A sign points visitors to Hanscom Field Civil Air Terminal in Massachusetts on Saturday, July 12, 2014.
Heir Pollution Puts Our Climate in Peril
Wealthy heirs and heiresses disproportionately burn up our planet through their private aircraft activity.
On January 8, 2022, a Bombardier Challenger 300 departed from Laurence G. Hanscom Field—a general aviation airport a few miles northwest of Boston, Massachusetts—to the beautiful Caribbean Island of Sint Maarten.
The flight lasted three and a half hours. Its jets emitted approximately 10 metric tons of CO2—two tons more than the average annual carbon footprint of a Massachusetts resident.
The owner of the Bombardier Challenger? Billionaire heir Bernard Saul II.
Three generations of Sauls created his high-flying fortune: Both his great-grandfather and grandfather, John Hennessey and Bernard I, got rich in the 19th century and stayed rich. Saul II greatly benefited from his lineage and inherited his grandfather’s property management firm in 1957. More than 60 years later, Saul II is one of the richest men in the world. Forbes estimates his net worth to be around a cool $2.5 billion.
The constituency served by the expansion of private jet space at Hanscom Field is a small minority of ultra-high net worth individuals and their affluent heirs.
In billionaire fashion, Saul II is an active player in the business aviation market: He bears an ownership stake in four different private jets.
This is hardly surprising. Private aircraft owners tend to be a class of ultra-wealthy individuals with a median net worth of at least $140 million. But Saul II’s flight activity—or, more accurately, the flight activity of the jets that he owns—from Hanscom Field symbolizes a trend that’s flown largely under the radar: A phenomenon we like to call “heir pollution.”
Many researchers have exposed the political influence of inherited-wealth dynasties, the strategies they deploy to protect their assets from taxation, and their continued exploitation of the philanthropic sector for their own benefit. But few have captured how wealthy heirs and heiresses disproportionately burn up our planet through their private aircraft activity.
Our analysis of Wealth-X’s database reveals that there are approximately 760 high net worth individuals in the United States who, thanks to their inherited wealth, have an ownership stake in at least one private jet.
Thirty-three of these inheritors are native to, reside in, or own a second home in the state of Massachusetts—11 of them have made use of Hanscom Field since 2022 began.
Our Hanscom High Flyers report takes a comprehensive look at the flight activity of those who fly private from Hanscom Field, profiling the 20 most frequent high flyers over an 18-month period.
Two spots in the top 20 are occupied by two Massachusetts heirs, John Fish and Arthur S. Demoulas. Both are billionaires and, between them, they burned more than 3,000 tons of CO2 just by flying in and out of Hanscom.
The carbon footprint of the other 11 Bay Staters with dynastic wealth is approximately 1,964 metric tons, bringing heir pollution at Hanscom to an estimated 5,035 metric tons. This estimate does not even include the carbon footprint of non-Massachusetts heirs.
Heir pollution isn’t easily tracked. Some children of magnates prefer to outsource their jet travel, founding and relying on air charter businesses. A prime example is the late Paul David Phelan, who was born into a wealthy Canadian family and later founded the successful Chartright Air Group in the 1980s. Chartright is currently the second largest air charter business in Canada and owns a large, diverse fleet. Eight of its business jets have carried out operations at Hanscom, bringing their total carbon footprint at the airport to 476 metric tons.
The Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) wants to expand hangar capacity at Hanscom. Yet understandably, a coalition of local advocacy groups vehemently opposes Massport’s plan: Fueling this hotbed of heir pollution, these concerned citizens recognize, is facilitating climate disaster.
Curiously, Massport asserts that expanding hangar capacity will actually lessen the airport’s carbon footprint. More space, Massport argues, would eliminate their frequent ferry flights, which transport empty planes to other airports for storage purposes. However, there is no evidence to suggest that this is the case. Hanger expansion is much more likely to encourage owners and jet card holders to fly more, intensifying private jet air traffic and worsening climate effects. Think of it like highway expansion, which has a track record of increasing automobile traffic instead of relieving road congestion.
The constituency served by the expansion of private jet space at Hanscom Field is a small minority of ultra-high net worth individuals and their affluent heirs. The dynastically wealthy are flying more than ever. They will continue to do so at our own climate peril—unless we fight against private jet expansion and, through struggle, mobilize for a green energy future.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
On January 8, 2022, a Bombardier Challenger 300 departed from Laurence G. Hanscom Field—a general aviation airport a few miles northwest of Boston, Massachusetts—to the beautiful Caribbean Island of Sint Maarten.
The flight lasted three and a half hours. Its jets emitted approximately 10 metric tons of CO2—two tons more than the average annual carbon footprint of a Massachusetts resident.
The owner of the Bombardier Challenger? Billionaire heir Bernard Saul II.
Three generations of Sauls created his high-flying fortune: Both his great-grandfather and grandfather, John Hennessey and Bernard I, got rich in the 19th century and stayed rich. Saul II greatly benefited from his lineage and inherited his grandfather’s property management firm in 1957. More than 60 years later, Saul II is one of the richest men in the world. Forbes estimates his net worth to be around a cool $2.5 billion.
The constituency served by the expansion of private jet space at Hanscom Field is a small minority of ultra-high net worth individuals and their affluent heirs.
In billionaire fashion, Saul II is an active player in the business aviation market: He bears an ownership stake in four different private jets.
This is hardly surprising. Private aircraft owners tend to be a class of ultra-wealthy individuals with a median net worth of at least $140 million. But Saul II’s flight activity—or, more accurately, the flight activity of the jets that he owns—from Hanscom Field symbolizes a trend that’s flown largely under the radar: A phenomenon we like to call “heir pollution.”
Many researchers have exposed the political influence of inherited-wealth dynasties, the strategies they deploy to protect their assets from taxation, and their continued exploitation of the philanthropic sector for their own benefit. But few have captured how wealthy heirs and heiresses disproportionately burn up our planet through their private aircraft activity.
Our analysis of Wealth-X’s database reveals that there are approximately 760 high net worth individuals in the United States who, thanks to their inherited wealth, have an ownership stake in at least one private jet.
Thirty-three of these inheritors are native to, reside in, or own a second home in the state of Massachusetts—11 of them have made use of Hanscom Field since 2022 began.
Our Hanscom High Flyers report takes a comprehensive look at the flight activity of those who fly private from Hanscom Field, profiling the 20 most frequent high flyers over an 18-month period.
Two spots in the top 20 are occupied by two Massachusetts heirs, John Fish and Arthur S. Demoulas. Both are billionaires and, between them, they burned more than 3,000 tons of CO2 just by flying in and out of Hanscom.
The carbon footprint of the other 11 Bay Staters with dynastic wealth is approximately 1,964 metric tons, bringing heir pollution at Hanscom to an estimated 5,035 metric tons. This estimate does not even include the carbon footprint of non-Massachusetts heirs.
Heir pollution isn’t easily tracked. Some children of magnates prefer to outsource their jet travel, founding and relying on air charter businesses. A prime example is the late Paul David Phelan, who was born into a wealthy Canadian family and later founded the successful Chartright Air Group in the 1980s. Chartright is currently the second largest air charter business in Canada and owns a large, diverse fleet. Eight of its business jets have carried out operations at Hanscom, bringing their total carbon footprint at the airport to 476 metric tons.
The Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) wants to expand hangar capacity at Hanscom. Yet understandably, a coalition of local advocacy groups vehemently opposes Massport’s plan: Fueling this hotbed of heir pollution, these concerned citizens recognize, is facilitating climate disaster.
Curiously, Massport asserts that expanding hangar capacity will actually lessen the airport’s carbon footprint. More space, Massport argues, would eliminate their frequent ferry flights, which transport empty planes to other airports for storage purposes. However, there is no evidence to suggest that this is the case. Hanger expansion is much more likely to encourage owners and jet card holders to fly more, intensifying private jet air traffic and worsening climate effects. Think of it like highway expansion, which has a track record of increasing automobile traffic instead of relieving road congestion.
The constituency served by the expansion of private jet space at Hanscom Field is a small minority of ultra-high net worth individuals and their affluent heirs. The dynastically wealthy are flying more than ever. They will continue to do so at our own climate peril—unless we fight against private jet expansion and, through struggle, mobilize for a green energy future.
- Tax the Fat Cat Private Jet Class, Invest in Green Transit ›
- Climate Researcher Threatened With Termination for Taking a Stand Against Flying ›
- 'Time to Ground These Fat Cats': Markey Proposes Tax Hike on Private Jet Travel ›
- 'Luxury Mega-Polluters': Climate Activists Target Private Jets of Ultra-Rich in Geneva ›
- Over 100 Climate Activists Arrested for Blocking Private Jets From Taking Off in Amsterdam ›
- 15 US Climate Activists Arrested at Global Protests Against Private Jets ›
On January 8, 2022, a Bombardier Challenger 300 departed from Laurence G. Hanscom Field—a general aviation airport a few miles northwest of Boston, Massachusetts—to the beautiful Caribbean Island of Sint Maarten.
The flight lasted three and a half hours. Its jets emitted approximately 10 metric tons of CO2—two tons more than the average annual carbon footprint of a Massachusetts resident.
The owner of the Bombardier Challenger? Billionaire heir Bernard Saul II.
Three generations of Sauls created his high-flying fortune: Both his great-grandfather and grandfather, John Hennessey and Bernard I, got rich in the 19th century and stayed rich. Saul II greatly benefited from his lineage and inherited his grandfather’s property management firm in 1957. More than 60 years later, Saul II is one of the richest men in the world. Forbes estimates his net worth to be around a cool $2.5 billion.
The constituency served by the expansion of private jet space at Hanscom Field is a small minority of ultra-high net worth individuals and their affluent heirs.
In billionaire fashion, Saul II is an active player in the business aviation market: He bears an ownership stake in four different private jets.
This is hardly surprising. Private aircraft owners tend to be a class of ultra-wealthy individuals with a median net worth of at least $140 million. But Saul II’s flight activity—or, more accurately, the flight activity of the jets that he owns—from Hanscom Field symbolizes a trend that’s flown largely under the radar: A phenomenon we like to call “heir pollution.”
Many researchers have exposed the political influence of inherited-wealth dynasties, the strategies they deploy to protect their assets from taxation, and their continued exploitation of the philanthropic sector for their own benefit. But few have captured how wealthy heirs and heiresses disproportionately burn up our planet through their private aircraft activity.
Our analysis of Wealth-X’s database reveals that there are approximately 760 high net worth individuals in the United States who, thanks to their inherited wealth, have an ownership stake in at least one private jet.
Thirty-three of these inheritors are native to, reside in, or own a second home in the state of Massachusetts—11 of them have made use of Hanscom Field since 2022 began.
Our Hanscom High Flyers report takes a comprehensive look at the flight activity of those who fly private from Hanscom Field, profiling the 20 most frequent high flyers over an 18-month period.
Two spots in the top 20 are occupied by two Massachusetts heirs, John Fish and Arthur S. Demoulas. Both are billionaires and, between them, they burned more than 3,000 tons of CO2 just by flying in and out of Hanscom.
The carbon footprint of the other 11 Bay Staters with dynastic wealth is approximately 1,964 metric tons, bringing heir pollution at Hanscom to an estimated 5,035 metric tons. This estimate does not even include the carbon footprint of non-Massachusetts heirs.
Heir pollution isn’t easily tracked. Some children of magnates prefer to outsource their jet travel, founding and relying on air charter businesses. A prime example is the late Paul David Phelan, who was born into a wealthy Canadian family and later founded the successful Chartright Air Group in the 1980s. Chartright is currently the second largest air charter business in Canada and owns a large, diverse fleet. Eight of its business jets have carried out operations at Hanscom, bringing their total carbon footprint at the airport to 476 metric tons.
The Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) wants to expand hangar capacity at Hanscom. Yet understandably, a coalition of local advocacy groups vehemently opposes Massport’s plan: Fueling this hotbed of heir pollution, these concerned citizens recognize, is facilitating climate disaster.
Curiously, Massport asserts that expanding hangar capacity will actually lessen the airport’s carbon footprint. More space, Massport argues, would eliminate their frequent ferry flights, which transport empty planes to other airports for storage purposes. However, there is no evidence to suggest that this is the case. Hanger expansion is much more likely to encourage owners and jet card holders to fly more, intensifying private jet air traffic and worsening climate effects. Think of it like highway expansion, which has a track record of increasing automobile traffic instead of relieving road congestion.
The constituency served by the expansion of private jet space at Hanscom Field is a small minority of ultra-high net worth individuals and their affluent heirs. The dynastically wealthy are flying more than ever. They will continue to do so at our own climate peril—unless we fight against private jet expansion and, through struggle, mobilize for a green energy future.
- Tax the Fat Cat Private Jet Class, Invest in Green Transit ›
- Climate Researcher Threatened With Termination for Taking a Stand Against Flying ›
- 'Time to Ground These Fat Cats': Markey Proposes Tax Hike on Private Jet Travel ›
- 'Luxury Mega-Polluters': Climate Activists Target Private Jets of Ultra-Rich in Geneva ›
- Over 100 Climate Activists Arrested for Blocking Private Jets From Taking Off in Amsterdam ›
- 15 US Climate Activists Arrested at Global Protests Against Private Jets ›