SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
January, 06 2010, 11:28am EDT
Contact:
Ari Savitzky, FairVote Rhode Island - ari.savitzky@gmail.com / 401-529-3982
Paul Fidalgo, FairVote communications director - paul@fairvote.org / 301-270-4616
Rhode Island Legislature Overrides Electoral Reform Vetoes
FairVote Catalyst for Major Wins for Youth Pre-registration, Elections for U.S. Senate Vacancies
WASHINGTON
The Rhode Island State Senate and House of Representatives yesterday
voted to override two gubernatorial vetoes of landmark electoral reform
legislation, thereby enacting FairVote-initiated measures allowing
voter pre-registration for 16 and 17-year-olds and mandating popular
elections to fill all U.S. Senate vacancies.
FairVote,
a nonpartisan think tank devoted to improving American elections, has
been a leader in the drive to bring these reforms to Rhode Island
through the efforts of its state affiliate, FairVote Rhode Island. In
2006, FairVote was the key catalyst for the advance registration
legislation, working closely with prime sponsor Rep. Edwin Pacheco. The
bill (S 0085/H 5005) will allow 16 and 17-year-old Rhode Island
citizens to "pre-register" to vote, automatically adding them to the
rolls for the first election for which they are eligible. Starting in
2006, this measure easily passed both houses of the Rhode Island
legislature four times with bipartisan support, only to inexplicably
face Gov. Donald Carcieri's veto pen each time.
FairVote this year helped usher in legislation introduced by Rep.
Christopher Fierro and Sen. Paul Jabour mandating special elections for
the filling of vacated U.S. Senate seats (S 0201/H 5094), the need for
which became alarmingly apparent in the wake of controversies and
scandals surrounding governor-appointed senators after the 2008
election. Rhode Island's own David Segal, a FairVote analyst, testified in 2009
before the U.S. Senate on behalf of a constitutional amendment
mandating Senate vacancy elections backed by leading Republicans and
Democrats, including Sens. John McCain (R-AZ) and Russ Feingold (D-WI),
while Connecticut's Republican governor Jodi Rell signed legislation
passed out of the Democratically-controlled legislature last year,
though Gov. Carcieri rejected a similar bill that had once again
passed overwhelmingly with bipartisan support.
Both vetoes were easily overturned by both houses of the Rhode Island legislature Tuesday.
"We are proud to have helped lay the groundwork for today's important
victories," said Rob Richie, elections expert and FairVote executive
director. "With the good will and strong advocacy provided over the
years by FairVote and like-minded reformers-such as the leadership of
both houses, Reps. Edwin Pacheco and Christopher Fierro, Sens. Paul
Jabour and Rhoda Perry, and Secretary of State A. Ralph Mollis-Rhode
Island voters will now have expanded access for its newest voters and
the final word about who represents them in the U.S. Senate. This is a
good day for democracy in Rhode Island - and the nation."
Tuesday's events in Providence are the latest in a major nationwide
sweep of pro-democracy reforms backed by FairVote. Youth
pre-registration measures have gained enormous ground all across the
country, with new legislation recently passed in several states. In
2009, FairVote worked closely with Democracy North Carolina to build a
bipartisan legislative majority in support of pre-registration for
16-year-olds in that state, which also included a significant civics
education component. Also in 2009, with the signature of Republican
governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California enacted a 17-year-old
pre-registration measure- an effort led by FairVote ally the New
America Foundation. The District of Columbia recently passed sweeping
election reform legislation which included pre-registration measures,
which was supported by testimony
to the DC City Council from FairVote's Adam Fogel. In 2008, FairVote
helped bring about pre-registration legislation in Florida that was
supported by both a Republican governor and Republican legislative
majority.
Meanwhile, several other
states are either in the process of passing or considering similar
bills, all with FairVote as a crucial source of research and support,
and congressional legislation is anticipated to support the idea
nationally. Commissioned by the Pew Charitable Trusts, a new report by
George Mason University professor Michael McDonald found that voter
pre-registration in Hawaii and Florida has a direct impact on youth
registration and participation when accompanied by civic education
initiatives at schools and government agencies.
FairVote has also been at the forefront of the movement to mandate
special elections for filling U.S. Senate vacancies in the same manner
that U.S. House vacancies are required to be filled: by election of the
people. David Segal's commentary on this issue has appeared in the New York Times, the Baltimore Sun, and just weeks before last year's win in Connecticut, the Hartford Courant, and Rob Richie's commentary was published in the Miami Herald.
FairVote acts to transform our elections to achieve universal access to participation, a full spectrum of meaningful ballot choices and majority rule with fair representation for all. As a catalyst for change, we build support for innovative strategies to win a constitutionally protected right to vote, universal voter registration, a national popular vote for president, instant runoff voting and proportional representation.
LATEST NEWS
Report Exposes How Trump Administration Has 'Mowed Down' Regulators Overseeing Prediction Markets
The Trump administration last week sued Minnesota after it passed a law banning prediction markets from operating in the state.
May 24, 2026
A Sunday report in The New York Times revealed how the Trump administration is using a key government agency to shut down any efforts to regulate online betting markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket.
According to the Times, the administration has stacked the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) with industry insiders who have systematically "mowed down" staffers at the agency who have expressed interest in providing oversight on prediction markets.
Among other things, the report documented how multiple officials at CTFC have been put on leave simply for asking questions about the betting markets' ties to members of President Donald Trump's family or for having past experience enforcing regulations related to cryptocurrencies.
What's more, the Times found that even being an industry insider isn't enough to guarantee good standing in the agency. Brian Quintenz, who was tapped by Trump to lead CTFC last year, saw his nomination withdrawn after he drew the ire of Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss for refusing to support their cryptocurrency exchange's complaint against the agency.
Revelations about industry insiders rolling over regulators at CTFC come as the Trump administration is fighting any attempts by states to regulate prediction markets.
As explained in a Thursday report from CNBC, the Trump administration is "fighting a multi-front battle to stop the state actions and assert its regulatory authority," with CTFC arguing that it is "the only entity that can regulate" betting platforms.
16 different states are engaged in legal proceedings against the platforms, and Minnesota last week passed a law to ban them outright, which immediately drew a lawsuit from the administration.
The new Minnesota law, which is scheduled to take effect in August, bans prediction markets "from hosting, creating or advertising in the state," according to ABC News.
In an interview with ABC, Minnesota state Rep. Emma Greenman (D-63B) said she authored the legislation because she has grown increasingly concerned about young people in the state seeing their finances drained from placing online bets.
"We're seeing studies come out that say [the companies] are targeting 18- to 21-year-olds," said Greenman, "and we are seeing gambling starting younger and younger."
CFTC Chair Michael Selig last month warned states against trying to regulate prediction markets, which he said would "circumvent the clear directive of Congress."
"Our message to Wisconsin is the same as to New York, Arizona, and others," said Selig. "If you interfere with the operation of federal law in regulating financial markets, we will sue you."
Keep ReadingShow Less
GOP Hawks Alarmed as Trump Mulls Deal to End His Illegal Iran War
"Nothing was accomplished by Operation Epic Fury except putting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in charge of Iran and the Strait of Hormuz," said one critic of the war.
May 24, 2026
President Donald Trump revealed on Saturday that he is mulling a deal that would end his illegal war with Iran, and some hawks within the Republican Party are expressing alarm.
According to a Sunday report in The New York Times, many details of the agreement to end the war remain murky, with the fate of Iran's enriched uranium up in the air. US and Iranian officials have also given contradictory messages about the proposed deal's contents, suggesting there is much work still to be done before any agreement is finalized.
Regardless, three hawkish GOP senators on Saturday raised major concerns about the contents of the deal, warning against accepting any agreement that will leave Iran in a stronger position than before Trump illegally launched a war against it without any authorization from Congress in late February.
"If it is perceived in the region that a deal with Iran allows the regime to survive and become more powerful over time, we will have poured gasoline on the conflicts in Lebanon and Iraq," wrote Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who lobbied Trump to attack Iran repeatedly before the start of the war. "A deal that is perceived to allow Iran to survive and possess the ability to control the [Strait of Hormuz] in the future will put Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Shia militias in Iraq on steroids.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), another longtime Iran hawk, said he was "deeply concerned" about what he's been hearing about the deal and expressed particular worry about Iran getting relief from US sanctions while still maintaining the ability to shut down the Strait of Hormuz.
"If the result of all that is to be an Iranian regime—still run by Islamists who chant 'death to America'—now receiving billions of dollars," Cruz wrote, "being able to enrich uranium and develop nuclear weapons, and having effective control over the Strait of Hormuz, then that outcome would be a disastrous mistake."
Sen. Roger Wicker (D-Miss.) was even blunter in his condemnation of the reported agreement.
"The rumored 60-day ceasefire—with the belief that Iran will ever engage in good faith—would be a disaster," Wicker wrote. "Everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury would be for naught!"
Ben Rhodes, a former deputy national security adviser for President Barack Obama, challenged Wicker's claims that Trump's illegal war had achieved anything of value.
"Nothing was accomplished by Operation Epic Fury," Rhodes wrote, "except putting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in charge of Iran and the Strait of Hormuz."
Rhodes' criticism was echoed by Stephen Wertheim, senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, who wrote that "everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury is already for naught."
Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group, accused the Iran hawks of being delusional for thinking further bombing would force Iran to capitulate.
"DC's Iran hawks got two wars, nearly every conceivable sanction designation, a blockade, threw a wrench in global economy," Vaez wrote, "and will still claim that just a little more pressure and a touch more bombing will magically yield the concessions they still won't be satisfied with."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Biggest Wealth Divide in Modern History': Graphic Shows Shocking Reality of US Economy
Data released by the University of Michigan and Gallup this week showed US consumer sentiment cratering even as stock markets hit record highs.
May 23, 2026
Multiple polls and surveys released in recent days have shown US consumer sentiment cratering—and all the while, the US stock market keeps hitting record highs.
The Kobeissi Letter, a financial newsletter, posted a graphic Saturday that matched consumer sentiment as measured by the University of Michigan's Surveys of Consumers with the performance of the S&P 500 stock index over a 30-year span.
The graphic shows that, up until around 2020, consumer sentiment matched stock market performance closely, although there was a large divergence between the two leading up to the 2008 financial crisis, where stocks briefly outperformed consumer sentiment before crashing downward as the housing bubble burst.
But throughout the last six years, the graphic shows, the S&P 500 has produced an almost continuous upward surge even as consumer sentiment spirals downward.
Absolutely incredible:
Over the last 6 years, the S&P 500 has risen +130% while US Consumer Sentiment has collapsed by -55%, to its lowest since data began in 1952.
We are witnessing the formation of the biggest wealth divide in modern history. https://t.co/XGMR6DfuNc pic.twitter.com/2w7cRvn7ok
— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) May 23, 2026
"Absolutely incredible," commented Kobeissi Letter. "Over the last six years, the S&P 500 has risen +130% while US Consumer Sentiment has collapsed by -55%, to its lowest since data began in 1952. We are witnessing the formation of the biggest wealth divide in modern history."
Kobeissi Letter produced the graphic one day after the University of Michigan's latest survey found consumer sentiment hitting the lowest level on record.
Joanne Hsu, director of the survey, observed that "the cost of living continues to be a first-order concern, with 57% of consumers spontaneously mentioning that high prices were eroding their personal finances, up from 50% last month."
On the same day, Gallup published new data showing that Americans' economic confidence has fallen to its lowest level since October 2022, with just 16% of Americans rating the economy as excellent or good, and nearly half describing it as poor.
Axios reported on Saturday that even Republicans have been growing sour on the US economy, citing a recent poll from The Associated Press showing GOP approval of President Donald Trump on the economy to be at around 60%, down from 80% just three months ago.
"The growing GOP gloom could hardly come at a worse time for Trump and the party," Axios noted, "less than six months out from a midterm election that's likely to turn on the economy."
The gap between overall consumer sentiment and stock market performance also lines up with recent consumer spending trends. Data published by The Financial Times earlier this year showed that the top 10% of earners in the US now account for nearly half of all consumer spending, while the bottom 80% of earners now account for less than 40% of all consumer spending.
A February report from TD Economics economist Ksenia Bushmeneva noted that “the economic divide between America’s households at the top of the income spectrum and everyone else continued to widen last year,” as “upper-income households benefited from the still-robust wage growth, strong gains in equity markets, and better access to consumer credit.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular