May, 11 2021, 12:00am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Global Communications Director: global-comms@350.org
WASHINGTON
The rights to freedom of demonstration, health and a healthy environment are non-negotiable and must be fully respected everywhere across the world. Based on these principles, 350.org makes public its support for the peaceful demonstrators who are taking to the streets in several Colombian cities, demanding changes in social, health and economic policies. Above all, they are demanding an immediate end to police, military and state violence against unarmed citizens.
"It is unacceptable that the Colombian government allows repressive and extremely violent police actions against a large majority of unarmed and peaceful citizens, who are only exercising their right to demand changes that they consider essential for the country", said Ilan Zugman, 350.org's Latin America director.
According to AFP, and also based on reports from the Colombian NGO Temblores, the police actions are leaving a terrifying toll. In just the first three days of the protests, there were a total of 1181 cases of police violence, 92 victims of abuse of force, 26 deaths, four victims of sexual aggression, 672 arbitrary detentions and 12 aggressions to the eyes of the demonstrators.
Colombian media outlets that extensively cover environmental and human rights issues - such as La Silla Vacia, Cero Setenta and Pacifista - are also recording the irresponsible actions of the police in several areas, as well as the enormous peaceful response of thousands of Colombians to these abuses.
"Colombia's social movements and youth are setting an example of courage and commitment by taking their demands for fairer and more efficient social, health and economic policies to the streets of the country. However, the police response has been terrifying and reprehensible. The people who died and those who were assaulted or threatened deserve a proper investigation into these abuses of authority and assurances that they will have safety and freedom from now on," said Zugman.
Opportunities for a Just Recovery
It is also worth noting that, although the government's tax reform proposal was the trigger for the protests, the demonstrations already encompass other demands, such as the desire for urgent public policies that put the most vulnerable communities at the centre of attention.
Climate youth groups, indigenous associations and several NGOs are expressing concern about the government's reform of the public health system, which could subsequently undermine healthcare in rural and poor areas of the country. They are also highlighting the inadequacy of measures to combat the pandemic, as well as the insufficiency of financial support to help the most vulnerable families in need.
Two issues closely related to 350.org's mission also appear on the agenda of a considerable part of the protesters: the need to guarantee the safety and dignity of climate activists and the implementation of environmental policies that will lead Colombia to a just and complete energy transition.
Colombia holds the shameful title of 'world champion country' for the highest rate of assassinations targeting social and environmental leaders around the world, including indigenous leaders who end up being killed for defending their territories from encroachment and environmental destruction. A very important part of the Colombian civil society movement is therefore demanding that the State act much more responsively to protect these people and do justice to those who have already been killed.
In this sense, the cases that stand out are those of the "false positives", as are called the innocent young people, generally of very low income, who were executed by the military forces under the argument that they were involved in guerrillas. These murders were made in order to make people believe that the security policies of the government of the day were producing results.
Fracking would aggravate Colombia's current problems
On the environmental side, the national government's insistence on expanding oil, gas and coal extraction and, in particular, on promoting the use of fracking for gas production, at a time when the world desperately needs to keep fossil fuels in the ground, is striking.
Besides the fact that fossil fuels clearly have their days numbered in the global marketplace, these investments can lead to soil, water and food pollution. Moreover, the fossil fuel industry concentrates its revenues, as we know, and does nothing to prepare the country for the global economic challenges of the coming decades.
Another point of concern is the repression against anti-fracking protesters in the region known as Medio Magdalena, where the government is trying to develop a pilot fracking project. As the 350.org team has expressed in this letter sent to Colombian President Ivan Duque and in events about the issue, activists in this region are being threatened and intimidated for their defense of a territory free from the serious harm caused by fracking.
The Colombian government needs to guarantee the protection of constitutional rights to free expression, dignity and life, which are not being respected in this case.
"Development is done by including people in decision-making and supporting the improvement of the quality of life of communities. The case of fracking in Colombia goes in the opposite direction in both aspects. The country has the opportunity to review its public policies in this area and invest in a Just Recovery immediately, as many of the protesters are calling for," added Zugman.
For ideas for a Just Recovery in Colombia and around the world, see these sessions from 350.org's April 2021 Global Gathering for a Just Recovery.
350 is building a future that's just, prosperous, equitable and safe from the effects of the climate crisis. We're an international movement of ordinary people working to end the age of fossil fuels and build a world of community-led renewable energy for all.
LATEST NEWS
As Premiums Soar and Millions Lose Coverage, Over Half of Americans Say End Private Health Insurance
Fifty-two percent expressed support, and the proposal was even more popular than that among respondents under age 45 as well as registered Democrats and Independents. Just 30% of those polled were opposed, while the rest said that they were "not sure."
The polling follows the administration's quiet release of data showing that 4.2 million lost Affordable Care Act (ACA) coverage as of February. Trump and his Republican allies in Congress have come under fire for letting ACA subsidies expire at the end of last year—as well as for enacting the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which is expected to leave more working-class Americans uninsured over the next decade. Already, Protect Our Care estimates that 3.8 million people have lost coverage under Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program, bringing the total for Trump's term to around 8 million.
"A mind-boggling number of Americans have found themselves joining the ranks of the uninsured," Protect Our Care president Brad Woodhouse said in a Tuesday statement. "And this is just the beginning. As working families continue to get squeezed left and right by GOP-driven healthcare cost hikes and bureaucratic red tape, millions more Americans will lose the care they rely on to stay alive and healthy."
"These are diabetic patients rationing insulin and parents skipping cancer screenings," he continued. "These are small business owners and farmers shutting down their life's work because they can no longer afford to buy insurance on their own. These are moms, veterans, and seniors. These are the millions who will hand Trump and Republicans in Congress a withering rebuke at the ballot box in November for making healthcare unaffordable so they could make billionaires and big corporations richer."
As premiums soar and Americans begin to endure the consequences of the national Republican healthcare agenda, a sweeping coalition of groups that support a universal single-payer system declared earlier this month that "now is the time for Medicare for All."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) have repeatedly introduced the Medicare for All Act in Congress, and support for it has grown among elected Democrats and the US public—as suggested by the new polling.
In a statement about the healthcare findings, the pollsters explained:
While eliminating insurance companies may sound like a radical change to healthcare, the share of Americans who want to replace private insurance with a government health plan (52%) is larger than the share who want to expand the existing Obamacare (the health coverage system established by the Affordable Care Act) (38%). The share who favor repealing Obamacare (28%) is about as large as the share who oppose replacing private insurance with a government plan (30%).
Americans who support a national healthcare plan do not universally see expanding Obamacare as a step in the right direction. Only a little more than half (56%) of the Americans who support creating a national health plan also support expanding Obamacare. On the other hand, most Americans who support expanding Obamacare would also support a national health plan that replaces private insurance (77%).
Although "only 8% of Americans would describe themselves as socialists," which is "smaller than the shares who describe themselves with several other ideological adjectives offered in a poll question, including progressive (17%), liberal (23%), and conservative (34%)," the pollsters also noted, "many policy proposals championed by democratic socialists draw significant support from Americans."
For example, majorities of respondents endorsed the government covering the cost of college tuition for all students (55%) and building public housing (57%).
When asked, "Do you think Donald Trump has had the right priorities or hasn’t paid enough attention to the country's most important problems?" 60% of respondents said the president "hasn't paid attention to the most important problems."
The polling comes just over four months away from the November midterm elections, in which Democrats hope to reclaim majorities in both chambers of Congress. Some Democratic candidates, including US Senate hopefuls Graham Platner in Maine and Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan, are explicitly running on support for Medicare for All.
After multiple progressives running to represent various New York districts in the US House of Representatives won their primaries last week, Sanders called their victories proof that Americans "are sick and tired of status quo politics," while Jayapal similarly celebrated that "bold, people-powered candidates took on the Democratic establishment and won."
"They ran on Medicare for All. On a public option for housing. On a foreign policy that centers human dignity over political convenience. And they won," Jayapal said. "This is what happens when movements build power. People-powered movements win."
Most Popular