SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
");background-position:center;background-size:19px 19px;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-color:#222;padding:0;width:var(--form-elem-height);height:var(--form-elem-height);font-size:0;}:is(.js-newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter_bar.newsletter-wrapper) .widget__body:has(.response:not(:empty)) :is(.widget__headline, .widget__subheadline, #mc_embed_signup .mc-field-group, #mc_embed_signup input[type="submit"]){display:none;}:is(.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper) #mce-responses:has(.response:not(:empty)){grid-row:1 / -1;grid-column:1 / -1;}.newsletter-wrapper .widget__body > .snark-line:has(.response:not(:empty)){grid-column:1 / -1;}:is(.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper) :is(.newsletter-campaign:has(.response:not(:empty)), .newsletter-and-social:has(.response:not(:empty))){width:100%;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;justify-content:center;align-items:center;gap:8px 20px;margin:0 auto;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col .text-element{display:flex;color:var(--shares-color);margin:0 !important;font-weight:400 !important;font-size:16px !important;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col .whitebar_social{display:flex;gap:12px;width:auto;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col a{margin:0;background-color:#0000;padding:0;width:32px;height:32px;}.newsletter-wrapper .social_icon:after{display:none;}.newsletter-wrapper .widget article:before, .newsletter-wrapper .widget article:after{display:none;}#sFollow_Block_0_0_1_0_0_0_1{margin:0;}.donation_banner{position:relative;background:#000;}.donation_banner .posts-custom *, .donation_banner .posts-custom :after, .donation_banner .posts-custom :before{margin:0;}.donation_banner .posts-custom .widget{position:absolute;inset:0;}.donation_banner__wrapper{position:relative;z-index:2;pointer-events:none;}.donation_banner .donate_btn{position:relative;z-index:2;}#sSHARED_-_Support_Block_0_0_7_0_0_3_1_0{color:#fff;}#sSHARED_-_Support_Block_0_0_7_0_0_3_1_1{font-weight:normal;}.sticky-sidebar{margin:auto;}@media (min-width: 980px){.main:has(.sticky-sidebar){overflow:visible;}}@media (min-width: 980px){.row:has(.sticky-sidebar){display:flex;overflow:visible;}}@media (min-width: 980px){.sticky-sidebar{position:-webkit-sticky;position:sticky;top:100px;transition:top .3s ease-in-out, position .3s ease-in-out;}}.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper.sidebar{background:linear-gradient(91deg, #005dc7 28%, #1d63b2 65%, #0353ae 85%);}
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
As members of the Union of American Physicians and Dentists, these clinicians are demanding the right to advocate for their patients without fear of retaliation.
At two hospitals tucked in the quiet corners of Bellingham, Washington, an unfolding labor struggle cuts to the heart of the crisis in American healthcare. At PeaceHealth St. Joseph and PeaceHealth United General, hospitalists, including physicians and advanced practice providers, have walked off the job. However, this isn't a fight over salaries. It is a strike for the soul of their profession.
As members of the Union of American Physicians and Dentists (UAPD), these clinicians are demanding the right to advocate for their patients without fear of retaliation. They're calling out a system in which metrics and margins take precedence over urgent care and human dignity, discharges are prioritized over medical necessity and unsafe staffing has become the norm.
Despite a ruling from the National Labor Relations Board affirming their union, PeaceHealth, a large nonprofit hospital system, refuses to negotiate. The hospitalists are caught between two employers: Sound Physicians, which hires and pays them, and PeaceHealth, which controls their working conditions. Both point fingers, while the providers bear the burden.
We are striking to have a voice in our working conditions to ensure we can provide the best care for our patients.
In the following interviews, I speak with Katie Pernick (KP), Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP); Dr. Andy Radvany (AR), Hospitalist; and Joe Crane (JC), organizing coordinator, UAPD. They discuss how their struggle is rooted both in the specific conditions of Bellingham, Washington, and reflective of broader national dynamics, connecting clinical workplaces to the growing labor movement, the accelerating corporatization of healthcare, and a rising wave of collective action among white-collar and caregiving professions.
Can you describe specific examples of how PeaceHealth's policies have impacted patient care or safety in Bellingham or Sedro-Woolley?
Katie Pernick stands outside PeaceHealth St. Joseph. (Photo: Brian Pernick)
KP: For too long, healthcare has been dictated by insurance companies and hospital corporations. Healthcare decisions need to be made by physicians and advanced practice clinicians (APC), not by administration looking at what a patient is costing them. We are striking to have a voice in our working conditions to ensure we can provide the best care for our patients. For example, two years ago our contract was adjusted, without our input, to require us to see more patients. As hospitalists we are interacting with everyone: the patient, families, nurses, therapists, social workers, and specialists. That does not include the patients' imaging, lab work, and exam findings. All this information has to be integrated to provide a detailed plan of care. To do it for 16 or more acutely ill patients a day is a lot to ask. The increase in patient load has put patient care at risk and doesn't allow us the time needed to properly assess patients and their understanding of their illness, their symptoms, and conversation to allow the patient to have a voice in their care.
Another example is the early discharge requirement. Administration would like us to send patients home by 10:00 am. If I were to try to meet this requirement daily, I would have to cut down on time spent educating the patient on medications, their illness, and what to expect on return home. This doesn't consider that I would be seeing my sickest patients later in the day in favor of seeing my patients that are well enough to go home first. Hospital administration regularly adds busy work not related to patient care. This is more distraction from providing care for my patients.
No one's death should be part of an investment strategy.
Finally, over the years there have been several times where someone in administration has called me to tell me a patient had been in the hospital long enough and I needed to discharge the patient. In these situations, the administrator had not personally been to see the patient or assessed the patient, it was solely on how they looked in the chart and that according to insurance the patient should have been well by that time.
How has the refusal of PeaceHealth to recognize your union affected your ability to advocate for patients or voice safety concerns on the job?
KP: Patients trust us to care for them, and it is time for physicians and APCs to stand up and advocate on a larger scale for them. We want a say in our working conditions so we can provide the best care for patients and continue to do so. We want to address issues like the ones outlined above. I work with amazing people who truly care about their patients. When you are constantly asked to compromise your personal and moral ethics to care for patients it leads to moral injury, distress, and burn out. I can feel it happening to me on days when I have too many patients and feel like someone isn't getting my best.
Do you see your strike as part of a larger trend of healthcare worker organizing across the U.S.? If so, how?
KP: I hope so. Healthcare dictated by the moneymaking corporations isn't the best healthcare. I know so many physicians and APCs who are tired of not being able to provide appropriate care. We need to fight on a larger scale and stand together. American healthcare cannot continue in this way. Just this week the Hospitalists at Skagit Regional, another Sound Physicians site, voted in favor of unionizing by an overwhelming majority. I know several of my colleagues have been getting many questions about our experience from other hospitalists around the country.
Many countries with strong public health systems (like the U.K. or Canada) have unionized physicians. Do you see international models as informing your approach here?
Joe Crane (in sunglasses) stands with striking workers. (Photo: Pierre King)
JC: The biggest problem with comparing the different systems isn't the public model versus nonprofit groups like PeaceHealth. The problem is that in America, we have companies like Sound Physicians that invest private equity money to make money from people in the worst moments of their lives. No one's death should be part of an investment strategy. Before we can start looking at how other unions in other countries are organized and fight back, we must fix a system that makes billions for investors when patients are sick and dying.
What role do corporate healthcare contractors like Sound Physicians play in undermining worker power and continuity of care?
KP: Estimates put 20% of healthcare dollars being spent on administrative tasks. Instead of turning down a patient for a life changing medication or medical device, what if we just said yes, they need this? Healthcare contractors like Sound add a layer of wasted medical dollars. I have two employers to answer to. More people sitting behind desks instead of directly caring for patients.
How has the community responded to the strike so far, and what do you want patients and families in this region to understand about your goals?
KP: I believe the majority of our community supports our union. PeaceHealth is a major local employer, and its decisions directly affect a wide segment of the population. Over the past year, its insurance policies have drawn criticism, and across the system, both in hospitals and clinics, providers are exhausted and overwhelmed. Our patients see it too; they can read the fatigue and strain on our faces.
Sound Physicians hospitalists have unionized under UAPD. PeaceHealth's advanced practice clinicians have done the same. Our nurses are in the midst of contract negotiations with Washington State Nurses Association, and our support staff have unionized with Service Employees International Union and are striking this week. When such a significant portion of an employer's workforce is organizing and protesting, it speaks volumes. PeaceHealth administrators often claim they are listening and seeking compromise, but if that were truly the case, how could so many workers be this frustrated?
It echoes the banking crisis of 2008, when profit-driven incentives corrupted the mortgage industry. Now, similarly perverse incentives are spreading through medicine like a cancer.
To our community, I want to say: We care deeply. We want the best for our patients. We want to return to work next week. But we also want a meaningful voice in the decisions that shape our ability to provide safe, ethical care. That means a seat at the table with PeaceHealth leadership.
To our colleagues, from dietary aides and housekeeping to radiology techs, phlebotomists, nurses, and beyond, we stand with you. We see the sacrifices you're making. That workers already struggling to make ends meet are willing to forgo a week's wages speaks to just how unfair these contracts are. Your courage underscores why this fight matters, for all of us.
How do you respond to the argument that physician unionization is incompatible with traditional notions of medical professionalism?
KP: When healthcare took a turn toward factory assembly line care and not an individual who needed tailored care, we went away from traditional medicine. When doctors are told they can only spend 20 minutes with a patient we turned away from traditional medicine. When I was told the reason I take so long to see patients is because I take too much time getting to know them, we turned away from traditional medicine.
Unionization is a return to the medical profession ideals in a time when corporations want to keep us quiet and subservient. The role of the Physician and APC's is to advocate for patients. Corporate healthcare took our professional autonomy; we want it back. They have not listened to us before. Unionization is the path back to traditional notions of medical professionalism. This is the path forward.
What do you think the growing labor unrest across industries, from Starbucks to Amazon to hospitals, says about the state of democracy and worker power in America?
JC: Something is broken in this country. More Physicians have unionized in the last two years than in the prior 20 years. As a union organizer, people might assume that this surge of unionization makes me happy; it does in the sense of seeing people come together and fight back, but it also breaks my heart how broken this system in our country is. Over $400 million per year are spent trying to crush workers who'd like to have a voice. Here in Bellingham, Washington, clinicians are taking to the strike line not for more money, but for the simple ask of wanting to care for their patients in the best possible way. Sound and PeaceHealth are taking money they made off sick human beings and are spending that money to try to make sure the physicians can't advocate for their patients. Our system is broken, but our UAPD members are standing up and fighting back, and we will win this fight.
Dr. Andy Radvany protests outside the hospital. (Photo: Pierre King)
AR: Americans are pushing back against an economy where CEOs earn hundreds or even thousands of times more than their lowest-paid workers—a level of inequality rare in other developed nations. Executive pay has long outpaced reason, symbolizing a broken system.
Employee-owned WinCo offers a compelling alternative. It has created many millionaires among workers, without minting a single billionaire, proving that shared ownership can build wealth more equitably.
With a national election coming up, what would you like to see from political leaders in terms of healthcare reform and labor protections for clinicians?
JC: With the coming election, we need political leaders to stand up and fight with healthcare workers. We need to strengthen our labor laws. Your doctor shouldn't fear retaliation for advocating for their patients, and companies shouldn't profit from their constituents' sickness in a hospital. Doctors shouldn't have to strike just to be able to advocate for their patients. The politicians need to stand up and join the fight. If for no other reason, then they, too, will be patient someday. Do they want to be a profit margin on a spreadsheet or a human being getting the best possible help from a clinician who isn't afraid to speak up for their patient?
AR: I would like to see bills pushing back against C-Suite compensation, and private equity buyouts of healthcare interests. Medicine should not be for-profit business. The problem has grown exponentially, and hospital closures and lack of access are the result.
These are my patients, and their healthcare decisions should be made by me, not hospital administration.
Twenty years ago, many treatments and procedures that could be expedited to save money and keep patients out of the hospital are now delayed, until hospitalization becomes the only way to get them done quickly. This benefits hospital profits, not patients.
Meanwhile, corporate incentives have infiltrated even nonprofit health systems, distorting priorities. Executives chase bonus structures that reward volume and revenue, not outcomes or care. It's a systemic issue, deeper than any one boardroom. In many cases, leaders are doing exactly what they've been incentivized to do. It echoes the banking crisis of 2008, when profit-driven incentives corrupted the mortgage industry. Now, similarly perverse incentives are spreading through medicine like a cancer.
The words, "Patients over profits" are projected onto the building of PeaceHealth St. Joseph. (Photo: Bellingham Trouble Makers)
If this strike succeeds, or fails, what precedent do you believe it will set for other hospitalists and healthcare workers nationwide?
KP: This strike is personal for me. This is my community. My patients are friends, friends of friends, parents of people I see at the gym, and the cashier that knows me from my weekly shopping. These are my patients, I don't know just the information in the chart (ie; imaging reports, lab work, vital signs). I know who has a sick cat at home, who is hoping to get out of the hospital before their grandchild's birthday next week, and who is scared to go home. These are my patients, and their healthcare decisions should be made by me, not hospital administration.
I hope our strike stirs more resistance from healthcare workers. We are the people that have the greatest opportunity to affect change in healthcare. It won't be able to come from the patients; they are effectively trapped by our healthcare system to accept what is given by their insurance. We need to stand for what is right, and we need to start now. Change is slow, but hope is already spreading.
As Musk is trying to gut the agencies that enforce federal regulations, state corporate law is poised to become even more important. Delaware should have held firm.
While Elon Musk attacks federal agencies’ ability to protect us from the worst excesses of corporate power, a little known Musk initiative sailed through the Delaware legislature this week. Delaware’s corporate law drew Musk’s ire when its well-regarded Court of Chancery sided with Tesla shareholders and tossed out his $56 billion pay package. Musk packed up his Tesla toys and moved the company’s incorporation to Texas, but his lawyers still pushed Delaware lawmakers to twist the state’s laws to suit his oligarchic interests and give him more power over our lives.
The Delaware House passed Senate Bill 21 (SB 21) on March 25, after the Delaware Senate passed it on March 13. Governor Matt Meyer, who played a central role in the bill’s passage, promptly signed it into law.
Most companies operate under Delaware’s corporate law, with about two-thirds of S&P 500 companies incorporated in the state, and most corporate lawsuits occur in Delaware’s special Court of Chancery. And as corporate interests have eroded many federal tools of corporate accountability—like federal financial, environmental, and worker safety regulations—Delaware corporate law has become one of the last mechanisms of corporate accountability, especially for shareholder lawsuits. Now, as Musk is trying to gut the agencies that enforce federal regulations, state corporate law is poised to become even more important.
Insulating the self-serving decisions of corporate insiders from challenge and gutting the federal agencies and protections that hold corporate power accountable are two sides of the same coin.
Regular shareholders like working peoples’ pensions can bring lawsuits challenging corporate misconduct. But corporate law gives directors and officers broad latitude to make decisions free from liability—even if they are very costly to the corporation and its stakeholders. Courts, however, look more closely at decisions by corporate insiders—including controlling shareholders like Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and private equity firms that often retain significant stakes in companies after they take them public—when there are conflicts of interest.
The case challenging Musk’s $56 billion Tesla pay package was one of those instances. Upset that a Delaware judge ruled against him in that case, Musk disparaged her and Delaware courts, reincorporated Tesla and SpaceX in Texas, and called on others to do the same.
Corporate insiders convinced Delaware legislators that they were in a hostage situation: Either overhaul their state’s corporate law to give more power to Zuckerberg, private equity firms, and other corporate insiders to everyone else’s detriment by passing SB 21 immediately, or face a mass exodus of corporations and a corresponding slashing of their state budget. Delaware Rep. Madinah Wilson-Anton said, “Our budget is being held hostage and we’re supposed to just listen to the demands, but we have not been told who they’re coming from.”
However, since SB 21 would make it much harder for regular shareholders to hold insiders accountable for their self-serving actions in Delaware courts, many organizations representing regular shareholders have spoken out against the bill, saying its passage would make Delaware less attractive as a state of incorporation. Rep. Wilson-Anton noted: “When we continue to pass bills that are catering to a very small minority of companies that have lost in court and are upset they lost in court, it creates an environment where other companies say, ‘You know what, we’re just gonna stay in our home state because Delaware is just a state where the highest bidder gets to write the law.’” Meanwhile, a recent poll found that only 16% of Delaware voters believe that SB 21 should have passed as is and 63% are less likely to vote for legislators who back SB 21.
Rewriting Delaware corporate law at the behest of Musk and other corporate insiders makes no sense. Insulating the self-serving decisions of corporate insiders from challenge and gutting the federal agencies and protections that hold corporate power accountable are two sides of the same coin. Heads Big Tech oligarchs win, tails the rest of us lose. As the former head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs K. Sabeel Rahman said, “a world without government isn’t a world where we’re not being governed. It’s just we’re being governed in a super undemocratic way.”
Champions in the fight against inequality face formidable challenges in 2025. But by working together at all levels—from the shop floor to state houses to the halls of Congress—we can still find ways to build power.
In dark times like these, shining a light on successful efforts to reverse our country’s extreme inequality is more important than ever. As we looked back on 2024, we actually found plenty to celebrate. Here are 10 inspiring wins that deserve more attention.
Volkswagen workers in Chattanooga, Tennessee voted overwhelmingly in April to join the United Auto Workers (UAW), a landmark win for labor organizing in the South. The region has suffered deeply because of its low-road, anti-union economic model. Seven out of ten states with the highest levels of poverty are in the South, according to the Economic Policy Institute.
Whatever happens on the national political stage over the next four years, local communities can still win important fights for a more just society.
Another UAW election, at a Mercedes-Benz facility in Vance, Alabama, where management was more aggressively anti-union, went the other way in May. But the union has vowed to continue organizing in the region. “This is a David and Goliath fight,” UAW President Shawn Fain said after the Mercedes loss. “Sometimes Goliath wins a battle. But David wins the war.”
Organizing workers at Amazon—now the nation’s second largest private employer—has been a white whale of the labor movement for years. Aside from a breakthrough union election win in Staten Island, puncturing the e-commerce giant’s anti-labor strategy has been challenging. That is, until this year, when the Teamsters made sizable gains.
The National Labor Relations Board ruled this summer that Amazon should be considered a joint employer of the delivery drivers it subcontracts, opening up that class of workers to organize. And organize they did—according to the Teamsters, over 5,000 drivers have joined the union at nine Amazon locations. Warehouse workers have made advances as well. In California, Amazon employees in San Francisco and at the company’s air hub in San Bernardino are now demanding union recognition.
For the past two years, the United Food and Commercial Workers union has led a coalition of more than 100 organizations against the proposed merger of grocery giants Kroger and Albertsons. The union predicted the mega-merger would result in “lost jobs, closed stores, food deserts, and higher prices.”
By contrast, corporate executives stood to make a killing. At Albertsons alone, the proposed merger agreement would’ve delivered as much as $146 million to the firm’s top 10 officials.
On December 10, one federal court judge and another in Washington state sided with the Federal Trade Commission and issued temporary injunctions against the deal. The following day, Albertsons threw in the towel on what would’ve been the biggest grocery store merger in U.S. history. “This is the first time the FTC has ever sought to block a merger not just because it’s gonna be bad for consumers, but also for workers,” FTC chair Lina Khan said shortly after the decision.
Despite the red wave on November 5, voters in several states passed ballot initiatives to adopt inequality-fighting policies that most Republican politicians oppose.
In the red states of Nebraska, Missouri, and Alaska, voters approved guaranteed paid leave, while Missouri and Alaska also passed state minimum wage hikes.
Washington state voters rejected a hedge fund-financed ballot proposal to repeal the state’s path-breaking capital gains tax on the rich. They also beat back an effort to gut a state-operated long-term care insurance program. In Illinois, voters adopted a nonbinding measure expressing support for an extra 3% tax on income of over $1 million.
In 2024, for the first time ever, over 100,000 Americans filed their tax returns digitally directly to the IRS. The agency’s Direct File system went live in 12 pilot states, breaking the dominance that for-profit tax preparation companies have enjoyed for years.
“This is an important fight to ensure greedy tax prep companies don’t continue to rake in money from filers who are simply doing their civic duty,” wrote Public Citizen’s Susan Harley for Inequality.org.
Direct file also advances racial justice. Color of Change and the Groundwork Collaborative exposed how Intuit’s TurboTax and H&R Block target Black and low-income communities for costly and unnecessary services.
Unfortunately, this fight is not over. House Republicans are urging President-elect Donald Trump to kill the IRS’s free direct file service on day one of his second administration.
President Joe Biden adopted a range of pathbreaking executive actions to protect U.S. workers—including safeguards against toiling in extreme heat, broader overtime pay coverage, and new measures protecting organizing rights. He also authorized rules to crack down on bosses who misclassify employees as independent contractors or force them to sign noncompete agreements.
The beauty of executive actions: no need for Congressional approval. The downside: The next president has the power to roll them back.
Will that happen under Trump, a self-declared but dubious champion of the working class? We shall see. In the meantime, the National Employment Law Project and several other organizations have put together a guide on how state policymakers could enact similar standards at the subfederal level.
Did you know that private jets pollute 10 to 20 times more per passenger than commercial airplanes? And the typical private jet owner, with a net worth of nearly $200 million, actually pays a far smaller share of air safety fees than commercial coach passengers, according to Institute for Policy Studies research.
In 2024, Stop Private Jet Expansion, a 100-organization coalition, won two major victories in their campaign to block the expansion of New England’s largest private jet airport, Hanscom Field outside Boston. Massachusetts state rejected the developer’s environmental impact submission, demanding supplemental information. As part of a comprehensive climate bill, the state legislature also updated the charter of Massport, the agency that will decide the future of the airport, to require them to consider carbon emissions and climate change in their decision-making.
Elon Musk has called for “deleting” the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. What’s his problem with this federal agency? For Musk and his finance bro buddies, it appears the CFPB has been overly effective in helping ordinary Americans stand up to big money interests.
Recently the agency announced it’s forcing shady “credit repair” companies to return $1.8 billion in illegal junk fees to 4.3 million Americans. The agency also just issued new limits on overdraft fees that will save consumers billions more. During its nearly 14-year history, the CFPB has won nearly $21 billion in compensation for victims of fraud, racial discrimination in lending, and other financial abuse.
“Weakening the CFPB, slowing its work, or steering it to favor industry over the public interest,” explains the advocacy group Americans for Financial Reform, “would give bad actors a green light to do their worst and further deepen this country’s racial wealth gap.”
For four decades, procurement rules made it difficult for local and state policymakers to ensure that federally funded projects create good jobs. With megabillions in new public investment about to flow into infrastructure and clean energy projects, a labor-community alliance known as the Local Opportunities Coalition led the charge to get rid of these anti-worker vestiges of the conservative Reagan era.
Finally, in 2024, the Biden administration got the job done. Now state and local governments can give companies a leg up in bidding competitions if they commit to creating specific numbers of jobs with minimum levels of pay and benefits. They can also require hiring preferences for local workers and disadvantaged communities, ban the use of contract funds for union-busting, and prohibit employers from misclassifying workers as “independent contractors” to skirt labor laws.
Whatever happens on the national political stage over the next four years, local communities can still win important fights for a more just society.
One particularly inspiring example from 2024: the battles to protect county-owned nursing homes in rural Wisconsin against privatization. Study after study has shown that private equity-owned facilities have lower-quality care and higher mortality rates. And yet many Republican lawmakers are backing for-profit corporations’ efforts to take over this critical service.
As veteran community organizer George Goehl has reported, Wisconsin seniors put up a strong fight this year. They succeeded in ousting pro-privatization members of at least three county boards and are continuing to organize to protect their healthcare from corporate greed.
Champions in the fight against inequality face formidable challenges. But by working together at all levels—from the shop floor to state houses to the halls of Congress—we can still find ways to build power and move our country towards a just economy that works for everyone.