blocked::https://www.facebook.com/notes/sarah-palin/dont-get-demoralized-get-organized-take-back-the-20/37385\">posted a list of House Democrats who voted for health care reform with crosshairs aimed at their locations. In a March 23 tweet about her map, Palin \u003Ca href=\"https://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FSarahPalinUSA%2Fstatus%2F10935548053\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"blocked::https://mediamatters.org/rd?to=https://twitter.com/SarahPalinUSA/status/10935548053\u003Cbr /> blocked::https://twitter.com/SarahPalinUSA/status/10935548053\">wrote: \" 'Don't Retreat, Instead -- RELOAD!' \" Palin's list was criticized by conservative Elizabeth Hasselbeck, who introduced and endorsed Palin during the 2008 campaign, as helping foster a climate of violent rhetoric. Hasselbeck added that the list is \"purely despicable\" and \"insane.\" Beck: \"Grab a torch.\" Asserting that politicians are addicted to spending, Beck stated: \"When do we ever run those who are bankrupting our country and literally stealing our children's future out of town? Grab a torch.\" [Glenn Beck, 1/6/10] Huckabee: Members of Congress \"should be tarred and feathered as the original tea partiers would have done.\" As RightWingWatch.org noted, Fox News host Mike Huckabee said of members of Congress in January: HUCKABEE: Every member of Congress knows in his gut what's in the people's interest and what's in K Street's interest. If you think your real boss is some smug guy in a corner office with his Gucci loafers up on a mahogany deck and not the folks back home, those folks who voted for you, who gave you 25 or 50 hard-earned bucks, who put up yard signs and made calls for you, you deserve to lose. Shame on you, you shouldn't just be fired, you should be tarred and feathered as the original tea partiers would have done. That's my view and I welcome yours. [Fox News' Huckabee,1/25/10] Stossel said he has \"Barney Frank in effigy\" hanging above his sofa. In a February 3 interview with New York magazine, when Fox Business host John Stossel was asked, \"What's hanging above your sofa?\" he responded: \"Barney Frank in effigy.\" [New York, 2/3/10] Morris: \"Those crazies in Montana who say, 'We're going to kill ATF agents because the U.N.'s going to take over' -- well, they're beginning to have a case.\" During a long conspiracy theory about a \"super-national authority\" that will oversee U.S. financial institutions, Fox News contributor Dick Morris asserted that because President Obama's policies are \"internationalist ... [t]hose crazies in Montana who say, 'We're going to kill ATF agents because the U.N.'s going to take over' -- well, they're beginning to have a case.\" [Fox News' Your World with Neil Cavuto, 3/31/09] Beck portrays Obama, Democrats as vampires, suggests \"driv[ing] a stake through the heart of the bloodsuckers.\" Beck aired a graphic portraying Obama and Democrats as vampires and said, \"The government is full of vampires, and they are trying to suck the lifeblood out of the economy.\" Beck then suggested \"driv[ing] a stake through the heart of the bloodsuckers.\" [Glenn Beck, 3/30/09] Beck: \"To the day I die, I am going to be a progressive hunter.\" Telling his listeners that they \"are going to learn so much on Friday,\" Beck compared himself to \"Israeli Nazi hunters\" and commented, \"I'm going to find these big progressives and, to the day I die, I'm going to be a progressive hunter.\" He added: BECK: I'm going to find these people that have done this to our -- you know, to our country, and expose them. I don't care where -- I don't care if they're in nursing homes. I'm going to expose what they have done and make sure that the people understand, because our Constitution, our republic -- if it survives -- it will only survive because the people are waking up and through the grace of God, because we are that close to losing our republic. [Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program, 1/20/10] Beck: \"This is the end of prosperity in America forever ... the end of America as you know it.\" Telling his audience, \"You must not allow this to pass,\" Beck stated in November 2009 that \"they're going to get passed that 60-vote barrier. And they'll get there by people like [Sen.] Joe Lieberman, who's a reasonable guy and has good intent. You'll get passed it by people like that, who say, you know what? Look, we got to be reasonable; we have to have a debate. And then Harry Reid will go for the 51 count and he'll pass this thing. And it will be a nail in the coffin of America.\" Beck added: \"You must -- must get on the phone in your districts. You must wake everybody up you know. This is the end of prosperity in America forever if this bill passes. This is the end of America as you know it.\" [Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program, 11/19/09] Beck: \"[T]he fundamental transformation of America is complete.\" Beck also said: \"Not only are they doing health care, but they are doing education in this same bill. Education and health care.\" He added: \"It is overwhelming the system. And I'm telling you, if this bill passes -- health care and education all in one bill -- if this passes, the fundamental transformation of America is complete. There's no going back from this point. It must not pass.\" [The Glenn Beck Program, 3/15/10] Beck: \"If you can be deemed someone who maybe shouldn't have a baby, they can have their people come in.\" Beck said on his Fox News show: \"You know and I know in this 2,300-page bill that includes education, the control that this government has is endless. They will -- if this passes, they will control every aspect of your life.\" Beck further said: \"They will be able to -- there is places in here that if you can be deemed someone who maybe shouldn't have a baby, they can have their people come in. The government is in our homes on this.\" [Glenn Beck, 3/16/10] Beck: We lose \"the Democratic Party to the socialists.\" On his March 19 Fox News program, Beck stated: \"If this passes, I think it makes the election of people like Lindsey Graham, who are the compromise with big government, darn near impossible, because you can't tone this one down. You've got to pull this back by strong constitutionalists. Don't we -- if this passes, don't we lose, really, the Democratic Party to the socialists? And the Republican Party either has to be, you know, real federalists, real people that understand controlled power, or you are going to have a third party?\" [Glenn Beck,3/19/10] Moore: \"This is a dark day for America if we pass this bill.\" Discussing the market reaction to passing the health bill, The Wall Street Journal's Stephen Moore said on Fox News: \"I think personally -- I think that the markets have always thought for the last year and a half that eventually this day would come. And I think, by the way, this is a dark day for America if we pass this bill.\" [America's News HQ, 3/21/10] Cal Thomas claimed health reform \"is an outrage\" and \"a sham\"; \"[e]uthanasia is coming.\" On Fox News' America's News HQ, Thomas said the health bill is \"a triumph of the humanistic, atheistic philosophy. Instead of being endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights, those rights are going to be taken away by bureaucrats who will decide whether you get a hip replacement or a heart bypass, based on your age and your ability to pay more taxes.\" He continued: THOMAS: It is an outrage. It is a sham. Euthanasia is coming. You can call them death panels. That's exactly what they're going to be. We are going to really be sorry for this, but, unfortunately, when the guy in the white robe comes to give us our little pill, as President Obama told ABC, the 100-year-old woman who wants to live must get in order to make it equal for everybody and not to spend so much, it will be too late. [America's News HQ, 11/21/09] Hannity: \"If we get nationalized health care, it's over; this is socialism.\" In November 2009, Sean Hannity said, \"When you look at the extreme czars, and you look at Barack Obama, and you look at the Barack Obama that portrayed himself one year ago as a very different candidate, you know, why -- I feel like I have been vindicated. I was excoriated for saying he is far more radical than people know. You know, what do you see about him? Do you think he is far -- do you think he's a socialist? Do you think he's -- because I think this is -- if we get nationalized health care, it's over. This is socialism, and that's a kind word.\" [Fox News' Hannity,11/2/09]","author":{"@type":"Person","description":"Newswire Editor is a Common Dreams staff position.","identifier":"25413159","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://www.commondreams.org/media-library/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8zMjg5OTM0MS9vcmlnaW4ucG5nIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTc4ODc3OTc4NH0.Kro-XRoA7MB_ddUbc_2x6KjtfCnnkFR_VUghmVRfeoE/image.png?width=210"},"name":"newswireeditor","url":"https://www.commondreams.org/author/newswireeditor"},"dateModified":"2022-12-22T00:19:57Z","datePublished":"2010-04-08T15:28:43Z","description":"Media Matters' Burns: There are "real consequences" to network's history of violent rhetoric","headline":"Pelosi Death Threats Linked to Fox News","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","height":"600","representativeOfPage":"True","url":"","width":"1200"},"isAccessibleForFree":"True","mainEntityOfPage":"https://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2010/04/08/pelosi-death-threats-linked-fox-news","publisher":{"@id":"https://www.commondreams.org/","@type":"Organization","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","height":"511","url":"https://assets.rbl.ms/32373543/origin.png","width":"1501"},"name":"Common Dreams","sameAs":["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Dreams","https://www.facebook.com/commondreams.org","https://twitter.com/commondreams"],"url":"https://www.commondreams.org/"},"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":["h1",".widget__subheadline",".social-author",".body-description"]}},{"@id":"https://www.commondreams.org/","@type":"Organization","address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","addressCountry":"USA","addressLocality":"Portland","addressRegion":"Maine","postalCode":"04112","streetAddress":"PO Box 443"},"alternateName":"CommonDreams.org","contactPoint":{"@type":"ContactPoint","availableLanguage":"English","email":"info@commondreams.org","telephone":"+1-207-775-0488","url":"https://www.commondreams.org"},"ethicsPolicy":"https://www.commondreams.org/ethics-policy","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","height":"511","representativeOfPage":"True","url":"https://assets.rbl.ms/32373543/origin.png","width":"1501"},"name":"Common Dreams","nonprofitStatus":"Nonprofit501c3","publishingPrinciples":"https://www.commondreams.org/publishing-principles","sameAs":["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Dreams","https://www.loc.gov/item/lcwaN0010146/","https://www.facebook.com/commondreams.org","https://twitter.com/commondreams","https://www.instagram.com/commondreams/"],"telephone":"207-775-0488","url":"https://www.commondreams.org/"}]}
Pelosi Death Threats Linked to Fox News | Common Dreams
Media Matters' Burns: There are "real consequences" to network's history of violent rhetoric
WASHINGTON
Today, after the mother of
Gregory
Giusti -- the man arrested for allegedly threatening Speaker Nancy
Pelosi's life over health care reform -- stated that Fox News was a
factor in her son's alleged actions, Media
Matters for America released the following statement:
"The violent language and scare
tactics we see on Fox News every day have real consequences," said
Eric
Burns, President of Media Matters. "This is a network that ran a 14-month
campaign against health care reform,
which left their viewers confused and angry. The question is, now
that one of those viewers has allegedly threatened Speaker Pelosi's life
over health care reform, is Fox News going to do anything about it?"
BACKGROUND
On April 7, the Los Angeles Timesreported
that "[s]everal
federal officials say the man [Giusti]
made dozens of calls to Pelosi's homes in California and
Washington, D.C., and to her husband's business office. The suspect
allegedly
recited her home address and said that if she wanted to see it again,
she
should not support the healthcare overhaul bill that was recently
signed."
The same day, Giusti's
mother, Eleanor Giusti, made the following comments to ABC's San
Francisco affiliate,
KGO-TV:
ELEANOR GIUSTI: Greg has -- frequently gets in with
a
group of people that have really radical ideas and that are not
consistent with
myself or the rest of the family and -- which gets him into problems.
And
apparently I would say this must be another one that somehow he's gotten
onto
either by -- I'd say Fox News or all of those that are really radical,
and he
-- that's where he comes from.
As Media Matters has
noted, Fox News hosts and guests have repeatedly
used
violent rhetoric and apocalyptic language to describe health care reform
and other issues. Additionally,
a number of network personalities have a history of issuing
inflammatory
remarks about Pelosi.
Most notably, Glenn Beck discussed "put[ting] poison" in Pelosi's wine:
INFLAMMATORY REMARKS
ABOUT PELOSI
Beck
talks about "put[ting] poison" in Pelosi's wine.
Glenn Beck stated:
BECK: So, Speaker Pelosi, I just wanted to -- you
gonna drink your wine? Are you blind? Do those eyes not work? There you
-- I
want you to drink it now. Drink it. Drink it. Drink it.
I really just wanted to thank you for having me
over
here to wine country. You know, to be invited, I thought I had to be a
major
Democratic donor or a longtime friend of yours, which I'm not.
By the way, I put poison in your -- no, I -- I look
forward to all the policy discussions that we're supposed to have -- you
know,
on health care, energy reform, and the economy. [Glenn Beck, 8/6/09]
Cal
Thomas: Pelosi's "deliberately provocative" walk across Capitol
was like "the march through Skokie,
Illinois, by the
Nazis." Columnist Cal Thomas said, "When Nancy
Pelosi went through those tea partiers, it was like -- what should
we
analogize this to? -- the march through Skokie, Illinois,
by the Nazis. It was deliberately provocative. They wanted a
reaction." [Fox News Watch, 3/27/10]
Fox & Friends re-enacts
pro-life
heckler who told Pelosi to "burn in hell." Co-host Steve
Doocy played a heckler who shouted, "Nancy Pelosi, you'll burn in
hell!" during a Pelosi speech while co-host Alisyn Camerota
imitated
Pelosi. After they re-enacted the events, co-host Peter Johnson Jr.
laughed. [Fox & Friends, 10/30/09]
Beck
asks if Pelosi was "inciting" tea partiers with House gavel --
"a big hammer." Beck asked, "If [Pelosi]
was really worried about violence and she thought these people were
violent, why would you grab a big hammer and walk into a sea of
these
people?" He later asked, "Did anyone say to Nancy Pelosi,
'You're inciting these people. You're slapping them across the
face'?"
[Glenn Beck, 3/25/10]
O'Reilly
says Pelosi is pushing "Fidel Castro stuff." Bill
O'Reilly stated that "Nancy Pelosi and her far-left crew want to
raise
the top tax rate to 45 percent. That's not capitalism, that's Fidel
Castro
stuff, confiscating wages that people honestly earn. [The
O'Reilly Factor, 11/4/2009]
Beck
lists Pelosi among California's
"really dangerous people" that include communists,
eco-terrorists,
Black Panthers. Beck stated that "California has become
quite a hotbed
for all kinds of radicals -- communists, socialists, all in the
1960s, but
they were here before -- progressives. Now, eco-terrorists, they're
here.
You have the Panthers formed here. Nancy Pelosi is here. A lot of
really
dangerous people in a state as volatile as this one, and it is on
the
edge." [Glenn Beck, 2/9/10]
O'Reilly
hosts tea party activist who says it "would have been more symbolic
had [Pelosi] had a whip." On The O'Reilly Factor,
tea party
activist Kevin Jackson characterized the walk to the Capitol by
Pelosi and
other members of Congress on the day the House voted for health
care
reform as "this very wealthy white lady leading a group of black,
you
know, men up to the thing with her gavel in her hand. It would have
been
more symbolic had she had a whip." [The
O'Reilly Factor, 3/31/10]
Miller:
Pelosi has a "sub-reptilian intellect." On The
O'Reilly Factor, radio host
Dennis Miller claimed that voters "did not want to turn $1.2
million
over to a sub-reptilian intellect like Nancy Pelosi." After
O'Reilly
compared Pelosi's comments following the November 2009 elections to
"George Custer at the Little Big Horn, before the arrow went
through
his throat," Miller added, "This woman could lose a game of
Tic-Tac-Toe to an amoeba, for God's sakes. It will show you the
holes in
the system we have that this is the most powerful woman in the
United States of America.
Look at her -- she's sub-reptilian. ... Empty, vapid, nobody's
home."
[The O'Reilly Factor, 11/4/09]
Miller:
"If you go in with her and the long knives ... you better be ready
to
play hard." Dennis Miller said of Pelosi:
"There's blood in the water on her, and I hope they bring in
Cousteau's kid to document it because this is going to be a
beautiful
demise. ... It's going to get ugly, and if you go in with her and
the long
knives, I would warn you -- and you're not a plastic surgeon, you
better
be ready to play hard, because you will get the speaker's gavel
from her
when you pry it from her cold, dead hand, as they say in the
trade."
[The O'Reilly Factor, 5/19/09]
Doocy
thought O'Reilly asking if Pelosi is a "kook" was a "great
question." On Fox
& Friends, Doocy played a clip of O'Reilly asking Sarah
Palin, "Do you think that [Pelosi's] a kook? ... Do you think she's
actually crazy?" Doocy added, "What a great question: 'Is she a
kook?' " [Fox & Friends, 1/13/10]
VIOLENT, APOCALYPIC
RHETORIC
Palin: "Don't Retreat, Instead -
RELOAD!" Palin posted
a list of House Democrats who voted for health care reform with
crosshairs
aimed at their locations. In a March 23 tweet about her map, Palin wrote:
" 'Don't Retreat, Instead -- RELOAD!' " Palin's list was
criticized by conservative Elizabeth Hasselbeck, who introduced and
endorsed Palin during the 2008 campaign, as helping
foster
a climate of violent rhetoric. Hasselbeck added that the list is
"purely despicable" and "insane."
Beck: "Grab a
torch." Asserting that politicians are
addicted to spending, Beck stated: "When do we ever run those who
are
bankrupting our country and literally stealing our children's
future out
of town? Grab a torch." [Glenn
Beck, 1/6/10]
Huckabee: Members of
Congress "should be tarred and feathered as the original tea
partiers
would have done." As RightWingWatch.org
noted, Fox News host Mike Huckabee said
of members of Congress in January:
HUCKABEE: Every member of Congress knows in his gut
what's in the people's interest and what's in K Street's interest. If
you think your
real boss is some smug guy in a corner office with his Gucci loafers up
on a
mahogany deck and not the folks back home, those folks who voted for
you, who
gave you 25 or 50 hard-earned bucks, who put up yard signs and made
calls for
you, you deserve to lose. Shame on you, you shouldn't just be fired, you
should
be tarred and feathered as the original tea partiers would have done.
That's my
view and I welcome yours. [Fox News' Huckabee, 1/25/10]
Stossel said he has
"Barney Frank in effigy" hanging above his sofa. In
a February 3 interview with New York magazine,
when Fox Business host John Stossel was asked, "What's hanging
above
your sofa?" he responded: "Barney Frank in effigy." [New
York, 2/3/10]
Morris: "Those
crazies in Montana
who say, 'We're going to kill ATF agents because the U.N.'s going
to take
over' -- well, they're beginning to have a case."
During a long conspiracy theory about a "super-national
authority" that will oversee U.S. financial institutions, Fox News
contributor Dick Morris asserted that because President Obama's
policies
are "internationalist ... [t]hose crazies in Montana who say,
'We're
going to kill ATF agents because the U.N.'s going to take over' --
well,
they're beginning to have a case." [Fox News' Your World
with Neil Cavuto, 3/31/09]
Beck portrays Obama,
Democrats as vampires, suggests "driv[ing] a stake through the
heart
of the bloodsuckers." Beck aired a graphic
portraying Obama and Democrats as vampires and said, "The
government
is full of vampires, and they are trying to suck the lifeblood out
of the
economy." Beck then suggested "driv[ing] a stake through the
heart of the bloodsuckers." [Glenn
Beck, 3/30/09]
Beck: "To the
day I die, I am going to be a progressive hunter."
Telling his listeners that they "are going to learn so much on
Friday," Beck compared himself to "Israeli Nazi hunters"
and commented, "I'm going to find these big progressives and, to
the
day I die, I'm going to be a progressive hunter." He added:
BECK: I'm going to find these people that have done
this to our -- you know, to our country, and expose them. I don't care
where --
I don't care if they're in nursing homes. I'm going to expose what they
have
done and make sure that the people understand, because our Constitution,
our
republic -- if it survives -- it will only survive because the people
are
waking up and through the grace of God, because we are that close to
losing our
republic. [Premiere Radio Networks' The
Glenn Beck Program, 1/20/10]
Beck:
"This is the end of prosperity in America
forever ... the end of America
as you know it." Telling his audience, "You
must not allow this to pass," Beck stated in November 2009 that
"they're going to get passed that 60-vote barrier. And they'll get
there by people like [Sen.] Joe Lieberman, who's a reasonable guy
and has
good intent. You'll get passed it by people like that, who say, you
know
what? Look, we got to be reasonable; we have to have a debate. And
then
Harry Reid will go for the 51 count and he'll pass this thing. And
it will
be a nail in the coffin of America."
Beck added: "You must -- must get on the phone in your districts.
You
must wake everybody up you know. This is the end of prosperity in
America
forever if this bill passes. This is the end of America as you know
it."
[Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn
Beck Program, 11/19/09]
Beck:
"[T]he fundamental transformation of America is complete."
Beck also said: "Not only are they doing health care, but they are
doing education in this same bill. Education and health care." He
added: "It is overwhelming the system. And I'm telling you, if this
bill passes -- health care and education all in one bill -- if this
passes, the fundamental transformation of America is complete.
There's
no going back from this point. It must not pass." [The Glenn
Beck Program, 3/15/10]
Beck:
"If you can be deemed someone who maybe shouldn't have a baby, they
can have their people come in." Beck said on his
Fox News show: "You know and I know in this 2,300-page bill that
includes education, the control that this government has is
endless. They
will -- if this passes, they will control every aspect of your
life."
Beck further said: "They will be able to -- there is places in here
that if you can be deemed someone who maybe shouldn't have a baby,
they
can have their people come in. The government is in our homes on
this." [Glenn Beck, 3/16/10]
Beck:
We lose "the Democratic Party to the socialists."
On his March 19 Fox News program, Beck stated: "If this passes, I
think it makes the election of people like Lindsey Graham, who are
the
compromise with big government, darn near impossible, because you
can't
tone this one down. You've got to pull this back by strong
constitutionalists. Don't we -- if this passes, don't we lose,
really, the
Democratic Party to the socialists? And the Republican Party either
has to
be, you know, real federalists, real people that understand
controlled
power, or you are going to have a third party?" [Glenn Beck, 3/19/10]
Moore:
"This is a dark day for America if we pass this
bill." Discussing the market reaction to passing the
health bill, The Wall Street Journal's
Stephen Moore said on Fox News: "I think personally -- I think that
the markets have always thought for the last year and a half that
eventually this day would come. And I think, by the way, this is a
dark
day for America
if we pass this bill." [America's News HQ, 3/21/10]
Cal
Thomas claimed health reform "is an outrage" and "a
sham"; "[e]uthanasia is coming." On Fox
News' America's News HQ,
Thomas said the health bill is "a triumph of the humanistic,
atheistic philosophy. Instead of being endowed by our creator with
certain
inalienable rights, those rights are going to be taken away by
bureaucrats
who will decide whether you get a hip replacement or a heart
bypass, based
on your age and your ability to pay more taxes." He continued:
THOMAS: It
is an outrage. It is a sham. Euthanasia is coming. You can call them
death
panels. That's exactly what they're going to be. We are going to really
be sorry
for this, but, unfortunately, when the guy in the white robe comes to
give us
our little pill, as President Obama told ABC, the 100-year-old woman who
wants
to live must get in order to make it equal for everybody and not to
spend so
much, it will be too late. [America's News HQ, 11/21/09]
Hannity:
"If we get nationalized health care, it's over; this is
socialism." In November 2009, Sean Hannity said, "When you
look at
the extreme czars, and you look at Barack Obama, and you look at
the
Barack Obama that portrayed himself one year ago as a very
different
candidate, you know, why -- I feel like I have been vindicated. I
was
excoriated for saying he is far more radical than people know. You
know,
what do you see about him? Do you think he is far -- do you think
he's a
socialist? Do you think he's -- because I think this is -- if we
get
nationalized health care, it's over. This is socialism, and that's a
kind
word." [Fox News' Hannity, 11/2/09]
Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit,
501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to
comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative
misinformation in the U.S. media.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The ruling in Rümeysa Öztürk's case came less than 24 hours after courts ruled that Badar Khan Suri's case must be heard in Virginia and that Mahmoud Khalil's case must remain in New Jersey.
On Wednesday, Tufts University student Rümeysa Öztürk was the third detained international scholar in 24 hours to secure a victory in a case against the Trump administration when a federal appeals panel ordered the government to return Öztürk to Vermont from the crowded Louisiana detention center to which she was sent hours after plainclothes immigration agents arrested her in March.
The Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals handed down its ruling weeks after U.S. District Judge William K. Sessions III in Vermont ordered the administration to return Öztürk to the New England state, where she had been located when her attorneys filed a habeas corpus petition on her behalf.
Sessions' ruling had demanded that Öztürk be returned to Vermont for a hearing by May 1, but she remained in Louisiana—where the Trump administration has sent numerous foreign students marked for deportation to ensure their cases would be handled by conservative judges—as the White House appealed the case to the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
That court said Wednesday that Öztürk must be sent back to Vermont by May 14, where a federal judge will hold a hearing on her habeas corpus petition on May 22. A bail hearing for Öztürk's release will also be held on May 9.
— (@)
Öztürk's lawyers argue that the government is unconstitutionally retaliating against her for co-writing an op-ed in her school newspaper last year in which she called on Tufts to divest from companies tied to Israel and its bombardment of Gaza. She was detained in March by plainclothes immigration agents—some of whom wore masks—near her apartment in Somerville, Massachusetts.
"No one should be arrested and locked up for their political views," said Esha Bhandari, deputy director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, which is helping to represent Öztürk. "Every day that Rümeysa Öztürk remains in detention is a day too long. We're grateful the court refused the government’s attempt to keep her isolated from her community and her legal counsel as she pursues her case for release."
Lawyers recently submitted new filings in Öztürk's case in Vermont, describing her living conditions for nearly two months in Louisiana.
In a cramped room with 23 other women, Öztürk has suffered progressively more severe asthma attacks and has been exposed to triggers for her asthma, including insect and rodent droppings and a lack of fresh air.
"Rümeysa has suffered six weeks in crowded confinement without adequate access to medical care and in conditions that doctors say risk exacerbating her asthma attacks. Her detention—over an op-ed she co-authored in her student newspaper—is as cruel as it is unconstitutional," said Jessie Rossman, legal director for the ACLU of Massachusetts. "Today, we moved one step closer to returning Rümeysa to her community and studies in Massachusetts."
With Öztürk expected to return to Vermont within days, the ACLU this week was also celebrating another "huge blow for the Trump administration" in the case of Georgetown University postdoctoral fellow Badar Khan Suri, who was also arrested in March by masked immigration agents before being secretly transported first to Louisiana and then to Texas.
A federal court ruled Suri's habeas corpus case should be heard in a court in Virginia, where he was living with his wife and young children when he was detained.
The Department of Homeland Security said Suri was "rendered deportable" under the Immigration and Nationality Act because he was found "spreading Hamas propaganda and promoting antisemitism on social media"—claims for which DHS offered no evidence.
His lawyers have argued he was being detained for constitutionally protected speech in support of Palestinian rights.
A federal court in Virginia is now set to hear Suri's case regarding his demand to be returned to Virginia and released on bond on May 14.
Eden Heilman, legal director for the ACLU of Virginia, said the court rejected the Trump administration's effort to "find a court it believed would be friendlier to its unlawful detention of people advocating for Palestinian rights."
"We are pleased the court saw through the Trump administration's attempts to manipulate the law, and we won't stop fighting until Dr. Khan Suri is reunited with his family," said Heilman.
Meanwhile, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia on Tuesday rejected the Trump administration's effort to appeal the issue of where former Columbia University student organizer Mahmoud Khalil's habeas corpus case should be heard, ensuring that a federal court in New Jersey—where Khalil was detained when the petition was filed—will remain the venue for the case.
The administration has been pushing for Khalil's case to be heard in Louisiana, where he has also been in Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention since March, when ICE agents accosted him and his pregnant wife and took him away in an unmarked vehicle—eventually sending him 1,400 miles away from his wife and his legal counsel, where he remained last month during the birth of his first child.
Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel with the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, expressed hope that Tuesday's ruling "sends a strong message to other courts around the country facing government attempts to shop for favorable jurisdictions by moving people detained on unconstitutional immigration charges around."
"It is the fundamental job of the judiciary," said Kaufman, "to stand up to this kind of government manipulation of our basic rights."
Reporting out Wednesday indicates that congressional Republicans are considering a proposal that would force low-income Americans to pay more for Medicaid coverage, a highly regressive plan aimed at helping the GOP offset the massive projected cost of another round of tax breaks for the wealthy.
The proposal, first reported by The American Prospect's David Dayen, is part of a menu of options Republicans are weighing for inclusion in their forthcoming reconciliation package. A House Energy and Commerce Committee markup of the legislation is expected next week.
"Making poor people pay more for healthcare is exactly the kind of effective cut to Medicaid that moderate Republicans have sworn they would not abide," Dayen wrote. "While reducing the federal share of Obamacare's Medicaid expansion, which provides federal funding to extend Medicaid to adults under age 65 up to 138% of the poverty level in 40 states and D.C., is not part of the menu, this is a backdoor way of achieving something like that reduction, on the backs of individuals who get Medicaid."
The proposal is described in the emerging reconciliation proposal as "cost-sharing above 100% FPL," or federal poverty level.
Medicaid's website explains that out-of-pocket Medicaid costs currently apply to all "enrollees except those specifically exempted by law, and most are limited to nominal amounts."
Under the GOP proposal, according to Dayen, "Medicaid recipients making at or above the federal poverty level, which is $15,650 for a single individual and $21,150 for a two-person household, would have to pay some money for coverage—either in premiums, co-payments for hospital visits and other treatment, or other fees."
"Currently, Medicaid gives states the option to impose out-of-pocket spending on recipients, though some populations and services, like children under 18 or pregnancy care, are exempted," Dayen added. "Some premiums and enrollment fees are limited to beneficiaries above 150% of the poverty line; this policy would take that number lower."
— (@)
Matt Bruenig, founder of the People's Policy Project, told the Prospect that "whether you call it a co-pay, a premium, a fee, or a tax, the net result is either a reduction in the disposable incomes of those subject to the cost-sharing or people forgoing healthcare."
"When I look out into the American income distribution for places where I'd like to cut things back," Bruenig added, "families with incomes between 100% and 138% of the poverty line is not where my eye tends to go."
In response to Dayen's reporting, Working Families Party national director Maurice Mitchell said in a statement that "Republicans want to hike Medicaid premiums and copays to pay for massive tax cuts for the rich."
"The fix is in," said Mitchell. "They care more about tax breaks for their billionaire donors than keeping costs low for families in their own districts. But we're not going to let them get away with it. We're ready to fight back."
"The bottom line is that the Republican bill is going to cut healthcare for kids, seniors, Americans with disabilities, and working families."
Another option on the GOP policy menu for Medicaid is work requirements, which have been tried to disastrous effect at the state level. Research has repeatedly shown that work requirements do little to boost employment while making it more difficult for eligible program recipients to continue receiving benefits. Most Medicaid recipients already work.
Dayen's reporting was published shortly before the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released an analysis examining the potential consequences of some of the Medicaid cuts floated by Republican lawmakers in recent days.
The CBO—which did not examine the GOP plan to impose more payments on poor Americans—found that the Republican proposals would "reduce the resources available to states to fund Medicaid programs."
"Overall, CBO expects that, on average, states would replace roughly half of the reduced funds with their own resources," the budget office said. "Additionally, in response to the loss of the other half of the resources, states would modify their Medicaid programs and reduce Medicaid spending using three levers: reduce provider payment rates, reduce the scope or amount of optional services, and reduce Medicaid enrollment."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who requested the CBO analysis last month, said Wednesday that "the Republican plan for healthcare means benefit cuts and terminated health insurance for millions of Americans who count on Medicaid."
"Republicans continue to use smoke and mirrors to try to trick Americans into thinking they aren't going to hurt anybody when they proceed with this reckless plan, but fighting reality is an uphill battle," said Wyden. "The bottom line is that the Republican bill is going to cut healthcare for kids, seniors, Americans with disabilities, and working families, and Democrats are going to fight to stop it."
"Throughout Griffin's shameful attempt to overturn the election, the people of North Carolina proved that we will not be silent," said the executive director of Common Cause North Carolina.
A six-month saga that drew national attention over a North Carolina state Supreme Court seat finally came to a close on Wednesday when the Republican judge who lost the race last fall conceded.
Jefferson Griffin, a Republican judge on the state Court of Appeals, lost the 2024 North Carolina Supreme Court election to incumbent Allison Riggs, a Democrat, by over 700 votes, a lead confirmed by two recounts. But Griffin would not accept the results, and instead launched an extraordinary bid to challenge tens of thousands of ballots in the race.
On Monday, a federal judge appointed by U.S. President Donald Trump dealt a decisive blow to Griffin's effort, ordering election officials to certify the results of the election and confirm that Riggs had won.
In his ruling, the judge wrote that "retroactive changes to election procedures raise serious due process concerns" and that Griffin essentially sought "to change the rules of the game after it had been played."
In a statement shared with outlet NC Newsline, Riggs said Monday that "today, we won."
"I'm proud to continue upholding the Constitution and the rule of law as North Carolina's Supreme Court Justice," she added.
Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich called the ruling "good news for democracy."
Instead of appealing the ruling, Griffin conceded defeat to Riggs. "While I do not fully agree with the District Court's analysis, I respect the court's holding—just as I have respected every judicial tribunal that has heard this case," Griffin said in a statement provided to The Associated Press. "I will not appeal the court's decision."
Common Cause North Carolina, is a nonpartisan grassroots organization, cheered the development.
"This is a victory for North Carolina voters, led by North Carolina voters," said Bob Phillips, executive director of Common Cause North Carolina, in a statement on Wednesday. "Throughout Griffin's shameful attempt to overturn the election, the people of North Carolina proved that we will not be silent when a politician attacks the voting rights of our family members, friends, and neighbors. We've shown the awesome power of everyday people to protect the freedom to vote."
In state court, Griffin challenged more than 60,000 votes on eligibility grounds.
At one rally organized by Common Cause North Carolina in February, speakers warned that Griffin's challenge of those votes was a threat to democracy and that the strategy could be copied by other losing politicians who want to challenge their defeats, according to NC Newsline.