SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Yesterday, at the US Institute of Peace in
Washington, a bright-eyed young Pakistani man, dressed in a brown cap
and brown robe, and sporting long stringy hair and a beard, pointed the
way out of the Afghan-Pakistan quagmire.
If only Washington were listening.
The speaker was Faisal Ali Khan, founder of the Foundation for Integrated Development,
who lives in Dera Ismail Khan, a province of Pakistan that borders on
Waziristan. It's Waziristan, north and south, that is generally
considered to be the heartland of Taliban-inspired Islamic extremism,
and a key base for as many as 14 separate Islamist groups that operate
in Pakistan and whose activities often spill over into neighboring
Afghanistan. The foundation, operating entirely independently, is
trying to create and sustain development projects and social change programs in South Waziristan.
In his presentation, Ali Khan patiently explained the enormous
difficulties in trying to counter the appeal of the Taliban and Al
Qaeda types in this extremely poor, war-torn region, where hundreds of
thousands of displaced refugees crowd into camps, where US Predator
attacks rain down missiles from the sky, where heavy-handed Pakistani
army actions make it seem like Pakistan is at war with its own people.
Among other things, in Waziristan -- and also in Pakistan's settled
areas, such as the Swat Valley -- the Taliban layers its reactionary
ideology on top of seething resentments and "channels social
revolutionary feelings" among desperately poor tribes to build support,
says Ali Khan.
Little of this registers on US officials, not to mention among
counterinsurgency specialists. Even the best-intentioned development
experts, often working with organizations such as US AID, go charging
into Waziristan in heavily armed convoys, riding through villages in
brand new armored SUVs -- if they go at all -- and like typical Ugly
Americans, try to bring enlightenment to the masses. Not surprisingly,
says Ali Khan, they're not well received.
"When we go into South Waziristan, which we do often, we travel in
old cars. We bring a couple of fattened sheep in the back of our pickup
trucks, because when people see that they realize we are there for a
jirga [tribal leadership gathering] or for a peace offering. We go in
unarmed," he said. "And we don't make everyone sit around a table. We
sit in a circle, and we listen."
After his presentation, I interviewed Ali Khan about his ideas for dealing with the extremists and their ideology.
"It's not a a problem we can fix right away. We need to have a
long-term approach," he said. "We take an 80- to 100-year approach,
which we think is realistic. It's generational. You need to have very
long-term goals in order to achieve short-term results, and within that
framework we work in five-year blocks of time."
When I pointed out that the United States seems to want instant
results -- instant democracy, just add water -- he agreed, expressing
skepticism that the United States has the patience to allow Pakistan
and the people who live in the region to attack the problem
systematically.
The vast majority of the people in Waziristan and other parts of the
Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) in Pakistan don't support
the Taliban and their ilk, he said. "They see them as an outside force.
They see them as people who've come in and disrupted their society,
destroyed their livelihoods, killed their sheep." But thanks in part to
America's violent approach to the region, and to the attacks by the
Pakistani army, support for the Taliban has increased significantly,
even in the past year or so.
"I'd estimate that about 30 percent of the people in FATA support
the Taliban," he said. "That's because they feel like they're being
attacked from all sides, by the United States, by Pakistan, by
Afghanistan. To them it's almost like they're being ethnically
cleansed. But only a year ago, the support for the Taliban was probably
in the range of 15 percent or less." In other words, support for the
Islamists has likely doubled in a year.
Ali Khan says that the United States needs to ease up. "I don't see
it as a problem that the United States has to come in and fix. They
need to step back, and let us deal with it."
Al Qaeda, in particular, feeds off the US presence. "The anti-state
actors [like Al Qaeda and the Taliban] are keen to keep the United
States engaged and involved as long as possible, because the longer
they are there, the more they are able to recruit people to their
cause," says Ali Khan.
But he doesn't see the United States backing off anytime soon. "I don't see that as something that's going to happen," he said.
Ali Khan focuses much of his energy on the youth of the area, who
are the prime targets for Taliban recruitment. He says that the Pashtun
diaspora, especially the three to four million Pakistani Pashtuns who
live in the Arabian Gulf countries, could be mobilized to persuade
their friends and families and tribes to abandon Islamism. He suggests
using radio and television and other media, along with tribal jirgas,
in an all-out effort to counter Taliban and Al Qaeda propaganda.
"Unfortunately," Ali Khan told me, "the Taliban has great appeal
because the people are not being presented with a choice. There appears
to be no alternative."
"You can even engage with elements of these extremist movements," he
said. "We're assuming that all of them are the enemy. But there are
many of them in the middle. So even from within, you can take a lot of
people with you."
That's all very sensible. But it's far more likely that the United
States will make things a lot worse before they get better, in part
because there is such an abysmal lack of understanding of the social
and economic conditions in FATA (and in Afghanistan) on the part of US
officials. By squeezing Pakistan to escalate its war against its own
people, by firing missiles into FATA from the sky, we're creating
enemies by the hundreds. And if President Obama eventually decides to
escalate the war in Afghanistan along the same lines, by doubling US
forces there, the size and strength of our enemies will grow
astronomically.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Yesterday, at the US Institute of Peace in
Washington, a bright-eyed young Pakistani man, dressed in a brown cap
and brown robe, and sporting long stringy hair and a beard, pointed the
way out of the Afghan-Pakistan quagmire.
If only Washington were listening.
The speaker was Faisal Ali Khan, founder of the Foundation for Integrated Development,
who lives in Dera Ismail Khan, a province of Pakistan that borders on
Waziristan. It's Waziristan, north and south, that is generally
considered to be the heartland of Taliban-inspired Islamic extremism,
and a key base for as many as 14 separate Islamist groups that operate
in Pakistan and whose activities often spill over into neighboring
Afghanistan. The foundation, operating entirely independently, is
trying to create and sustain development projects and social change programs in South Waziristan.
In his presentation, Ali Khan patiently explained the enormous
difficulties in trying to counter the appeal of the Taliban and Al
Qaeda types in this extremely poor, war-torn region, where hundreds of
thousands of displaced refugees crowd into camps, where US Predator
attacks rain down missiles from the sky, where heavy-handed Pakistani
army actions make it seem like Pakistan is at war with its own people.
Among other things, in Waziristan -- and also in Pakistan's settled
areas, such as the Swat Valley -- the Taliban layers its reactionary
ideology on top of seething resentments and "channels social
revolutionary feelings" among desperately poor tribes to build support,
says Ali Khan.
Little of this registers on US officials, not to mention among
counterinsurgency specialists. Even the best-intentioned development
experts, often working with organizations such as US AID, go charging
into Waziristan in heavily armed convoys, riding through villages in
brand new armored SUVs -- if they go at all -- and like typical Ugly
Americans, try to bring enlightenment to the masses. Not surprisingly,
says Ali Khan, they're not well received.
"When we go into South Waziristan, which we do often, we travel in
old cars. We bring a couple of fattened sheep in the back of our pickup
trucks, because when people see that they realize we are there for a
jirga [tribal leadership gathering] or for a peace offering. We go in
unarmed," he said. "And we don't make everyone sit around a table. We
sit in a circle, and we listen."
After his presentation, I interviewed Ali Khan about his ideas for dealing with the extremists and their ideology.
"It's not a a problem we can fix right away. We need to have a
long-term approach," he said. "We take an 80- to 100-year approach,
which we think is realistic. It's generational. You need to have very
long-term goals in order to achieve short-term results, and within that
framework we work in five-year blocks of time."
When I pointed out that the United States seems to want instant
results -- instant democracy, just add water -- he agreed, expressing
skepticism that the United States has the patience to allow Pakistan
and the people who live in the region to attack the problem
systematically.
The vast majority of the people in Waziristan and other parts of the
Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) in Pakistan don't support
the Taliban and their ilk, he said. "They see them as an outside force.
They see them as people who've come in and disrupted their society,
destroyed their livelihoods, killed their sheep." But thanks in part to
America's violent approach to the region, and to the attacks by the
Pakistani army, support for the Taliban has increased significantly,
even in the past year or so.
"I'd estimate that about 30 percent of the people in FATA support
the Taliban," he said. "That's because they feel like they're being
attacked from all sides, by the United States, by Pakistan, by
Afghanistan. To them it's almost like they're being ethnically
cleansed. But only a year ago, the support for the Taliban was probably
in the range of 15 percent or less." In other words, support for the
Islamists has likely doubled in a year.
Ali Khan says that the United States needs to ease up. "I don't see
it as a problem that the United States has to come in and fix. They
need to step back, and let us deal with it."
Al Qaeda, in particular, feeds off the US presence. "The anti-state
actors [like Al Qaeda and the Taliban] are keen to keep the United
States engaged and involved as long as possible, because the longer
they are there, the more they are able to recruit people to their
cause," says Ali Khan.
But he doesn't see the United States backing off anytime soon. "I don't see that as something that's going to happen," he said.
Ali Khan focuses much of his energy on the youth of the area, who
are the prime targets for Taliban recruitment. He says that the Pashtun
diaspora, especially the three to four million Pakistani Pashtuns who
live in the Arabian Gulf countries, could be mobilized to persuade
their friends and families and tribes to abandon Islamism. He suggests
using radio and television and other media, along with tribal jirgas,
in an all-out effort to counter Taliban and Al Qaeda propaganda.
"Unfortunately," Ali Khan told me, "the Taliban has great appeal
because the people are not being presented with a choice. There appears
to be no alternative."
"You can even engage with elements of these extremist movements," he
said. "We're assuming that all of them are the enemy. But there are
many of them in the middle. So even from within, you can take a lot of
people with you."
That's all very sensible. But it's far more likely that the United
States will make things a lot worse before they get better, in part
because there is such an abysmal lack of understanding of the social
and economic conditions in FATA (and in Afghanistan) on the part of US
officials. By squeezing Pakistan to escalate its war against its own
people, by firing missiles into FATA from the sky, we're creating
enemies by the hundreds. And if President Obama eventually decides to
escalate the war in Afghanistan along the same lines, by doubling US
forces there, the size and strength of our enemies will grow
astronomically.
Yesterday, at the US Institute of Peace in
Washington, a bright-eyed young Pakistani man, dressed in a brown cap
and brown robe, and sporting long stringy hair and a beard, pointed the
way out of the Afghan-Pakistan quagmire.
If only Washington were listening.
The speaker was Faisal Ali Khan, founder of the Foundation for Integrated Development,
who lives in Dera Ismail Khan, a province of Pakistan that borders on
Waziristan. It's Waziristan, north and south, that is generally
considered to be the heartland of Taliban-inspired Islamic extremism,
and a key base for as many as 14 separate Islamist groups that operate
in Pakistan and whose activities often spill over into neighboring
Afghanistan. The foundation, operating entirely independently, is
trying to create and sustain development projects and social change programs in South Waziristan.
In his presentation, Ali Khan patiently explained the enormous
difficulties in trying to counter the appeal of the Taliban and Al
Qaeda types in this extremely poor, war-torn region, where hundreds of
thousands of displaced refugees crowd into camps, where US Predator
attacks rain down missiles from the sky, where heavy-handed Pakistani
army actions make it seem like Pakistan is at war with its own people.
Among other things, in Waziristan -- and also in Pakistan's settled
areas, such as the Swat Valley -- the Taliban layers its reactionary
ideology on top of seething resentments and "channels social
revolutionary feelings" among desperately poor tribes to build support,
says Ali Khan.
Little of this registers on US officials, not to mention among
counterinsurgency specialists. Even the best-intentioned development
experts, often working with organizations such as US AID, go charging
into Waziristan in heavily armed convoys, riding through villages in
brand new armored SUVs -- if they go at all -- and like typical Ugly
Americans, try to bring enlightenment to the masses. Not surprisingly,
says Ali Khan, they're not well received.
"When we go into South Waziristan, which we do often, we travel in
old cars. We bring a couple of fattened sheep in the back of our pickup
trucks, because when people see that they realize we are there for a
jirga [tribal leadership gathering] or for a peace offering. We go in
unarmed," he said. "And we don't make everyone sit around a table. We
sit in a circle, and we listen."
After his presentation, I interviewed Ali Khan about his ideas for dealing with the extremists and their ideology.
"It's not a a problem we can fix right away. We need to have a
long-term approach," he said. "We take an 80- to 100-year approach,
which we think is realistic. It's generational. You need to have very
long-term goals in order to achieve short-term results, and within that
framework we work in five-year blocks of time."
When I pointed out that the United States seems to want instant
results -- instant democracy, just add water -- he agreed, expressing
skepticism that the United States has the patience to allow Pakistan
and the people who live in the region to attack the problem
systematically.
The vast majority of the people in Waziristan and other parts of the
Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) in Pakistan don't support
the Taliban and their ilk, he said. "They see them as an outside force.
They see them as people who've come in and disrupted their society,
destroyed their livelihoods, killed their sheep." But thanks in part to
America's violent approach to the region, and to the attacks by the
Pakistani army, support for the Taliban has increased significantly,
even in the past year or so.
"I'd estimate that about 30 percent of the people in FATA support
the Taliban," he said. "That's because they feel like they're being
attacked from all sides, by the United States, by Pakistan, by
Afghanistan. To them it's almost like they're being ethnically
cleansed. But only a year ago, the support for the Taliban was probably
in the range of 15 percent or less." In other words, support for the
Islamists has likely doubled in a year.
Ali Khan says that the United States needs to ease up. "I don't see
it as a problem that the United States has to come in and fix. They
need to step back, and let us deal with it."
Al Qaeda, in particular, feeds off the US presence. "The anti-state
actors [like Al Qaeda and the Taliban] are keen to keep the United
States engaged and involved as long as possible, because the longer
they are there, the more they are able to recruit people to their
cause," says Ali Khan.
But he doesn't see the United States backing off anytime soon. "I don't see that as something that's going to happen," he said.
Ali Khan focuses much of his energy on the youth of the area, who
are the prime targets for Taliban recruitment. He says that the Pashtun
diaspora, especially the three to four million Pakistani Pashtuns who
live in the Arabian Gulf countries, could be mobilized to persuade
their friends and families and tribes to abandon Islamism. He suggests
using radio and television and other media, along with tribal jirgas,
in an all-out effort to counter Taliban and Al Qaeda propaganda.
"Unfortunately," Ali Khan told me, "the Taliban has great appeal
because the people are not being presented with a choice. There appears
to be no alternative."
"You can even engage with elements of these extremist movements," he
said. "We're assuming that all of them are the enemy. But there are
many of them in the middle. So even from within, you can take a lot of
people with you."
That's all very sensible. But it's far more likely that the United
States will make things a lot worse before they get better, in part
because there is such an abysmal lack of understanding of the social
and economic conditions in FATA (and in Afghanistan) on the part of US
officials. By squeezing Pakistan to escalate its war against its own
people, by firing missiles into FATA from the sky, we're creating
enemies by the hundreds. And if President Obama eventually decides to
escalate the war in Afghanistan along the same lines, by doubling US
forces there, the size and strength of our enemies will grow
astronomically.