

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

"When I do a puzzle with my daughters, there is usually an elephant next to a giraffe next to a rhino. But if I was trying to give them a more realistic sense of the world, it would be a cow next to a cow next to a cow and then a chicken," said the lead researcher. (Photo: Ryan Thompson/USDA/flickr/cc)
While scientists and conservationists grow increasingly worried about the world's biodiversity, a new study that sought to estimate the biomass of all living creatures on Earth has shed some light on humanity's impact.
The planet is largely dominated by plants, which make up 82 percent of all life on Earth, followed by bacteria at 13 percent, and the remaining five percent is everything else, including 7.6 billion human beings.

According to the study, published Monday by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), people only make up 0.01 percent of the Earth's biomass--however, their impact has been massive.
The researchers estimate that, in terms of biomass, the so-called rise of human civilization has destroyed 83 percent of wild mammals, 80 percent of marine animals, 50 percent of plants, and 15 percent of fish.

"Over the relatively short span of human history," the study notes, "major innovations, such as the domestication of livestock, adoption of an agricultural lifestyle, and the Industrial Revolution, have increased the human population dramatically and have had radical ecological effects."
Unsustainable human practices and dietary choices have led to a scenerio wherein 36 percent of mammals are human and 60 percent are livestock--meaning only four percent are wild.

"It is pretty staggering," Ron Milo, a professor at Israel's Weizmann Institute of Science who led the study, told the Guardian. "Our dietary choices have a vast effect on the habitats of animals, plants, and other organisms."
"When I do a puzzle with my daughters, there is usually an elephant next to a giraffe next to a rhino. But if I was trying to give them a more realistic sense of the world, it would be a cow next to a cow next to a cow and then a chicken," he added.
"I would hope people would take this [work] as part of their worldview of how they consume," concluded Milo. "I would hope this gives people a perspective on the very dominant role that humanity now plays on Earth."
The study's findings provoked both amazement and concern.
"Amazing figures showing we should humbly look for a more #sustainable human existence on this planet," remarked one sustainability organization on Twitter.
Another environmental advocate tweeted in response: "Does enough time remain to change human behavior for a better outcome?"
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
While scientists and conservationists grow increasingly worried about the world's biodiversity, a new study that sought to estimate the biomass of all living creatures on Earth has shed some light on humanity's impact.
The planet is largely dominated by plants, which make up 82 percent of all life on Earth, followed by bacteria at 13 percent, and the remaining five percent is everything else, including 7.6 billion human beings.

According to the study, published Monday by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), people only make up 0.01 percent of the Earth's biomass--however, their impact has been massive.
The researchers estimate that, in terms of biomass, the so-called rise of human civilization has destroyed 83 percent of wild mammals, 80 percent of marine animals, 50 percent of plants, and 15 percent of fish.

"Over the relatively short span of human history," the study notes, "major innovations, such as the domestication of livestock, adoption of an agricultural lifestyle, and the Industrial Revolution, have increased the human population dramatically and have had radical ecological effects."
Unsustainable human practices and dietary choices have led to a scenerio wherein 36 percent of mammals are human and 60 percent are livestock--meaning only four percent are wild.

"It is pretty staggering," Ron Milo, a professor at Israel's Weizmann Institute of Science who led the study, told the Guardian. "Our dietary choices have a vast effect on the habitats of animals, plants, and other organisms."
"When I do a puzzle with my daughters, there is usually an elephant next to a giraffe next to a rhino. But if I was trying to give them a more realistic sense of the world, it would be a cow next to a cow next to a cow and then a chicken," he added.
"I would hope people would take this [work] as part of their worldview of how they consume," concluded Milo. "I would hope this gives people a perspective on the very dominant role that humanity now plays on Earth."
The study's findings provoked both amazement and concern.
"Amazing figures showing we should humbly look for a more #sustainable human existence on this planet," remarked one sustainability organization on Twitter.
Another environmental advocate tweeted in response: "Does enough time remain to change human behavior for a better outcome?"
While scientists and conservationists grow increasingly worried about the world's biodiversity, a new study that sought to estimate the biomass of all living creatures on Earth has shed some light on humanity's impact.
The planet is largely dominated by plants, which make up 82 percent of all life on Earth, followed by bacteria at 13 percent, and the remaining five percent is everything else, including 7.6 billion human beings.

According to the study, published Monday by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), people only make up 0.01 percent of the Earth's biomass--however, their impact has been massive.
The researchers estimate that, in terms of biomass, the so-called rise of human civilization has destroyed 83 percent of wild mammals, 80 percent of marine animals, 50 percent of plants, and 15 percent of fish.

"Over the relatively short span of human history," the study notes, "major innovations, such as the domestication of livestock, adoption of an agricultural lifestyle, and the Industrial Revolution, have increased the human population dramatically and have had radical ecological effects."
Unsustainable human practices and dietary choices have led to a scenerio wherein 36 percent of mammals are human and 60 percent are livestock--meaning only four percent are wild.

"It is pretty staggering," Ron Milo, a professor at Israel's Weizmann Institute of Science who led the study, told the Guardian. "Our dietary choices have a vast effect on the habitats of animals, plants, and other organisms."
"When I do a puzzle with my daughters, there is usually an elephant next to a giraffe next to a rhino. But if I was trying to give them a more realistic sense of the world, it would be a cow next to a cow next to a cow and then a chicken," he added.
"I would hope people would take this [work] as part of their worldview of how they consume," concluded Milo. "I would hope this gives people a perspective on the very dominant role that humanity now plays on Earth."
The study's findings provoked both amazement and concern.
"Amazing figures showing we should humbly look for a more #sustainable human existence on this planet," remarked one sustainability organization on Twitter.
Another environmental advocate tweeted in response: "Does enough time remain to change human behavior for a better outcome?"