August, 31 2010, 09:05am EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Dana Balicki, 202 422 8624, dana@codepink.org
Medea Benjamin, 415 235 6517, medea@globalexchange.org
The Iraq Debacle Is Not Over, Women Speaking Out Against Continued Presence in Iraq
Military Moms, Iraq Veterans and Veteran Peace Activists Respond to the Iraq Withdrawal
WASHINGTON
In light of the withdrawal of combat troops from Iraq, military moms,
veterans, and peace activists are speaking out and pushing back against
President Obama's declarations that the war in Iraq is ending because a
majority of the combat troops are returning home. Below are the short
bios and contacts of several women from Maine to California, who are
available to speak about their experience either in the Iraq War or
their affected communities as well as respond to President Obama's
speech scheduled for 8pm EST, August 31st.
"Just as the cost of the war in Iraq cannot be measured only in
terms of lives lost or billions wasted, its end cannot be 'scheduled,'
as is the unstated implication of combat troop withdrawal. For the
Iraqis who have to deal with broken lives, broken infrastructure, a
broken political system, the war is not over," says Cynthia Benjamin,
mother of an OIF soldier, emergency room nurse and active member of
Military Families Speak Out and CODEPINK. "It will go on and on for too
many of our warriors and their families because of PTSD, traumatic brain
injuries and other devastating injuries to our soldiers."
"With the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops from Iraq, the
administration, the military and the media are trying to put a positive
spin on this grim chapter of U.S. history. It would certainly give some
comfort to the grieving families of the over 4,400 soldiers killed in
Iraq if their sacrifices had left Iraq a better place or made America
safer," Medea Benjamin, cofounder of CODEPINK and Global Exchange,
states.
Spokeswomen available for interview on August 31 Iraq withdrawal date:
Medea Benjamin (Washington, DC) and Jodie Evans (Los Angeles, CA) are CODEPINK cofounders and
internationally recognized spokeswomen of the American peace and social
justice movement. CODEPINK started as a preemptive protest to the
invasion of Iraq and continues to mobilize communities for peace around
the world today. Both Benjamin and Evans have been featured on CNN,
NYTimes, Fox News, Democracy Now!, MSNBC and countless others over the
years.
Joyce Wagner, 2 time OIF veteran (OIF II and OIF III) and
currently a student at Chatham College and a member of Iraq Veterans
Against the War. She lives in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Additional
contact for IVAW: Maggie Martin is the media team leader for IVAW's
Operation Recovery campaign, maggiemartin1@gmail.com.
Ann Wright U.S. Army colonel (retired), official of the U.S. State Department (retired) resigned
from her post in 2003 to protest the occupation of Iraq. She is the
author of "Voices of Dissent" and speaks world-wide on issues of peace.
She has been featured on FOX, CNN, NYTimes, BBC, CBC and many other
domestic and international outlets.
Cindy Thomas, is an army wife and works with the Under the
Hood Veterans Outreach Cafe in Killeen, Texas. Under The Hood Cafe is a
place for soldiers to gather, relax and speak freely about the wars and
the military. Most recently, Under the Hood organized a press conference
to respond to President Obama's withdrawal plans and to shed light on
the disastrous effects of this war and ongoing presence has on our
troops.
Cynthia Benjamin is a military mother, an emergency room nurse, and an activist with
CODEPINK and Military Families Speak Out living in New York State. The
promise of a homecoming next week for all combat troops stationed in
Iraq is not the end of the struggle for Cynthia Benjamin and other such
mothers, whose sons and daughters still suffer the trauma of engagement.
Read her most recent article here on Women's Media Center.
Lisa Savage, teacher and local peace organizer in Solon,
Maine. As a teacher, CODEPINK Maine Local Coordinator and organizer with
Bring Our War $$ Home coalition, daughter of a veteran (Korean war),
and granddaughter of two veterans (WWII and WWI), Savage was inspired to
activism after seeing her teenaged students being seduced by
sophisticated ad campaigns and high pressure sales tactics to enlist in
the military to get an education and healthcare.
Janet Weil, military family member and member of Bay Area Code Pink and Military Families Speak Out
in Concord, California. Weil is the aunt of a Marine lieutenant who has
served one deployment in Iraq and is scheduled to be deployed to
Afghanistan. She has been active in opposing the war in the Bay Area
since summer 2002. As a citizen, wife, mother of a grown son, and the
daughter and granddaughter of veterans, she is dedicated to helping
bring our war dollars back home for jobs not war.
For interview requests please call Dana Balicki, CODEPINK Campaign
Director, at 202 422 8624.
CODEPINK is a women-led grassroots organization working to end U.S. wars and militarism, support peace and human rights initiatives, and redirect our tax dollars into healthcare, education, green jobs and other life-affirming programs.
(818) 275-7232LATEST NEWS
Senate Tosses 'Dangerous Provision' Preventing State-Level AI Regulation From GOP Megabill
"From the start, this provision had Big Tech's money and lobbyists all over it. This is a major victory for the American people over the AI industry," said one advocate.
Jul 01, 2025
With a 99-1 vote early Tuesday, the Republican-controlled Senate decided to remove a controversial provision that would have prevented state-level regulation on artificial intelligence for 10 years from U.S. President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending bill that is currently being debated in Congress.
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) was the lone lawmaker who voted to keep the moratorium in the bill.
While far from the only controversial part of the reconciliation package, the provision drew opposition from an ideologically diverse group that included Democratic and Republican state attorneys general; over 140 groups working to support children's online safety, consumer protections, and responsible innovation; and faith leaders.
Senators struck Sen. Ted Cruz's (R-Texas) AI measure from the megabill by adopting an amendment introduced by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.). They voted on Blackburn's amendment during a session known as a vote-a-rama. Blackburn introduced the amendment after considering an agreement that would have watered down the provision.
According to The Verge, the measure that was rejected on Tuesday required states to avoid regulation AI and "automated decision systems" if they wanted to get funding for their broadband programs.
The provision would have been a major win for Big Tech, which has made the case that state laws around AI are obstructing their ability to do business.
Advocates and Democratic lawmakers cheered the decision to strip the provision.
"From the start, this provision had Big Tech's money and lobbyists all over it. This is a major victory for the American people over the AI industry. It shows that Americans are aware of the proliferation of AI harms in real time," said J.B. Branch, Big Tech accountability advocate at the watchdog group Public Citizen.
Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) said Tuesday that "early this morning, the Senate overwhelmingly voted to reject a dangerous provision to block states from regulating artificial intelligence, including protecting kids online. This 99-1 vote sent a clear message that Congress will not sell out our kids and local communities in order to pad the pockets of Big Tech billionaires."
In addition to concerns focused on Big Tech, experts recently told The Guardian that in the absence of state-level AI regulation, untrammeled growth of AI would take a toll on the world's "dangerously overheating climate."
Sacha Haworth, the executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, credited the "massive" defeat of Cruz's provision to the "incredible mobilizing by advocates to beat back Big Tech lobbying and last-minute bullying."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Shred JD Vance as He Shrugs Off Millions of Americans Losing Medicaid as 'Minutiae'
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Jul 01, 2025
Vice President J.D. Vance took heat from critics this week when he downplayed legislation that would result in millions of Americans losing Medicaid coverage as mere "minutiae."
Writing on X, Vance defended the budget megabill that's currently being pushed through the United States Senate by arguing that it will massively increase funding to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which he deemed to be a necessary component of carrying out the Trump administration's mass deportation operation.
"The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits," wrote Vance. "The [One Big Beautiful Bill] fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass."
He then added that "everything else—the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy—is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions."
It was this line that drew the ire of many critics, as the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the Senate version of the budget bill would slash spending on Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program by more than $1 trillion over a ten-year-period, which would result in more than 10 million people losing their coverage. Additionally, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) has proposed an amendment that would roll back the expansion of Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which would likely kick millions more off of the program.
Many congressional Democrats were quick to pounce on Vance for what they said were callous comments about a vital government program.
"So if the only thing that matters is immigration... why didn't you support the bipartisan Lankford-Murphy bill that tackled immigration far better than your Ugly Bill?" asked Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.). "And it didn't have 'minutiae' that will kick 12m+ Americans off healthcare or raise the debt by $4tn."
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Veteran healthcare reporter Jonathan Cohn put some numbers behind the policies that are being minimized by the vice president.
"11.8M projected to lose health insurance," he wrote. "Clinics and hospitals taking a hit, especially in rural areas. Low-income seniors facing higher costs. 'Minutiae.'"
Activist Leah Greenberg, the co-chair of progressive organizing group Indivisible, zeroed in on Vance's emphasis on ramping up ICE's funding as particularly problematic.
"They are just coming right out and saying they want an exponential increase in $$$ so they can build their own personal Gestapo," she warned.
Washington Post global affairs columnist Ishaan Tharoor also found himself disturbed by the sheer size of the funding increase for ICE that Vance is demanding and he observed that "nothing matters more apparently than giving ICE a bigger budget than the militaries of virtually every European country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Heinrich Should Be Ashamed': Lone Senate Dem Helps GOP Deliver Big Pharma Win
The provision, part of the Senate budget bill, was described as "a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars."
Jul 01, 2025
The deep-pocketed and powerful pharmaceutical industry notched a significant victory on Monday when the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a bill described by critics as a handout to drug corporations can be included in the Republican reconciliation package, which could become law as soon as this week.
The legislation, titled the Optimizing Research Progress Hope and New (ORPHAN) Cures Act, would exempt drugs that treat more than one rare disease from Medicare's drug-price negotiation program, allowing pharmaceutical companies to charge exorbitant prices for life-saving medications in a purported effort to encourage innovation. (Medications developed to treat rare diseases are known as "orphan drugs.")
The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen observed that if the legislation were already in effect, Medicare "would have been barred from negotiating lower prices for important treatments like cancer drugs Imbruvica, Calquence, and Pomalyst."
Among the bill's leading supporters is Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), whose spokesperson announced the parliamentarian's decision to allow the measure in the reconciliation package after previously advising that it be excluded. Heinrich is listed as the legislation's only co-sponsor in the Senate, alongside lead sponsor Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.).
"Sen. Heinrich should be ashamed of prioritizing drug corporation profits over lower medicine prices for seniors and people with disabilities," Steve Knievel, access to medicines advocate at Public Citizen, said in a statement Monday. "Patients and consumers breathed a sigh of relief when the Senate parliamentarian stripped the proposal from Republicans' Big Ugly Betrayal, so it comes as a gut punch to hear that Sen. Heinrich welcomed the reversal and continued to champion a proposal that will transfer billions from taxpayers to Big Pharma."
"People across the country are demanding lower drug prices and for Medicare drug price negotiations to be expanded, not restricted," Knievel added. "Sen. Heinrich should apologize to his constituents and start listening to them instead of drug corporation lobbyists."
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a lobbying group whose members include pharmaceutical companies, has publicly endorsed and promoted the legislation, urging lawmakers to pass it "as soon as possible."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients."
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the ORPHAN Cures Act would cost U.S. taxpayers around $5 billion over the next decade.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients For Affordable Drugs Now, said that "patients are infuriated to see the Senate cave to Big Pharma by reviving the ORPHAN Cures Act at the eleventh hour."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars," said Basey. "We call on lawmakers to remove this unnecessary provision immediately and stand with an overwhelming majority of Americans who want the Medicare Negotiation program to go further. Medicare negotiation will deliver huge savings for seniors and taxpayers; this bill would undermine that progress."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular