September, 14 2020, 12:00am EDT
DRUG PRICING: Trump Caves to Drug Industry; Long-Delayed Executive Order Another Broken Promise to Patients
Executive order “makes no changes”…calls for HHS to “test” new model…“could take months” to even be implemented This is about politics, not patients: “Experts see the order as the administration’s effort to show it is taking steps to lower drug pricing, as the president seeks reelection” Right after Trump tweets that “drug prices are coming down FAST” in response to his executive orders, news breaks that another drug company is increasing prices
WASHINGTON
Today, Accountable Pharma released the following statement in response to the Sunday release of President Trump's long-delayed "international pricing index" executive order. The executive order, which is almost certain to not be implemented before the end of Trump's term and isn't expected to meaningfully impact drug prices if it ever does, comes nearly a month after his August 24th deadline and his commitment to implement an executive order that would help bring down drug prices by "50, 60, even 70%."
"This is a massive win for the drug industry and another broken drug pricing promise by President Trump,"said Eli Zupnick, spokesman for Accountable Pharma. "The drug industry is going to act like this weak executive order is a horrific injustice but the reality is that they were wildly successful in lobbying their former colleagues in the Administration to delay and water down this executive order to the point where it almost certainly won't save a single American a single penny on their prescription drugs."
Trump's big promise in July: "...we're going to hold that [executive order] until August 24th, hoping that the pharmaceutical companies will come up with something that will substantially reduce drug prices. And the clock starts right now. So it's August 24th at 12:00, after which the order on favored nations will go into effect."
Trump's claimed impact of the executive orders: "Drug prices will be coming down 50, 60, even 70%"
Timeline of empty threats, fake fights, and drug pricing inaction
July 24th: Trump held a press conference unveiling three executive orders on drug pricing and promising a fourth one if the drug industry didn't respond by August 24th. The executive orders were widely panned as unlikely to have any impact this year even if they were actually implemented. Regarding the fourth executive order, Trump said "...we're going to hold that [executive order] until August 24th, hoping that the pharmaceutical companies will come up with something that will substantially reduce drug prices. And the clock starts right now. So it's August 24th at 12:00, after which the order on favored nations will go into effect."
July 27th: Drug company executives cancel their planned White House meeting in a show of faux outrage. This kicks off the pretend fight between the drug industry and Trump that allows him to say he is "taking on big pharma" without actually delivering results.
July 29th: Drug company executives assure their shareholders not to worry, saying they "are not expecting any impact" from the executive orders.
Through mid-August: Trump continued to claim that "Drug prices will be coming down 50, 60, even 70%" due to his actions.
August 24th: Crickets..."...federal law required signed executive orders to be published in the Federal Register. No 'favored nation' order has appeared, so the missing order either violates the law or is incomplete."
August 26: PhRMA finally responds with a counter-offer that wouldn't meet Trump's test of "substantially reducing" drug prices, but they try to sweeten the deal by saying their actions would come before the election.
August 27th - August 31: Crickets....no updates from the White House or HHS.
September 1: Trump is asked about the executive order and claims that the drug companies will be coming to the White House "this week" to discuss their proposal. A PhRMA representative said she was not aware of any meeting scheduled.
Trump Claimed He Was Enacting "Favored Nations" Reforms To Lower Drug Prices At Least Three Times In Last Three Years--Promising "Transformative" And "Revolutionary" Change Each Time
- July 24, 2020: "I'm taking a bold and historic, very dramatic action to reduce the price of prescription drugs for American patients and American seniors. . . . Under this transformative order, Medicare will be required to purchase drugs at the same price as other countries pay. . . . But we have--we get now the lowest price anywhere in the world. And no more will we have to suffer by saying, "Gee, why is it so much cheaper for the exact same drug in some other country?"
- July 5, 2019: "We're going to be announcing something very shortly ... We're working on a favored nations clause, where we pay whatever lowest nation's price is. Why should other nations, like Canada--but why should other nations pay much less than us? They've taken advantage of the system for a long time--pharma. So we're working on, right now, a favored nations clause, so that whatever the lowest nation is, anywhere in the world--or company--but the lowest nation or company. Then what happens is we will pay that amount, and that's being worked on right now. We're going to do it in the form of an executive order."
- October 25, 2018: "Not anymore. Under our new plan, the Department of Health and Human Services would allow Medicare to determine the price it pays for certain drugs based on the cheaper prices paid by other nations. Some people call it "favored nations clauses." . . . At long last, the drug companies and foreign countries will be held accountable for how they rigged the system against American consumers. This is a revolutionary change. Nobody has had the courage to do it, or they just didn't want to do it."
President Trump Has Been Making Promises On Drug Prices For Years . . .
- February 4, 2020: "I was pleased to announce last year that, for the first time in 51 years, the cost of prescription drugs actually went down."
- July 5, 2019: "We're going to be announcing something very shortly ... We're working on a favored nations clause, where we pay whatever lowest nation's price is. Why should other nations, like Canada -- but why should other nations pay much less than us? They've taken advantage of the system for a long time -- pharma. So we're working on, right now, a favored nations clause, so that whatever the lowest nation is, anywhere in the world -- or company -- but the lowest nation or company. Then what happens is we will pay that amount, and that's being worked on right now. We're going to do it in the form of an executive order."
- April 24, 2019: "Many drug companies are giving European countries a better deal than they give their own country. And that has to stop. We've already informed them that's stopping."
- February 6, 2019: "It's unacceptable that Americans pay vastly more than people in other countries for the exact same drugs, often made in the exact same place. This is wrong, this is unfair, and together we will stop it -- and we'll stop it fast."
- January 23, 2019: "I just had a meeting on drug pricing and various other things. And prescription drugs, for the first time in history -- the history of our country -- have gone down in 2018."
- October 25, 2018: "This really is an important day for me. I've been talking about drug price reductions for a long time. And now we're doing things that nobody was, let's say -- because I'm speaking on behalf of all of us -- bold enough to do. And they're going to have a tremendous impact. . . . We're fighting for lower drug prices, which will now be automatic. It will be automatic and very substantial."
- March 19, 2018: "You'll be seeing drug prices falling very substantially in the not-too-distant future, and it's going to be beautiful."
- January 30, 2018: "One of my greatest priorities is to reduce the price of prescription drugs...I I have directed my administration to make fixing the injustice of high drug prices one of our top priorities for the year. And prices will come down substantially--watch."
- February 28, 2017: "[I will] work to bring down the artificially high price of drugs, and bring them down immediately."
And Latest Executive Order Proclamations Were Met With Skepticism
- Salon: "Pharma CEOs privately scoff at Trump's drug pricing orders: "Not expecting any impact."
- Washington Post: "Trump signs executive orders aimed at lowering drug prices in largely symbolic move. The orders are unlikely to take effect anytime soon, if they do so at all."
- STAT News: "...it's unclear whether the effort to make progress on drug pricing will pay off, given that Trump can't immediately enact any of the policies. Rather, the orders direct his administration to begin the normal, notoriously slow regulatory processes needed to reform the existing system. The administration will have to speed through that process to formalize any of the policies before November."
- Politico: "'The drug EOs are a way to give the appearance of movement on Trump's pricing agenda without actually doing anything,' wrote Capital Alpha Partners' Rob Smith in a note, adding that the original favored nations rule has languished with budget officials for more than a year. 'A more impactful step would be to issue this actual proposed rule and begin the process of finalizing it rather than holding what amounts to a glorified press conference.'"
- NYT: "Mr. Trump's executive orders may have more symbolic meaning than any kind of immediate practical consequence."
- NPR: "The prescription drug bill that stalled after passing in the House in December, called HR3, would have had a much larger impact, says Stacie Dusetzina, a health policy professor at Vanderbilt University. "The bottom line is that these orders will not make a meaningful difference for patients when it comes to what they pay out-of-pocket for their medications," Dusetzina writes in an email to NPR."
MEANWHILE: Drug Prices Have Continued To Soar...
- Politico: "Drug prices steadily rise amid pandemic, data shows."
- Politifact: "Donald Trump wrong again about prescription drug prices."
- HealthDay: "U.S. Drug Prices Have Risen Three Times Faster Than Inflation."
- CBS News: "2020 is three days old and drug prices are already jumping."
- The Hill: "Survey: About 1 in 10 US adults rationing medicine in effort to lower costs."
... As Drug Companies Rake In Record Profits...
- West Health Policy Center: "New Analysis Finds Large Drugmakers Could Lose $1 Trillion in Sales and Still Be the Most Profitable Industry."
- Axios: "Health care CEO pay outstrips infectious disease research."
- Newsweek: "Big Pharma Companies Earn More Profits Than Most Other Industries, Study Suggests."
- FiercePharma: "How the 8 biggest U.S. pharmas enriched their shareholders in 2019."
- Axios: "Big Pharma is on a stock buyback spree."
- Axios: "4 pharma companies saved $7 billion from GOP tax law."
And Industry Executives Fill The Top Levels Of The Administration
- NYT: "Trump's Vaccine Chief Has Vast Ties to Drug Industry, Posing Possible Conflicts."
- Reuters: "Trump chooses Gottlieb to run FDA; Pharma breathes sigh of relief."
- Politico: "Trump picks ex-pharma executive Azar to lead HHS."
- Politico: "Former drug industry lobbyist helps steer Trump drug plan."
- Politico: "Trump's HHS secretary nominee boosted drug prices while at Eli Lilly."
Accountable.US is a nonpartisan watchdog that exposes corruption in public life and holds government officials and corporate special interests accountable by bringing their influence and misconduct to light. In doing so, we make way for policies that advance the interests of all Americans, not just the rich and powerful.
LATEST NEWS
'The Next Recession Starts Here': Trump Team Weighs Abolishing Bank Regulators
The president-elect's advisers are reportedly discussing plans to shrink or eliminate key bank watchdogs, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Dec 13, 2024
President-elect Donald Trump and his advisers are reportedly considering plans to weaken—or abolish altogether—top bank regulators, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
The Wall Street Journalreported Thursday that members of Trump's transition team and the new Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency have asked nominees under consideration to head the FDIC and OCC if the bank watchdogs could be eliminated and have their functions absorbed by the Treasury Department, which is set to be run by a billionaire hedge fund manager and crypto enthusiast.
"Bank executives are optimistic President-elect Donald Trump will ease a host of regulations on capital cushions and consumer protections, as well as scrutiny of consolidation in the industry," the Journal reported. "But FDIC deposit insurance is considered near sacred. Any move that threatened to undermine even the perception of deposit insurance could quickly ripple through banks and in a crisis might compound customer fears."
The Trump team's internal and fluid discussions about the fate of the key bank regulators broadly aligns with Project 2025's proposal to "merge the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Federal Reserve's non-monetary supervisory and regulatory functions."
The FDIC, which is primarily funded by bank insurance premiums, was established during the Great Depression to restore public trust in the nation's banking system, and the agency played a central role in navigating the 2023 bank failures that threatened a systemic crisis.
Observers warned that gutting the FDIC and OCC could catalyze another economic meltdown.
"The next recession starts here," tech journalist Jacob Silverman warned in response to the Journal's reporting.
Eric Rauchway, a historian of the New Deal, wrote that "even Milton Friedman appreciated the FDIC," underscoring the extreme nature of the incoming Trump administration's deregulatory ambitions.
Musk, the world's wealthiest man, is also pushing for the elimination of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency established in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
The Journal noted Thursday that "Rep. Andy Barr, a Republican from Kentucky and Trump ally on the House Financial Services Committee, has backed the plan to eliminate or drastically alter the CFPB and said he wants to get rid of what he calls 'one-size-fits-all' regulation for banks."
Barr has received millions of dollars in campaign donations from the financial sector and "introduced many pieces of pro-industry legislation, including significant rollbacks of protections stemming from the 2008 financial crisis," according to the watchdog group Accountable.US.
Keep ReadingShow Less
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Says 'Political Movement,' Not Murder, Is the Path to Medicare for All
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," he said. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together."
Dec 12, 2024
Addressing the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and conversations it has sparked about the country's for-profit system, longtime Medicare for All advocate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday condemned the murder and stressed that getting to universal coverage will require a movement challenging corporate money in politics.
"Look, when we talk about the healthcare crisis, in my view, and I think the view of a majority of Americans, the current system is broken, it is dysfunctional, it is cruel, and it is wildly inefficient—far too expensive," said Sanders (I-Vt.), whose position is backed up by various polls.
"The reason we have not joined virtually every other major country on Earth in guaranteeing healthcare to all people as a human right is the political power and financial power of the insurance industry and drug companies," he told Jacobin. "It will take a political revolution in this country to get Congress to say, 'You know what, we're here to represent ordinary people, to provide quality care to ordinary people as a human right,' and not to worry about the profits of insurance and drug companies."
Asked about Thompson's alleged killer—26-year-old Luigi Mangione, whose reported manifesto railed against the nation's expensive healthcare system and low life expectancy—Sanders said: "You don't kill people. It's abhorrent. I condemn it wholeheartedly. It was a terrible act. But what it did show online is that many, many people are furious at the health insurance companies who make huge profits denying them and their families the healthcare that they desperately need."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system," he continued, noting the tens of thousands of Americans who die each year because they can't get to a doctor.
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," Sanders added. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together and understanding that it is the right of every American to be able to walk into a doctor's office when they need to and not have to take out their wallet."
"The way we're going to bring about the kind of fundamental changes we need in healthcare is, in fact, by a political movement which understands the government has got to represent all of us, not just the 1%," the senator told Jacobin.
The 83-year-old Vermonter, who was just reelected to what he says is likely his last six-year term, is an Independent but caucuses with Democrats and sought their presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020. He has urged the Democratic Party to recognize why some working-class voters have abandoned it since Republicans won the White House and both chambers of Congress last month. A refusal to take on insurance and drug companies and overhaul the healthcare system, he argues, is one reason.
Sanders—one of the few members of Congress who regularly talks about Medicare for All—isn't alone in suggesting that unsympathetic responses to Thompson's murder can be explained by a privatized healthcare system that fails so many people.
In addition to highlighting Sanders' interview on social media, Congressman Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pointed out to Business Insider on Wednesday that "you've got thousands of people that are sharing their stories of frustration" in the wake of Thompson's death.
Khanna—a co-sponsor of the Medicare for All Act, led in the House of Representatives by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—made the case that you can recognize those stories without accepting the assassination.
"You condemn the murder of an insurance executive who was a father of two kids," he said. "At the same time, you say there's obviously an outpouring behavior of people whose claims are being denied, and we need to reform the system."
Two other Medicare for All advocates, Reps. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), also made clear to Business Insider that they oppose Thompson's murder but understand some of the responses to it.
"Of course, we don't want to see the chaos that vigilantism presents," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We also don't want to see the extreme suffering that millions of Americans confront when your life changes overnight from a horrific diagnosis, and people are led to just some of the worst, not just health events, but the worst financial events of their and their family's lives."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)—a co-sponsor of Sanders' Medicare for All Act—similarly toldHuffPost in a Tuesday interview, "The visceral response from people across this country who feel cheated, ripped off, and threatened by the vile practices of their insurance companies should be a warning to everyone in the healthcare system."
"Violence is never the answer, but people can be pushed only so far," she continued. "This is a warning that if you push people hard enough, they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose faith in the ability of the people who are providing the healthcare to make change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will ultimately be a threat to everyone."
After facing some criticism for those comments, Warren added Wednesday: "Violence is never the answer. Period... I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular