

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
It's amazing that Alberto Gonzales still has his job.What do you need to do to get fired in the Bush Administration?
Well, if you're the President's crony, quite a lot, evidently.
Gonzales lied six ways to Sunday about his role in the U.S. attorneys' scandal and in the illegal domestic wiretapping program.
He's been a liar since his birth as Attorney General.
Even at his confirmation hearings, he told a whopper.
He submitted written testimony that said: "The policy of the United States is not to transfer individuals to countries where we believe they likely will be tortured." Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have estimated that the Bush Administration has transferred more than 100 detainees to countries notorious for torture. Many have since attested to torture.
So when members of Congress take up perjury charges against Gonzales, they should start at the beginning.
With Gonzales so compromised as the nation's leading law enforcement officer, why is he still in office?
Because Bush doesn't care. Gonzales is a career loyalist, even covering up for Bush when he had a drunk driving episode.
But more than that, in his dissembling before Congress, Gonzales was doing his master's bidding.
It was Bush who wanted to proceed with the illegal wiretapping.
It was Bush who wanted detainees tortured.
It was Bush (or at least Karl Rove) who wanted to use the offices of the U.S. attorneys to go after Democrats so as to swing elections to Republicans.
Lastly, it's convenient for Bush to have Gonzales still there. He offers one more layer of protection before the darts and spears come straight at the President.
The New York Times, for instance, can call for the impeachment of Gonzales. That's easy. It still hasn't called for the impeachment of Bush, however. That would take guts that the Times does not have.
Sure, Gonzales should be canned, prosecuted, or impeached-or any combination thereof. He's an embarrassment to the Department of Justice, and to the country.
But he's just been serving a criminal President.
And we need to devote our attention to that criminal: not his hired and hapless stooge.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
It's amazing that Alberto Gonzales still has his job.What do you need to do to get fired in the Bush Administration?
Well, if you're the President's crony, quite a lot, evidently.
Gonzales lied six ways to Sunday about his role in the U.S. attorneys' scandal and in the illegal domestic wiretapping program.
He's been a liar since his birth as Attorney General.
Even at his confirmation hearings, he told a whopper.
He submitted written testimony that said: "The policy of the United States is not to transfer individuals to countries where we believe they likely will be tortured." Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have estimated that the Bush Administration has transferred more than 100 detainees to countries notorious for torture. Many have since attested to torture.
So when members of Congress take up perjury charges against Gonzales, they should start at the beginning.
With Gonzales so compromised as the nation's leading law enforcement officer, why is he still in office?
Because Bush doesn't care. Gonzales is a career loyalist, even covering up for Bush when he had a drunk driving episode.
But more than that, in his dissembling before Congress, Gonzales was doing his master's bidding.
It was Bush who wanted to proceed with the illegal wiretapping.
It was Bush who wanted detainees tortured.
It was Bush (or at least Karl Rove) who wanted to use the offices of the U.S. attorneys to go after Democrats so as to swing elections to Republicans.
Lastly, it's convenient for Bush to have Gonzales still there. He offers one more layer of protection before the darts and spears come straight at the President.
The New York Times, for instance, can call for the impeachment of Gonzales. That's easy. It still hasn't called for the impeachment of Bush, however. That would take guts that the Times does not have.
Sure, Gonzales should be canned, prosecuted, or impeached-or any combination thereof. He's an embarrassment to the Department of Justice, and to the country.
But he's just been serving a criminal President.
And we need to devote our attention to that criminal: not his hired and hapless stooge.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive
It's amazing that Alberto Gonzales still has his job.What do you need to do to get fired in the Bush Administration?
Well, if you're the President's crony, quite a lot, evidently.
Gonzales lied six ways to Sunday about his role in the U.S. attorneys' scandal and in the illegal domestic wiretapping program.
He's been a liar since his birth as Attorney General.
Even at his confirmation hearings, he told a whopper.
He submitted written testimony that said: "The policy of the United States is not to transfer individuals to countries where we believe they likely will be tortured." Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have estimated that the Bush Administration has transferred more than 100 detainees to countries notorious for torture. Many have since attested to torture.
So when members of Congress take up perjury charges against Gonzales, they should start at the beginning.
With Gonzales so compromised as the nation's leading law enforcement officer, why is he still in office?
Because Bush doesn't care. Gonzales is a career loyalist, even covering up for Bush when he had a drunk driving episode.
But more than that, in his dissembling before Congress, Gonzales was doing his master's bidding.
It was Bush who wanted to proceed with the illegal wiretapping.
It was Bush who wanted detainees tortured.
It was Bush (or at least Karl Rove) who wanted to use the offices of the U.S. attorneys to go after Democrats so as to swing elections to Republicans.
Lastly, it's convenient for Bush to have Gonzales still there. He offers one more layer of protection before the darts and spears come straight at the President.
The New York Times, for instance, can call for the impeachment of Gonzales. That's easy. It still hasn't called for the impeachment of Bush, however. That would take guts that the Times does not have.
Sure, Gonzales should be canned, prosecuted, or impeached-or any combination thereof. He's an embarrassment to the Department of Justice, and to the country.
But he's just been serving a criminal President.
And we need to devote our attention to that criminal: not his hired and hapless stooge.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive