

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Arlen Specter started his political life as a liberal Democrat.
And now the senior senator from Pennsylvania is returning to the fold.
Specter, who has served five terms in the Senate as the last of the
old-school Rockefeller Republicans, has finally given up on his long,
fruitless effort to maintain a moderate base within what has become a
hard-right party.
"Since my election in 1980, as part of the Reagan Big Tent, the
Republican Party has moved far to the right," the senator explained in a statement announcing his decision to leave the GOP fold.
"Last year, more than 200,000 Republicans in Pennsylvania changed their
registration to become Democrats. I now find my political philosophy
more in line with Democrats than Republicans.
U.S. Senator Arlen Specter, R-Pennsylvania, is now U.S. Senator Arlen Specter, D-Pennsylvania.
The big news, of course, is that with Specter's move Democrats will
have 59 members in their Senate caucus (57 Democrats and independents
Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Joe Lieberman of Connecticut). And the
prospect that Democratic-Farmer-Labor candidate Al Franken will soon
take the seat he won in last fall's Minnesota voting means that the
Specter switch should give the Democrats the 60 seats they need to
avert GOP filibusters of legislation and appointments.
For the Obama administration and the Democrats, Specter party switch is the most dramatic development since the election.
Specter's motivations for switching are no mystery.
The senator, who was a liberal Democratic lawyer in Phildelphia in
the 1960s before joining to the GOP as part of a fight to break the
city's Democratic machine, has long been the most left-leaning member
of the Republican caucus in the chamber. He was targeted for defeat by
conservatives -- led by the Wall Street-funded Club for Growth -- in
2004. President Bush and other key Republicans defended him that year,
not out of love for Specter but because they did not want to lose a
seat representing a blue state.
After he backed the economic stimulus plan that all House
Republicans and most Senate Republicans opposed, Specter became the top
target of the Republican right. Former Congressman Pat Toomey, who
narrowly lost the 2004 Pennsylvania primary to Specter, announced that
he would again challenge the senator in 2010; and GOP chair Michael
Steele sent conflicting signals about whether the incumbent would have
the party's support next year.
At the same time, top Democrats -- led by Vice President Joe Biden,
a former senator from neighboring Delaware, and Pennsylvania Governor
Ed Rendell, a former Democratic National Committee chair -- have been
actively lobbying Specter to change his party affiliation.
Specter's first test will come on the issue of the Employee Free
Choice Act. Despite a history of working closely with labor -- and
enjoying union backing in key contests -- the Pennsylvania senator
sided with Republicans in saying he would support a filibuster to block
the pro-labor legislation.
Presumably, the party switch will free Specter from the pressure to
maintain his credibility -- and fund-raising prospects with big
business interests -- by blocking EFCA. He says now that his position
on EFCA is unchanged, but don't take the senator too seriously.
Watch for the newest Democratic senator to become a key player in a
move to tinker with the measure just enough to secure not just his vote
but that of straying Democratic senators such as Arkansan Blanche
Lincoln. (In fact, while Specter will need some cover for an EFCA
switch, it will undoubtedly be easier to bring him over than Lincoln.)
And watch for Specter to start flying his liberal flag on a number of high-profile issues.
Specter was closely tied to Americans for Democratic Action, the
liberal activist group, in his early campaigns as a Republican. The
Philadelphia ADA backed his early campaigns on the Republican line.
A number of key unions, pro-choice and pro-gay rights groups have
backed him over the years. It was not just that Specter voted right now
and again, he maintained amiable relations with these groups.
The fact of those relationships destroyed his prospects as a GOP
presidential contender in 1996. But they form the basis for the
presumption that Specter will not serve as a cautiously moderate
senator from Pennsylvania but as a reasonably liberal Democrat.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Arlen Specter started his political life as a liberal Democrat.
And now the senior senator from Pennsylvania is returning to the fold.
Specter, who has served five terms in the Senate as the last of the
old-school Rockefeller Republicans, has finally given up on his long,
fruitless effort to maintain a moderate base within what has become a
hard-right party.
"Since my election in 1980, as part of the Reagan Big Tent, the
Republican Party has moved far to the right," the senator explained in a statement announcing his decision to leave the GOP fold.
"Last year, more than 200,000 Republicans in Pennsylvania changed their
registration to become Democrats. I now find my political philosophy
more in line with Democrats than Republicans.
U.S. Senator Arlen Specter, R-Pennsylvania, is now U.S. Senator Arlen Specter, D-Pennsylvania.
The big news, of course, is that with Specter's move Democrats will
have 59 members in their Senate caucus (57 Democrats and independents
Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Joe Lieberman of Connecticut). And the
prospect that Democratic-Farmer-Labor candidate Al Franken will soon
take the seat he won in last fall's Minnesota voting means that the
Specter switch should give the Democrats the 60 seats they need to
avert GOP filibusters of legislation and appointments.
For the Obama administration and the Democrats, Specter party switch is the most dramatic development since the election.
Specter's motivations for switching are no mystery.
The senator, who was a liberal Democratic lawyer in Phildelphia in
the 1960s before joining to the GOP as part of a fight to break the
city's Democratic machine, has long been the most left-leaning member
of the Republican caucus in the chamber. He was targeted for defeat by
conservatives -- led by the Wall Street-funded Club for Growth -- in
2004. President Bush and other key Republicans defended him that year,
not out of love for Specter but because they did not want to lose a
seat representing a blue state.
After he backed the economic stimulus plan that all House
Republicans and most Senate Republicans opposed, Specter became the top
target of the Republican right. Former Congressman Pat Toomey, who
narrowly lost the 2004 Pennsylvania primary to Specter, announced that
he would again challenge the senator in 2010; and GOP chair Michael
Steele sent conflicting signals about whether the incumbent would have
the party's support next year.
At the same time, top Democrats -- led by Vice President Joe Biden,
a former senator from neighboring Delaware, and Pennsylvania Governor
Ed Rendell, a former Democratic National Committee chair -- have been
actively lobbying Specter to change his party affiliation.
Specter's first test will come on the issue of the Employee Free
Choice Act. Despite a history of working closely with labor -- and
enjoying union backing in key contests -- the Pennsylvania senator
sided with Republicans in saying he would support a filibuster to block
the pro-labor legislation.
Presumably, the party switch will free Specter from the pressure to
maintain his credibility -- and fund-raising prospects with big
business interests -- by blocking EFCA. He says now that his position
on EFCA is unchanged, but don't take the senator too seriously.
Watch for the newest Democratic senator to become a key player in a
move to tinker with the measure just enough to secure not just his vote
but that of straying Democratic senators such as Arkansan Blanche
Lincoln. (In fact, while Specter will need some cover for an EFCA
switch, it will undoubtedly be easier to bring him over than Lincoln.)
And watch for Specter to start flying his liberal flag on a number of high-profile issues.
Specter was closely tied to Americans for Democratic Action, the
liberal activist group, in his early campaigns as a Republican. The
Philadelphia ADA backed his early campaigns on the Republican line.
A number of key unions, pro-choice and pro-gay rights groups have
backed him over the years. It was not just that Specter voted right now
and again, he maintained amiable relations with these groups.
The fact of those relationships destroyed his prospects as a GOP
presidential contender in 1996. But they form the basis for the
presumption that Specter will not serve as a cautiously moderate
senator from Pennsylvania but as a reasonably liberal Democrat.
Arlen Specter started his political life as a liberal Democrat.
And now the senior senator from Pennsylvania is returning to the fold.
Specter, who has served five terms in the Senate as the last of the
old-school Rockefeller Republicans, has finally given up on his long,
fruitless effort to maintain a moderate base within what has become a
hard-right party.
"Since my election in 1980, as part of the Reagan Big Tent, the
Republican Party has moved far to the right," the senator explained in a statement announcing his decision to leave the GOP fold.
"Last year, more than 200,000 Republicans in Pennsylvania changed their
registration to become Democrats. I now find my political philosophy
more in line with Democrats than Republicans.
U.S. Senator Arlen Specter, R-Pennsylvania, is now U.S. Senator Arlen Specter, D-Pennsylvania.
The big news, of course, is that with Specter's move Democrats will
have 59 members in their Senate caucus (57 Democrats and independents
Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Joe Lieberman of Connecticut). And the
prospect that Democratic-Farmer-Labor candidate Al Franken will soon
take the seat he won in last fall's Minnesota voting means that the
Specter switch should give the Democrats the 60 seats they need to
avert GOP filibusters of legislation and appointments.
For the Obama administration and the Democrats, Specter party switch is the most dramatic development since the election.
Specter's motivations for switching are no mystery.
The senator, who was a liberal Democratic lawyer in Phildelphia in
the 1960s before joining to the GOP as part of a fight to break the
city's Democratic machine, has long been the most left-leaning member
of the Republican caucus in the chamber. He was targeted for defeat by
conservatives -- led by the Wall Street-funded Club for Growth -- in
2004. President Bush and other key Republicans defended him that year,
not out of love for Specter but because they did not want to lose a
seat representing a blue state.
After he backed the economic stimulus plan that all House
Republicans and most Senate Republicans opposed, Specter became the top
target of the Republican right. Former Congressman Pat Toomey, who
narrowly lost the 2004 Pennsylvania primary to Specter, announced that
he would again challenge the senator in 2010; and GOP chair Michael
Steele sent conflicting signals about whether the incumbent would have
the party's support next year.
At the same time, top Democrats -- led by Vice President Joe Biden,
a former senator from neighboring Delaware, and Pennsylvania Governor
Ed Rendell, a former Democratic National Committee chair -- have been
actively lobbying Specter to change his party affiliation.
Specter's first test will come on the issue of the Employee Free
Choice Act. Despite a history of working closely with labor -- and
enjoying union backing in key contests -- the Pennsylvania senator
sided with Republicans in saying he would support a filibuster to block
the pro-labor legislation.
Presumably, the party switch will free Specter from the pressure to
maintain his credibility -- and fund-raising prospects with big
business interests -- by blocking EFCA. He says now that his position
on EFCA is unchanged, but don't take the senator too seriously.
Watch for the newest Democratic senator to become a key player in a
move to tinker with the measure just enough to secure not just his vote
but that of straying Democratic senators such as Arkansan Blanche
Lincoln. (In fact, while Specter will need some cover for an EFCA
switch, it will undoubtedly be easier to bring him over than Lincoln.)
And watch for Specter to start flying his liberal flag on a number of high-profile issues.
Specter was closely tied to Americans for Democratic Action, the
liberal activist group, in his early campaigns as a Republican. The
Philadelphia ADA backed his early campaigns on the Republican line.
A number of key unions, pro-choice and pro-gay rights groups have
backed him over the years. It was not just that Specter voted right now
and again, he maintained amiable relations with these groups.
The fact of those relationships destroyed his prospects as a GOP
presidential contender in 1996. But they form the basis for the
presumption that Specter will not serve as a cautiously moderate
senator from Pennsylvania but as a reasonably liberal Democrat.