March, 15 2022, 12:27pm EDT
Coalition Welcomes Sierra Club Decision to Drop Nature Outings Greenwashing Israeli Apartheid
The move followed outreach by a coalition of racial, social and Indigenous justice groups.
WASHINGTON
In a positive step forward for environmental justice and Palestinian freedom, the Sierra Club's Board of Directors has suspended planned March 2022 nature "Outings" to Israel. One canceled trip was scheduled to start today. The Sierra Club's decision followed discussions with a broad coalition of racial, social and Indigenous justice groups. The Sierra Club has since removed the planned trips to Israel from its website.
After being contacted by individuals whose concerns about the Israel outings were dismissed by the Sierra Club, the coalition of groups wrote to Sierra Club leadership and members of the Board on February 22. The coalition's letter explained that the trips as planned would promote "a false image of Israel as environmentally-friendly," "erase both the existence of the Palestinian people and Israel's systemic racism and discrimination against them, and greenwash Israel's system of apartheid and its illegal colonization of occupied Palestinian and Syrian lands." The groups that signed the letter to the Sierra Club included: Adalah Justice Project, Adalah-NY: Campaign for the Boycott of Israel, Jewish Voice for Peace, NDN Collective, Palestinian Youth Movement-NYC, The Movement for Black Lives, US Campaign for Palestinian Rights, and Visualizing Palestine.
Israel's apartheid and colonization are not green, and exacerbate environmental injustice. Israel uses parks, nature reserves and forests to conceal ruins of depopulated Palestinian villages, appropriate land and curtail Palestinian access and development, including in Bedouin Palestinian villages in Al-Naqab (Negev) today. 182 Palestinian villages that Israel depopulated are concealed in Israeli parks and forests, preventing refugees from returning. Only 11% of trees in Israeli forests are indigenous species due to Zionist groups planting with non-native species, while Israel has uprooted over 800,000 native olive trees owned by Palestinians. The Israeli state purposely redirects water away from Palestinian communities for the use of Israeli settlers.
Responding to the Sierra Club's decision to heed the coalition's call, Sandra Tamari, Executive Director at Adalah Justice Project, said, "We welcome the Sierra Club's principled decision to do no harm to Palestinians by canceling these outings that greenwash Israeli apartheid. We will continue to engage with Sierra Club leadership to support their internal processes to bring their outings programs in alignment with their stated commitments to upholding racial and social justice. We are grateful to our Indigenous and Black siblings for their support in securing this positive step for Palestinian freedom and environmental justice."
The coalition's February letter to the Sierra Club said the planned trips reinforced "racist Israeli myths that European Zionsts established a state on 'a land without a people' and 'made the desert bloom,'" and would "contradict the Sierra Club's stated commitment to environmental justice, and undermine the struggle of Indigenous Palestinians for freedom."
Krystal Two Bulls, Director of the LANDBACK Campaign, NDN Collective, said, "We, as Indigenous people in the so-called US, know intimately the crimes of dispossession, displacement, and violences of settler-colonialism. We also know how these crimes were covered up through the narrative of conservation, which helped to invisibilize Indigenous Peoples from the landscape by claiming that the land was untouched or without relationship. We know conservation, to this day, aims to preclude Native Peoples from the present and separate us from reclaiming our power through demands such as LANDBACK. Conservancy contributed to the greenwashing of US settler colonialism and the cover up of the connected violences of European settlement; Sierra Club, unfortunately, has a role in and connection to this history. Land is not separate from the People who build their livelihoods upon it nor are Indigenous people separate from their land. Sierra Club canceling these "international outings", that will contribute to the greenwashing of israeli aparthied and israel's oppression of the Palestinian People, shows us that they are learning the tough lessons from the mistakes that they have made to Indigenous People on Turtle Island. We resolutely confirm that people of conscience cannot disconnect "outings on land" from the people who make their livelihood and have had relationship to the land since time immemorial, nor can they shirk the responsibility and accountability to uplifting the demands of those people for liberation, freedom and return."
On top of the planned trips' greenwashing and erasure of the Indigenous Palestinian people, the trips' descriptions avoided any mention of Israel's military occupation and illegal colonization of Palestinian and Syrian lands, and its system of apartheid rule over the Palestinian people. These omissions were particularly glaring given that Amnesty International had just solidified a growing global consensus by joining Palestinians, South Africans, Human Rights Watch, and Israel's leading human rights organization B'Tselem in confirming that Israel is committing the crime of apartheid against the Palestinian people.
Elena Stein, Senior Organizer at Jewish Voice for Peace, said, "For decades, Palestinians have invited all people of conscience to join them in ending the daily nightmare of living under Israeli apartheid and the violent theft and colonization of Palestinian lands. This urgent and righteous call for a boycott echoes the South African anti-apartheid movement's call to visitors: to do no harm to their struggle for basic rights under international law. We applaud the Sierra Club's principled decision to suspend nature outings that would have greenwashed Israeli apartheid and to respect the picket line of the growing global movement for Palestinian freedom."
Ahmad Abuznaid, Executive Director at the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights, said, "The fight for environmental justice has no borders. We must oppose colonization, militarism, land theft, and environmental destruction everywhere, in order to stop settler states from stealing native land and expelling the Indigenous people protecting it. The Sierra Club's decision to cancel trips to apartheid Israel is a welcome step forward as together we struggle toward justice for the Palestinian people and liberation for all."
U.S. foreign policy and militarism, including its maintenance of over 800 military bases across the globe, contribute in disastrous ways to climate change and rob the U.S. of valuable resources that should instead be invested in green technologies and life-giving programs, like healthcare and housing. Climate justice is rooted in anti-militarism, including the demand that the U.S. stop funding Israeli apartheid with massive arms packages and military funding.
Jewish Voice for Peace is a national, grassroots organization inspired by Jewish tradition to work for a just and lasting peace according to principles of human rights, equality, and international law for all the people of Israel and Palestine. JVP has over 200,000 online supporters, over 70 chapters, a youth wing, a Rabbinic Council, an Artist Council, an Academic Advisory Council, and an Advisory Board made up of leading U.S. intellectuals and artists.
(510) 465-1777LATEST NEWS
'Evil and Cruel': GOP Lawmaker Shamed for Unloading Medicaid-Related Stock Before Voting to Gut Program
"Their bill will gut Medicaid and kill people, and they know it," said Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.).
Jul 03, 2025
Republican Congressman Robert Bresnahan of Pennsylvania got publicly shamed by many of his congressional colleagues on Thursday after it was revealed he unloaded a Medicaid-related stock before voting for a massive budget package that enacted historically devastating cuts to the program.
Quiver Quantitative, an investment data platform that tracks stock trades made by politicians and other prominent public figures, revealed on its X account that Bresnahan recently sold shares he'd owned in Centene Corporation, a for-profit firm that specializes in delivering healthcare exchanges for Medicaid. In the weeks since he sold his shares in the company, their value plunged by more than 40 percent.
Quiver Quantitative added that while Bresnahan claims not to manage his own stock portfolio, he does not appear to have set up a qualified blind trust that would eliminate potential conflicts of interest between his investments and his work as a member of Congress.
Regardless, many of Bresnahan's Democratic colleagues reacted with fury and disgust to revelations that the Centene shares were dropped before he voted for a bill that will slash more than $1 trillion from Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) over the span of a decade.
"This Congressman literally dumped stock in a Medicaid provider company right before this bill came to the floor," wrote Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.) on X. "Don't be fooled—these guys know exactly what they're doing."
"Wow," marveled Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.). "So he votes to gut Medicaid and throw 17 million people off of their healthcare and then dumps his Medicaid related stock to cover his own ass? That's just evil and cruel."
"If the Big Ugly Nasty Bill doesn't hurt Medicaid, why are Republicans selling their Medicaid-associated stocks?" asked Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.). "Their words say one thing, their actions another. Their bill will gut Medicaid and kill people, and they know it."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) ripped Bresnahan for "protecting his stock portfolio while ripping away health care from 17 million Americans" with his vote to gut Medicaid.
"This is Washington at its worst," she added. "We need to ban Congressional stock trading."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Climate Change Fueling 'Most Widespread and Damaging' Droughts in History: UN Report
"This is not a dry spell," said the co-author of a new U.N. report. "This is a slow-moving global catastrophe."
Jul 03, 2025
Climate change is driving "some of the most widespread and damaging drought events in recorded history," according to a report published Wednesday on global drought hotspots.
Over the past two years, droughts have fueled increased food insecurity, dehydration, and disease that have heightened poverty and political instability in several regions of the world, according to research by the U.S. National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC) and the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD).
"This is not a dry spell," says Dr. Mark Svoboda, report co-author and NDMC Director. "This is a slow-moving global catastrophe, the worst I've ever seen. This report underscores the need for systematic monitoring of how drought affects lives, livelihoods, and the health of the ecosystems that we all depend on."
The report examined conditions in some of the globe's most drought-prone regions. They found that the economic disruption caused by droughts today is twice as high as in 2000.
In Eastern and Southern Africa, which have been blighted with dangerously low levels of rainfall, more than 90 million people face acute hunger.
Somalia has been hit particularly hard, with 4.4 million, more than a quarter of the population, facing "crisis level" food insecurity in early 2025. Zambia, meanwhile, faced one of the world's worst energy crises last year when the Zambezi River dried up, causing its hydroelectric dams to run critically low.
Other drought-plagued regions have seen wide ranges of ecological and economic disruptions.
In Spain, low levels of rainfall in 2023 devastated olive crops, causing olive oil prices to double. In the Amazon Basin, low water levels caused a mass death of fish and endangered dolphins. The Panama Canal became so depleted that trade vessels were forced to re-route, causing multi-week shipping delays. And in Morocco, Eid celebrations had to be cancelled due to a shortage of sheep.
Recent studies of drought have found that they are increasingly caused not by lack of rainfall, but by aggressive heat, which speeds up evaporation. The areas hit the hardest over the past two years were ones already suffering from the most severe temperature increases. It was also exacerbated by a particularly severe El Niño weather cycle in 2023-24.
"This was a perfect storm," says report co-author Dr. Kelly Helm Smith, NDMC Assistant Director and drought impacts researcher. "El Niño added fuel to the fire of climate change, compounding the effects for many vulnerable societies and ecosystems past their limits."
Though the effects of droughts are often felt most acutely in areas already suffering from poverty and instability, the researchers predict that as they get worse, the effects will be felt worldwide.
In 2024, then the hottest year on record, 48 of the 50 U.S. states faced drought conditions, the highest proportion ever seen. Drought in the U.S. has coincided with a dramatic increase in wildfire frequency and severity over the past 50 years.
"Ripple effects can turn regional droughts into global economic shocks," Smith said. "No country is immune when critical water-dependent systems start to collapse."
The researchers advocated for investments in global drought prevention, but also for broader measures to address the existing inequalities that make droughts more severe.
"Drought has a disproportionate effect on those with few resources," Smith said. "We can act now to reduce the effects of future droughts by working to ensure that everyone has access to food, water, education, health care and economic opportunity."
The researchers also emphasized the urgency of coordinated action to confront the climate crisis.
"The struggles...to secure water, food, and energy under persistent drought offer a preview of water futures under unchecked global warming," said Svoboda. "No country, regardless of wealth or capacity, can afford to be complacent."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump-GOP Budget Bill Will Give Top 1% Over $1 Trillion in Tax Breaks: Analysis
The amount set to flow to a "tiny sliver of affluent families" over the next decade is roughly equal to the Medicaid cuts included in the Republican bill, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.
Jul 03, 2025
An analysis released Thursday estimates that the Republican legislation on the brink of final passage in Congress would deliver over $1 trillion in combined tax breaks to the richest 1% of Americans over the next decade—an amount roughly equal to the bill's unprecedented cuts to Medicaid.
The new analysis by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP), which utilizes data from the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation and other sources, finds that the "tiny sliver of affluent families" in the top 1% of the U.S. income distribution will "receive tax cuts totaling $1.02 trillion over the next decade."
The centerpiece of Trump's megabill is a trillion-dollar tax cut to the wealthy, paid for by increasing the national debt and cutting public services. pic.twitter.com/ISr2XuIdJQ
— ITEP (@iteptweets) July 3, 2025
ITEP has previously shown that the Republican bill's tax cuts—largely extensions of expiring provisions of the 2017 Trump-GOP tax law—would be highly skewed to the wealthy, with the small percentage of households at the very top receiving significantly more in total tax breaks than middle- and lower-income Americans.
"Sixty-nine percent of the net tax cuts would go to the richest fifth of Americans in 2026, only 11% would go to the middle fifth of Americans, and less than 1% would go to the poorest fifth," the group found. "The $107 billion in net tax cuts going to the richest 1% next year would exceed the amount going to the entire bottom 60% of taxpayers."
ITEP's new analysis was released as House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) wrapped up a record-breaking, eight-hour-plus speech against the GOP legislation, which delayed a final vote on the measure. Republicans are expected to pass the unpopular bill on Thursday.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular