Summit Unlikely to Bridge Gap Between Washington and Latin America
The
Obama administration is seeking a "new beginning" in the hemisphere,
and a "more equal partnership" with Latin America - according to
President Obama's point man for the Summit of the Americas. The Summit
will gather 34 presidents from the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago on
April 17-19.
But there is little movement to
match the rhetoric, and the political gulf between Washington and most
of Latin America is large and growing.
As expected, the Obama administration announced the easing of travel
and remittance restrictions for Cuban-Americans with relatives on the
island, and also opened some communications links. This is welcome news
for these Cuban-Americans and some telecom corporations. But it will
not impress the rest of the hemisphere. Several presidents including
Lula da Silva of Brazil have called upon Obama to lift the 47-year-old
embargo. There is a widely shared resentment for what is seen as an
ugly reminder of an era when Washington too often decided which
governments in the region would stand and which would fall.
Cuba has until now been more of a domestic policy than a foreign policy
problem, due to the influence of right-wing Cuban Americans in Florida,
a state that has decided two of the last three U.S. presidential
elections. That is the simple reason that Obama will not lift the
embargo, but now the United States' Cuba policy is also becoming a real
foreign policy problem. Last month Senator Richard Lugar, a Republican
leader on foreign policy who is close to President Obama wrote to the
President that "our current approach [to Cuba] could serve as an
impediment to gaining support for larger goals" in the region.
He could have said the same about our approach to Venezuela, where Washington supported a failed military coup
against the elected government of President Hugo Chavez in 2002, and
has tried - unsuccessfully -- to undermine and isolate that government
ever since. Unfortunately, President Obama is also getting the wrong
advice on this issue. Although Chavez, like the other left presidents
in the region, welcomed the new U.S. president with open arms, the
Obama administration immediately initiated a war of words with hostile
statements that were sure to poison relations at the outset. This was a
mistake, even if it plays well in South Florida.
The Obama administration has also done very little to repair relations
with Bolivia, where the Bush administration's support for the political
opposition, its suspension of Bolivia's trade preferences in the U.S.
market, and a long history of unwanted interference subsumed under "the
war on drugs" has soured relations with Bolivia's first indigenous
president. The Obama team also has yet to reverse the Bush
administration's hostile January move within the WTO, when it objected
to Bolivia's request to exempt public hospitals and health care from
potential ownership by foreign corporations, in accordance with
Bolivia's new constitution.
Nothing would be easier than for this administration to turn a new page
and normalize relations with Cuba, Venezuela, and Bolivia. There are no
substantive issues preventing such normalization - none of these
countries has any nuclear programs, they are all against terrorism and
drug trafficking, and none of them poses even the slightest security
threat to the United States.
The political landscape of Latin America has changed drastically over
the last decade, with left governments now in power in most of the
region. Even before the current world recession, most of them had
rejected the failed economic experiment that the U.S. government still
supports. But Washington's foreign policy establishment has barely
changed its attitude toward Latin America. Until it does, the gulf
between North and South in the hemisphere will remain.
This op-ed was distributed by McClatchy Tribune Information Services.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The
Obama administration is seeking a "new beginning" in the hemisphere,
and a "more equal partnership" with Latin America - according to
President Obama's point man for the Summit of the Americas. The Summit
will gather 34 presidents from the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago on
April 17-19.
But there is little movement to
match the rhetoric, and the political gulf between Washington and most
of Latin America is large and growing.
As expected, the Obama administration announced the easing of travel
and remittance restrictions for Cuban-Americans with relatives on the
island, and also opened some communications links. This is welcome news
for these Cuban-Americans and some telecom corporations. But it will
not impress the rest of the hemisphere. Several presidents including
Lula da Silva of Brazil have called upon Obama to lift the 47-year-old
embargo. There is a widely shared resentment for what is seen as an
ugly reminder of an era when Washington too often decided which
governments in the region would stand and which would fall.
Cuba has until now been more of a domestic policy than a foreign policy
problem, due to the influence of right-wing Cuban Americans in Florida,
a state that has decided two of the last three U.S. presidential
elections. That is the simple reason that Obama will not lift the
embargo, but now the United States' Cuba policy is also becoming a real
foreign policy problem. Last month Senator Richard Lugar, a Republican
leader on foreign policy who is close to President Obama wrote to the
President that "our current approach [to Cuba] could serve as an
impediment to gaining support for larger goals" in the region.
He could have said the same about our approach to Venezuela, where Washington supported a failed military coup
against the elected government of President Hugo Chavez in 2002, and
has tried - unsuccessfully -- to undermine and isolate that government
ever since. Unfortunately, President Obama is also getting the wrong
advice on this issue. Although Chavez, like the other left presidents
in the region, welcomed the new U.S. president with open arms, the
Obama administration immediately initiated a war of words with hostile
statements that were sure to poison relations at the outset. This was a
mistake, even if it plays well in South Florida.
The Obama administration has also done very little to repair relations
with Bolivia, where the Bush administration's support for the political
opposition, its suspension of Bolivia's trade preferences in the U.S.
market, and a long history of unwanted interference subsumed under "the
war on drugs" has soured relations with Bolivia's first indigenous
president. The Obama team also has yet to reverse the Bush
administration's hostile January move within the WTO, when it objected
to Bolivia's request to exempt public hospitals and health care from
potential ownership by foreign corporations, in accordance with
Bolivia's new constitution.
Nothing would be easier than for this administration to turn a new page
and normalize relations with Cuba, Venezuela, and Bolivia. There are no
substantive issues preventing such normalization - none of these
countries has any nuclear programs, they are all against terrorism and
drug trafficking, and none of them poses even the slightest security
threat to the United States.
The political landscape of Latin America has changed drastically over
the last decade, with left governments now in power in most of the
region. Even before the current world recession, most of them had
rejected the failed economic experiment that the U.S. government still
supports. But Washington's foreign policy establishment has barely
changed its attitude toward Latin America. Until it does, the gulf
between North and South in the hemisphere will remain.
This op-ed was distributed by McClatchy Tribune Information Services.
The
Obama administration is seeking a "new beginning" in the hemisphere,
and a "more equal partnership" with Latin America - according to
President Obama's point man for the Summit of the Americas. The Summit
will gather 34 presidents from the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago on
April 17-19.
But there is little movement to
match the rhetoric, and the political gulf between Washington and most
of Latin America is large and growing.
As expected, the Obama administration announced the easing of travel
and remittance restrictions for Cuban-Americans with relatives on the
island, and also opened some communications links. This is welcome news
for these Cuban-Americans and some telecom corporations. But it will
not impress the rest of the hemisphere. Several presidents including
Lula da Silva of Brazil have called upon Obama to lift the 47-year-old
embargo. There is a widely shared resentment for what is seen as an
ugly reminder of an era when Washington too often decided which
governments in the region would stand and which would fall.
Cuba has until now been more of a domestic policy than a foreign policy
problem, due to the influence of right-wing Cuban Americans in Florida,
a state that has decided two of the last three U.S. presidential
elections. That is the simple reason that Obama will not lift the
embargo, but now the United States' Cuba policy is also becoming a real
foreign policy problem. Last month Senator Richard Lugar, a Republican
leader on foreign policy who is close to President Obama wrote to the
President that "our current approach [to Cuba] could serve as an
impediment to gaining support for larger goals" in the region.
He could have said the same about our approach to Venezuela, where Washington supported a failed military coup
against the elected government of President Hugo Chavez in 2002, and
has tried - unsuccessfully -- to undermine and isolate that government
ever since. Unfortunately, President Obama is also getting the wrong
advice on this issue. Although Chavez, like the other left presidents
in the region, welcomed the new U.S. president with open arms, the
Obama administration immediately initiated a war of words with hostile
statements that were sure to poison relations at the outset. This was a
mistake, even if it plays well in South Florida.
The Obama administration has also done very little to repair relations
with Bolivia, where the Bush administration's support for the political
opposition, its suspension of Bolivia's trade preferences in the U.S.
market, and a long history of unwanted interference subsumed under "the
war on drugs" has soured relations with Bolivia's first indigenous
president. The Obama team also has yet to reverse the Bush
administration's hostile January move within the WTO, when it objected
to Bolivia's request to exempt public hospitals and health care from
potential ownership by foreign corporations, in accordance with
Bolivia's new constitution.
Nothing would be easier than for this administration to turn a new page
and normalize relations with Cuba, Venezuela, and Bolivia. There are no
substantive issues preventing such normalization - none of these
countries has any nuclear programs, they are all against terrorism and
drug trafficking, and none of them poses even the slightest security
threat to the United States.
The political landscape of Latin America has changed drastically over
the last decade, with left governments now in power in most of the
region. Even before the current world recession, most of them had
rejected the failed economic experiment that the U.S. government still
supports. But Washington's foreign policy establishment has barely
changed its attitude toward Latin America. Until it does, the gulf
between North and South in the hemisphere will remain.
This op-ed was distributed by McClatchy Tribune Information Services.