January, 06 2010, 04:18pm EDT
Nation's Largest RN Organization Blasts Bid to Tax Benefits, Urges Other Reforms to Protect Patients, Families In Final Talks on Healthcare Reform Legislation
The nation's largest union and professional organization of
registered nurses today called on House members to hold the line in
opposing a tax on workers' healthcare benefits, and called for other
changes in the final healthcare legislation to expand affordability and
crack down on insurance industry abuses.
WASHINGTON
The nation's largest union and professional organization of
registered nurses today called on House members to hold the line in
opposing a tax on workers' healthcare benefits, and called for other
changes in the final healthcare legislation to expand affordability and
crack down on insurance industry abuses.
"It is unconscionable that workers and families with
employer-sponsored health plans, who receive virtually no benefits from
the proposed legislation, would have their health coverage taxed and
seriously eroded," said Deborah Burger, RN, co-president of the 150,000
member National Nurses United, formed last month through a unification
of the California Nurses Association/NNOC, United American Nurses, and
the Massachusetts Nurses Association.
"Enactment of this tax would be a disgraceful betrayal of working families and their yearning for genuine reform," Burger said.
The excise tax on workers' benefits is a central plank of the Senate
version of the bill, and is supported by the White House, in contrast
to the House bill which instead sets new taxes on the highest-income
earners. Congressional Budget estimates say the tax would affect 19
percent of employer-paid plans, or 30 million Americans by 2016, a
number that Citizens for Tax Justice says will soar to 58 million
people by 2019.
"Advocates of the tax have made clear their intent: to force
working people into cheaper, high deductible plans that provide less
coverage and shift more costs to employees. The inevitable effect will
be more people skipping needed medical care, enduring much higher
out-of-pocket costs and risking financial ruin due to medical bills,"
said NNU Co-president Karen Higgins, RN.
A Towers-Perrin employer survey last September found 86 percent of
employers would pass along their higher costs to employees, "an
especially bitter pill for those working families who were assured that
health reform would not undermine their present coverage," said NNU
Co-president Jean Ross, RN. "They will be saddled with higher costs and
less coverage, while insurance companies will still have free rein to
raise premiums, co-pays, deductibles, co-insurance and other fees, and
continue to routinely deny needed medical care."
"Enactment of the tax, whose central premise is to control
healthcare costs by reducing utilization of needed medical care while
failing to control the pricing practices of the healthcare industry,
would symbolize a central failing of the proposed legislation, ceding
far too much to the insurers and the rest of the healthcare industry,"
Burger added.
In addition to calling on Congressional leaders to drop the excise
tax, NNU is calling on Congress to make other changes in the final
bill, including:
1. A state waiver to ERISA, the federal employee retirement system,
to allow states to pass Medicare for all/single-payer reforms without a
court challenge from healthcare corporations.
2. Medicaid expansion to 150 percent of the poverty level (the House
version) rather than the more limited Senate Medicaid expansion. Half
of the increased coverage under the bill comes through Medicaid
expansion; with the failure of Congress to stop the price gouging of
the insurers and drug companies, the broadest possible increase in
Medicaid eligibility is essential for American families.
3. Closure of the loopholes on the insurance regulations in the
bills that ostensibly ban rescissions (insurers dropping people when
they get sick) and refusal to sell policies to people with pre-existing
conditions.
Among the ways to close those loopholes are:
A. Eliminate the state-based exchanges in favor of a strongly
regulated federal exchange, to prohibit insurers from avoiding strong
consumer-won protections in some states by issuing the policies in
unregulated states.
B. Prohibit rescissions under any circumstances. The current bill
allows patients to be dropped for "fraud or intentional
misrepresentation," the same pretext insurers commonly use now.
C. Prevent insurers from being able to charge up to four times more
based on age, or more for certain conditions. No age-based premiums
should be allowed, and the bill should include a direct prohibition on
marketing gimmicks that enable insurers to avoid sicker enrollees.
D. Bar the higher charges allowed for employees who fail "wellness"
programs because they have diabetes, high blood pressure, high
cholesterol readings or other chronic conditions.
"The repeated concessions Congress and the White House have made to
opponents and obstructionists have gravely weakened the promise of
reform," said Higgins. "Nurses will continue to campaign for more cost
effective, comprehensive reform by expanding Medicare to cover
everyone, and passing single payer bills in individual states."
"In the meantime, Congress has one final opportunity to fix some of
the worst problems in this legislation. We will be closely monitoring
the votes of our legislators on the final bill," Ross said. "We ask and
expect members of the House of Representatives to vote no on any bill
providing for an excise tax on health care benefits."
National Nurses United, with close to 185,000 members in every state, is the largest union and professional association of registered nurses in US history.
(240) 235-2000LATEST NEWS
Why Can't We Fund Universal Public Goods? Blame the Tax-Dodging Billionaire Nepo Babies
"In 2024, these billionaire families used their enormous wealth to make record-breaking political contributions to secure a GOP trifecta," reads a new report.
Dec 13, 2024
The children of the richest families in the U.S. are well-known for spending their vast wealth on frivolous luxuries—constructing a replica of a medieval church on their acres of property, in the case of banking heir Timothy Mellon, or starting a brand of T-shirts described by one critic as "terrible beyond your wildest imagination," as Wyatt Koch, nephew of Republican megadonors Charles and David, did.
But a report released by Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF) on Thursday shows how "billionaire nepo babies" don't just waste their families' fortunes. They also benefit from "a rigged system" that allows them to "pass that wealth down over generations without being properly taxed–often without being taxed at all."
In addition, the heirs of the country's biggest fortunes spend vast sums "to elect politicians who protect their unearned wealth and manipulate the country's economy in their favor," said ATF.
Along with Mellon and Koch, the report profiles Samuel Logan of the Scripps media dynasty; Nicola Peltz-Beckham, daughter of billionaire investor Nelson Peltz; Gabrielle Rubenstein, whose family has made its fortune in private equity; and President-elect Donald Trump's son, Eric Trump.
The nepo babies are part of a small group of billionaire families in the U.S. who benefit from tax loopholes that ensure little of their immense wealth ever goes to benefit the public good.
At least 90 billionaires have passed away over the last decade, leaving their beneficiaries $455 billion in collective wealth.
But according to ATF, "$255 billion (56%) of that amount was likely entirely exempt from the capital gains tax because of a special break called 'stepped up basis.'"
"Trump and his allies in Congress are doing their donors' bidding by rigging the system in their favor and pushing a $4 trillion giveaway to wealthy elites and giant corporations."
Without loopholes included the stepped up basis tax cut, the current estate tax on billionaires and centimillionaires would yield enough revenue to fund universal childcare, preschool, and paid family leave for U.S. workers, with hundreds of billions of dollars left over, according to ATF's report.
The wealthy heirs profiled in the report and their families are some of the Republican Party's top donors—contributing hundreds of millions of dollars to candidates including Trump in the hopes of securing even more tax cuts.
Mellon, for example, is Trump's "biggest supporter, giving $140 million to a pro-Trump PAC in 2024 alone," reads the report.
A previous analysis by ATF found that as of late October, just 150 billionaire families had spent $1.9 billion on the 2024 elections.
As the Center for American Progress found earlier this year, Trump's plan to extend the tax cuts that he pushed through in 2017 would cost $4 trillion over the next decade.
"The vast wealth inherited by centuries-old billionaire families is staggering. While these heirs and their billions go undertaxed, enormous sums are squandered on lavish mansions, private jets, and vanity projects instead of funding crucial public investments," said ATF executive director David Kass. "In 2024, these billionaire families used their enormous wealth to make record-breaking political contributions to secure a GOP trifecta. Now, Trump and his allies in Congress are doing their donors' bidding by rigging the system in their favor and pushing a $4 trillion giveaway to wealthy elites and giant corporations—all while advocating for cuts to vital programs that working and middle-class Americans depend on."
The report calls for Congress to pass "proven, pragmatic proposals to unrig the tax system that enjoy high levels of popular support," such as the Ultra Millionaire Tax Act that was proposed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) this year. The bill would tax fortunes between $50 million and $1 billion at 2% and wealth above $1 billion at $1 billion.
The small tax on enormous wealth would generate "a whopping $3 trillion over 10 years," said ATF.
The estate tax could also be "restored so that it can play a meaningful role in promoting fairness and equal opportunities" through the passage of the For the 99.5% Act, which was introduced in 2023 by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.).
Under the bill, the estate tax exemption would be lowered to $7 million per couple and the current 40% flat rate would be replaced with a sliding scale that would charge higher rates as a family's wealth grows.
"None of these tax reforms would impoverish the ultra wealthy, nor even inconvenience them in any meaningful way–but they would reduce the concentration of wealth that is so corrosive to society," reads the report. "At the same time, they would raise trillions of dollars that could be used to reduce inequality and improve the lives of families that can only dream of the kind of security and opportunity enjoyed by the nation’s richest clans."
"And if rich families ever did need to tighten their belts a bit to pay their taxes," the report continues, "the economizing might begin by reducing the flow of money funding the extravagant lifestyles of America's Billionaire Nepo Babies."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'The Next Recession Starts Here': Trump Team Weighs Abolishing Bank Regulators
The president-elect's advisers are reportedly discussing plans to shrink or eliminate key bank watchdogs, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Dec 13, 2024
President-elect Donald Trump and his advisers are reportedly considering plans to weaken—or abolish altogether—top bank regulators, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
The Wall Street Journalreported Thursday that members of Trump's transition team and the new Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency have asked nominees under consideration to head the FDIC and OCC if the bank watchdogs could be eliminated and have their functions absorbed by the Treasury Department, which is set to be run by a billionaire hedge fund manager and crypto enthusiast.
"Bank executives are optimistic President-elect Donald Trump will ease a host of regulations on capital cushions and consumer protections, as well as scrutiny of consolidation in the industry," the Journal reported. "But FDIC deposit insurance is considered near sacred. Any move that threatened to undermine even the perception of deposit insurance could quickly ripple through banks and in a crisis might compound customer fears."
The Trump team's internal and fluid discussions about the fate of the key bank regulators broadly aligns with Project 2025's proposal to "merge the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Federal Reserve's non-monetary supervisory and regulatory functions."
The FDIC, which is primarily funded by bank insurance premiums, was established during the Great Depression to restore public trust in the nation's banking system, and the agency played a central role in navigating the 2023 bank failures that threatened a systemic crisis.
Observers warned that gutting the FDIC and OCC could catalyze another economic meltdown.
"The next recession starts here," tech journalist Jacob Silverman warned in response to the Journal's reporting.
Eric Rauchway, a historian of the New Deal, wrote that "even Milton Friedman appreciated the FDIC," underscoring the extreme nature of the incoming Trump administration's deregulatory ambitions.
Musk, the world's wealthiest man, is also pushing for the elimination of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency established in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
The Journal noted Thursday that "Rep. Andy Barr, a Republican from Kentucky and Trump ally on the House Financial Services Committee, has backed the plan to eliminate or drastically alter the CFPB and said he wants to get rid of what he calls 'one-size-fits-all' regulation for banks."
Barr has received millions of dollars in campaign donations from the financial sector and "introduced many pieces of pro-industry legislation, including significant rollbacks of protections stemming from the 2008 financial crisis," according to the watchdog group Accountable.US.
Keep ReadingShow Less
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular