Jul 21, 2004
Not to risk blasphemy, but shouldn't a special commission look into whether God provided the warrior President with faulty intelligence? Recall that George W. Bush has confided to Bob Woodward that in shaping his plans for invading Iraq he relied on advice from a "higher father," not on Poppy Bush in Texas, the former President. Now we learn from advance news leaks that the 9/11 Commission has concluded from its investigation that it was Iran, not Iraq, that collaborated with Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda terrorists before their attack on America. Oops. Have we gone to war against the wrong country? One assumes it was not the Almighty who confused the two nations. Maybe Bush suffered from a fuzzy connection in his prayer circuitry. So close to God, yet so distant from the truth.
His mistake is not a joking matter, of course. It may be the most egregious example of how Bush's pious self-assurance led the United States into an ill-fated war with colossal misrepresentation of the facts. The 9/11 Commission's report will provide more details when it is released. Meanwhile, the press reports that Tehran, not Baghdad, formed cooperative relations with Al Qaeda some months before bin Laden's 2001 terror attacks on New York and Washington. Iran gave safe passage to some Qaeda agents exiting Afghanistan including several on their way to fly 9/11's highjacked airliners. There's apparently no evidence to suggest the Iranians had advance knowledge of the attacks on US cities.
But the obvious question is, What did the President know and when did he know it? If these facts were known to US authorities before the war was launched against Saddam Hussein, why was this information not shared with the American public? Because Bush's warmaking logic would have been severely crippled. He wanted to attack Iraq, not the better-equipped Muslim nation next door. Alternately, why didn't the White House consider that Iran was a far more plausible partner for the terrorists? Bush did name Iran among his "axis of evil" but never swerved from the plan to launch "shock and awe" against Saddam, a far weaker military adversary. Iran, as we subsequently learned, was actually working on acquiring "weapons of mass destruction"--a nuclear bomb.
The dimensions of Bush's historic errors continue to expand, the more we learn after the fact. The official line characterizes these revelations as unfortunate "mistakes" or "faulty intelligence." However, the pattern of concocted threats and concealment of contradictory evidence suggests a deliberate intent that fits quite snugly with Bush's own political objectives. The "mistakes" all provide convenient support for his fateful decision to make an unprovoked war. Our President may indeed be holier than thou, but he should be made to answer for this here on earth.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
© 2023 The Nation
William Greider
William Greider (1936 - 2019) was a progressive American journalist who worked for many outlets, including a longtime position as national affairs correspondent for The Nation magazine. He authored many books, including: "The Soul of Capitalism"; "Who Will Tell The People?: The Betrayal Of American Democracy" and "Secrets of the Temple: How the Federal Reserve Runs the Country"
Not to risk blasphemy, but shouldn't a special commission look into whether God provided the warrior President with faulty intelligence? Recall that George W. Bush has confided to Bob Woodward that in shaping his plans for invading Iraq he relied on advice from a "higher father," not on Poppy Bush in Texas, the former President. Now we learn from advance news leaks that the 9/11 Commission has concluded from its investigation that it was Iran, not Iraq, that collaborated with Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda terrorists before their attack on America. Oops. Have we gone to war against the wrong country? One assumes it was not the Almighty who confused the two nations. Maybe Bush suffered from a fuzzy connection in his prayer circuitry. So close to God, yet so distant from the truth.
His mistake is not a joking matter, of course. It may be the most egregious example of how Bush's pious self-assurance led the United States into an ill-fated war with colossal misrepresentation of the facts. The 9/11 Commission's report will provide more details when it is released. Meanwhile, the press reports that Tehran, not Baghdad, formed cooperative relations with Al Qaeda some months before bin Laden's 2001 terror attacks on New York and Washington. Iran gave safe passage to some Qaeda agents exiting Afghanistan including several on their way to fly 9/11's highjacked airliners. There's apparently no evidence to suggest the Iranians had advance knowledge of the attacks on US cities.
But the obvious question is, What did the President know and when did he know it? If these facts were known to US authorities before the war was launched against Saddam Hussein, why was this information not shared with the American public? Because Bush's warmaking logic would have been severely crippled. He wanted to attack Iraq, not the better-equipped Muslim nation next door. Alternately, why didn't the White House consider that Iran was a far more plausible partner for the terrorists? Bush did name Iran among his "axis of evil" but never swerved from the plan to launch "shock and awe" against Saddam, a far weaker military adversary. Iran, as we subsequently learned, was actually working on acquiring "weapons of mass destruction"--a nuclear bomb.
The dimensions of Bush's historic errors continue to expand, the more we learn after the fact. The official line characterizes these revelations as unfortunate "mistakes" or "faulty intelligence." However, the pattern of concocted threats and concealment of contradictory evidence suggests a deliberate intent that fits quite snugly with Bush's own political objectives. The "mistakes" all provide convenient support for his fateful decision to make an unprovoked war. Our President may indeed be holier than thou, but he should be made to answer for this here on earth.
William Greider
William Greider (1936 - 2019) was a progressive American journalist who worked for many outlets, including a longtime position as national affairs correspondent for The Nation magazine. He authored many books, including: "The Soul of Capitalism"; "Who Will Tell The People?: The Betrayal Of American Democracy" and "Secrets of the Temple: How the Federal Reserve Runs the Country"
Not to risk blasphemy, but shouldn't a special commission look into whether God provided the warrior President with faulty intelligence? Recall that George W. Bush has confided to Bob Woodward that in shaping his plans for invading Iraq he relied on advice from a "higher father," not on Poppy Bush in Texas, the former President. Now we learn from advance news leaks that the 9/11 Commission has concluded from its investigation that it was Iran, not Iraq, that collaborated with Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda terrorists before their attack on America. Oops. Have we gone to war against the wrong country? One assumes it was not the Almighty who confused the two nations. Maybe Bush suffered from a fuzzy connection in his prayer circuitry. So close to God, yet so distant from the truth.
His mistake is not a joking matter, of course. It may be the most egregious example of how Bush's pious self-assurance led the United States into an ill-fated war with colossal misrepresentation of the facts. The 9/11 Commission's report will provide more details when it is released. Meanwhile, the press reports that Tehran, not Baghdad, formed cooperative relations with Al Qaeda some months before bin Laden's 2001 terror attacks on New York and Washington. Iran gave safe passage to some Qaeda agents exiting Afghanistan including several on their way to fly 9/11's highjacked airliners. There's apparently no evidence to suggest the Iranians had advance knowledge of the attacks on US cities.
But the obvious question is, What did the President know and when did he know it? If these facts were known to US authorities before the war was launched against Saddam Hussein, why was this information not shared with the American public? Because Bush's warmaking logic would have been severely crippled. He wanted to attack Iraq, not the better-equipped Muslim nation next door. Alternately, why didn't the White House consider that Iran was a far more plausible partner for the terrorists? Bush did name Iran among his "axis of evil" but never swerved from the plan to launch "shock and awe" against Saddam, a far weaker military adversary. Iran, as we subsequently learned, was actually working on acquiring "weapons of mass destruction"--a nuclear bomb.
The dimensions of Bush's historic errors continue to expand, the more we learn after the fact. The official line characterizes these revelations as unfortunate "mistakes" or "faulty intelligence." However, the pattern of concocted threats and concealment of contradictory evidence suggests a deliberate intent that fits quite snugly with Bush's own political objectives. The "mistakes" all provide convenient support for his fateful decision to make an unprovoked war. Our President may indeed be holier than thou, but he should be made to answer for this here on earth.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.