April, 08 2010, 11:28am EDT
Pelosi Death Threats Linked to Fox News
Media Matters' Burns: There are "real consequences" to network's history of violent rhetoric
WASHINGTON
Today, after the mother of
Gregory
Giusti -- the man arrested for allegedly threatening Speaker Nancy
Pelosi's life over health care reform -- stated that Fox News was a
factor in her son's alleged actions, Media
Matters for America released the following statement:
"The violent language and scare
tactics we see on Fox News every day have real consequences," said
Eric
Burns, President of Media Matters.
"This is a network that ran a 14-month
campaign against health care reform,
which left their viewers confused and angry. The question is, now
that one of those viewers has allegedly threatened Speaker Pelosi's life
over health care reform, is Fox News going to do anything about it?"
BACKGROUND
On April 7, the
Los Angeles Timesreported
that "[s]everal
federal officials say the man [Giusti]
made dozens of calls to Pelosi's homes in California and
Washington, D.C., and to her husband's business office. The suspect
allegedly
recited her home address and said that if she wanted to see it again,
she
should not support the healthcare overhaul bill that was recently
signed."
The same day, Giusti's
mother, Eleanor Giusti, made the following comments to ABC's San
Francisco affiliate,
KGO-TV:
ELEANOR GIUSTI: Greg has -- frequently gets in with
a
group of people that have really radical ideas and that are not
consistent with
myself or the rest of the family and -- which gets him into problems.
And
apparently I would say this must be another one that somehow he's gotten
onto
either by -- I'd say Fox News or all of those that are really radical,
and he
-- that's where he comes from.
As Media Matters has
noted, Fox News hosts and guests have repeatedly
used
violent rhetoric and apocalyptic language to describe health care reform
and other issues. Additionally,
a number of network personalities have a history of issuing
inflammatory
remarks about Pelosi.
Most notably, Glenn Beck discussed "put[ting] poison" in Pelosi's wine:
INFLAMMATORY REMARKS
ABOUT PELOSI
- Beck
talks about "put[ting] poison" in Pelosi's wine.
Glenn Beck stated:
BECK: So, Speaker Pelosi, I just wanted to -- you
gonna drink your wine? Are you blind? Do those eyes not work? There you
-- I
want you to drink it now. Drink it. Drink it. Drink it.I really just wanted to thank you for having me
over
here to wine country. You know, to be invited, I thought I had to be a
major
Democratic donor or a longtime friend of yours, which I'm not.By the way, I put poison in your -- no, I -- I look
forward to all the policy discussions that we're supposed to have -- you
know,
on health care, energy reform, and the economy. [Glenn Beck, 8/6/09]
- Cal
Thomas: Pelosi's "deliberately provocative" walk across Capitol
was like "the march through Skokie,
Illinois, by the
Nazis." Columnist Cal Thomas said, "When Nancy
Pelosi went through those tea partiers, it was like -- what should
we
analogize this to? -- the march through Skokie, Illinois,
by the Nazis. It was deliberately provocative. They wanted a
reaction." [Fox News Watch,
3/27/10]
- Fox & Friends re-enacts
pro-life
heckler who told Pelosi to "burn in hell." Co-host Steve
Doocy played a heckler who shouted, "Nancy Pelosi, you'll burn in
hell!" during a Pelosi speech while co-host Alisyn Camerota
imitated
Pelosi. After they re-enacted the events, co-host Peter Johnson Jr.
laughed. [Fox & Friends,
10/30/09]
- Beck
asks if Pelosi was "inciting" tea partiers with House gavel --
"a big hammer." Beck asked, "If [Pelosi]
was really worried about violence and she thought these people were
violent, why would you grab a big hammer and walk into a sea of
these
people?" He later asked, "Did anyone say to Nancy Pelosi,
'You're inciting these people. You're slapping them across the
face'?"
[Glenn Beck, 3/25/10]
- O'Reilly
says Pelosi is pushing "Fidel Castro stuff." Bill
O'Reilly stated that "Nancy Pelosi and her far-left crew want to
raise
the top tax rate to 45 percent. That's not capitalism, that's Fidel
Castro
stuff, confiscating wages that people honestly earn. [The
O'Reilly Factor, 11/4/2009]
- Beck
lists Pelosi among California's
"really dangerous people" that include communists,
eco-terrorists,
Black Panthers. Beck stated that "California has become
quite a hotbed
for all kinds of radicals -- communists, socialists, all in the
1960s, but
they were here before -- progressives. Now, eco-terrorists, they're
here.
You have the Panthers formed here. Nancy Pelosi is here. A lot of
really
dangerous people in a state as volatile as this one, and it is on
the
edge." [Glenn Beck, 2/9/10]
- O'Reilly
hosts tea party activist who says it "would have been more symbolic
had [Pelosi] had a whip." On The O'Reilly Factor,
tea party
activist Kevin Jackson characterized the walk to the Capitol by
Pelosi and
other members of Congress on the day the House voted for health
care
reform as "this very wealthy white lady leading a group of black,
you
know, men up to the thing with her gavel in her hand. It would have
been
more symbolic had she had a whip." [The
O'Reilly Factor, 3/31/10]
- Miller:
Pelosi has a "sub-reptilian intellect." On The
O'Reilly Factor, radio host
Dennis Miller claimed that voters "did not want to turn $1.2
million
over to a sub-reptilian intellect like Nancy Pelosi." After
O'Reilly
compared Pelosi's comments following the November 2009 elections to
"George Custer at the Little Big Horn, before the arrow went
through
his throat," Miller added, "This woman could lose a game of
Tic-Tac-Toe to an amoeba, for God's sakes. It will show you the
holes in
the system we have that this is the most powerful woman in the
United States of America.
Look at her -- she's sub-reptilian. ... Empty, vapid, nobody's
home."
[The O'Reilly Factor, 11/4/09]
- Miller:
"If you go in with her and the long knives ... you better be ready
to
play hard." Dennis Miller said of Pelosi:
"There's blood in the water on her, and I hope they bring in
Cousteau's kid to document it because this is going to be a
beautiful
demise. ... It's going to get ugly, and if you go in with her and
the long
knives, I would warn you -- and you're not a plastic surgeon, you
better
be ready to play hard, because you will get the speaker's gavel
from her
when you pry it from her cold, dead hand, as they say in the
trade."
[The O'Reilly Factor, 5/19/09]
- Doocy
thought O'Reilly asking if Pelosi is a "kook" was a "great
question." On Fox
& Friends, Doocy played a clip of O'Reilly asking Sarah
Palin, "Do you think that [Pelosi's] a kook? ... Do you think she's
actually crazy?" Doocy added, "What a great question: 'Is she a
kook?' " [Fox & Friends,
1/13/10]
VIOLENT, APOCALYPIC
RHETORIC
- Palin: "Don't Retreat, Instead -
RELOAD!" Palin
posted
a list of House Democrats who voted for health care reform with
crosshairs
aimed at their locations. In a March 23 tweet about her map, Palin wrote:
" 'Don't Retreat, Instead -- RELOAD!' " Palin's list was
criticized by conservative Elizabeth Hasselbeck, who introduced and
endorsed Palin during the 2008 campaign, as helping
foster
a climate of violent rhetoric. Hasselbeck added that the list is
"purely despicable" and "insane."
- Beck: "Grab a
torch." Asserting that politicians are
addicted to spending, Beck stated: "When do we ever run those who
are
bankrupting our country and literally stealing our children's
future out
of town? Grab a torch." [Glenn
Beck, 1/6/10]
- Huckabee: Members of
Congress "should be tarred and feathered as the original tea
partiers
would have done." As RightWingWatch.org
noted, Fox News host Mike Huckabee said
of members of Congress in January:
HUCKABEE: Every member of Congress knows in his gut
what's in the people's interest and what's in K Street's interest. If
you think your
real boss is some smug guy in a corner office with his Gucci loafers up
on a
mahogany deck and not the folks back home, those folks who voted for
you, who
gave you 25 or 50 hard-earned bucks, who put up yard signs and made
calls for
you, you deserve to lose. Shame on you, you shouldn't just be fired, you
should
be tarred and feathered as the original tea partiers would have done.
That's my
view and I welcome yours. [Fox News' Huckabee,
1/25/10]
- Stossel said he has
"Barney Frank in effigy" hanging above his sofa. Ina February 3 interview with New York magazine,
when Fox Business host John Stossel was asked, "What's hanging
above
your sofa?" he responded: "Barney Frank in effigy." [New
York, 2/3/10]
- Morris: "Those
crazies in Montana
who say, 'We're going to kill ATF agents because the U.N.'s going
to take
over' -- well, they're beginning to have a case."
During a long conspiracy theory about a "super-national
authority" that will oversee U.S. financial institutions, Fox News
contributor Dick Morris asserted that because President Obama's
policies
are "internationalist ... [t]hose crazies in Montana who say,
'We're
going to kill ATF agents because the U.N.'s going to take over' --
well,
they're beginning to have a case." [Fox News' Your World
with Neil Cavuto, 3/31/09]
- Beck portrays Obama,
Democrats as vampires, suggests "driv[ing] a stake through the
heart
of the bloodsuckers." Beck aired a graphic
portraying Obama and Democrats as vampires and said, "The
government
is full of vampires, and they are trying to suck the lifeblood out
of the
economy." Beck then suggested "driv[ing] a stake through the
heart of the bloodsuckers." [Glenn
Beck, 3/30/09]
- Beck: "To the
day I die, I am going to be a progressive hunter."
Telling his listeners that they "are going to learn so much on
Friday," Beck compared himself to "Israeli Nazi hunters"
and commented, "I'm going to find these big progressives and, to
the
day I die, I'm going to be a progressive hunter." He added:
BECK: I'm going to find these people that have done
this to our -- you know, to our country, and expose them. I don't care
where --
I don't care if they're in nursing homes. I'm going to expose what they
have
done and make sure that the people understand, because our Constitution,
our
republic -- if it survives -- it will only survive because the people
are
waking up and through the grace of God, because we are that close to
losing our
republic. [Premiere Radio Networks' The
Glenn Beck Program, 1/20/10]
- Beck:
"This is the end of prosperity in America
forever ... the end of America
as you know it." Telling his audience, "You
must not allow this to pass," Beck stated in November 2009 that
"they're going to get passed that 60-vote barrier. And they'll get
there by people like [Sen.] Joe Lieberman, who's a reasonable guy
and has
good intent. You'll get passed it by people like that, who say, you
know
what? Look, we got to be reasonable; we have to have a debate. And
then
Harry Reid will go for the 51 count and he'll pass this thing. And
it will
be a nail in the coffin of America."
Beck added: "You must -- must get on the phone in your districts.
You
must wake everybody up you know. This is the end of prosperity in
America
forever if this bill passes. This is the end of America as you know
it."
[Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn
Beck Program, 11/19/09]
- Beck:
"[T]he fundamental transformation of America is complete."
Beck also said: "Not only are they doing health care, but they are
doing education in this same bill. Education and health care." He
added: "It is overwhelming the system. And I'm telling you, if this
bill passes -- health care and education all in one bill -- if this
passes, the fundamental transformation of America is complete.
There's
no going back from this point. It must not pass." [The Glenn
Beck Program, 3/15/10]
- Beck:
"If you can be deemed someone who maybe shouldn't have a baby, they
can have their people come in." Beck said on his
Fox News show: "You know and I know in this 2,300-page bill that
includes education, the control that this government has is
endless. They
will -- if this passes, they will control every aspect of your
life."
Beck further said: "They will be able to -- there is places in here
that if you can be deemed someone who maybe shouldn't have a baby,
they
can have their people come in. The government is in our homes on
this." [Glenn Beck, 3/16/10]
- Beck:
We lose "the Democratic Party to the socialists."
On his March 19 Fox News program, Beck stated: "If this passes, I
think it makes the election of people like Lindsey Graham, who are
the
compromise with big government, darn near impossible, because you
can't
tone this one down. You've got to pull this back by strong
constitutionalists. Don't we -- if this passes, don't we lose,
really, the
Democratic Party to the socialists? And the Republican Party either
has to
be, you know, real federalists, real people that understand
controlled
power, or you are going to have a third party?" [Glenn Beck,
3/19/10]
- Moore:
"This is a dark day for America if we pass this
bill." Discussing the market reaction to passing the
health bill, The Wall Street Journal's
Stephen Moore said on Fox News: "I think personally -- I think that
the markets have always thought for the last year and a half that
eventually this day would come. And I think, by the way, this is a
dark
day for America
if we pass this bill." [America's News HQ, 3/21/10]
- Cal
Thomas claimed health reform "is an outrage" and "a
sham"; "[e]uthanasia is coming." On Fox
News' America's News HQ,
Thomas said the health bill is "a triumph of the humanistic,
atheistic philosophy. Instead of being endowed by our creator with
certain
inalienable rights, those rights are going to be taken away by
bureaucrats
who will decide whether you get a hip replacement or a heart
bypass, based
on your age and your ability to pay more taxes." He continued:
THOMAS: It
is an outrage. It is a sham. Euthanasia is coming. You can call them
death
panels. That's exactly what they're going to be. We are going to really
be sorry
for this, but, unfortunately, when the guy in the white robe comes to
give us
our little pill, as President Obama told ABC, the 100-year-old woman who
wants
to live must get in order to make it equal for everybody and not to
spend so
much, it will be too late. [America's News HQ, 11/21/09]
- Hannity:
"If we get nationalized health care, it's over; this is
socialism." In November 2009, Sean Hannity said, "When you
look at
the extreme czars, and you look at Barack Obama, and you look at
the
Barack Obama that portrayed himself one year ago as a very
different
candidate, you know, why -- I feel like I have been vindicated. I
was
excoriated for saying he is far more radical than people know. You
know,
what do you see about him? Do you think he is far -- do you think
he's a
socialist? Do you think he's -- because I think this is -- if we
get
nationalized health care, it's over. This is socialism, and that's a
kind
word." [Fox News' Hannity,
11/2/09]
Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.
LATEST NEWS
Privacy Defenders Decry 'Spy Draft' in Section 702 Renewal Advanced by Senate
"It's not about who RISAA allows the government to spy on, it's about who RISAA allows the government to force to spy," explained one critic.
Apr 18, 2024
Civil liberties defenders on Thursday decried the U.S. Senate's advancement of the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, which critics say lawmakers are trying to ram through without protection against warrantless surveillance and with a provision that would effectively make every American a spy whether they like it or not.
Senators voted 67-32 in favor of a cloture motion to begin voting on RISAA, a bill to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which expires on Friday. FISA—a highly controversial law that has been abused hundreds of thousands of times—allows warrantless surveillance of non-U.S. citizens but also often sweeps up Americans' communication data in the process.
In a 273-147 vote last week, House lawmakers passed RISAA, including an amendment critics say dramatically expands the government's unchecked surveillance authority by compelling a wide range of individuals and organizations—including businesses and the media—to cooperate in government spying operations.
This so-called "Make Everyone a Spy" clause would allow the attorney general or director of national intelligence to force electronic communication service providers to "immediately provide... all information, facilities, or assistance" the government deems necessary.
"This bill would basically allow the government to institute a spy draft," Seth Stern, director of advocacy at Freedom of the Press Foundation, warned Thursday. "It will lead to significant distrust between journalists and sources, not to mention everyone else."
"It's not about who RISAA allows the government to spy on, it's about who RISAA allows the government to force to spy," he added. "Regardless of whether the end target of the surveillance is a foreigner, it's indisputable that the people the government can enlist to conduct the surveillance are Americans. And what's more, these civilians ordered to spy would be gagged and sworn to secrecy under the law."
In addition to the "Make Everyone a Spy" provision, civil libertarians have sounded the alarm over the House lawmakers' rejection of an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the legislation.
Critics accuse Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and colleagues including Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Mark Warner (D-Va.) of trying to rush a vote on RISAA while disingenuously claiming Section 702's powers will expire with the law on Friday. That's a misleading claim, as a national security court earlier this month approved the government's request to continue a disputed surveillance program even if Section 702 lapses.
"There is simply no defense of Majority Leader Schumer and Sen. Warner's duplicity," Sean Vitka, policy director at the progressive advocacy group Demand Progress, said in a statement. "House Intelligence Committee leaders poisoned this bill with one of the most repugnant surveillance expansions in history, and apparently the administration was too busy attacking commonsense privacy protections to notice. They know it, we know it, and now the American people know it."
"There can be no mistake: Sens. Schumer and Warner just helped hand the next president an unspeakably dangerous weapon that will be used against their own constituents," Vitka added. "And there is only one vote left to stop it."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.)—who
said earlier this week that the bill would dragoon the American people into becoming "an agent for Big Brother"—on Thursday argued that "this issue demands a debate about meaningful reforms, not a rushed vote to rubber-stamp more warrantless government surveillance powers."
In an attempt to tackle the warrantless surveillance issue, Senate Judiciary Chair Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) on Thursday proposed a RISAA amendment that would require the government to obtain a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court before accessing Americans' private communications.
However, the amendment contains exceptions to the warrant requirement in the event of unspecified emergencies and cyberattacks.
"If the government wants to spy on the private communications of Americans, they should be required to get approval from a judge—just as our Founders intended," Durbin said in a statement. "Congress has a responsibility to the American people to get this right."
The Biden administration and U.S. intelligence agencies vehemently oppose the Durbin-Cramer amendment. The White House called the measure "a reckless policy choice contrary to the key lessons of 9/11 and not grounded in any constitutional requirement or statute."
"The amendment outright bars the government from gaining access to lawfully collected information using terms associated with U.S. persons," the administration added. "Exceptions to that prohibition are narrow and unworkable. They are insufficient to protect our national security."
On Wednesday, the House also passed the Fourth Amendment Is Not for Sale Act, which would prohibit the government from buying Americans' information from data brokers if it would otherwise need a warrant to obtain the data, which includes location and internet records. The Senate will now take up FANFSA.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'The Opposite of Leadership': US Vetoes Palestine's UN Membership
Palestine's permanent observer at the United Nations said the resolution's failure "will not break our will, and it will not defeat our determination."
Apr 18, 2024
U.S. President Joe Biden's administration on Thursday used the country's veto power at the United Nations Security Council to block Palestine's bid to become a full member of the U.N.
While 12 nations voted in favor of Palestinian membership and two abstained, the United States is one of five countries—along with China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom—who have veto authority at the Security Council.
Since Israel launched what the International Court of Justice has said is a "plausibly" genocidal assault of the Gaza Strip in response to a Hamas-led October attack, the Biden administration has blocked three cease-fire resolutions at the Security Council. Under mounting global pressure, the U.S. finally abstained last month, allowing a cease-fire measure to pass.
In the lead-up to Thursday's vote, the Biden administration was pressuring other countries to oppose the Palestinian Authority's renewed membership effort so it could possibly avoid a veto, according to leaked cables obtained by The Intercept.
"Take a moment to ponder how isolated Biden has made the U.S.," said Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, after the veto. "Biden lobbied Japan, South Korea, and Ecuador HARD to oppose the Palestine resolution so that the U.S. wouldn't have to veto. They refused. So Biden cast his fourth veto in seven months (!!) This is the opposite of leadership."
In addition to the nations Parsi highlighted, Algeria, China, France, Guyana, Malta, Mozambique, Russia, Sierra Leone, and Slovenia voted for giving Palestine full U.N. membership while Switzerland and the United Kingdom abstained.
After the vote, U.N. Newsreported on remarks from Riyad Mansour, a U.N. permanent observer for the state of Palestine:
"We came to the Security Council today as an important historic moment, regionally and internationally, so that we could salvage what can be saved. We place you before a historic responsibility to establish the foundations of a just and comprehensive peace in our region."
Council members were given the opportunity "to revive the hope that has been lost among our people" and to translate their commitment towards a two-state solution into firm action "that cannot be maneuvered or retracted," and the majority of council members "have risen to the level of this historic moment, and they have stood on the side of justice and freedom and hope, in line with the ethical and humanitarian and legal principles that must govern our world and in line with simple logic."
"The fact that this resolution did not pass will not break our will, and it will not defeat our determination," Mansour added. "We will not stop in our effort. The state of Palestine is inevitable. It is real. Perhaps they see it as far away, but we see it as near, and we are the faithful."
Parsi said that "a Western-friendly senior Global South diplomat" told him of Biden's veto: "Whatever agonizing claim the U.S. had to lead a self-appointed free world has died a very loud public death on the Security Council horseshoe tonight. YOU CAN'T LEAD IF YOU CAN'T LISTEN."
Biden, a Democrat seeking reelection in November, has faced fierce criticism in the United States and around the world for U.S. complicity in Israel's war on Gaza—which Hamas, not the Palestinian Authority, has controlled for nearly two decades. In under seven months, Israeli forces have killed 33,970 Palestinians, injured another 76,770, displaced most of the besieged enclave's 2.3 million population, devastated civilian infrastructure, and severely limited the flow of lifesaving humanitarian assistance.
Israel—which already got $3.8 billion in annual U.S. military aid before October 7—continues to receive weapons support from the Biden administration, even as a growing chorus of critics, including some Democrats in Congress, argues that the arms transfers violate U.S. and international law.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Shameful': Columbia Greenlights Police Crackdown on Anti-War Encampment
Even after dozens of students were arrested, hundreds "rushed to take the place of their classmates" and continued the protest.
Apr 18, 2024
The arrests of dozens of Columbia University and Barnard College students on Thursday "galvanized" other supporters of Palestinian rights on the campuses, as hundreds of students occupied the school's western lawn after New York City police filled at least two buses with protesters who had been detained for setting up an encampment.
"Disclose, divest, we will not stop, we will not rest," chanted hundreds of students as they marched around the area where organizers had set up a tent encampment early Wednesday morning.
Columbia President Minouche Shafik informed the campus community on Thursday that she had authorized the police to clear the encampment.
As it has been in the past, the school has become a center of anti-war protests—and crackdowns by school officials and the police—since Israel began its bombardment of Gaza in October.
Pro-Palestinian students and alumni have demanded that Columbia divest from companies that profit from Israel's apartheid policies in the occupied Palestinian territories and cancel its dual degree program with Tel Aviv University.
In response to pro-Palestinian demonstrations, Columbia in November suspended the campus chapters of Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine—an action that pushed the New York Civil Liberties Union and Palestine Legal to file a lawsuit on behalf of the students last month.
On Thursday, police and Columbia employees took down about 50 tents that had been up for more than a day and disposed of them in trash cans and alleyways—but The New York Times reported later that "demonstrators repitched a couple of tents, and ... recovered the main signage from the encampment as well," while hundreds of students were "still gathered and chanting on the south side of the grass."
The arrests came a day after Shafik testified before the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce about antisemitism on campus.
U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), whose daughter, Isra Hirsi, was among the Barnard students who were suspended on Thursday for participating in the encampment protest, questioned Shafik about whether antisemitic protests have actually taken place at Columbia, prompting the president to say there have not.
"There has been a rise in targeting and harassment against anti-war protesters, because it's been pro-war and anti-war protesters is what it seems, like, correct?" asked Omar.
"Correct," replied Shafik.
On Thursday, Omar posted on social media two images of protesters at Columbia: one from the encampment this week, and one from 1968, when students protested the U.S. war in Vietnam.
New York City Council member Tiffany Cabán was among those who condemned the university's crackdown on the protests on Thursday.
"Suspending and arresting Columbia/Barnard student activists and disbanding student organizations—including Jewish students and organizations—doesn't combat antisemitism or increase safety," said Cabán. "All it does is punish and intimidate those who believe in human rights for Palestinians. Shameful."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular