SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Greenleaf Power’s Desert View woody-biomass power plant is pictured in Mecca, California.
(Photo: Dicklyon/Wikipedia/CC BY-SA 4.0)
Woody Biomass Expansion Threatens Joe Biden’s Environmental Justice Legacy
His continued support for the energy source is unethical and illogical from an economic and health perspective.
Oct 24, 2023
Enviva, the world’s largest woody biomass producer, will be placing its largest wood pellet production plant in Epes, Alabama, a remote town where 99% of residents are Black. Woody biomass is the process of burning trees for energy, and Enviva keeps putting woody biomass plants in predominantly Black communities, killing Black people and trees for profit.
As Enviva misleads the public with claims of being good for the planet, the Biden administration watches and supports the development of woody energy. But President Joe Biden should not be supporting woody biomass when it makes no sense economically, environmentally, and socially.
As a false climate solution, particular cases show that woody biomass projects are more destructive to air and water quality than fossil fuels. In the predominantly Black Northampton County of North Carolina, where a prominent woody biomass plant exists, local health assessments show that 60% of residents suffer from high blood pressure, 11% from heart disease, and 10% from asthma.
Woody biomass’s sole purpose is that it is detrimental to the health of trees and Black people, which is not an explanation for its continued use.
Additional scientific studies have shown that woody biomass has the fastest-growing share of premature deaths among all other energy sources at 39-47%. Enviva publicly states that trees as an energy source can be reliable when other renewable energy forms aren’t available. But the truth is that when Enviva burns wood to make woody biomass, it creates 3 times the carbon that natural gas does. The depiction of woody biomass as renewable energy is deceptive, as statistics have only proved otherwise.
President Biden understands the health harms associated with woody biomass. Despite this knowledge, environmental groups still need to lobby the president to avoid future subsidization of woody biomass. However, increased subsidization of woody biomass is unwise because as renewable energy sources like solar and wind have become cheaper, woody biomass hasn’t followed suit.
According to studies by Dominion Energy, Dominion’s least expensive biomass plant was more than double the energy efficiency cost of electricity from utility-scale solar and onshore wind. Additionally, the efficiency of woody biomass is 20%, which is lower than both wind and solar. Combined with the fact that woody biomass has high production costs, woody biomass is an inefficient and costly energy source.
To be sure, trees bring environmental benefits. Trees are the lungs of the Earth, and trees’ absorption of carbon is an effective nature-based carbon solution. They help to protect wildlife and cool the Earth, but they are not energy resources. Chopping trees increases deforestation, and cutting down trees for woody biomass projects reduces their carbon absorption effectiveness. Taking the time to grow new trees when we already have trees exploits nature. Clearing trees is inefficient, and since wind and solar are cost-efficient alternatives, they distract us from putting clean energy on the grid.
As Biden thinks about his support for woody biomass, he must know his legacy hangs in the balance. As the overseer of the Environmental Justice Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, and the Justice40 initiative, his support for woody biomass is self-destructive. Going forward, continued expansion of wind and solar and halting the subsidization of woody biomass is essential. But most importantly, including woody biomass as an enemy of his environmental goals is paramount.
In California, woody biomass releases more carbon during production than coal. To be looped in the same sentence with a toxic energy source like coal is alarming, and the continued support by Biden for woody biomass is unethical and illogical from an economic and health perspective. Woody biomass’s sole purpose is that it is detrimental to the health of trees and Black people, which is not an explanation for its continued use. As a fossil fuel clone, woody biomass projects must end.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Shane Lee
Shane J. Lee is an environmental justice program coordinator for the Sustain Our Future Foundation (SOFF). He is a public voices fellow with the OpEd Project in partnership with the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
renewable energyenvironmental racismjoe bidenenvironmental justiceclimate emergencyfossil fuelspublic healthinflation reduction act
Enviva, the world’s largest woody biomass producer, will be placing its largest wood pellet production plant in Epes, Alabama, a remote town where 99% of residents are Black. Woody biomass is the process of burning trees for energy, and Enviva keeps putting woody biomass plants in predominantly Black communities, killing Black people and trees for profit.
As Enviva misleads the public with claims of being good for the planet, the Biden administration watches and supports the development of woody energy. But President Joe Biden should not be supporting woody biomass when it makes no sense economically, environmentally, and socially.
As a false climate solution, particular cases show that woody biomass projects are more destructive to air and water quality than fossil fuels. In the predominantly Black Northampton County of North Carolina, where a prominent woody biomass plant exists, local health assessments show that 60% of residents suffer from high blood pressure, 11% from heart disease, and 10% from asthma.
Woody biomass’s sole purpose is that it is detrimental to the health of trees and Black people, which is not an explanation for its continued use.
Additional scientific studies have shown that woody biomass has the fastest-growing share of premature deaths among all other energy sources at 39-47%. Enviva publicly states that trees as an energy source can be reliable when other renewable energy forms aren’t available. But the truth is that when Enviva burns wood to make woody biomass, it creates 3 times the carbon that natural gas does. The depiction of woody biomass as renewable energy is deceptive, as statistics have only proved otherwise.
President Biden understands the health harms associated with woody biomass. Despite this knowledge, environmental groups still need to lobby the president to avoid future subsidization of woody biomass. However, increased subsidization of woody biomass is unwise because as renewable energy sources like solar and wind have become cheaper, woody biomass hasn’t followed suit.
According to studies by Dominion Energy, Dominion’s least expensive biomass plant was more than double the energy efficiency cost of electricity from utility-scale solar and onshore wind. Additionally, the efficiency of woody biomass is 20%, which is lower than both wind and solar. Combined with the fact that woody biomass has high production costs, woody biomass is an inefficient and costly energy source.
To be sure, trees bring environmental benefits. Trees are the lungs of the Earth, and trees’ absorption of carbon is an effective nature-based carbon solution. They help to protect wildlife and cool the Earth, but they are not energy resources. Chopping trees increases deforestation, and cutting down trees for woody biomass projects reduces their carbon absorption effectiveness. Taking the time to grow new trees when we already have trees exploits nature. Clearing trees is inefficient, and since wind and solar are cost-efficient alternatives, they distract us from putting clean energy on the grid.
As Biden thinks about his support for woody biomass, he must know his legacy hangs in the balance. As the overseer of the Environmental Justice Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, and the Justice40 initiative, his support for woody biomass is self-destructive. Going forward, continued expansion of wind and solar and halting the subsidization of woody biomass is essential. But most importantly, including woody biomass as an enemy of his environmental goals is paramount.
In California, woody biomass releases more carbon during production than coal. To be looped in the same sentence with a toxic energy source like coal is alarming, and the continued support by Biden for woody biomass is unethical and illogical from an economic and health perspective. Woody biomass’s sole purpose is that it is detrimental to the health of trees and Black people, which is not an explanation for its continued use. As a fossil fuel clone, woody biomass projects must end.
From Your Site Articles
- Analysis Shows US Wind and Solar Could Outpace Coal and Nuclear Power in 2023 ›
- Genetically-Engineered Trees: A "Cure" Worse Than the Disease ›
- Animal Agriculture Emits Nearly 60% of Greenhouse Gases From Food Production: Study ›
- Humans Less Than 1% of Life on Earth, But Have Destroyed Half of Its Plants, More Than 80% of All Mammals ›
- Biofuels Not All They're Cracked Up To Be, Report Finds ›
Shane Lee
Shane J. Lee is an environmental justice program coordinator for the Sustain Our Future Foundation (SOFF). He is a public voices fellow with the OpEd Project in partnership with the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
Enviva, the world’s largest woody biomass producer, will be placing its largest wood pellet production plant in Epes, Alabama, a remote town where 99% of residents are Black. Woody biomass is the process of burning trees for energy, and Enviva keeps putting woody biomass plants in predominantly Black communities, killing Black people and trees for profit.
As Enviva misleads the public with claims of being good for the planet, the Biden administration watches and supports the development of woody energy. But President Joe Biden should not be supporting woody biomass when it makes no sense economically, environmentally, and socially.
As a false climate solution, particular cases show that woody biomass projects are more destructive to air and water quality than fossil fuels. In the predominantly Black Northampton County of North Carolina, where a prominent woody biomass plant exists, local health assessments show that 60% of residents suffer from high blood pressure, 11% from heart disease, and 10% from asthma.
Woody biomass’s sole purpose is that it is detrimental to the health of trees and Black people, which is not an explanation for its continued use.
Additional scientific studies have shown that woody biomass has the fastest-growing share of premature deaths among all other energy sources at 39-47%. Enviva publicly states that trees as an energy source can be reliable when other renewable energy forms aren’t available. But the truth is that when Enviva burns wood to make woody biomass, it creates 3 times the carbon that natural gas does. The depiction of woody biomass as renewable energy is deceptive, as statistics have only proved otherwise.
President Biden understands the health harms associated with woody biomass. Despite this knowledge, environmental groups still need to lobby the president to avoid future subsidization of woody biomass. However, increased subsidization of woody biomass is unwise because as renewable energy sources like solar and wind have become cheaper, woody biomass hasn’t followed suit.
According to studies by Dominion Energy, Dominion’s least expensive biomass plant was more than double the energy efficiency cost of electricity from utility-scale solar and onshore wind. Additionally, the efficiency of woody biomass is 20%, which is lower than both wind and solar. Combined with the fact that woody biomass has high production costs, woody biomass is an inefficient and costly energy source.
To be sure, trees bring environmental benefits. Trees are the lungs of the Earth, and trees’ absorption of carbon is an effective nature-based carbon solution. They help to protect wildlife and cool the Earth, but they are not energy resources. Chopping trees increases deforestation, and cutting down trees for woody biomass projects reduces their carbon absorption effectiveness. Taking the time to grow new trees when we already have trees exploits nature. Clearing trees is inefficient, and since wind and solar are cost-efficient alternatives, they distract us from putting clean energy on the grid.
As Biden thinks about his support for woody biomass, he must know his legacy hangs in the balance. As the overseer of the Environmental Justice Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, and the Justice40 initiative, his support for woody biomass is self-destructive. Going forward, continued expansion of wind and solar and halting the subsidization of woody biomass is essential. But most importantly, including woody biomass as an enemy of his environmental goals is paramount.
In California, woody biomass releases more carbon during production than coal. To be looped in the same sentence with a toxic energy source like coal is alarming, and the continued support by Biden for woody biomass is unethical and illogical from an economic and health perspective. Woody biomass’s sole purpose is that it is detrimental to the health of trees and Black people, which is not an explanation for its continued use. As a fossil fuel clone, woody biomass projects must end.
From Your Site Articles
- Analysis Shows US Wind and Solar Could Outpace Coal and Nuclear Power in 2023 ›
- Genetically-Engineered Trees: A "Cure" Worse Than the Disease ›
- Animal Agriculture Emits Nearly 60% of Greenhouse Gases From Food Production: Study ›
- Humans Less Than 1% of Life on Earth, But Have Destroyed Half of Its Plants, More Than 80% of All Mammals ›
- Biofuels Not All They're Cracked Up To Be, Report Finds ›
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.