

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Behold the spineless Democratic Party.On Iraq, no deadlines.
On trade, no enforceable worker protections.
Now, today, on oil industry price gouging, collapse.
In the face of withering pressure from the oil industry, the Democrats in the House, led by Congressman Bart Stupak (D-Michigan), have reportedly castrated their own legislation.
Stupak's original bill -- HR 1252 -- would make it unlawful to sell crude oil, gasoline, natural gas, or petroleum distillates at a price that "is unconscionably excessive" or "indicates the seller is taking unfair advantage unusual market conditions (whether real or perceived) or the circumstances of an emergency to increase prices unreasonably."
The law would be enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
But according to a report by Darren Goode in Congress Daily AM, late last night, Stupak "added a trigger to his bill allowing the FTC to go after price gougers only during presidentially-declared energy emergencies."
In other words -- almost never.
Tyson Slocum of Public Citizen's Congress Watch called the move "pretty unfortunate."
Slocum said that Stupak's original bill would have given the FTC long needed powers to go after oil companies in situations like the one the country is facing today -- skyrocketing gasoline prices.
"There is no question that the record high gasoline prices we are seeing today amount to just a transfer of wealth," Slocum said. "Up until this point, the FTC has not moved, because the antitrust laws on the books are so weak. There is no price gouging law currently on the books."
Stupak and more than 100 House members said they wanted to put that law on the books. But now, it looks like the Democrats have once again caved to the dominant corporate powers that be.
The House will vote on the bill later today.
Slocum said that Public Citizen was strongly in favor of the original Stupak bill.
But if the bill is going to be similar to a bill introduced by Senator Maria Cantwell (D-Washington) -- only enforceable in times of energy emergencies -- Public Citizen would not fight for it.
"This shows the oil industry still holds sway over the Democratic Party," Slocum said. "Things are definitely different, but not that much different. Are you going to see the Democrats taking big swings at Big Oil? No."
Stupak's office did not return calls seeking comment.
Slocum said that some environmental groups want to see higher gasoline prices so that Americans drive less -- like in Europe.
"But in Europe, the gasoline prices are higher because of taxes," Slocum said. "And the taxes are used to fund mass transit. Here, the money goes straight to the oil companies. It's just a transfer of wealth."
(c) 2007 Corporate Crime Reporter
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Behold the spineless Democratic Party.On Iraq, no deadlines.
On trade, no enforceable worker protections.
Now, today, on oil industry price gouging, collapse.
In the face of withering pressure from the oil industry, the Democrats in the House, led by Congressman Bart Stupak (D-Michigan), have reportedly castrated their own legislation.
Stupak's original bill -- HR 1252 -- would make it unlawful to sell crude oil, gasoline, natural gas, or petroleum distillates at a price that "is unconscionably excessive" or "indicates the seller is taking unfair advantage unusual market conditions (whether real or perceived) or the circumstances of an emergency to increase prices unreasonably."
The law would be enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
But according to a report by Darren Goode in Congress Daily AM, late last night, Stupak "added a trigger to his bill allowing the FTC to go after price gougers only during presidentially-declared energy emergencies."
In other words -- almost never.
Tyson Slocum of Public Citizen's Congress Watch called the move "pretty unfortunate."
Slocum said that Stupak's original bill would have given the FTC long needed powers to go after oil companies in situations like the one the country is facing today -- skyrocketing gasoline prices.
"There is no question that the record high gasoline prices we are seeing today amount to just a transfer of wealth," Slocum said. "Up until this point, the FTC has not moved, because the antitrust laws on the books are so weak. There is no price gouging law currently on the books."
Stupak and more than 100 House members said they wanted to put that law on the books. But now, it looks like the Democrats have once again caved to the dominant corporate powers that be.
The House will vote on the bill later today.
Slocum said that Public Citizen was strongly in favor of the original Stupak bill.
But if the bill is going to be similar to a bill introduced by Senator Maria Cantwell (D-Washington) -- only enforceable in times of energy emergencies -- Public Citizen would not fight for it.
"This shows the oil industry still holds sway over the Democratic Party," Slocum said. "Things are definitely different, but not that much different. Are you going to see the Democrats taking big swings at Big Oil? No."
Stupak's office did not return calls seeking comment.
Slocum said that some environmental groups want to see higher gasoline prices so that Americans drive less -- like in Europe.
"But in Europe, the gasoline prices are higher because of taxes," Slocum said. "And the taxes are used to fund mass transit. Here, the money goes straight to the oil companies. It's just a transfer of wealth."
(c) 2007 Corporate Crime Reporter
Behold the spineless Democratic Party.On Iraq, no deadlines.
On trade, no enforceable worker protections.
Now, today, on oil industry price gouging, collapse.
In the face of withering pressure from the oil industry, the Democrats in the House, led by Congressman Bart Stupak (D-Michigan), have reportedly castrated their own legislation.
Stupak's original bill -- HR 1252 -- would make it unlawful to sell crude oil, gasoline, natural gas, or petroleum distillates at a price that "is unconscionably excessive" or "indicates the seller is taking unfair advantage unusual market conditions (whether real or perceived) or the circumstances of an emergency to increase prices unreasonably."
The law would be enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
But according to a report by Darren Goode in Congress Daily AM, late last night, Stupak "added a trigger to his bill allowing the FTC to go after price gougers only during presidentially-declared energy emergencies."
In other words -- almost never.
Tyson Slocum of Public Citizen's Congress Watch called the move "pretty unfortunate."
Slocum said that Stupak's original bill would have given the FTC long needed powers to go after oil companies in situations like the one the country is facing today -- skyrocketing gasoline prices.
"There is no question that the record high gasoline prices we are seeing today amount to just a transfer of wealth," Slocum said. "Up until this point, the FTC has not moved, because the antitrust laws on the books are so weak. There is no price gouging law currently on the books."
Stupak and more than 100 House members said they wanted to put that law on the books. But now, it looks like the Democrats have once again caved to the dominant corporate powers that be.
The House will vote on the bill later today.
Slocum said that Public Citizen was strongly in favor of the original Stupak bill.
But if the bill is going to be similar to a bill introduced by Senator Maria Cantwell (D-Washington) -- only enforceable in times of energy emergencies -- Public Citizen would not fight for it.
"This shows the oil industry still holds sway over the Democratic Party," Slocum said. "Things are definitely different, but not that much different. Are you going to see the Democrats taking big swings at Big Oil? No."
Stupak's office did not return calls seeking comment.
Slocum said that some environmental groups want to see higher gasoline prices so that Americans drive less -- like in Europe.
"But in Europe, the gasoline prices are higher because of taxes," Slocum said. "And the taxes are used to fund mass transit. Here, the money goes straight to the oil companies. It's just a transfer of wealth."
(c) 2007 Corporate Crime Reporter