SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Brits in the Gulf: Playing with Fire
Mar 25, 2007
The seizure of 15 British naval troops in the Persian Gulf by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Navy has Washington hawks all aflutter. Anything these days could be a pretext to launch their much sought after attack on Iran. The Ahmadinejad government may also be eager to bolster its own internal political position by keeping tensions ratcheted up with the U.S. and Britain.
But let's look at this incident as many Iranians probably view it.
First of all, though the British steadfastly maintain they were in Iraqi waters at the time, the fact is that sovereignty over the narrow straights nearby where the British were operating has been disputed for centuries. The latest chapter began when Saddam Hussein ripped up a treaty he had signed under duress with the Shah in 1975. According to international legal experts, the issue has still not been settled and the Iranians have frequently acted to maintain their claims.
In June 2004, six British marines and two sailors were similarly seized by Iran They were presented blindfolded on Iranian television and admitted entering Iranian waters illegally, then released unharmed after three days.
Secondly, it's difficult to blame the Iranians for being suspicious of the British naval presence. Reportedly, for months now George W. Bush has authorized clandestine American military missions into Iran. Those actions range from preparing targeted strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities, to carrying out joint operations with opposition groups in Iran--the kind of operations that, if the shoe were on the other foot, George W. Bush would brand as "cowardly acts of terrorism."
Also, as I pointed out in an earlier post, during the end of the Iran --Iraq war, the U.S. carried out many secret raids against Iranian forces. Any wonder that today the Iranians are not a trifle sensitive about British warships, helicopters and marines operating just a few miles off their coast.
The Brits are steadfast allies of the Americans in Iraq. Would it not be natural to suspect that elite British troops--from the SAS, for instance--are engaged with the Americans in those current clandestine missions?
The Royal Navy may be helping Iraq prevent smuggling along its coast, but by cruising around in those disputed waters, the British warships and marines are also asking for trouble.
Barry M. Lando writes barrylando.com, a blog about Iraq, the Middle East and his new book, Web of Deceit.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Barry Lando
Barry M. Lando has published a novel, "The Watchman's File" about America and Israel's most closely-guarded secret (It's not the bomb). Lando, a graduate of Harvard and Columbia University, spent 25 years as an award-winning investigative producer with 60 Minutes. He blogs on international affairs at https://barrymlando.com.
The seizure of 15 British naval troops in the Persian Gulf by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Navy has Washington hawks all aflutter. Anything these days could be a pretext to launch their much sought after attack on Iran. The Ahmadinejad government may also be eager to bolster its own internal political position by keeping tensions ratcheted up with the U.S. and Britain.
But let's look at this incident as many Iranians probably view it.
First of all, though the British steadfastly maintain they were in Iraqi waters at the time, the fact is that sovereignty over the narrow straights nearby where the British were operating has been disputed for centuries. The latest chapter began when Saddam Hussein ripped up a treaty he had signed under duress with the Shah in 1975. According to international legal experts, the issue has still not been settled and the Iranians have frequently acted to maintain their claims.
In June 2004, six British marines and two sailors were similarly seized by Iran They were presented blindfolded on Iranian television and admitted entering Iranian waters illegally, then released unharmed after three days.
Secondly, it's difficult to blame the Iranians for being suspicious of the British naval presence. Reportedly, for months now George W. Bush has authorized clandestine American military missions into Iran. Those actions range from preparing targeted strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities, to carrying out joint operations with opposition groups in Iran--the kind of operations that, if the shoe were on the other foot, George W. Bush would brand as "cowardly acts of terrorism."
Also, as I pointed out in an earlier post, during the end of the Iran --Iraq war, the U.S. carried out many secret raids against Iranian forces. Any wonder that today the Iranians are not a trifle sensitive about British warships, helicopters and marines operating just a few miles off their coast.
The Brits are steadfast allies of the Americans in Iraq. Would it not be natural to suspect that elite British troops--from the SAS, for instance--are engaged with the Americans in those current clandestine missions?
The Royal Navy may be helping Iraq prevent smuggling along its coast, but by cruising around in those disputed waters, the British warships and marines are also asking for trouble.
Barry M. Lando writes barrylando.com, a blog about Iraq, the Middle East and his new book, Web of Deceit.
Barry Lando
Barry M. Lando has published a novel, "The Watchman's File" about America and Israel's most closely-guarded secret (It's not the bomb). Lando, a graduate of Harvard and Columbia University, spent 25 years as an award-winning investigative producer with 60 Minutes. He blogs on international affairs at https://barrymlando.com.
The seizure of 15 British naval troops in the Persian Gulf by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Navy has Washington hawks all aflutter. Anything these days could be a pretext to launch their much sought after attack on Iran. The Ahmadinejad government may also be eager to bolster its own internal political position by keeping tensions ratcheted up with the U.S. and Britain.
But let's look at this incident as many Iranians probably view it.
First of all, though the British steadfastly maintain they were in Iraqi waters at the time, the fact is that sovereignty over the narrow straights nearby where the British were operating has been disputed for centuries. The latest chapter began when Saddam Hussein ripped up a treaty he had signed under duress with the Shah in 1975. According to international legal experts, the issue has still not been settled and the Iranians have frequently acted to maintain their claims.
In June 2004, six British marines and two sailors were similarly seized by Iran They were presented blindfolded on Iranian television and admitted entering Iranian waters illegally, then released unharmed after three days.
Secondly, it's difficult to blame the Iranians for being suspicious of the British naval presence. Reportedly, for months now George W. Bush has authorized clandestine American military missions into Iran. Those actions range from preparing targeted strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities, to carrying out joint operations with opposition groups in Iran--the kind of operations that, if the shoe were on the other foot, George W. Bush would brand as "cowardly acts of terrorism."
Also, as I pointed out in an earlier post, during the end of the Iran --Iraq war, the U.S. carried out many secret raids against Iranian forces. Any wonder that today the Iranians are not a trifle sensitive about British warships, helicopters and marines operating just a few miles off their coast.
The Brits are steadfast allies of the Americans in Iraq. Would it not be natural to suspect that elite British troops--from the SAS, for instance--are engaged with the Americans in those current clandestine missions?
The Royal Navy may be helping Iraq prevent smuggling along its coast, but by cruising around in those disputed waters, the British warships and marines are also asking for trouble.
Barry M. Lando writes barrylando.com, a blog about Iraq, the Middle East and his new book, Web of Deceit.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.