

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
LONDON -- Kudos to President Barack Obama for closing the U.S. prison at Guantanamo, Cuba, and the CIA's network of secret, or "black,'" prisons abroad, both blots on America's honour and grave violations of international law.
The U.S. conquered Cuba in the 1898 Spanish-American War. Washington then installed a U.S. citizen as president who granted Washington base rights to Guantanamo in perpetuity. A century later, the U.S. made a similar sweetheart deal in Afghanistan.
Now is an excellent time for Obama also to close the U.S. base at Guantanamo and return it to Cuba. Gitmo is a military white elephant. Returning it to Cuba would be a good start to thawing relations between Havana and Washington.
Obama's next step in returning America to its senses should be ending use of the propaganda terms, "terrorism," and "war on terror."
Britain's youthful foreign secretary, David Miliband, is one of its most interesting and brainy politicians. He could very well replace Gordon Brown as prime minister if Britain's rapidly worsening financial crisis goes critical.
Rebuking the George W. Bush administration, the outspoken Miliband recently urged Washington to cease using the term "war on terror," which he calls "misleading and mistaken."
This term implies a unified, pan-national enemy when there is none. It also encourages war psychosis, fear and employing the military to deal with problems the West "could not kill its way out of."
The Bush administration was a ship of fools steered by crypto-fascist neoconservatives and religious fundamentalists. It failed at everything except propaganda.
Thanks to White House domination of U.S. media, brilliant news manipulation, propaganda worthy of Joseph Goebbels, and a public largely ignorant of world affairs, the White House fib factory marketed fear of "terrorism" to win votes and justify colonial adventures abroad.
As disenchanted former Republican party strategist Kevin Phillips points out, some of Bush's strongest supporters were "security moms" in the Midwest and South. They were terrified into believing Osama bin Laden and his turbaned devils were coming to Pocatello, Iowa, and Tupelo, Miss., to attack their little Johnnies.
Nonsense
Proclaiming "war on terrorism" -- a logical and grammatical nonsense -- boosted the Pentagon's budget by 50%, unleashed armies of mercenaries run by big Republican donors, facilitated Dick Cheney's crusade to grab the world's oil, and justified invading Iraq and Afghanistan. Americans who opposed Bush's phony global conflict were branded traitors, appeasers and anti-American.
The term "terrorism" is designed not only to arouse potent emotions of fear and loathing, but to dehumanize one's foes and deny them any legitimate motivations. "Terrorists" are sub-human, just like "anti-state elements" in the Soviet Union and China. Terrorists are a disease. One can never negotiate with them. Even their children are legitimate targets.
Slapping this label on all who oppose the U.S. and its allies totally distorted reality. I always avoided using "terrorism," which became the most cherished word in the Bush administration's version of George Orwell's totalitarian "Doublespeak."
The proper term we should use is "anti-western groups" or "violent extremists." The U.S., which burned alive 100,000 Japanese civilians on the night of March, 9 1945, killed two million Vietnamese civilians, and is responsible for 500,000 to one million Iraqi civilian deaths has no right to brand others "terrorists."
Iraqis and Afghans who oppose U.S. and/or NATO occupation should be called "the resistance," not "insurgents." We invaded them and overthrew their governments. One might as well call the French resistance, "insurgents."
Watch for other key propaganda terms being used by the media: "Nation building," "free world," "collateral damage," "counter-terror operations," "enhanced interrogation" and "exporting democracy."
I hope Obama will heed Miliband's good advice and end Bush/Cheney's Orwellian lies. Americans need the truth about their foreign wars.
They need to know al-Qaida was only a handful of extremists, and 9/11 likely a one-off event.
And that crimes such as Guantanamo, torture, kidnappings (rendition) and stomping small countries create more enemies of the West than Osama bin Laden ever dreamed of.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
LONDON -- Kudos to President Barack Obama for closing the U.S. prison at Guantanamo, Cuba, and the CIA's network of secret, or "black,'" prisons abroad, both blots on America's honour and grave violations of international law.
The U.S. conquered Cuba in the 1898 Spanish-American War. Washington then installed a U.S. citizen as president who granted Washington base rights to Guantanamo in perpetuity. A century later, the U.S. made a similar sweetheart deal in Afghanistan.
Now is an excellent time for Obama also to close the U.S. base at Guantanamo and return it to Cuba. Gitmo is a military white elephant. Returning it to Cuba would be a good start to thawing relations between Havana and Washington.
Obama's next step in returning America to its senses should be ending use of the propaganda terms, "terrorism," and "war on terror."
Britain's youthful foreign secretary, David Miliband, is one of its most interesting and brainy politicians. He could very well replace Gordon Brown as prime minister if Britain's rapidly worsening financial crisis goes critical.
Rebuking the George W. Bush administration, the outspoken Miliband recently urged Washington to cease using the term "war on terror," which he calls "misleading and mistaken."
This term implies a unified, pan-national enemy when there is none. It also encourages war psychosis, fear and employing the military to deal with problems the West "could not kill its way out of."
The Bush administration was a ship of fools steered by crypto-fascist neoconservatives and religious fundamentalists. It failed at everything except propaganda.
Thanks to White House domination of U.S. media, brilliant news manipulation, propaganda worthy of Joseph Goebbels, and a public largely ignorant of world affairs, the White House fib factory marketed fear of "terrorism" to win votes and justify colonial adventures abroad.
As disenchanted former Republican party strategist Kevin Phillips points out, some of Bush's strongest supporters were "security moms" in the Midwest and South. They were terrified into believing Osama bin Laden and his turbaned devils were coming to Pocatello, Iowa, and Tupelo, Miss., to attack their little Johnnies.
Nonsense
Proclaiming "war on terrorism" -- a logical and grammatical nonsense -- boosted the Pentagon's budget by 50%, unleashed armies of mercenaries run by big Republican donors, facilitated Dick Cheney's crusade to grab the world's oil, and justified invading Iraq and Afghanistan. Americans who opposed Bush's phony global conflict were branded traitors, appeasers and anti-American.
The term "terrorism" is designed not only to arouse potent emotions of fear and loathing, but to dehumanize one's foes and deny them any legitimate motivations. "Terrorists" are sub-human, just like "anti-state elements" in the Soviet Union and China. Terrorists are a disease. One can never negotiate with them. Even their children are legitimate targets.
Slapping this label on all who oppose the U.S. and its allies totally distorted reality. I always avoided using "terrorism," which became the most cherished word in the Bush administration's version of George Orwell's totalitarian "Doublespeak."
The proper term we should use is "anti-western groups" or "violent extremists." The U.S., which burned alive 100,000 Japanese civilians on the night of March, 9 1945, killed two million Vietnamese civilians, and is responsible for 500,000 to one million Iraqi civilian deaths has no right to brand others "terrorists."
Iraqis and Afghans who oppose U.S. and/or NATO occupation should be called "the resistance," not "insurgents." We invaded them and overthrew their governments. One might as well call the French resistance, "insurgents."
Watch for other key propaganda terms being used by the media: "Nation building," "free world," "collateral damage," "counter-terror operations," "enhanced interrogation" and "exporting democracy."
I hope Obama will heed Miliband's good advice and end Bush/Cheney's Orwellian lies. Americans need the truth about their foreign wars.
They need to know al-Qaida was only a handful of extremists, and 9/11 likely a one-off event.
And that crimes such as Guantanamo, torture, kidnappings (rendition) and stomping small countries create more enemies of the West than Osama bin Laden ever dreamed of.
LONDON -- Kudos to President Barack Obama for closing the U.S. prison at Guantanamo, Cuba, and the CIA's network of secret, or "black,'" prisons abroad, both blots on America's honour and grave violations of international law.
The U.S. conquered Cuba in the 1898 Spanish-American War. Washington then installed a U.S. citizen as president who granted Washington base rights to Guantanamo in perpetuity. A century later, the U.S. made a similar sweetheart deal in Afghanistan.
Now is an excellent time for Obama also to close the U.S. base at Guantanamo and return it to Cuba. Gitmo is a military white elephant. Returning it to Cuba would be a good start to thawing relations between Havana and Washington.
Obama's next step in returning America to its senses should be ending use of the propaganda terms, "terrorism," and "war on terror."
Britain's youthful foreign secretary, David Miliband, is one of its most interesting and brainy politicians. He could very well replace Gordon Brown as prime minister if Britain's rapidly worsening financial crisis goes critical.
Rebuking the George W. Bush administration, the outspoken Miliband recently urged Washington to cease using the term "war on terror," which he calls "misleading and mistaken."
This term implies a unified, pan-national enemy when there is none. It also encourages war psychosis, fear and employing the military to deal with problems the West "could not kill its way out of."
The Bush administration was a ship of fools steered by crypto-fascist neoconservatives and religious fundamentalists. It failed at everything except propaganda.
Thanks to White House domination of U.S. media, brilliant news manipulation, propaganda worthy of Joseph Goebbels, and a public largely ignorant of world affairs, the White House fib factory marketed fear of "terrorism" to win votes and justify colonial adventures abroad.
As disenchanted former Republican party strategist Kevin Phillips points out, some of Bush's strongest supporters were "security moms" in the Midwest and South. They were terrified into believing Osama bin Laden and his turbaned devils were coming to Pocatello, Iowa, and Tupelo, Miss., to attack their little Johnnies.
Nonsense
Proclaiming "war on terrorism" -- a logical and grammatical nonsense -- boosted the Pentagon's budget by 50%, unleashed armies of mercenaries run by big Republican donors, facilitated Dick Cheney's crusade to grab the world's oil, and justified invading Iraq and Afghanistan. Americans who opposed Bush's phony global conflict were branded traitors, appeasers and anti-American.
The term "terrorism" is designed not only to arouse potent emotions of fear and loathing, but to dehumanize one's foes and deny them any legitimate motivations. "Terrorists" are sub-human, just like "anti-state elements" in the Soviet Union and China. Terrorists are a disease. One can never negotiate with them. Even their children are legitimate targets.
Slapping this label on all who oppose the U.S. and its allies totally distorted reality. I always avoided using "terrorism," which became the most cherished word in the Bush administration's version of George Orwell's totalitarian "Doublespeak."
The proper term we should use is "anti-western groups" or "violent extremists." The U.S., which burned alive 100,000 Japanese civilians on the night of March, 9 1945, killed two million Vietnamese civilians, and is responsible for 500,000 to one million Iraqi civilian deaths has no right to brand others "terrorists."
Iraqis and Afghans who oppose U.S. and/or NATO occupation should be called "the resistance," not "insurgents." We invaded them and overthrew their governments. One might as well call the French resistance, "insurgents."
Watch for other key propaganda terms being used by the media: "Nation building," "free world," "collateral damage," "counter-terror operations," "enhanced interrogation" and "exporting democracy."
I hope Obama will heed Miliband's good advice and end Bush/Cheney's Orwellian lies. Americans need the truth about their foreign wars.
They need to know al-Qaida was only a handful of extremists, and 9/11 likely a one-off event.
And that crimes such as Guantanamo, torture, kidnappings (rendition) and stomping small countries create more enemies of the West than Osama bin Laden ever dreamed of.