a timely manner.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Nation
Katrina Vanden Heuvel
Katrina vanden Heuvel is an American editor and publisher. She is the editor, publisher, and part-owner of the magazine The Nation. She has been the magazine's editor since 1995.
The Congressional Progressive Caucus has released a set of
recommendations based on its series of forums on Afghanistan--the
sixth and last of which will be held Wednesday. It's releasing the
report now so its membership may consider it in deciding how to vote
on the $96 billion War Supplemental this week.
Here is a preview of just a few of the valuable recommendations in the
report:
"Require an 80-20 ratio (political-military) with all future US funding,
with a special inspector general to monitor the implementation of this
ratio"
Even Gen. Petraeus calls for this 80-20 ratio in his counterinsurgency
strategy, but a panelist on the Afghanistan Forum, Gen. Paul Eaton,
former commander of Iraq's security forces,pointed out that funding in
Afghanistan is 90 percent military.
"Require the immediate cessation of drone attacks
Many of the panelists, including Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson--Colin
Powell's former Chief of Staff -- pointed out that the high number of
civilian deaths from drone attacks creates more enemies and fuels the
insurgency rather than undermining it.
"Require UN involvement in overseeing and mandating the role of US and
international military operations.... Require any increase in US troop
presence is oriented to training and support roles for Afghan security
forces...not for US-led counterinsurgency efforts."
The report reads, "17,000 additional troops are neither sufficient to
manage the conflict nor a useful contribution because the already
deployed US/international forces are not being presently utilized." It
is worth noting that the Petraeus counterinsurgency strategy calls for
upwards of 400,000 troops. Col. Wilkerson recommended the
support/training role of any additional troops.
"Require the initiative of a dialogue process, with Saudi Arabia--who
initiated previous talks between Afghan government and ethnic/tribal
leaders--taking the lead, or with other international organization
taking the lead."
Its clear that the insurgency will not be defeated and security not
achieved until ethnic and tribal leaders are brought into the fold.
While I personally would like to see a call for immediate withdrawal of
US troops, and a sharp and smart focus on diplomatic and political
solutions to the conflict, these recommendations would improve the
current strategy of escalation that destabilizes the region and
threatens President Obama's domestic and international agenda. Kudos to
the Progressive Caucus for setting up these forums, listening to people
with a deep understanding of the issues, and putting forth
recommendations in a timely manner.
Katrina Vanden Heuvel
Katrina vanden Heuvel is an American editor and publisher. She is the editor, publisher, and part-owner of the magazine The Nation. She has been the magazine's editor since 1995.
The Congressional Progressive Caucus has released a set of
recommendations based on its series of forums on Afghanistan--the
sixth and last of which will be held Wednesday. It's releasing the
report now so its membership may consider it in deciding how to vote
on the $96 billion War Supplemental this week.
Here is a preview of just a few of the valuable recommendations in the
report:
"Require an 80-20 ratio (political-military) with all future US funding,
with a special inspector general to monitor the implementation of this
ratio"
Even Gen. Petraeus calls for this 80-20 ratio in his counterinsurgency
strategy, but a panelist on the Afghanistan Forum, Gen. Paul Eaton,
former commander of Iraq's security forces,pointed out that funding in
Afghanistan is 90 percent military.
"Require the immediate cessation of drone attacks
Many of the panelists, including Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson--Colin
Powell's former Chief of Staff -- pointed out that the high number of
civilian deaths from drone attacks creates more enemies and fuels the
insurgency rather than undermining it.
"Require UN involvement in overseeing and mandating the role of US and
international military operations.... Require any increase in US troop
presence is oriented to training and support roles for Afghan security
forces...not for US-led counterinsurgency efforts."
The report reads, "17,000 additional troops are neither sufficient to
manage the conflict nor a useful contribution because the already
deployed US/international forces are not being presently utilized." It
is worth noting that the Petraeus counterinsurgency strategy calls for
upwards of 400,000 troops. Col. Wilkerson recommended the
support/training role of any additional troops.
"Require the initiative of a dialogue process, with Saudi Arabia--who
initiated previous talks between Afghan government and ethnic/tribal
leaders--taking the lead, or with other international organization
taking the lead."
Its clear that the insurgency will not be defeated and security not
achieved until ethnic and tribal leaders are brought into the fold.
While I personally would like to see a call for immediate withdrawal of
US troops, and a sharp and smart focus on diplomatic and political
solutions to the conflict, these recommendations would improve the
current strategy of escalation that destabilizes the region and
threatens President Obama's domestic and international agenda. Kudos to
the Progressive Caucus for setting up these forums, listening to people
with a deep understanding of the issues, and putting forth
recommendations in a timely manner.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.